Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
not reported
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study conducted in accordance with generally accepted scientific principles, possibly with incomplete reporting or methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1973
Report date:
1973

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline available
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Method: other: Procedure adopted was described in US Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO)'s "Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Food, Drugs and Cosmetics."
GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Trichlorooctylstannane
EC Number:
221-435-4
EC Name:
Trichlorooctylstannane
Cas Number:
3091-25-6
Molecular formula:
C8H17Cl3Sn
IUPAC Name:
trichlorooctylstannane
Details on test material:
Monooctyltin Trichloride [CAS No. 3091-25-6]

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
The substance was tested in 6 rabbits (3 males and 3 females). Animals were kept separately in V2A wire cages and fed on NAFAG, Gossau SG, rabbit food and water ad libitum.

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: right eye in each rabbit used as control
Amount / concentration applied:
Undiluted test material used for testing.
Amount applied: 0.1 mL
Duration of treatment / exposure:
The test material was put in the left eye with a syringe for 30 seconds. The treated eyes of 3 rabbits were rinsed with 10 mL lukewarm water. The other 3 rabbits did not undergo rinsing.
Observation period (in vivo):
Reactions were observed with a slit lamp after 24 hours and after 2, 3, 4 and 7 days.
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
6 rabbits (3 males, 3 females)
Details on study design:
Amounts of 0.1 ml of the test substance were introduced into the conjunctival sac of the left eye with a syringe. After application, the eyelids were held open for a few seconds. The right eye served as control. The treated eyes of 3 rabbits were each rinsed with 10 mL lukewarm water about 30 seconds after treatment. Reactions were appraised with a slit lamp after 24 hours and then after 2, 3, 4 and 7 days.

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
6 rabbits
Time point:
other: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 days
Score:
80
Max. score:
80
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 1-7 days
Score:
10
Max. score:
10
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 1-7 days
Score:
16.8
Max. score:
20
Irritant / corrosive response data:
PEII (cornea) = 80
PEII (iris) = 10
PEII (conjunctivae) = 16.8
Other effects:
no information

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Eyes rinsed

Days after Application

Rabbit 1 F

Rabbit 2 F

Rabbit 3 F

Cornea

Iris

Conjunctivae

Cornea

Iris

Conjunctivae

Cornea

Iris

Conjunctivae

1

80

10

16

80

10

18

80

10

16

2

80

10

16

80

10

18

80

10

18

3

80

10

16

80

10

18

80

10

18

4

80

10

16

80

10

18

80

10

18

5

80

10

16

80

10

18

80

10

18

6

80

10

16

80

10

18

80

10

18

7

80

10

16

80

10

18

80

10

18

 

Table 2: Eyes not rinsed

Days after Application

Rabbit 3 M

Rabbit 5 M

Rabbit 6 M

Cornea

Iris

Conjunctivae

Cornea

Iris

Conjunctivae

Cornea

Iris

Conjunctivae

1

80

10

14

80

10

16

80

10

18

2

80

10

14

80

10

16

80

10

18

3

80

10

16

80

10

16

80

10

18

4

80

10

16

80

10

16

80

10

18

5

80

10

16

80

10

16

80

10

18

6

80

10

16

80

10

16

80

10

18

7

80

10

16

80

10

16

80

10

18

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
highly irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: not specified
Conclusions:
TK-11386 (n-octyltin trichloride) had a primary irritation index of 80 for the cornea, 10 for the iris, and 16.8 for the conjunctivae. Therefore, it was considered a severe irritant to the rabbit eye.
Executive summary:

The eye irritation potential of octyltin trichloride was investigated in 6 New Zealand white rabbits. Amounts of 0.1 ml of the test substance were introduced into the conjunctival sac of the left eye with a syringe. After application, the eyelids were held open for a few seconds. The right eye served as control. The treated eyes of 3 rabbits were each rinsed with 10 ml lukewarm water about 30 seconds after treatment. Reactions were appraised with a slit lamp after 24 hours and then after 2, 3, 4 and 7 days. The cornea was scored on the basis of degree of opacity, and area involved. The iris was scored for the presence of folds, congestion, swelling, circumcorneal injection, reaction to light, hemorrhage and gross destruction. The conjunctivae were scored for redness, chemosis, and discharge. The maximum scores for the cornea, iris, and conjunctivae were 80, 10, and 20, respectively. TK-11386 (n-octyltin trichloride) had a primary irritation index of 80 for the cornea, 10 for the iris, and 16.8 for the conjunctivae. Therefore, it was considered a severe irritant to the rabbit eye.

These values corresponds to the highest values according to the scoring system. The mean scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours are 4 and 2 and 3 for the cornea and iris respectively according to the scoring system, these value are greater than the values stated in the DSD (67/548/EEC) and CLP (1272/2008) regulations, and therefore the test substance will be classified accordingly.