Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 310-080-1 | CAS number: 102242-49-9 The complex residue resulting from the vacuum distillation of C6-24 fatty alcohols which is derived from hydrogenation of C6-24 fatty acids methyl esters. It consists predominantly of satd. fatty alcohols having carbon numbers greater than C18, dimerization products, and long chain esters having carbon numbers greater than C32 and boils at > 250°C (482°F) at 10 torr.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Three different in vitro genetic toxicity test were available. All three were considered reliable and consequently were used as key studies.
1. The mutagenic potential of the test substance was investigated in a study according to OECD 471 (Ames) using the five strains TA 1535, 1537, 1538, 98 and 100 with and without metabolic activation. Five test substance concentration from 8 to 5000 µg/plate and adequate positive controls were applied in agar. No enhanced mutation rate in the S9 treated or untreated cells was observed in the Ames test. Therefore, the test substance was considered not to be mutagenic.
2. The test substance was assessed for its potential to induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus using V79 cells of the Chinese hamster. The study was performed in two independent experiments with and without metabolic activation. Treatment duration was 4 or 24 hours. Precipitation was observed in for concentrations equal or higher than 35.0 µg/mL. Cytotoxic effects occurred only in concentrations showing very strong test item induced precipitation. In both experiments, all mutant frequencies remained well within the historical range of solvent controls. The induction factor did not exceed the threshold of three times the corresponding solvent control.
All controls were valid.
In this test according to OECD Guideline 476 under GLP, the test substance did not induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus in V79 cells (with and without metabolic activation). Therefore, it is considered to be non-mutagenic in this HPRT assay.
3.
The test substance was assessed for its potential to induce micronuclei in human lymphocytes in vitro in the absence and presence of metabolic activation by S9 mix acc. to OECD guideline 487 under GLP. Two independent experiments were performed, both with and without S9, with exposure periods of 4 or 20 hours. The chromosomes were prepared 40 hours after start of treatment with the test item. In each experimental group two parallel cultures were analysed. 1000 binucleate cells per culture were scored for cytogenetic damage on coded slides.The highest treatment concentration in this study was chosen with regard to the solubility properties of the test item. While no cytotoxicity was observed, precipitation occured at 13.6 µg/mL or higher. In both experiments, in the absence and presence of S9 mix, no biologically relevant increase in the number of cells carrying micronuclei was observed. All controls were valid.
In conclusion, it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported, the test substance did not induce micronuclei in human lymphocytes in vitro,when tested up to precipitating concentrations.
Short description of key information:
genetic toxicity in vitro (Ames test): negative
genetic toxicity in vitro (HPRT): negative
genetic toxicity in vitro (micronucleus test): negative
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on results of the key studies the substance does not need to be classified according to GHS (Regulation (EU) 1272/2008) and also does not need to be classified according to DPD (67/548/EEC).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.