Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 265-198-5 | CAS number: 64742-94-5 A complex combination of hydrocarbons obtained from distillation of aromatic streams. It consists predominantly of aromatic hydrocarbons having carbon numbers predominantly in the range of C9 through C16 and boiling in the range of approximately 165°C to 290°C (330°F to 554°F).
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP compliant, near guideline study, available as unpublished report, minor restrictions in design and/or reporting but otherwise adequate for assessment
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 986
- Report date:
- 1986
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Naphtha (petroleum), heavy catalytic reformed
- EC Number:
- 265-070-9
- EC Name:
- Naphtha (petroleum), heavy catalytic reformed
- Cas Number:
- 64741-68-0
- IUPAC Name:
- 64741-68-0
- Reference substance name:
- Heavy catalytic reformed naphtha (petroleum)
- IUPAC Name:
- Heavy catalytic reformed naphtha (petroleum)
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): test article API 83-06
- Substance type: Heavy catalytic reformed naphtha (petroleum)
-Description: A complex combination of hydrocarbons produced from the distillation of products from a catalytic reforming process. It consists of predominantly aromatic hydrocarbons having carbon numbers predominantly in the range of C7 through C12 (approx. 91% aromatics, 9% paraffins: no benzene reported present). It has a boiling range of approximately 90°C to 230°C (194-446°F).
- Physical state: non-viscous liquid
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature, protected from light
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- L5178Y TK+/- mouse lymphoma cells Clone 3.7.2C (Burroughs Wellcome, North Carolina< USA)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Preliminary toxicity test: 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0 10.0, 50.0 and 100 µL/mL for the first test (with and without S9 activation) and 0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0 and 10.0 µL/mL for the second test (with S9 activation only).
Mutagenicity tests: Eight dose levels decreasing approximately 10-fold from highest to lowest: 0.1 µL/mL to 0.013 µL/mL for non-activated cultures and 0.5 µL/mL to 0.067 µL/mL for S9 activated cultures. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: ethanol
Controlsopen allclose all
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- without S9
Migrated to IUCLID6: 1 and 0.5 µL/mL
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Acetone
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
- Remarks:
- with S9
Migrated to IUCLID6: 5 and 7.5 µg/mL
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- PRELIMINARY TOXICITY TEST: With and without S9 activation. Tube cultures were initiated by seeding one centrifuge tube/dose level and 2 tubes/solvent control with 6 mL of a cell suspension containing 1 x 10E6 cells/mL. API 83-06 was solubilised and diluted in ethanol to intended concentrations and added to the tubes. Medium or S9 activation mixture was added. The tubes were exposed for 4 hours, after which time the API 83-06 was removed by centrifugation and the cells washed. Toxicity was determined by comparing the cell population growth at each concentration with the solvent controls. Cell population density was determined 24 and 48 hours after initial exposure.
MUTAGENICITY ACTIVITY TEST (Study number MAI #T2420.701)
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in culture
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 hours at 37°C in the dark.
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 2 days (with a cell population adjustment at 24 and 48 hours).
CLONING: At the end of the expression period, 12 non-activated and 6 S9 activated cultures were cloned, in cloning medium containing 0.34% Noble agar, based on their degree of toxicity. The non-activated cultures that were cloned were treated with 0.075, 0.056, 0.042, 0.032, 0.024 or 0.018 µL/mL. The S9 activated cultures that were cloned were treated with 0.12, 0.089 or 0.067 µL/mL. TFT at a final concentration of 3 µg/mL was used as the restrictive agent.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Two
MUTAGENICITY ACTIVITY TEST (Study number MAI #T2420.701012)
The API 83-06 was re-tested in the presence of S9. The initial toxicity test was also repeated and based on these data API 83-06 was tested over a range of concentrations from 0.3 - 0.03 µL/mL.
- Exposure duration: 4 hours at 37°C in the dark.
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 2 days (with a cell population adjustment at 24 and 48 hours).
CLONING: At the end of the expression period, 10 cultures were selected for cloning based on their degree of toxicity. The cultures that were cloned were treated with 0.22, 0.18, 0.15, 0.11 or 0.07 µL/mL. - Evaluation criteria:
- Positive: if there is a positive dose response and one or more of the doses in the 10% or greater total growth range exhibit a mutant frequency which is 2-fold greater than background level. All data including that from cultures with less than 10% total growth used to establish the dose response relationship.
Equivocal: if there is no dose response but any one or more of the 3 highest doses with 10% or more total growth exhibit a 2-fold increase in mutant frequency over background, or if there is a dose response but no culture exhibits a 2-fold increase in mutant frequency over background.
Negative: if there is no dose response in cultures with 10% or greater total growth and none of these test cultures exhibit a 2-fold or greater increase in mutant frequency over background.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- ambiguous
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Any other information on results incl. tables
Three non-activated cultures that were cloned exhibited mutant frequencies which were significantly greater than the mean mutant frequency of the solvent controls (mutant frequencies 31.0, 3.6 and 2.0 times greater than controls and respective total growth was 1, 2 and 10%). As API 83-06 has a very steep toxic response curve in this system, minute differences in dose result in large differences in total growth. The total growth exhibited by each culture may be more representative of dose delivered than the concentration of API 83-06 indicated. A comparison of induced mutant frequency with total growth indicates a dose-dependent response and the data are judged equivocal.
Two S9 activated cultures that were cloned exhibited mutant frequencies which were more than twice the mean mutant frequency of the solvent controls. Total growth of these cultures was 4 and 7%. A dose-dependent response was noted.
API 83-06 was re-tested with S9 activation. The cultures that were cloned were treated with a range of concentrations which produced 10-91% total growth. One culture exhibited a mutant frequency which was 2.1 times solvent control mean frequency. However, the duplicate culture for this dose (0.22 µL/mL) did not exhibit a significant increase in mutant frequency. A dose-dependent response was noted in the treated cultures. The mutagenic response of API 83-06 in the presence of S9 activation is classed as “equivocal” since a reproducible positive response was not observed.
Under the conditions of these tests, Heavy catalytic reformed naphtha (petroleum), API 83-06, produced an equivocal response in the presence and absence of exogenous metabolic activation.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
ambiguous with metabolic activation
ambiguous without metabolic activation
Under the conditions of these tests, Heavy catalytic reformed naphtha (petroleum), API 83-06, produced an equivocal response in the presence and absence of exogenous metabolic activation. - Executive summary:
- API 83-06 (CAS 64741-68-0) was tested in the L5178 Y TK +/- mouse lymphoma mutagenesis assay in the presence and absence of Aroclor induced rat liver S9. Three non-activated cultures that were cloned exhibited mutant frequencies which were significantly greater than the mean mutant frequency of the solvent controls (mutant frequencies 31.0, 3.6 and 2.0 times greater than controls and respective total growth was 1, 2 and 10%). As API 83-06 has a very steep toxic response curve in this system, minute differences in dose result in large differences in total growth. The total growth exhibited by each culture may be more representative of dose delivered than the concentration of API 83-06 indicated. A comparison of induced mutant frequency with total growth indicates a dose-dependent response and the data are judged equivocal. Two S9 activated cultures that were cloned exhibited mutant frequencies which were more than twice the mean mutant frequency of the solvent controls. Total growth of these cultures was 4 and 7%. A dose-dependent response was noted. API 83-06 was re-tested with S9 activation. The cultures that were cloned were treated with a range of concentrations which produced 10-91% total growth. One culture exhibited a mutant frequency which was 2.1 times solvent control mean frequency. However, the duplicate culture for this dose (0.22 µL/mL) did not exhibit a significant increase in mutant frequency. A dose-dependent response was noted in the treated cultures. The mutagenic response of API 83-06 in the presence of S9 activation is classed as “equivocal” since a reproducible positive response was not observed. Under the conditions of these tests, Heavy catalytic reformed naphtha (petroleum), API 83-06, (CAS 6471-68-0) produced an equivocal response in the presence and absence of exogenous metabolic activation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.