Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-456-2 | CAS number: 60-12-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP-compliant, guideline study, reliable without restrictions
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5375 - In vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The study design also meets the requirements of UK Department of Health Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals for Mutagenecy
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Phenylethyl alcohol
- IUPAC Name:
- Phenylethyl alcohol
Constituent 1
Method
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Final concentration of Phenylethyl alcohol CAS No 60-12-8: (µg/ml)
Experiment 1
4(20)-hour without S9: 0*, 38.13, 76.25, 152.5, 305*, 610*, 1220*, MMC 0.4*
4(20)-hour with S9 0*: 38.13, 76.25, 152.5, 305*, 610*, 1220*, CP 5*
Experiment 2
24-hour without S9: 0*, 38.13, 76.25, 152.5, 305*, 610*, 1220*, MMC 0.2*
*Dose levels selected for metaphase analysis
4(20)-hour with S9 (2%): 0*, 38.13, 76.25, 152.5, 305*, 610*, 1220*, CP 5* - Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle and positive controls were used in parallel with the test item.
Positive control items:
-In the absence of S9, mitomycin C (MMC) (Sigma, Batch No. 089K0731) was used at 0.4 and 0.2 µg/ml for cultures in Experiment 1 and 2 respectively. It was dissolved in Minimal Essential Medium.
-In the presence of S9, cyclophosphamide (CP) (Acros, Batch No. A0302605) was used at 5 µg/ml in both experiments. It was dissolved in dimethyl sulphoxide.
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Duplicate lymphocyte cultures (A and B) were established for each dose level by mixing the following components, giving, when dispensed into sterile plastic flasks for each culture:
-8.05-9.05 ml MEM, 10% (FBS)
-0.1 ml Li-heparin
-0.1 ml phytohaemagglutinin
-0.75 ml heparinised whole blood - Evaluation criteria:
- The dose range for the Preliminary Toxicity Test was 4.77, 9.53, 19.06, 38.13, 76.25, 152.5, 305, 610, 1220 µg/ml. The maximum dose was the maximum recommended dose level, the 10 mM concentration. No precipitate of the test item was observed in the parallel blood-free cultures at the end of the exposure in any exposure group.
Microscopic assessment of the slides prepared from the exposed cultures showed that metaphase cells were present up to 1220 µg/ml in all three exposure groups. In the 24-hour exposure group the test item induced a dose related increase in toxicity and achieved 81% mitotic inhibition at 1220 µg/ml and 57% mitotic inhibition at 610 µg/ml. The 4(20)-hour exposure group in the presence of S9 demonstrated a more modest increase in toxicity with 25% mitotic
inhibition at 1220 µg/ml.
The selection of the maximum dose level was based on the maximum recommended dose level, the 10 mM concentration and was 1220 µg/ml for the 4(20)-hour exposure groups and for the continuous exposure group used in Experiment 2. - Statistics:
- The frequency of cells with aberrations excluding gaps and the frequency of polyploid cells was compared, where necessary, with the concurrent vehicle control value using Fisher's Exact test.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: Not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Preliminary Test
The dose range for the Preliminary Toxicity Test was 4.77, 9.53, 19.06, 38.13, 76.25, 152.5, 305, 610, 1220 µg/ml. The maximum dose was the maximum recommended dose level, the 10 mM concentration. No precipitate of the test item was observed in the parallel blood-free cultures at the end of the exposure in any exposure group.
Experiment 1 and 2
The maximum dose level selected for metaphase analysis was the maximum recommended dose level, the 10 mM concentration dose level (1220 µg/ml). No precipitate of the test item was observed at the end of exposure in either exposure group. No marked dose-related inhibition of mitotic index was observed. All of the vehicle control cultures had frequencies of cells with chromosome aberrations within the expected range.
(See attached document for results) - Remarks on result:
- other: strain/cell type: mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
The test item did not induce any statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells
with aberrations either in the absence or presence of metabolic activation. - Executive summary:
An in vitro study for the detection of structural chromosomal aberrations in cultured mammalian cells was conducted on the test item Phenyl ethyl alcohol. Cultures of human lymphocytes were treated with the test item in duplicate and were evaluated for chromosome aberrations at three dose levels, together with vehicle and positive controls. Four treatment conditions were used for the study; i.e. In Experiment 1, 4 hours in the presence of an induced rat liver homogenate metabolising system (S9), at a 2% final concentration with cell harvest after a 20-hour expression period and a 4 hours exposure in the absence of metabolic activation (S9) with a 20-hour expression period. In Experiment 2, the 4 hours exposure with addition of S9 was repeated (using a 1% final S9 concentration), whilst in the absence of metabolic activation the exposure time was increased to 24 hours. The result of the test showed that the test item did not induce any statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with chromosome aberrations in either the absence or presence of a liver enzyme metabolising system in either of two separate experiments. The test item Phenyl ethyl alcohol is not therefore considered to be clastogenic to human lymphocytes in vitro.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.