Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 939-703-0 | CAS number: 1474044-75-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Ames test: negative (Ciba-Geigy, 1982) mammalian gene mutation assay (HPRT): negative (Harlan, 2013) (read across compound) chromosomal damage: negative (RCC, 2005, BASF 2022) (read across compound)
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- August 09, 2012 - November 12, 2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Harlan Cytotest Cell Research GmbH (Harlan CCR), In den Leppsteinswiesen 19, 64380 Rossdorf, Germany
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- HPRT
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- The V79 cell line (supplied by Laboratory for Mutagenicity Testing; Technical University, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany) are stored in liquid nitrogen in the cell bank of Harlan CCR allowing the repeated use of the same cell culture batch in experiments. Before freezing, the level of spontaneous mutants was depressed by treatment with HAT-medium. Each batch is screened for mycoplasm contamination and checked for karyotype stability and spontaneous mutant frequency. Consequently, the parameters of the experiments remain similar because of the reproducible characteristics of the cells.
- Type and identity of media: MEM (minimal essential medium) containing Hank’s salts supplemented with 10 % foetal bovine serum (FBS), neomycin (5 μg/mL) and amphotericin B (1 %). - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbital/ß-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- See any other information on materials and methods incl. tables.
- Vehicle / solvent:
- On the day of the experiment (immediately before treatment), the test item was dissolved in ethanol. The solvent was chosen based on solubility properties and its relative non-toxicity to the cell cultures. The final concentration of ethanol in the culture medium was 0.5 % (v/v).
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 24 hours
- Exposure duration: In the first experiment the treatment period was 4 hours with and without metabolic activation. The second experiment was performed with a treatment time of 4 hours with and 24 hours without metabolic activation.
- Expression/fixation time: Three or four days after treatment 1.5x10^6 cells per experimental point were sub-cultivated in 175 cm² flasks containing 30 mL medium. Following the expression time of 7 days five 80 cm² cell culture flasks were seeded with about 3 - 5x10^5 cells each in medium containing 6-TG. Two additional 25 cm² flasks were seeded with approx. 500 cells each in non-selective medium to determine the viability.
The cultures were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 1.5 % CO2 for about 7-10 days. The colonies were stained with 10 % methylene blue in 0.01 % KOH solution.
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 6-thioguanine
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: The study was performed in two independent experiments, using identical experimental procedures.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: The stained colonies with more than 50 cells were counted. In doubt the colony size was checked with a preparation microscope.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Toxicity of the test item is indicated by a reduction of the cloning efficiency (CE). - Evaluation criteria:
- Acceptability of the Assay
The gene mutation assay is considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:
The numbers of mutant colonies per 10^6 cells found in the solvent controls falls within the laboratory historical control data.
The positive control substances should produce a significant increase in mutant colony frequencies.
The cloning efficiency II (absolute value) of the solvent controls should exceed 50 %.
The data of this study comply with the above mentioned criteria.
Evaluation of Results
A test item is classified as positive if it induces either a concentration-related increase of the mutant frequency or a reproducible and positive response at one of the test points.
A test item producing neither a concentration-related increase of the mutant frequency nor a reproducible positive response at any of the test points is considered non-mutagenic in this system.
A positive response is described as follows:
A test item is classified as mutagenic if it reproducibly induces a mutation frequency that is three times above the spontaneous mutation frequency at least at one of the concentrations in the experiment.
The test item is classified as mutagenic if there is a reproducible concentration-related increase of the mutation frequency. Such evaluation may be considered also in the case that a threefold increase of the mutant frequency is not observed.
However, in a case by case evaluation this decision depends on the level of the corresponding solvent control data. If there is by chance a low spontaneous mutation rate within the laboratory's historical control data range, a concentration-related increase of the mutations within this range has to be discussed. The variability of the mutation rates of solvent controls within all experiments of this study was also taken into consideration. - Statistics:
- A linear regression (least squares) was performed to assess a possible dose dependent increase of mutant frequencies. The number of mutant colonies obtained for the groups treated with the test item were compared to the solvent control groups. A trend is judged as significant whenever the p-value (probability value) is below 0.05. However, both, biological and statistical significance was considered together.
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS GENOTOXICITY:
No relevant and reproducible increase in mutant colony numbers/10^6 cells was observed in the main experiments up to the maximum concentration. The mutant frequency remained well within the historical range of solvent controls.
A linear regression analysis (least squares) was performed to assess a possible dose dependent increase of mutant frequencies. A p-value below 0.05 was detected in culture I of the first experiment with metabolic activation and in culture II of the second experiment without metabolic activation. These trends however, were judged as biologically irrelevant as the mutation frequency remained well within the range of the historical solvent controls.
In both experiments of this study (with and without S9 mix) the range of the solvent controls was from 8.8 up to 25.0 mutants per 10^6 cells; the range of the groups treated with the test item was from 3.8 up to 35.3 mutants per 10^6 cells.
EMS (150 μg/mL) and DMBA (1.1 μg/mL) were used as positive controls and showed a distinct increase in induced mutant colonies.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
The range finding pre-experiment was performed using a concentration range of 39.1 to 5000 μg/mL according to the current OECD guideline 476 to evaluate toxicity in the presence (4 hours treatment) and absence (4 hours and 24 hours treatment) of metabolic activation. Relevant cytotoxic effects were observed at 78.1 μg/mL and above after 4 hours treatment without metabolic activation and at 156.3 μg/mL with metabolic activation. Following 24 hours treatment the cell growth was completely inhibited down to the lowest concentration.
The test medium was checked for precipitation or phase separation at the end of each treatment period (4 or 24 hours) prior to removal to the test item. Phase separation was observed at 625 μg/mL and above in the presence of metabolic activation following 4 hours treatment and at 312.5 mg/mL and above in the absence of metabolic activation following 24 hours treatment.
Based on the results of the pre-experiment, the individual concentrations of the main experiments were selected. A series of concentrations generally spaced by a factor of 2 was applied. Narrower spacing was used at high concentrations with metabolic activation to cover the onset of cytotoxicity more closely.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
Relevant cytotoxic effects indicated by a relative cloning efficiency I and/or a relative cell density below 50% in both cultures were observed in the first experiment at 78.0 μg/mL with metabolic activation. In the second experiment cytotoxic effects as described above occurred at 10.0 μg/mL without metabolic activation. The recommended cytotoxic range of approximately 10-20% relative cloning efficiency I or relative cell density was covered without metabolic activation. In the presence of metabolic activation moderate cytotoxic effects were noted in the first experiment with metabolic activation at the highest analysable concentration of 78 μg/mL with metabolic activation. Exceedingly severe cytotoxic effects occurred at the next higher, phase separating concentration of 156 μg/mL. In the second experiment with metabolic activation turbidity observed at the maximum concentration of 120 μg/mL indicated that the limit of solubility was reached. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported the test item did not induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus in V79 cells.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (only 4 strains tested, no confirmatory experiment)
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- His-operon
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254 induced fraction of Chinese hamster liver, supplemented with co-factors
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 25, 75, 225, 675 and 2025 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Acetone
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Acetone
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: (- S9): daunorubicin-HCl (TA 98); 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide (TA 100); N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (TA 1535); 9 (5) aminoacridine hydrochloride (TA 1537); (+S9): cyclophosphamide (TA 1535)
- Remarks:
- daunorubicin-HCl: 5, 10 µg/plate (DR); 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide: 0.125, 0.25 µg/plate (4-NQO); N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine: 3, 5 µg/plate (MNNG); 9 (5) aminoacridine hydrochloride: 50, 100 µg/plate (AAC); cyclophosphamide: 250 µg/plate (CP)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Incubation time: 48 h at 37 °C in the dark
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 plates/concentration
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth compared to the negative control - Evaluation criteria:
- The test substance is generally considered to be non mutagenic if the colony count in relation to the negative control is not doubled at any concentration.
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- (at 2025 µg/plate without S9)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- It can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported the test item did not induce gene mutations in the bacterial strains used.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (only 4 strains tested, no confirmatory experiment)
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- His-operon
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor induced S9 mix (rat liver microsomes and co-factors)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 25, 75, 225, 675 and 2025 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Acetone
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: (- S9): daunorubicin-HCl (TA 98); 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide (TA 100); N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (TA 1535); 9 (5) aminoacridine hydrochloride (TA 1537); (+S9): cyclophosphamide (TA 1535)
- Remarks:
- daunorubicin-HCl: 5, 10 µg/plate (DR); 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide: 0.125, 0.25 µg/plate (4-NQO); N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine: 3, 5 µg/plate (MNNG); 9 (5) aminoacridine hydrochloride: 50, 100 µg/plate (AAC); cyclophosphamide: 250 µg/plate (CP)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Incubation time: 48 h at 37 °C in the dark
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 plates/concentration
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth compared to the negative control - Evaluation criteria:
- The test substance is generally considered to be non mutagenic if the colony count in relation to the negative control is not doubled at any concentration.
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 2025 µg/plate in TA 98, TA 1535 and TA 1537 with and without S9 and in TA 100 only without S9
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- It can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported the test item did not induce gene mutations in the bacterial strains used.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- November 10, 2004 - March 21, 2005
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- RCC Cytotest Cell Research GmbH, In den Leppsteinswiesen 19, 64380 Rossdorf
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Target gene:
- not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: MEM (Minimal Essential Medium) supplemented with 10 % fetal calf serum (FCS)
- Properly maintained: yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbital/p-Naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I, 4h, without S9 mix: (1.56), 3.13, 6.25, 12.50, (25.0), (50.0) µg/ml
Experiment I, 4h, with S9 mix: (3.13), 6.25, 12.50, 25.0, 50.0, (100.0) µg/ml
Experiment II, 18h, without S9 mix: (0.39), (0.78), (1.56), 3.13, 6.25, 12.50 µg/ml
Experiment II, 28h, without S9 mix: (1.56), 3.13, 6.25, (12.50) µg/ml
Experiment II, 4h, with S9 mix: 3.13, (6.25), 12.50, 25.0, (50.0), (100.0) µg/ml
Concentrations in parentheses were not analyzed - Vehicle / solvent:
- ethanol 0.5% (v/v)
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: with metabolic activation: 4h, without metabolic activation: 4, 18 and 28h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 18 or 28 h
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent):
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells):
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): colcemid (0.2 µg/mL culture medium)
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED:
100 well spread metaphase plates per culture were scored for cytogenetic damage on coded slides, except for the positive control group in Experiment I after 4 hrs treatment without metabolic activation, in Experiment II after 28 hrs treatment without metabolic activation, and in Experiment II after 4 hrs treatment with metabolic activation, where only 50 metaphase plates were scored due to strong genotoxicity.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index, cell number
For evaluation of cytotoxicity indicated by reduced cell numbers two additional cultures per test item and solvent control group, not treated with colcemid, were set up in parallel. These cultures were stained after 18 hrs and 28 hrs, respectively.
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: the number of polyploid cells in 500 metaphase cells per culture was determined
- Determination of endoreplication: yes
OTHER:
A pre-test on cell growth inhibition with 4 hrs and 24 hrs treatment was performed in order to determine the toxicity of the test item. - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is classified as non-dastogenic if:
- the number of induced structural chromosome aberrations in all evaluated dose groups is in the range of our historical control data (0.0 - 4.0 % aberrant cells, exclusive gaps).
and/or
- no significant increase of the number of structural chromosome aberrations is observed.
A test item is classified as clastogenic if:
- the number of induced structural chromosome aberrations is not in the range of our historical control data (0.0 - 4.0 % aberrant cells, exclusive gaps).
and
- either a concentration-related or a significant increase of the number of structural chromosome aberrations is observed.
A test item can be classified as aneugenic if:
- the number of induced numerical aberrations is not in the range of our historical control data (0.0 - 8.5 % polyploid cells). - Statistics:
- Statistical significance was confirmed by means of the Fisher's exact test (p < 0.05). However, both biological and statistical significance should be considered together. If the criteria mentioned above for the test item are not clearly met, the classification with regard to the historical data and the biological relevance is discussed and/or a confirmatory experiment is performed.
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: no
- Effects of osmolality: no
- Precipitation: In the absence of S9 mix, precipitation of the test item in culture medium was observed in Experiment II at preparation interval 18 hrs at 6.25 µg/mL and above. In the presence of S9 mix, test item precipitates in culture medium were observed in Experiment I at preparation interval 18 hrs at 12.5 µg/mL and above and in Experiment II at preparation interval 28 hrs at 100 µg/mL.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
Using reduced cell numbers as an indicator for toxicity in the pre-test, clear toxic effects were observed after 4 hrs treatment with 25.8 µg/mL and above in the absence of S9 mix. In addition, 4 hrs treatment with 51.6 µg/mL and above in the presence of S9 mix induced strong toxic effects. Considering the toxicity data and the occurrence of test item precipitation of-the pre-test, 50 µg/mL (without S9 mix) and 100 µg/mL (with S9 mix) were chosen as top concentrations in Experiment I. Dose selection of Experiment II was also influenced by test item toxicity and the occurrence of precipitation. In the range finding experiment clearly reduced cell numbers were observed after 24 hrs exposure with 25.8 µg/mL and above. Therefore, 12.5 µg/mL were chosen as top treatment concentration for continuous exposure in the absence of S9 mix. In the presence of S9 mix 100 µg/mL were chosen as top treatment concentration with respect to the results obtained in Experiment I.
In the pre-experiment, precipitation of the test item in culture medium was observed after treatment with 51.6pg/mL and above in the absence and the presence of S9 mix.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
The aberration rates of the cells after treatment with the test item (0.5-4.0% aberrant cells, exclusive gaps) were close to the range of the solvent control values (1.5 - 2.5 % aberrant cells, exclusive gaps) and within the range of our historical control data: 0.0 - 4.0 % aberrant cells, exclusive gaps.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
In this study, toxic effects indicated by reduced cell numbers and/or mitotic indices of about or below 50% of control were observed. However, in Experiment I at 18 hrs preparation interval in the presence of S9 mix and in Experiment II at 28 hrs preparation interval in the absence of S9 mix concentrations showing clear cytotoxicity were not scorable for cytogenetic damage. In detail, in the absence of S9 mix, toxic effects indicated by reduced cell numbers of about and below 50 % of control were observed after 4 hrs treatment with 12.5 µg/mL (46 % of control) in Experiment I and after 18 hrs continuous treatment with 12.5 µg/mL (51 % of control) in Experiment II. In the presence of S9 mix, cell numbers were cleariy reduced after 4 hrs treatment with 25 µg/mL (15 % of control) in Experiment II. - Conclusions:
- In conclusion, it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce structural chromosome aberrations in V79 cells (Chinese hamster cell line) when tested up to cytotoxic test item concentrations.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Guideline of Japanese Ministry of Labor, dated June 12, 1979
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 6 strains tested (preincubation method), no confirmatory experiment; no data on test substance purity
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- His- and Trp-operon
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100, E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S-9 purchased from Kikkoman Co., Ltd. and S-9 mixture prepared (S9: 0.3 mL, MgCl2 8 µmol, KCl 33 µmol, glucose-6-phosphate 5 µmol, NADPH 4 µmol, NADH 4 µmol Na2HPO4/KH2PO4 buffer (pH 7.4) 100 µmol + distilled water)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 50, 100, 500, 1000 and 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-nitrofluorene
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: Plate method (preincubation method)
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 minutes (with shaking)
- Exposure duration: 48 hours
- Incubation temperature: 37°C
- 2 Petri dishes per strain and per concentration
The sterility was tested with sample solution or S9-mix mixed with soft agar solution, displayed over the minimal agar plate without preincubation method.
The strains of S. typhimurium and E. coli were obtained from National Institute of Hygenic Sciences, Tokyo, Japan on April 11, 1980 and preserved at -82°C.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth (compared to control), reduced titer, reduced background lawn - Evaluation criteria:
- A test substance is generally considered to be non-mutagenic if the colony count in relation to the negative control is not doubled at any concentration.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- depending on the strain from 10 µg/plate onwards without S9 and from 500 µg/plate onwards with S9
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- from 500 µg/plate onwards with and without S9
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- depending on the strain from 10 µg/plate onwards without S9 and from 500 µg/plate onwards with S9
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- depending on the strain from 10 µg/plate onwards without S9 and from 500 µg/plate onwards with S9
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- depending on the strain from 10 µg/plate onwards without S9 and from 500 µg/plate onwards with S9
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- No evidence of the induction of point mutations by the compound or by the metabolites of the substance formed as a result of microsomal activation was detectable in any of the strains of Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli used in this experiment.
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported the test item did not induce gene mutations in the bacterial strains used.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 487 (In vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 29 Jul 2016
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
- Target gene:
- N/A
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: Primary Human Lymphocytes
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- In this test system primary human lymphocytes were analyzed for the occurrence of
micronuclei. Fresh Blood was collected from a single donor for each experiment.
Only healthy, non-smoking donors and not receiving medication were used. In this study, in
the 1st Experiment a 31 year old male donor, in the 2nd Experiment a male (29 years old) donor and in the 3rd Experiment a 30 year old male donor were used.
The lymphocytes of each donor have previously shown to respond well to stimulation of
proliferation with phytohemagglutinin (PHA) and to the used positive control substances. Whole blood cultures were treated with the test substance, the erythrocytes were lysed by hypotonic treatment before preparation of the slides. - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Cytokinesis block (if used):
- cytokinesis block method using the actin polymerisation inhibitor cytochalasin B (Cyt B)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 fraction
The S9 fraction was prepared according to Ames et al. (7) at BASF SE in an AAALAC-approved laboratory in accordance with the German Animal Welfare Act and the effective European Council Directive.
At least 5 male Wistar rats [Crl:WI(Han)] (200 - 300 g; Charles River Laboratories Germany GmbH, Sulzfeld, Germany) received 80 mg/kg b.w. phenobarbital i.p. and beta-naphthoflavone orally (both supplied by Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) each on three consecutive days.
During this time, the animals were housed in polycarbonate cages: central air conditioning with a fixed range of temperature of 20 - 24°C and a fixed relative humidity of 45 - 65%. The day/night rhythm was 12 hours: light from 6 am to 6 pm and dark from 6 pm to 6 am.
Standardized pelleted feed and drinking water from bottles were available ad libitum.
24 hours after the last administration, the rats were sacrificed, and the induced livers were prepared using sterile solvents and glassware at a temperature of +4°C. The livers were weighed and washed in a weight-equivalent volume of a 150 mM KCl solution (1 mL ≙ 1 g wet liver), then homogenized in three volumes of KCl solution. After centrifugation of the homogenate at 9000 x g for 10 minutes at +4°C, 5-mL portions of the supernatant (S9 fraction) were stored at -70°C to -80°C.
The sterility of the S9 fraction was determined by incubating 1 mL S9 fraction on an agar plate at 37°C for 48 hours. The content of protein was measured with an appropriate method (e.g. Bradford). To check the activity of the S9 fraction a bacterial reverse mutation assay according to Ames et al. (7) was performed (results see Appendix 8). - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Following the requirements of the current OECD Guideline 487 a test substance with defined composition should be tested up to a maximum concentration of 2 mg/mL, 2 µL/mL or 10 mM, whichever is the lowest. When the test substance is not of defined composition, e.g. substance of unknown or variable composition, complex reaction products or biological materials (socalled UVCBs), or environmental extracts, the top concentration should be higher to increase the concentration of each of the components (e.g. 5 mg/mL). In case of toxicity, the top concentration should produce reduction of the proliferation index (CBPI) to 45 ± 5% (leading to a cytostasis increase of 55 ± 5%) of the concurrent vehicle control. For relatively insoluble
test substances only one concentration should be tested showing turbidity or precipitation in culture medium at the end of exposure period.
Dose selection of the 1st Experiment
Without S9 mix 4 hours exposure
1.4 µg/mL - 83.3 µg/mL
With S9 mix
4 hours exposure
2.5 µg/mL - 150.0 µg/mL
Dose selection of the 2nd Experiment
Without S9 mix
20-hours exposure
0.5 µg/mL - 30.0 µg/mL
Dose selection of the 3rd Experiment
Without S9 mix 4 hours exposure
4.0 µg/mL - 25.0 µg/mL
With S9 mix 4 hours exposure
3.5 µg/mL - 60.0 µg/mL
In this study the concentrations are given as rounded values by using a dilution factor of 1.8, except for a dilution factor of 1.5 in the 3rd Experiment with S9mix and a dilution factor of 1.3 in the 3rd Experiment without S9mix.
At least three concentrations were evaluated to detect a possible dose-response relationship.
At least 2 cultures were prepared per test group (referred to as A and B), and at least 1000 cells per culture were evaluated for the occurrence of micronucleated cells. - Vehicle / solvent:
- Due to the limited solubility of the test substance in water, ethanol was selected as the vehicle, which has been demonstrated to be suitable in the in vitro micronucleus test and for which historical control data are available.
The final concentration of the vehicle ethanol in culture medium was 1% (v/v). - Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- colchicine
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- see "any other information on materials and methods"
- Rationale for test conditions:
- see "any other information on materials and methods"
- Evaluation criteria:
- Acceptance criteria
The in vitro micronucleus assay is considered valid if the following criteria are met:
• The quality of the slides allowed the evaluation of a sufficient number of analyzable cells in
the control groups (vehicle/positive) and in at least three exposed test groups.
• Sufficient cell proliferation was demonstrated in the vehicle control.
• The number of cells containing micronuclei in the vehicle control was within the range of our
laboratory’s historical negative control data (95% control limit). Weak outliers can be judged
acceptable if there is no evidence that the test system is not “under control”.
• The positive controls both with and without S9 mix induced a distinct, statistically significant
increase in the number of micronucleated cells in the expected range.
Assessment criteria
A test substance is considered to be clearly positive if all following criteria are met:
• A statistically significant increase in the number of micronucleated cells was obtained.
• A dose-related increase in the number of cells containing micronuclei was observed.
• The number of micronucleated cells exceeded both the concurrent vehicle control value and
the range of our laboratory’s historical negative control data (95% control limit).
A test substance is considered to be clearly negative if the following criteria are met:
• Neither a statistically significant nor dose-related increase in the number of cells containing
micronuclei was observed under any experimental condition.
• The number of micronucleated cells in all treated test groups was close to the concurrent
vehicle control value and within the range of our laboratory’s historical negative control data
(95% control limit). - Statistics:
- An appropriate statistical analysis was performed. The proportion of cells containing
micronuclei was calculated for each test group. A comparison of the micronucleus rates of each
test group with the concurrent vehicle control group was carried out for the hypothesis of equal
proportions (i.e. one-sided Fisher's exact test, BASF SE).
If the results of this test were statistically significant compared with the respective vehicle
control (p ≤ 0.05), labels (s
) were printed in the tables.
In addition, a statistical trend test (SAS procedure REG (16)) was performed to assess a
possible dose-related increase of micronucleated cells. The used model is one of the proposed
models of the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Test procedures Workgroup Report (17).
The dependent variable was the number of micronucleated cells and the independent variable
was the concentration. The trend was judged as statistically significant whenever the one-sided
p-value (probability value) was below 0.05.
However, both, biological and statistical significance were considered together. - Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: Primary Human Lymphocytes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- True negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TREATMENT CONDITIONS
Osmolality and pH values were not relevantly influenced by test substance treatment.
In the 1st Experiment, in the absence and the presence of S9 mix, test substance precipitation
was observed macroscopically in culture medium at the end of treatment at 14.3 µg/mL and
above.
After 20 hours continuous treatment test substance precipitation was observed at 16.7 µg/mL
and above (microscopically).
In the 3rd Experiment in the absence of S9 mix, test substance precipitation was observed
macroscopically in culture medium at the end of treatment at 25.0 µg/mL. In the presence of
metabolic activation precipitation in culture medium was observed microscopically at
40.0 µg/mL and above.
CYTOTOXICITY
In this study, no relevantly reduced proliferative activity was observed after 4 hours exposure
interval in the absence and presence of S9 mix in the test groups scored for cytogenetic
damage. In the 1st Experiment at 14.3 µg/mL in the absence of S9 mix a cytostasis of 68.5%
was observed. In the 3rd Experiment without S9 mix cytostasis levels of 62.4% and 84.0%
were observed after treatment with 19.2 µg/mL and 25.0 µg/mL, respectively. These groups
were not evaluated for cytogenetic damage due to the enhanced cytotoxicity levels. After
20 hours continuous test substance treatment without S9 mix in the test group (9.3 µg/mL)
scored for cytogenetic damage, reduced proliferation (cytostasis: 46.8%) was obtained.
GENOTOXICITY - MICRONUCLEUS ANALYSIS
In the presence of metabolic activation, in the 1
st Experiment the obtained values (0.3 – 0.7%
micronucleated cells) were within the range of the 95% control limit of the historical negative
control data (0.1 - 1.1% micronucleated cells; see Appendix 6). In the 3rd Experiment the
values of test substance treated groups varied between 0.3 – 0.4% micronucleated cells. These
values were all within the historical negative control data. In none of the two experiments with
S9 mix a statistically significant increase compared to the respective vehicle control value (0.3
and 0.5% micronucleated cells, 1st and 3rd Experiment, respectively) was observed.
In the 1st Experiment after 4 hours treatment in the absence of S9 mix, the values (0.3 – 0.5%
micronucleated cells) were within the range of the 95% control limit of the historical negative
control data (0.2 – 0.9% micronucleated cells; see Appendix 6). In the 3rd Experiment the
values of test substance treated groups varied between 0.2 – 0.6%. These values were all
within the historical negative control data. In none of the two experiments without S9 mix at 4h
treatment a statistically significant increase compared to the respective vehicle control value
(0.4 and 0.2% micronucleated cells, first and third Experiment, respectively) was observed.
After 20 hours continuous treatment the values (0.4 – 0.8% micronucleated cells) were within
the range of the 95% control limit of the historical negative control data (0.2 – 0.9%
micronucleated cells; see Appendix 6). A statistically significant increase compared to the
vehicle control value was not obseved (0.6% micronucleated cells).
Non of the experimental parts described above showed a positive dose response as assessed
by a trend analysis.
The positive control substances MMC (without S9 mix 0.04 and 0.31 µg/mL), Colchicine
(without S9 mix: 0.05 µg/mL) and CPA (with S9 mix; 2.50 and 3.50 µg/mL) induced statistically
significantly increased micronucleus frequencies in all independently performed experiments.
In this study, in the absence and presence of metabolic activation the frequencies of
micronucleated cells (4 h without S9 mix: 9.1 and 7.8% micronucleated cells; 20 h without S9
mix: 4.4% and 6.7% micronucleated cells (MMC and Col, respectively); 1
st experiment with S9
mix 3.6% and 6.0% micronucleated cells (2.50 and 3.50 µg/mL CPA, respectively) and 3rd
experiment with S9 mix 2.9% and 3.9% micronucleated cells (2.50 and 3.50 µg/mL CPA,
respectively) were compatible to the historical positive control data range (Appendix 7). - Conclusions:
- Thus, under the experimental conditions chosen here, the conclusion is drawn that Irgamet 39 has no potential to induce micronuclei (clastogenic and/or aneugenic activity) under in vitro conditions in primary human lymphocytes in the absence and the presence of metabolic activation.
Referenceopen allclose all
Experimental Result:
concentration (µg/ml) | PST | S9 Mix | relative cloning efficiency I (%) | relative cell density (%) | relative cloning efficiency II (%) | mutant colonies / 106cells | induction factor | relative cloning efficiency I (%) | relative cell density (%) | relative cloning efficiency II (%) | mutant colonies / 106cells | induction factor | |
Experiment I / 4h treatment | culture I | culture II | |||||||||||
solvent control (ethanol) | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 8.8 | 1.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 25.0 | 1.0 | ||
positive control (EMS) | 150.0 | - | 101.7 | 122.4 | 92.9 | 98.5 | 11.2 | 85.8 | 146.3 | 74.5 | 157.8 | 6.3 | |
test item | 0.16 | - | 110.4 | culture was not continued# | 95.1 | culture was not continued# | |||||||
test item | 0.31 | - | 110.2 | culture was not continued# | 87.9 | culture was not continued# | |||||||
test item | 0.63 | - | 119.0 | 117.1 | 83.0 | 14.7 | 1.7 | 87.9 | 102.1 | 128.4 | 14.4 | 0.6 | |
test item | 1.3 | - | 111.1 | 119.7 | 88.1 | 7.9 | 0.9 | 97.6 | 112.3 | 111.7 | 25.2 | 1.0 | |
test item | 2.5 | - | 114.4 | 97.7 | 77.6 | 19.5 | 2.2 | 98.2 | 72.9 | 123.4 | 10.1 | 0.4 | |
test item | 5.0 | - | 122.6 | 100.2 | 86.2 | 20.1 | 2.3 | 100.0 | 52.6 | 124.7 | 14.6 | 0.6 | |
test item | 10.0 | - | 96.7 | 56.5 | 78.8 | 19.5 | 2.2 | 66.8 | 45.2 | 99.2 | 25.6 | 1.0 | |
solvent control (ethanol) | + | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 18.0 | 1.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 22.7 | 1.0 | ||
positive control (DMBA) | 1.1 | + | 62.8 | 91.9 | 41.4 | 1579.1 | 87.7 | 59.3 | 104.1 | 73.7 | 1200.1 | 52.9 | |
test item | 9.8 | + | 102.2 | 106.8 | 84.3 | 15.5 | 0.9 | 98.4 | 93.5 | 89.1 | 22.0 | 1.0 | |
test item | 19.5 | + | 97.0 | 123.0 | 94.6 | 17.8 | 1.0 | 92.2 | 93.5 | 101.9 | 15.7 | 0.7 | |
test item | 39.0 | + | 99.7 | 113.1 | 98.4 | 19.3 | 1.1 | 96.8 | 85.8 | 82.0 | 23.2 | 1.0 | |
test item | 78.0 | + | 44.1 | 68.1 | 70.2 | 25.7 | 1.4 | 54.0 | 41.5 | 56.4 | 35.3 | 1.6 | |
test item | 156.0 | PS | + | 0.0 | culture was not continued## | 0.0 | culture was not continued## | ||||||
test item | 234.0 | + | 0.0 | culture was not continued## | 0.0 | culture was not continued## | |||||||
Experiment II / 24h treatment | |||||||||||||
solvent control (ethanol) | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 12.5 | 1.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 14.3 | 1.0 | ||
positive control (EMS) | 150.0 | - | 89.7 | 113.2 | 91.1 | 364.3 | 29.1 | 89.7 | 96.8 | 72.9 | 368.9 | 25.9 | |
test item | 0.31 | - | 98.8 | culture was not continued# | 101.3 | culture was not continued# | |||||||
test item | 0.63 | - | 100.6 | 114.7 | 76.7 | 21.8 | 1.7 | 98.2 | 88.5 | 124.6 | 7.8 | 0.5 | |
test item | 1.3 | - | 98.9 | 109.6 | 178.7 | 3.8 | 0.3 | 98.5 | 83.5 | 95.2 | 7.0 | 0.5 | |
test item | 2.5 | - | 95.8 | 118.0 | 89.8 | 25.2 | 2.0 | 96.1 | 100.1 | 130.8 | 9.4 | 0.7 | |
test item | 5.0 | - | 77.6 | 107.9 | 122.0 | 17.6 | 1.4 | 72.9 | 75.8 | 79.1 | 11.4 | 0.8 | |
test item | 10.0 | - | 21.1 | 18.3 | 87.8 | 29.2 | 2.3 | 23.8 | 15.2 | 82.0 | 26.6 | 1.9 | |
test item | 20.0 | - | 0.0 | culture was not continued## | 0.0 | culture was not continued## | |||||||
Experiment II / 4h treatment | |||||||||||||
solvent control (ethanol) | + | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 14.5 | 1.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 14.7 | 1.0 | ||
positive control (DMBA) | 1.1 | + | 83.9 | 80.9 | 87.3 | 544.1 | 37.6 | 79.3 | 78.5 | 71.8 | 577.2 | 39.3 | |
test item | 5.0 | + | 100.4 | culture was not continued# | 92.6 | culture was not continued# | |||||||
test item | 10.0 | + | 101.1 | 86.0 | 103.7 | 15.0 | 1.0 | 89.6 | 93.6 | 91.5 | 18.5 | 1.3 | |
test item | 20.0 | + | 99.6 | 88.9 | 100.8 | 17.0 | 1.2 | 86.3 | 100.0 | 88.2 | 18.8 | 1.3 | |
test item | 40.0 | + | 93.8 | 78.5 | 108.7 | 15.6 | 1.1 | 93.5 | 108.0 | 54.8 | 20.5 | 1.4 | |
test item | 80.0 | + | 94.9 | 79.2 | 101.2 | 18.1 | 1.3 | 94.3 | 103.4 | 69.9 | 32.8 | 2.2 | |
test item | 120.0 | T | + | 94.9 | 75.6 | 113.8 | 16.6 | 1.1 | 88.2 | 100.0 | 70.4 | 24.3 | 1.7 |
PS = Phase Separation visible at the end of treatment
T = Turbidity
# culture was not continued as a minimum of only four concentrations is required
## culture was not continued due to exceedingly severe cytotoxic effects
Table 1: Test results of experiment 1 (plate incorporation)
With or without S9-Mix |
Test substance concentration (μg/plate) |
Mean number of revertant colonies per plate (average of 3 plates) |
|||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
||||
TA 100 |
TA1535 |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
||
– |
0 |
139 |
17 |
17 |
5 |
– |
25 |
137 |
12 |
19 |
5 |
– |
75 |
135 |
13 |
26 |
4 |
– |
225 |
140 |
17 |
16 |
3 |
– |
675 |
113 |
15 |
16 |
5 |
– |
2025 |
73 |
6 |
12 |
1 |
Positive controls, –S9 |
Name |
4NQO |
MNNG |
DR |
AAC |
Control |
111 |
12 |
26 |
3 |
|
Concentration (μg/plate) |
0.125 |
3 |
5 |
50 |
|
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3) |
576 |
1215 |
244 |
52 |
|
Concentration (μg/plate) |
0.25 |
5 |
10 |
100 |
|
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3) |
844 |
1581 |
511 |
404 |
|
+ |
0 |
134 |
13 |
48 |
3 |
+ |
25 |
126 |
11 |
55 |
5 |
+ |
75 |
117 |
12 |
55 |
5 |
+ |
225 |
125 |
15 |
48 |
6 |
+ |
675 |
145 |
15 |
56 |
4 |
+ |
2025 |
155 |
12 |
46 |
5 |
Positive controls, +S9 |
Name |
--- |
CP |
--- |
--- |
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
--- |
15 |
--- |
--- |
|
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD) |
--- |
514 |
--- |
--- |
MNNG = N-methyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
4NQO = 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
AAC = 9-aminoacridine
DR = Daunorubicin-HCL
CP = Cyclophoshamide
Table 1. Test results of experiment 1 (plate incorporation).
With or without S9-Mix |
Test substance concentration (μg/plate) |
Mean number of revertant colonies per plate (average of 3 plates) |
|||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
||||
TA 100 |
TA1535 |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
||
– |
0 |
190 |
17 |
21 |
6 |
– |
25 |
201 |
15 |
30 |
5 |
– |
75 |
205 |
14 |
21 |
5 |
– |
225 |
216 |
14 |
28 |
6 |
– |
675 |
198 |
12 |
21 |
4 |
– |
2025 |
56 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Positive controls, –S9 |
Name |
4NQO |
MNNG |
DR |
AAC |
Control |
197 |
16 |
23 |
4 |
|
Concentration (μg/plate) |
0.125 |
3 |
5 |
50 |
|
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3) |
1015 |
1322 |
272 |
18 |
|
Concentration (μg/plate) |
0.25 |
5 |
10 |
100 |
|
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3) |
1351 |
1469 |
530 |
712 |
|
+ |
0 |
152 |
12 |
60 |
7 |
+ |
25 |
171 |
13 |
56 |
7 |
+ |
75 |
181 |
21 |
52 |
5 |
+ |
225 |
175 |
15 |
56 |
7 |
+ |
675 |
207 |
14 |
50 |
5 |
+ |
2025 |
160 |
3 |
25 |
2 |
Positive controls, +S9 |
Name |
--- |
CP |
--- |
--- |
Concentration (μg/plate) |
--- |
250 |
--- |
--- |
|
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD) |
--- |
572 |
--- |
--- |
MNNG = N-methyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
4NQO = 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
AAC = 9-aminoacridine
DR = Daunorubicin-HCL
CP = Cyclophoshamide
Summary of results
Aberrant cells | ||||||||||
Exp | Exposure Period | Preparation Interval | concentration (µg/ml) | S9 Mix | Polyploid cells (%) | cell numbers in % of control | Mitotic indices in % of control | incl. gaps* | excl. gaps* | with exchanges |
I | 4 h | 18 h | neg. control | - | 1.4 | n.t. | 100 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 |
4 h | 18 h | solvent control1 | - | 1.8 | 100 | 100 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | |
4 h | 18 h | pos. control2# | - | 1.0 | n.t. | 87 | 36.0 | 34.0S | 12.0 | |
4 h | 18 h | 3.13 | - | 1.7 | 71 | 83 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | |
4 h | 18 h | 6.25 | - | 1.8 | 102 | 104 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | |
4 h | 18 h | 12.5 | - | 1.7 | 46 | 76 | 5.5 | 3.5 | 0.0 | |
II | 18 h | 18 h | neg. control | - | 1.9 | n.t. | 100 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 |
18 h | 18 h | solvent control1 | - | 2.1 | 100 | 100 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 0.5 | |
18 h | 18 h | pos. control2 | - | 1.4 | n.t. | 104 | 11.5 | 10.5S | 2.0 | |
18 h | 18 h | 3.13 | - | 2.3 | 79 | 114 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | |
18 h | 18 h | 6.25P | - | 1.3 | 69 | 105 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | |
18 h | 18 h | 12.5P | - | 1.8 | 51 | 136 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | |
II | 28 h | 28 h | neg. control | - | 3.1 | n.t. | 100 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 |
28 h | 28 h | solvent control1 | - | 2.6 | 100 | 100 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | |
28 h | 28 h | pos. control2# | - | 1.2 | n.t. | 84 | 49.0 | 49.0S | 24.0 | |
28 h | 28 h | 3.13 | - | 2.5 | 88 | 90 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | |
28 h | 28 h | 6.25 | - | 1.5 | 56 | 89 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | |
I | 4 h | 18 h | neg. control | + | 1.9 | n.t. | 100 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 1.0 |
4 h | 18 h | solvent control1 | + | 2.4 | 100 | 100 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | |
4 h | 18 h | pos. control3 | + | 2.1 | n.t. | 96 | 8.5 | 8.0S | 4.0 | |
4 h | 18 h | 6.25 | + | 2.0 | 104 | 102 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | |
4 h | 18 h | 12.5P | + | 2.8 | 111 | 85 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | |
4 h | 18 h | 25P | + | 1.2 | 96 | 103 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | |
4 h | 18 h | 50P | + | 1.6 | 86 | 88 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | |
II | 4 h | 28 h | neg. control | + | 3.1 | n.t. | 100 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
4 h | 28 h | solvent control1 | + | 1.3 | 100 | 100 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 0.0 | |
4 h | 28 h | pos. control4# | + | 1.1 | n.t. | 92 | 46.0 | 45.0S | 15.0 | |
4 h | 28 h | 3.13 | + | 1.9 | 78 | 87 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 0.0 | |
4 h | 28 h | 12.5 | + | 2.7 | 53 | 101 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | |
4 h | 28 h | 25 | + | 1.9 | 15 | 131 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 |
* inclusive cells carrying exchanges
# evaluation of 50 metaphase plates per culture
P precipitation occurred
n.t. not tested
S aberration frequency statistically significant higher than corresponding control values
1 ethanol 0.5 % (v/v)
2 EMS 300.0 µg/ml
3 CPA 1.0 µg/ml
4 CPA 1.4 µg/ml
Mean number of revertant colonies per plate (average of 2):
|
µg/plate |
S9 mix |
TA 100 |
TA 1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA 98 |
TA 1537 |
TA 1538 |
DMSO |
0 |
- |
128 |
22 |
21 |
24 |
8 |
10 |
Sample |
0.5 |
- |
150 |
23 |
19 |
24 |
9 |
21 |
1 |
- |
142 |
16 |
20 |
12 |
8 |
14 |
|
5 |
- |
142 |
15 |
24 |
13 |
6 |
16 |
|
10 |
- |
130 |
21 |
18* |
6* |
6 |
15 |
|
50 |
- |
96* |
14* |
10* |
5* |
3* |
11* |
|
100 |
- |
70* |
12* |
12* |
0* |
0* |
6* |
|
500 |
- |
1* |
0* |
16* |
0* |
0* |
1* |
|
1000 |
- |
0* |
0* |
22* |
0* |
0* |
0* |
|
Positive control - S9 mix |
Name |
|
ENNG |
ENNG |
ENNG |
NF |
AAC |
NF |
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
|
2 |
10 |
5 |
2 |
10 |
5 |
|
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 2) |
|
330 |
484 |
986 |
998 |
26 |
877 |
|
DMSO |
0 |
+ |
138 |
30 |
16 |
42 |
18 |
40 |
Sample |
0.5 |
+ |
140 |
25 |
20 |
43 |
9 |
43 |
1 |
+ |
159 |
30 |
17 |
43 |
15 |
40 |
|
5 |
+ |
143 |
27 |
20 |
44 |
7 |
36 |
|
10 |
+ |
163 |
22 |
15 |
41 |
13 |
37 |
|
50 |
+ |
165 |
20 |
22* |
47 |
7 |
36 |
|
100 |
+ |
163 |
21 |
29* |
38 |
7 |
33 |
|
500 |
+ |
83* |
19 |
24* |
2* |
0* |
4* |
|
1000 |
+ |
52* |
10* |
27* |
0* |
0* |
0* |
|
Positive control + S9 mix |
Name |
|
BP |
2AA |
2AA |
BP |
BP |
BP |
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
|
5 |
1 |
40 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 2) |
|
892 |
54 |
384 |
456 |
189 |
129 |
*growth inhibition observable
ENNG: ethyl-3-nitro-1-nitrosoguanidine
NF: 2-nitrofluorene
AAC: 9-aminoacridine
BP: benzo(a)pyrene
2AA: 2-aminoanthracene
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Genetic toxicity in bacterial cells
There are two reverse gene mutation assays available which were performed similar and equivalent to the OECD Test guideline 471. Mutagenic effects in bacterial cells are appraised in a weight of evidence approach. In both studies, the bacteria strains TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 and TA 98 of S. typhimurium were exposed to the test substance (no data on purity) in Acetone at concentrations of 25, 75, 225, 675 and 2025 µg/plate in the presence and absence of mammalian metabolic activation in a plate incorporation test. In one experiment, S9 fraction from rats and in the other S9 fraction from hamster was employed. The test substance was tested up to cytotoxic concentrations. One experiment with triplicates was performed in each study. The positive controls induced the appropriate responses in the corresponding strains. There was no evidence of induced mutant colonies over background in these tests (Ciba Geigy Ltd. 1982). Both studies do not fully satisfy the requirements for Test Guideline OECD 471 for in vitro mutagenicity (bacterial reverse gene mutation) data, as strains capable of deleting cross-linkers/oxidizing agents were not included in the panel of strains tested. Nevertheless the studies are valid and suitable for assessment.
Furthermore, a read across approach to a structurally related compound is used additionally for genetic toxicity in bacterial cells (see CSR/attached read across justification).
In a reverse gene mutation assay performed according to a Japanese guideline similar and equivalent to the OECD Test guideline 471, Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538 and TA 98 and E. coli WP2 uvrA were exposed to the test substance (no data on purity) in DMSO at concentrations of 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 50, 100, 500, 1000 and 5000 µg/plate in the presence and absence of mammalian metabolic activation in a plate incorporation test. The test substance was tested up to precipitating and cytotoxic concentrations. Only one experiment with duplicates was performed. The positive controls induced the appropriate responses in the corresponding strains. There was no evidence of induced mutant colonies over background in this test.
Genetic toxicity in mammalian cells
The genotoxic potential of the test article in mammalian cells is assessed by read across approach to a structurally related compound (see CSR/attached read across justification).
A GLP-compliant mammalian cell mutagenicity test according to OECD guideline 476 was performed to investigate the potential of the test article to induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus in V79 cells of the Chinese hamster. The assay was performed in two independent experiments, using two parallel cultures each. The first main experiment was performed with and without liver microsomal activation and a treatment period of 4 hours. The second experiment was performed with a treatment time of 4 hours with and 24 hours without metabolic activation. The test item was dissolved in ethanol. The concentration range of the main experiments was limited by cytotoxic effects and the solubility of the test item in aqueous medium. The tested concentrations ranged from 0.63 to 120 µg/ml. No substantial and reproducible dose dependent increase of the mutation frequency was observed up to the maximum concentration with and without metabolic activation. The mutant frequency remained well within the historical range of solvent controls. Appropriate reference mutagens (EMS and DMBA), used as positive controls, induced a distinct increase in mutant colonies and thus, showed the sensitivity of the test system and the activity of the metabolic activation system. In conclusion it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported the test item did not induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus in V79 cells. Therefore, the test substance is considered to be non-mutagenic in this HPRT assay (Harlan, 2013).
Chromosomal damage in mammalian cells
Clastogenicity of the test article is assessed by read across approach to another structurally related compound (CAS 866625-93-6, see CSR/attached read across justification).
The test article dissolved in ethanol was assessed for its potential to induce structural chromosome aberrations in V79 cells of the Chinese hamster in vitro in two independent experiments (OECD 473, GLP). In each experimental group two parallel cultures were set up. The highest applied concentration in the pre-test on toxicity (3300 µg/mL; approx. 10 mM) was chosen with regard to the molecular weight with respect to the current OECD Guideline 473. Dose selection for the cytogenetic experiments was performed considering the toxicity data and the occurrence of precipitation. The chosen treatment concentrations ranged from 0.39 to 100 µg/ml. Toxic effects indicated by reduced cell numbers of about and below 50 % of control were observed in all experimental parts, except in the absence of S9 mix in Experiment II at 28 hrs preparation interval and in the presence of S9 mix in Experiment I at 18 hrs preparation interval. However, in these experimental parts, concentrations showing clear cytotoxicity were not scorable for cytogenetic damage. In both independent experiments, neither a statistically significant nor a biologically relevant increase in the number of cells carrying structural chromosomal aberrations was observed after treatment with the test item. No relevant increase in the frequencies of polyploid metaphases was found after treatment with the test item as compared to the frequencies of the controls. Appropriate mutagens were used as positive controls. They induced statistically significant increases (p < 0.05) in cells with structural chromosome aberrations. In conclusion, it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce structural chromosome aberrations as determined by the chromosome aberration test in V79 cells (Chinese hamster cell line) in vitro. Therefore, the test article is considered to be non-clastogenic in this chromosome aberration test with and without S9 mix when tested up to cytotoxic test item concentrations.
In vitro MNT in primary human lymphocytes
Clastogenicity of the test article is assessed by read across approach to another structurally related compound (see CSR/attached read across justification).
The test substance was assessed for its potential to induce micronuclei in primary human lymphocytes in vitro (clastogenic or aneugenic activity). Three independent experiments were carried out, with and without the addition of liver S9 mix from phenobarbital-and beta-naphthoflavone induced rats (exogenous metabolic activation). According to a solubility test for the determination of the experimental concentrations and taking into account the cytotoxicity actually found in the main experiments, the following concentrations were tested.
Test groups printed in bold type were evaluated for the occurrence of micronuclei:
1st Experiment
4 hours exposure, without S9 mix 0; 1.4;2.5; 4.4; 7.9; 14.3; 25.7; 46.3; 83.3 µg/mL
4 hours exposure, with S9 mix 0; 2.5;4.4; 7.9; 14.3; 25.7; 46.3; 83.3; 150.0 µg/mL
2nd Experiment
20 hours exposure, without S9 mix 0; 0.5;0.9; 1.6;2.9; 5.1;9.3; 16.7; 30.0 µg/mL
3rd Experiment
4 hours exposure, without S9 mix 0; 4.0;5.2; 6.7;8.8; 11.4;14.8; 19.2; 25.0 µg/mL
4 hours exposure, with S9 mix 0; 3.5; 5.3;7.9; 11.9; 17.8;26.7;40.0; 60.0 µg/mL
A sample of at least 1000 cells for each culture was analyzed for micronuclei, i.e. 2000 cells for each test group. In this study, ethanol was selected as vehicle. The vehicle controls gave frequencies of micronucleated cells within our historical negative control data range for primary human lymphocytes. The positive control substances, Mitomycin C (MMC), Colchicine and Cyclophosphamide (CPA), led to the expected increase in the number of cells containing micronuclei. In this study, cytotoxicity indicated by clearly reduced proliferation index (CBPI) was observed at least at the highest applied test substance concentration in all experimental parts without metabolic activation of this study. In the presence of S9 mix no cytotoxicity indicated by reduced proliferation index (CBPI) was observed. On the basis of the results of the present study, the test substance did not cause any biologically relevant increase in the number of cells containing micronuclei either without S9 mix or after adding a metabolizing system.
Thus, under the experimental conditions described, the test substance is considered to have no chromosome-damaging (clastogenic) effect nor to induce numerical chromosomal aberrations (aneugenic activity) under in vitro conditions in primary human lymphocytes in the absence and the presence of metabolic activation.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification, Labeling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for the purpose of classification under Regulation (EC) No.1272/2008. Based on the present data, classification for genotoxicity is not warranted under Regulation (EC) No.1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.