Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1993
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP-Guideline study without deviations

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1993
Report date:
1993

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Version / remarks:
1987
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Evaluation 24, 48 and 72 hours after challenge
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Ministerium für Umwelt, Raumordnung und Landwirtschaft des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen
Type of study:
Buehler test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1-chlorobutane
EC Number:
203-696-6
EC Name:
1-chlorobutane
Cas Number:
109-69-3
Molecular formula:
C4H9Cl
IUPAC Name:
1-chlorobutane
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): n-Butylchlorid
- Storage condition of test material: closed, desiccator, under local exhaust ventilation

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Fa. Harlan-Winkelmann, Borchen, Germany
- Age at study initiation: healthy young adults
- Weight at study initiation: 436 - 527 g
- Housing: conventional, max. 5 animals per cage (Makrolon Type IV)
- Diet: Ssniff G 4 ad libitum
- Water: tap water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 +/- 3
- Humidity (%): 30 -70
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12


Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
maize oil
Concentration / amount:
Conc. 50 % (w/w) in maize oil (MEH 56) (induction and challenge)
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
maize oil
Concentration / amount:
Conc. 50 % (w/w) in maize oil (MEH 56) (induction and challenge)
No. of animals per dose:
Test group: 20
Controls: 10
Details on study design:
Application volume: 0,4 mL

RANGE FINDING TESTS: 2,5; 25; 50% (w/w) in maize oil (MEH 56) and 100% (w/w)


MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 3
- Exposure period: 6 hours
- Test groups: 20 animals
- Control group: 10 animals
- Site: left flank
- Induction on days: 0, 7, 14
- Concentration: 50% (w/w) in maize oil (MEH 56)


B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Challenge on day: 28
- Exposure period: 6 hours
- Test groups: 20 animals
- Control group: 10 animals
- Site: right flank
- Concentration: 50% (w/w) in maize oil (MEH 56)
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24, 48 and 72


Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
1-Chlor-2,4-dinitrobenzol (HS-92/CDNB-1; 25.04.1993 - 27.05.1993)

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
50% (w/w)
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 50% (w/w). No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
50% (w/w)
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 50% (w/w). No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
other: 3rd reading
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
50% (w/w)
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: other: 3rd reading. . Hours after challenge: 72.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 50% (w/w). No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
50% (w/w)
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 50% (w/w). No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
50% (w/w)
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 50% (w/w). No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
other: 3rd reading
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
50% (w/w)
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: other: 3rd reading. . Hours after challenge: 72.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 50% (w/w). No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
Classification: not sensitizing