Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 939-703-0 | CAS number: 1474044-75-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The test substance caused severe damage to the rabbit eye. Strong effects concerning cornea opacity, iris, conjunctivae redness and swelling were seen in all animals and none of these effects were reversible within 7 days. Only slight irritating effects on rabbit skin, which were lower than the classification threshold, were caused by the substance.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- February 8, 1982 - February 15, 1982
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (24 h exposure, occlusive treatment, observation period)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Proposed Guidelines of the United States Environmental Agency (EPA) § 163.81-5 "Primary dermal irritation study", Federal Register, Vol. 43, No. 163, August 22, 1978.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: UFA Versuchsbetrieb Buehl, CH-5604 Hendschiken
- Weight at study initiation: 2 - 3 kg
- Housing: individually in metal cages
- Diet: standard rabbit foot, NAFAG, No. 814, Gossau SG; ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 4 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 2
- Humidity (%): 55 ± 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: untreated site of the same animal served as control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.5 mL
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 h
- Observation period:
- 7 days (scoring 24, 48 and 72 h and 4 and 7 days after application)
- Number of animals:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5 x 2.5 cm
- Type of wrap if used: gauze patch covered with an impermeable material, fastened with adhesive tape
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): no data
SCORING SYSTEM:
- Evaluation according to the Draize Scoring System for abraded and intact skin - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.67
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #4
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.33
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #5
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.67
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.33
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.33
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #4
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.67
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #5
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.67
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 7 days
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- According to the EU CLP regulation the dermal reactions resulting from exposure to the test article are below the level of significance and therefore the substance does not need to be classified.
Reference
Table 1: results for skin irritation (intact skin):
Observation time |
Rabbit no. |
|||||||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|||||||
Ery. |
Edema |
Ery. |
Edema |
Ery. |
Edema |
Ery. |
Edema |
Ery. |
Edema |
Ery. |
Edema |
|
24 h |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
48 h |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
72 h |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
4 d |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
7 d |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
Mean value 24 + 48 + 72 h |
1.67 |
2.00 |
1.00 |
1.33 |
0.00 |
1.33 |
1.33 |
1.67 |
0.67 |
1.67 |
1.00 |
2.00 |
Mean value 24 + 48 + 72 h all animals |
0.95 |
1.67 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Only the values for intact skin were taken in account for classification.
4/6 animals had an average edema score (24 - 72 h) > 1.5
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- February 8, 1982 - February 15, 1982
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (limited documentation, observation period 7 days)
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: UFA Versuchsbetrieb Buehl, CH-5604 Hendschiken
- Weight at study initiation: 2 - 3 kg
- Housing: individually in metal cages
- Diet: standard rabbit foot, NAFAG, No. 814, Gossau SG; ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 4 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 2
- Humidity (%): 55 ± 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: the adjacent eye served as control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.1 mL
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- one single application
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 7 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: in 3/6 animals
- Time after start of exposure: 30 s after application
SCORING SYSTEM: evaluation according to the Draize Scoring System at day 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: hand-slit lamp - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: not rinsed
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2.67
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: not rinsed
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: not rinsed
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- out of 3 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: not rinsed, score = 2 in all 3 animals (24/48/72 h)
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- out of 3 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: not rinsed; score = 3 in all 3 animals (24/48/72 h)
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- out of 3 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: not rinsed; score = 3 in all 3 animals (24/48/72 h)
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this experiment the test material was found to cause a marked irritation when applied to the rabbit eye mucosa.
Reference
Table 1: Results of eye irritation
|
Eye treatment |
not rinsed |
rinsed |
||||
Animal no. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
24 h |
Cornea |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Area |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|
Iris |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Conjunctiva |
3 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
|
Chemosis |
3 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
|
Discharge |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
|
48 h |
Cornea |
2 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Area |
4 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|
Iris |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Conjunctiva |
3 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
|
Chemosis |
3 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
Discharge |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
72 h |
Cornea |
2 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
Area |
4 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|
Iris |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Conjunctiva |
3 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
|
Chemosis |
3 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
Discharge |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
4 d |
Cornea |
2 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
Area |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|
Iris |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
Conjunctiva |
3 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
|
Chemosis |
3 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
Discharge |
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
7d |
Cornea |
2 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Area |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|
Iris |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
Conjunctiva |
3 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
|
Chemosis |
3 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
Discharge |
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Mean value 24, 48, 72 h |
Cornea |
2.00 |
2.67 |
2.00 |
1.00 |
1.33 |
1.33 |
Iris |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
Conjunctiva |
3.00 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
2.00 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
|
Chemosis |
3.00 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
1.33 |
2.33 |
2.00 |
Only the data of the animals that were not rinsed were considered for classification as, according to OECD guideline 405, the eyes should not be washed within 24 h after application. In this study, the eyes were washed 30 s after application.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irreversible damage)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin Irritation
In a primary dermal irritation study, performed using a method identical to that described in the Federal Register, Vol. 43, No. 163, August 22, 1978, 0.5 mL of the test substance (no data on purity) was applied under occlusive conditions to the intact and abraded skin of 6 Albino rabbits. Treatment was terminated 24 hours following application and the animals were observed for 7 days. Irritation was scored according to the Draize method 24, 48 and 72 hours and 4 days and 7 days after application. The animals had an average erythema score (24 h – 72 h) between 0 (1/6) and 1.67 (1/6) (maximal score = 4) and an average edema score (24 h – 72 h) between 1.33 (2/6) and 2.00 (2/6) (maximal score = 4). Only in 1/6 animals were the effects fully reversible within the observation period, but the tendency in the other animals pointed towards attenuation of the effects. It can be assumed that the effects would have been reversible within a larger observation period and/or conditions according to actual guidelines. Results from the abraded skin are not included in the final judgement for skin irritation of the test substance because of its lack of scientific justification and deviation from todays acceptable standardized procedures for the appraisal of skin irritation. In this study, the test substance is not a skin irritant (Ciba Geigy Ltd. 1982). This study is suitable for assessment of dermal irritation as it was performed using a protocol which is similar and equivalent to the OECD guideline. The conditions are even harsher (occlusive, extended exposure) than that described by the actual OECD guideline.
Eye irritation
The eye irritation potential of the test substance (no data on purity) was determined in a procedure similar and equivalent to the Test Guideline OECD 405. 0.1 mL of the test substance was applied to the conjunctival sac of the left eye of each of 6 Albino rabbits. The other eye remained untreated and served as control. The eyes of 3 animals were rinsed approximately 30 seconds after application. Irritation was recorded after 24, 48 and 72 hours. Appraisal of eye irritation was performed according to the method of Draize. Average Draize scores (24, 48 and 72 hours) were calculated per animal for corneal opacity, iritis, conjunctivae redness and chemosis. Average values (24 h – 72 h) of the 3 animals whose eyes were not rinsed for cornea were between 2 and 2.67 (maximal score = 4). Iris score were 2 (maximal score = 2) in all animals. The values for conjunctivae redness and chemosis were 3 in all animals (maximal score = 3 and 4, respectively). None of the effects was reversible within 7 days. Hence, in this study, the test substance causes irreversible damage to the eyes (Ciba Geigy Ltd. 1982). This study is suitable for assessment of eye irritation as it was performed using a protocol which is similar and equivalent to the OECD guideline.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification, Labelling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for the purpose of classification. Based on the criteria laid down in Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, classification for skin irritation is not warranted and "category 1" is warranted due to its eye damaging potential.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.