Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-834-7 | CAS number: 75-04-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Based on an Ames-Test (Mortelmans, 1986), which meets generally accepted scientific principles and which is acceptable for assessment, the test substance is not mutagenic in the Salmonella/microsome preincubation assay with and without metabolic activation.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Remarks:
- only 4 strains were tested
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The test substance was assayed for mutagenicity in the Salmonella/microsome preincubation assay using a standard protocol approved by the National Toxicology Program [see also Haworth et al, 1983].
To the 13 X 100-mm test tube maintained at 37°C the following substances were added:
0.5 ml of S-9 mix or 0.1 M PO4 buffer (pH 7.4), 0.05 ml of the overnight culture, and 0.05 ml of solvent or chemical dilution.
The mixture was mixed and allowed to incubate without shaking at 37°C for 20 min, at which time 2.0 ml of molten (45°C) top agar supplemented with 0.5 mM L-histidine and 0.5 mM D-biotin were added. The contents of the tubes were mixed and poured onto 25 ml of minimal glucose bottom agar [Vogel and Bonner, 1956] in 15 X 100-mm plastic petri dishes (Falcon Muta-Assay, 1028). When the top agar had solidified, the plates were inverted and incubated at 37°C for 48 hr. Concurrent solvent and positive controls were tested with and without the metabolic activation systems. Five dose levels of the test substance was tested, with three plates per dose level in four strains. - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Supplier: Fluka Chemical Co.
- Testing lab: SRI - Target gene:
- Histidine
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
- source of S9: Male Sprague-Dawley rats and male syrian hamsters; liver S9
- method of preparation of S9 mix: Aroclor 1254 (200 mg/ml in corn oil) was administered ip at 500 mg/kg 5 days prior to decapitation (EGG, SRI) or cervical dislocation (CWR). The animals were deprived of food 12-24 hr immediately preceding death; otherwise food and water were provided ad libitum. The livers were removed aseptically, washed in ice-cold 0.15 M KCl, and minced and homogenized (3 ml of 0.15 M KC1 per gm of wet tissue) in a Potter-Elvehjem apparatus with a Teflon pestle. CWR initially used a Waring blender, but switched to a Potter-Elvehjem apparatus. The S-9 fraction was obtained by centrifugation of the liver homogenate for 10 min at 9,000 g at 4°C. The S-9 mix was prepared immediately prior to each assay.
- Volumes of S9 mix:
Per milliliter:
S-9 fraction 0.10 ml
0.04 M MgC12 0.02 ml
1.65 M KC1 0.02 ml
0.04 M NADP 0.10 ml
0.05 M glucose-6-phosphate 0.10 ml
1.0 M NaH2P04, (pH 7.4) 0.10 ml
Distilled water 0.56 ml - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0, 100, 333, 1000, 3333, 10000 ug/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Water
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Potassium chloride
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- sodium azide
- other: -4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine for TA98; - with metabolic activation: 2-aminoanthracene (all strains).
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: 3
METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- preincubation test
TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Preincubation period: 20 min
- Exposure duration: 48 h
FOR GENE MUTATION:
- Ames test - Evaluation criteria:
- 1) Mutagenic response: a dose-related, reproducible increase in the number of revertants over background, even if the increase was less than twofold
2) nomutagenic response: when no increase in the number of revertants was elicited by the chemical
3) questionable response: when there was an absence of a clear-cut dose-related increase in revertants; when the dose-related increases in the number of revertants were not reproducible;
or when the response was of insufficient magnitude to support a determination of mutagenicity - Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- other: 10000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- other: 10000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- other: 10000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- other: 10000µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- GENOTOXIC EFFECTS:
- With metabolic activation: negative
- Without metabolic activation: negative
PRECIPITATION CONCENTRATION:
- No precipitate observed
CYTOTOXIC CONCENTRATION:
- With metabolic activation: 10000 ug/plate
- Without metabolic activation: 10000 ug/plate - Conclusions:
- Based on the results of this publication, the test substance is negative in the Salmonella/microsome preincubation assay with and without metabolic activation.
- Executive summary:
The test substance was evaluated for mutagenicity in the Salmonella/microsome preincubation assay using a standard protocol approved by the National Toxicology Program. Doses of 0, 100, 333, 1000, 3333 and 10000 ug/plate were tested in four Salmonella typhimurium strains (TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537) in the presence and absence of Aroclor-induced rat or hamster liver S9. The test substance was evaulated as negative in all experiments.
Reference
Strain: TA1535
Dose |
No Activation |
10% HLI |
10% RLI |
|||
Protocol |
Preincubation |
Preincubation |
Preincubation |
|||
ug/Plate |
Mean |
± SEM |
Mean |
± SEM |
Mean |
± SEM |
0 |
33 |
2.3 |
11 |
2.6 |
15 |
0.3 |
100 |
30 |
4.9 |
10 |
2.3 |
10 |
3 |
333 |
25 |
3.5 |
9 |
1.7 |
11 |
3.8 |
1000 |
30 |
2.7 |
11 |
2 |
10 |
0.9 |
3333 |
7s |
4.1 |
15 |
3.5 |
18 |
1.7 |
10000 |
0s |
0 |
0s |
0 |
0s |
0 |
Positive Control |
342 |
42.1 |
245 |
10.7 |
178 |
24.1 |
Strain: TA100
Dose |
No Activation |
10% HLI |
10% RLI |
|||
Protocol |
Preincubation |
Preincubation |
Preincubation |
|||
ug/Plate |
Mean |
± SEM |
Mean |
± SEM |
Mean |
± SEM |
0 |
146 |
10.4 |
121 |
2.7 |
121 |
6.5 |
100 |
118 |
5.1 |
114 |
8.6 |
136 |
11.5 |
333 |
129 |
9.4 |
132 |
5.7 |
116 |
10.3 |
1000 |
108 |
5.2 |
143 |
9.4 |
108 |
9.3 |
3333 |
118 |
9 |
121 |
16.9 |
94 |
11.1 |
10000 |
0s |
0 |
0s |
0 |
41s |
20.5 |
Positive Control |
377 |
8.7 |
966 |
42.3 |
456 |
24.8 |
Strain: TA98
Dose |
No Activation |
10% HLI |
10% RLI |
|||
Protocol |
Preincubation |
Preincubation |
Preincubation |
|||
ug/Plate |
Mean |
± SEM |
Mean |
± SEM |
Mean |
± SEM |
0 |
16 |
2 |
26 |
5.7 |
25 |
1.9 |
100 |
17 |
1.7 |
32 |
2.3 |
27 |
3.5 |
333 |
13 |
3.1 |
32 |
3.2 |
25 |
0.6 |
1000 |
12 |
3.2 |
34 |
4.7 |
32 |
2.3 |
3333 |
8s |
4.3 |
0s |
0 |
23 |
4.5 |
10000 |
t |
|
t |
|
0s |
0 |
Positive Control |
475 |
108.7 |
764 |
21.3 |
326 |
10.7 |
Strain: TA1537
Dose |
No Activation |
10% HLI |
10% RLI |
|||
Protocol |
Preincubation |
Preincubation |
Preincubation |
|||
ug/Plate |
Mean |
± SEM |
Mean |
± SEM |
Mean |
± SEM |
0 |
5 |
1.5 |
5 |
1.5 |
6 |
1.7 |
100 |
11 |
2.1 |
7 |
1.2 |
6 |
1 |
333 |
5 |
1.3 |
4 |
1 |
7 |
1.2 |
1000 |
6 |
3.2 |
7 |
1.2 |
4 |
0.7 |
3333 |
4 |
1.7 |
0s |
0 |
3 |
0.7 |
10000 |
0s |
0 |
t |
|
0s |
0 |
Positive Control |
350 |
41.7 |
406 |
11.5 |
135 |
8.7 |
Abbreviations:
RLI =
induced male Sprague Dawley rat liver S9
HLI = induced male Syrian hamster liver S9
s = Slight Toxicity; p = Precipitate; x = Slight Toxicity and
Precipitate; T = Toxic; c = Contamination
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
Based on a well documented study (Seiler, 1981), which meets generally accepted scientific principles and which is acceptable for assessment, the test substance is a Noncarcinogen in mice in a DSI-test.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian cell study: DNA damage and/or repair
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - male mice were used
- on the eve of test day: animals received injection of 18,5 kBq (0,5 µCi) (methyl-14C)-thymidine (subcuaneously in the back)
- the next day: prelabeled animals are randomly assigned to test and control groups (receive test substance i.p.)
- 3 hours later: again injection with labeled thymidine subcutaneously (10 µL = 0,37 MBq (10µCi) (methyl-14C)-thymidine
- 45 min later: i.p. injection of 3,0 mg unlabeled thymidine in 0,2 ml physiological saline (provides for a 5x10^4-fold dilution of the radioactive thymidine)
- 30 min later: mice were sacrified and their testes excised
- testes were transferred into 5% trichloroacetic acid (TCA), homogenized and centrifuged
- the pellet was washed twice in 5% TCA, resuspended in fresh 5% TCA, heated for 30 min at 95°C for DNA hydrolysis, cooled and centrifuged
- DNA content was determined photometrically
- radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation counting - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- male
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 3 hours
- Frequency of treatment:
- single application
- Dose / conc.:
- 5 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 15 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- no data
- Control animals:
- yes
- Statistics:
- nonparametric test (Wilcoxon-rank-test or equivalent)
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- Based on the DSI Test results of this publication, the test substance is a Noncarcinogen in mice.
- Executive summary:
Male mice were treated with the test substance intraperitoneal. Three dose levels (5, 15, 50 mg/kb bw) were investigated. The results show that the test substance is a Noncarcinogen under the test conditions chosen.
Reference
Table 1: DSI Test Results of Ethylamine
Compound |
Dose (mg/kg) |
%DSI |
Ethylamine |
5 i.p. |
0 |
15 |
0 |
|
50 |
5,6 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
The test substance was evaluated for mutagenicity in the Salmonella/microsome preincubation assay (Mortelmans, 1986) using a standard protocol approved by the National Toxicology Program. Doses of 0, 100, 333, 1000, 3333 and 10000 ug/plate were tested in four Salmonella typhimurium strains (TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537) in the presence and absence of Aroclor-induced rat or hamster liver S9. Also an in vivo DSI-test was performed in male mice (Seiler, 1981). Three concentrations of the test substance were tested (5, 15, 50 mg/kg bw/d) and showed no DNA synthesis inhibition.
Further in vitro Ames tests (Hussein, 1969; Szybalski, 1958; Air products, 1977) and a sister chromatide exchange (SCE) test (Speit, 1988) were performed. The test substance was evaulated as negative in all experiments except the SCE assay, where the test substance is described as a SCE inducer. However, this SCE assay has significant methodological deficiencies as no controls were investigated.
Taken all studies into account, the test substance is evaluated as not mutagenic.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation (EC) 1272/2008. No adverse findings on genotoxicity was observed in the Salmonella/microsome preincubation assay or in an in vivo DSI test. As a result the substance is not considered to be classified for mutagenicity under Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, as amended for the thirteenth time in Regulation (EC) No 2018/1480.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.