Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 259-461-3 | CAS number: 55066-48-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
ORAL
Key study:-Freeman (1980a) Acute toxicity: oral (OECD 401): LD50 2500 mg/kg bw (1800-3500 mg/kg bw) in males, 1850 mg/kg bw (1190-2870 mg/kg bw) in females (selected as the key value) and 2300 mg/kg bw (1760-3010 mg/kg bw)
INHALATION
A data waiver was submitted to address acute toxicity via the inhalatory route. Based on the known properties of the substance, exposure via inhalation is not considered to be a likely route of exposure.
DERMAL
Key study:- Freeman (1980b) Acute toxicity: dermal (similar to OECD 402): LD50 > 5000 mg/kg bw (male rats), 3100 mg/kg bw (female rats)
Supporting study:- Driscoll (1999) Acute toxicity dermal (OECD 402): LD50 > 2000 mg/kg bw (male/female rats) (read-across)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1980-03-20 to 1980-04-05
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was performed in compliance with GLP to a standardised guideline with some limitations in the level of detail in the reporting of the materials and methods.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Federal Register, Volume 43, No. 247
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: TAcN(SD)fBR
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: Young adult
- Weight at study initiation: Within the range of 180-280 g
- Fasting period before study: Overnight
- Housing: Singly housed in wire cages
- Diet: Ad libitum
- Water : Ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 7 days
IN-LIFE DATES: 1980-03-20 to 1980-04-05 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: alcohol
- Details on oral exposure:
- VEHICLE
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 0.5 mL/100 g bw - Doses:
- Range Finding test: 1000 and 2500 mg/kg bw administered as 5 mL/kg
Main test: 1000, 1600, 2500, 3200 and 5000 mg/kg bw - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Range finding study: 2 groups of 2 male and 2 female rats
Main test: 5 groups of 8 males and 8 females - Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days in total.
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Animals were observed for toxic signs at 1, 3, 5 and 24 hours post dosing and twice daily (once daily on weekends) for the fourteen day observation period. Surviving animals were weighed at the end of the observation period.
- Necropsy: Animals that died and all animals that survived through the observation period underwent a gross necropsy. Survivors were killed at the end of the study using ether inhalation. - Statistics:
- Probit analysis was used to calculate the LD50, performed using the method of Litchfield JT Jr & Wilcoxon F (1949) A Simplified Method of Evaluating Dose-Effect Experiments; J. Pharm. Exp. Therap., 96:99-115.
- Preliminary study:
- At 2500 mg/kg 1/2 male and 0/2 female animals died within the 72 hour observation period. All animals from the 1000 mg/kg group survived. Other dilutions at 10 mL/kg were used however this resulted the death of all the animals.
- Sex:
- female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- 1 850 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- other: (1190-2870 mg/kg bw)
- Sex:
- male
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- 2 500 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- other: (1800-3500 mg/kg bw)
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- 2 300 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- other: (1760-3010 mg/kg bw)
- Mortality:
- Most deaths ath the lower dose levels occurred more than 24 hours after dosing. At higher doses most deaths occurred during the first night after dosing.
- Clinical signs:
- other: At 1000 mg/kg bw lethargy, ataxia or adoption of the prone position were observed in 35 % of males and in all the females; the signs were observed in the first twenty four hours and survivors had recovered by 48 hours after having been dosed. Similar sign
- Gross pathology:
- There were no signs indicative of toxicity in any of the animals necropsied at term. In animals that died prior to scheduled termination, the only effects noted with yellow fluid (most likely test substance) in the stomach and reddish fluid in the intestines.
- Interpretation of results:
- Toxicity Category IV
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- The acute oral median lethal doses (LD50) for test substance were 2500 mg/kg bw (1800-3500 mg/kg bw) in males and 1850 mg/kg bw (1190-2870 mg/kg bw) in females and 2300 mg/kg bw (1760-3010 mg/kg bw) combined.
- Executive summary:
The acute oral toxicity of the test substance was investigated in male and female albino rats in a GLP study conducted to OECD guideline 401. Rats were doses via gastric intubation at doses of 1000, 1600, 2500, 3200 and 5000 mg/kg bw prepared as 0.5 mL/100 g bw in alcohol. The animals were observed for 14 days for mortality and any pharmacotoxic signs. The acute oral median lethal doses (LD50) was determined to be 2500 mg/kg bw (1800-3500 mg/kg bw) in males and 1850 mg/kg bw (1190-2870 mg/kg bw) in females and 2300 mg/kg bw (1760-3010 mg/kg bw) combined.
Reference
Table 1: Body weight and doses administered- males
MALES |
||||||||||
1000 mg/kg bw |
Animal No. |
2176 |
2177 |
2178 |
2179 |
2180 |
2316 |
2314 |
2315 |
Mean |
Vol test mat. administered (mL) |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
0.98 |
0.96 |
1.00 |
1.10 |
1.10 |
||
Pre-fast body weight (g) |
235 |
232 |
233 |
218 |
250 |
228 |
255 |
257 |
238.5 |
|
Dosing body weight (g) |
207 |
207 |
207 |
195 |
192 |
203 |
223 |
225 |
207.4 |
|
Terminal body weight (g) |
298 |
303 |
280 |
278 |
250 |
321 |
324 |
329 |
297.9 |
|
Gain/Loss (g) |
+63 |
+71 |
+47 |
+60 |
0 |
+93 |
+69 |
+72 |
+59.4 |
|
1600 mg/kg bw |
Animal No. |
2181 |
2182 |
2183 |
2184 |
2185 |
2342 |
2343 |
2344 |
Mean |
Vol test mat. administered (mL) |
1.00 |
0.91 |
1.00 |
1.10 |
0.97 |
1.10 |
1.20 |
1.10 |
||
Pre-fast body weight (g) |
238 |
203 |
227 |
249 |
209 |
241 |
268 |
251 |
235.8 |
|
Dosing body weight (g) |
209 |
181 |
201 |
220 |
193 |
215 |
235 |
220 |
209.3 |
|
Terminal body weight (g) |
284 |
275 |
281 |
292 |
D |
295 |
D |
D |
285.4 |
|
Gain/Loss (g) |
+46 |
+72 |
+54 |
+43 |
- |
+54 |
- |
- |
+53.8 |
|
2500 mg/kg bw |
Animal No. |
2186 |
2187 |
2188 |
2189 |
2190 |
2345 |
2346 |
2347 |
Mean |
Vol test mat. administered (mL) |
1.10 |
1.20 |
1.20 |
1.10 |
1.00 |
1.10 |
1.00 |
1.20 |
||
Pre-fast body weight (g) |
248 |
263 |
252 |
247 |
227 |
253 |
231 |
270 |
248.8 |
|
Dosing body weight (g) |
222 |
232 |
234 |
228 |
202 |
217 |
200 |
236 |
221.4 |
|
Terminal body weight (g) |
298 |
D |
307 |
325 |
D |
324 |
D |
333 |
317.4 |
|
Gain/Loss (g) |
+50 |
- |
+45 |
+78 |
- |
+29 |
- |
+63 |
+53.0 |
|
3200 mg/kg bw |
Animal No. |
2191 |
2192 |
2193 |
2194 |
2195 |
2348 |
2349 |
2350 |
Mean |
Vol test mat. administered (mL) |
1.10 |
1.00 |
1.10 |
1.20 |
1.10 |
1.00 |
1.10 |
1.20 |
||
Pre-fast body weight (g) |
243 |
253 |
241 |
268 |
238 |
240 |
248 |
264 |
249.4 |
|
Dosing body weight (g) |
215 |
209 |
214 |
249 |
218 |
209 |
212 |
232 |
219.8 |
|
Terminal body weight (g) |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
- |
|
Gain/Loss (g) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
5000 mg/kg bw |
Animal No. |
2196 |
2197 |
2198 |
2199 |
2200 |
2351 |
2352 |
2353 |
Mean |
Vol test mat. administered (mL) |
1.20 |
1.10 |
1.20 |
1.10 |
1.10 |
1.10 |
1.10 |
1.00 |
||
Pre-fast body weight (g) |
255 |
243 |
249 |
237 |
236 |
258 |
233 |
238 |
243.6 |
|
Dosing body weight (g) |
230 |
217 |
229 |
208 |
212 |
224 |
202 |
204 |
215.8 |
|
Terminal body weight (g) |
298 |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
- |
|
Gain/Loss (g) |
+43 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Table 2: Body weight and doses administered- females
FEMALES |
||||||||||
1000 mg/kg bw |
Animal No. |
2376 |
2377 |
2378 |
2379 |
2380 |
2506 |
2507 |
2508 |
Mean |
Vol test mat. administered (mL) |
0.98 |
1.00 |
0.93 |
1.00 |
0.99 |
1.00 |
0.99 |
0.93 |
||
Pre-fast body weight (g) |
220 |
233 |
206 |
225 |
212 |
228 |
221 |
206 |
218.9 |
|
Dosing body weight (g) |
195 |
206 |
185 |
205 |
197 |
203 |
198 |
185 |
196.8 |
|
Terminal body weight (g) |
D |
281 |
235 |
D |
D |
237 |
266 |
D |
254.8 |
|
Gain/Loss (g) |
- |
+48 |
+29 |
- |
- |
+9 |
+45 |
- |
+32.8 |
|
1600 mg/kg bw |
Animal No. |
2381 |
2382 |
2383 |
2384 |
2385 |
2533 |
2534 |
2535 |
Mean |
Vol test mat. administered (mL) |
0.92 |
0.94 |
1.00 |
0.95 |
0.95 |
0.92 |
0.92 |
1.00 |
||
Pre-fast body weight (g) |
203 |
200 |
225 |
201 |
209 |
208 |
204 |
227 |
209.6 |
|
Dosing body weight (g) |
184 |
188 |
208 |
189 |
189 |
183 |
183 |
207 |
191.4 |
|
Terminal body weight (g) |
230 |
233 |
253 |
D |
238 |
D |
222 |
259 |
239.2 |
|
Gain/Loss (g) |
+27 |
+33 |
+28 |
- |
+27 |
- |
+18 |
+32 |
+27.5 |
|
2500 mg/kg bw |
Animal No. |
2386 |
2387 |
2388 |
2389 |
2390 |
2536 |
2537 |
2538 |
Mean |
Vol test mat. administered (mL) |
0.99 |
0.96 |
0.98 |
0.93 |
0.93 |
0.96 |
0.94 |
0.97 |
||
Pre-fast body weight (g) |
221 |
210 |
218 |
209 |
202 |
217 |
207 |
213 |
212.1 |
|
Dosing body weight (g) |
197 |
191 |
196 |
186 |
186 |
191 |
188 |
193 |
191.0 |
|
Terminal body weight (g) |
238 |
D |
232 |
D |
235 |
D |
D |
D |
235.0 |
|
Gain/Loss (g) |
+17 |
- |
+14 |
- |
+33 |
- |
- |
- |
+21.3 |
|
3200 mg/kg bw |
Animal No. |
2391 |
2392 |
2393 |
2394 |
2395 |
2539 |
2540 |
2541 |
Mean |
Vol test mat. administered (mL) |
0.99 |
0.98 |
1.00 |
0.97 |
0.96 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
0.99 |
||
Pre-fast body weight (g) |
216 |
217 |
221 |
208 |
212 |
223 |
233 |
224 |
219.3 |
|
Dosing body weight (g) |
198 |
196 |
202 |
193 |
191 |
200 |
208 |
198 |
198.3 |
|
Terminal body weight (g) |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
- |
|
Gain/Loss (g) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
5000 mg/kg bw |
Animal No. |
2396 |
2397 |
2398 |
2399 |
2400 |
2542 |
2543 |
2544 |
Mean |
Vol test mat. administered (mL) |
0.96 |
0.93 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
0.92 |
0.99 |
1.00 |
||
Pre-fast body weight (g) |
201 |
195 |
217 |
216 |
214 |
204 |
216 |
217 |
210.0 |
|
Dosing body weight (g) |
184 |
178 |
194 |
193 |
196 |
184 |
197 |
199 |
190.6 |
|
Terminal body weight (g) |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
- |
|
Gain/Loss (g) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Table 3: Summary of mortality by sex, day and dose level
Dose (mg/kg bw) |
Sex |
Day |
Total/sex |
Total |
||||||||||||||
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
||||
1000 |
Male (8) |
No mortality |
0 |
4/16 |
||||||||||||||
Female (8) |
0 |
1 |
3 |
No further mortality |
4 |
|||||||||||||
1600 |
Male (8) |
0 |
0 |
3 |
No further mortality |
3 |
5/16 |
|||||||||||
Female (8) |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
No further mortality |
2 |
|||||||||||
2500 |
Male (8) |
0 |
2 |
1 |
No further mortality |
3 |
8/16 |
|||||||||||
Female (8) |
0 |
2 |
3 |
No further mortality |
5 |
|||||||||||||
3200 |
Male (8) |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
No Survivors |
8 |
16/16 |
|||||||||
Female (8) |
1 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
No Survivors |
8 |
||||||||||||
5000 |
Male (8) |
0 |
3 |
4 |
No further mortality |
7 |
15/16 |
|||||||||||
Female (8) |
0 |
5 |
3 |
No Survivors |
8 |
|||||||||||||
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 1 850 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- Two studies available with a Klimisch score of 2. The quality of the database is therefore high.
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1980-04-05 to 1980-04-19
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- The study was performed in compliance with GLP, and to a method similar to the standardised guideline OECD 402. Some deficiencies were present in the of the study, such as no methods to prevent the animals from ingesting the test material, a massive sensitivity difference between sexes and a lack of vehicle controls.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (no prevention of the animals ingesting the test material)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Federal Register, Volume 43, No. 247
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: Young adult
- Weight at study initiation: Within the weight range of 180 to 280 grams
- Housing: Individually housed in wire cages
- Diet: Ad libitum
- Water: Ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 7 days
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 1980-04-05 To: 1980-04-19 - Type of coverage:
- open
- Vehicle:
- other: alcohol
- Details on dermal exposure:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: The back, from the scapular region to the hips
- % coverage: Less than 30%
- Type of wrap if used: The site was left open to the air
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: Any excess material was removed by wiping with a clean cloth
- Time after start of exposure: 24 hours post dosing.
VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 mL/100 g bw - Duration of exposure:
- 24 hours
- Doses:
- 2000, 2500, 3100, 4000 and 5000 mg/kg bw
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 8 males and 8 females per dose
- Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Animals were observed for mortality and pharmacotoxic signs at 1, 3, 5 and 24 hours following dosing and twice daily (once daily on weekends) for the remainder of the 14 day observation period. Surviving animals were weighed at the end of the observation period. All animals were weighed prior to dosing.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: All the animals underwent a gross necropsy at the end of the experiment. the animals were killed using ether inhalation. - Statistics:
- Probit analysis was performed using the method of Litchfield JT Jr & Wilcoxon F (1949) A Simplified Method of Evaluating Dose-Effect Experiments; J. Pharm. Exp. Therap., 96:99-115.
- Preliminary study:
- Two rats of either sex were used. Each animal received a single dose of the test article, and was observed for the next 72 hours to determine the mortality only. The doses administered were 2400 and 5000 mg/kg bw. No animals died during the 72 hour observation period following dosing at 2500 mg/kg bw. All four rats died within 24 hours after being dosed at 5000 mg/kg bw.
- Sex:
- male
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 5 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- 3 100 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Mortality:
- Mortality was low in the male groups with only one of eight rats dead at 3100 and 5000 mg/kg bw. The females exhibited lethality as follows: 1/8 at 2500 mg/kg bw; 4/8 at 3100 mg/kg bw; 5/8 at 4000 mg/kg bw and 8/8 at 5000 mg/kg bw.
- Clinical signs:
- other: Clinical signs were first noted at 2500 mg/kg bw in the female rats and 3100 mg/kg bw in the male rats. The signs were of lethargy, ataxia, tremors and soft faeces; one female died on Day 3. At higher doses, the clinical signs included ataxia, lethargy, h
- Gross pathology:
- At necropsy, none of the animals that survived to term had any specific signs indicative of systemic toxicity. The predominant signs in animals that died during the study were hematuria in females at 5000 mg/kg bw and a change to greater fluidity in the consistency of the intestinal contents.
- Interpretation of results:
- not classified
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the test, the dermal LD50 in albino (Sprague Dawley CD) rats was determined to be greater than 5000 mg/kg bw for males and equal to 3100 (2900 - 3320) mg/kg bw for females.
- Executive summary:
Eighty male and female albino rats (8 males and 8 females per group) were dosed dermally with the test material at concentrations of 2000, 2500, 3100, 4000 and 5000 mg/kg bw prepared in alcohol. The test site was left uncovered, after 24 hours excess material was wiped off and the animals were observed for 14 days for mortality and signs of pharmacotoxicity. The acute dermal LD50 was determined to be > 5000 mg/kg bw in males and 3100 (2900-3200 mg/kg bw) in females.
Reference
Table 1: Body weights and doses administered
MALES |
||||||||||
2000 mg/kg bw | Animal No. | 2705 | 2706 | 2707 | 2708 | 2709 | 2710 | 2711 | 2712 | Mean |
Vol test material administered (mL) | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | ||
Pre-dose body weight (g) | 225 | 222 | 262 | 236 | 218 | 215 | 220 | 218 | 227.0 | |
Terminal body weight (g) | 314 | 309 | 349 | 316 | 316 | 330 | 344 | 303 | 322.6 | |
Gain/Loss (g) | +89 | +87 | +87 | +80 | +98 | +115 | +124 | +85 | +95.6 | |
2500 mg/kg bw | Animal No. | 2713 | 2714 | 2715 | 2716 | 2717 | 2718 | 2719 | 2720 | Mean |
Vol test material administered (mL) | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | ||
Pre-dose body weight (g) | 262 | 228 | 226 | 234 | 256 | 251 | 240 | 246 | 242.9 | |
Terminal body weight (g) | 350 | 308 | 319 | 310 | 353 | 308 | 320 | 327 | 324.4 | |
Gain/Loss (g) | +88 | +80 | +93 | +76 | +97 | +57 | +80 | +81 | +81.5 | |
3100 mg/kg bw | Animal No. | 2721 | 2722 | 2724 | 2725 | 2726 | 2728 | 2729 | 2730 | Mean |
Vol test material administered (mL) | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | ||
Pre-dose body weight (g) | 253 | 258 | 238 | 241 | 246 | 258 | 250 | 239 | 247.9 | |
Terminal body weight (g) | 330 | 306 | D | 324 | 306 | 355 | 360 | 338 | 331.3 | |
Gain/Loss (g) | +77 | +48 | - | +83 | +60 | +97 | +110 | +99 | +82.0 | |
4000 mg/kg bw | Animal No. | 2679 | 2680 | 2681 | 2682 | 2683 | 2684 | 2685 | 2686 | Mean |
Vol test material administered (mL) | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | ||
Pre-dose body weight (g) | 215 | 216 | 244 | 227 | 232 | 212 | 230 | 252 | 228.5 | |
Terminal body weight (g) | 301 | 306 | 312 | 290 | 319 | 291 | 293 | 317 | 303.6 | |
Gain/Loss (g) | +86 | +90 | +68 | +63 | +87 | +79 | +63 | +65 | +75.1 | |
5000 mg/kg bw | Animal No. | 2687 | 2688 | 2689 | 2690 | 2691 | 2692 | 2693 | 2694 | Mean |
Vol test material administered (mL) | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | ||
Pre-dose body weight (g) | 216 | 226 | 222 | 220 | 238 | 254 | 240 | 234 | 231.3 | |
Terminal body weight (g) | 284 | 275 | D | 318 | 308 | 280 | 300 | 301 | 295.1 | |
Gain/Loss (g) | +68 | +49 | - | +98 | +70 | +26 | +60 | +67 | +62.6 | |
FEMALES |
||||||||||
2000 mg/kg bw | Animal No. | 2862 | 2863 | 2864 | 2865 | 2866 | 2867 | 2868 | 2869 | Mean |
Vol test material administered (mL) | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.0 | ||
Pre-dose body weight (g) | 249 | 227 | 232 | 260 | 240 | 250 | 215 | 208 | 235.1 | |
Terminal body weight (g) | 259 | 211 | 230 | 253 | 261 | 271 | 234 | 228 | 243.4 | |
Gain/Loss (g) | +10 | -16 | -2 | -7 | +21 | +21 | +19 | +20 | +8.3 | |
2500 mg/kg bw | Animal No. | 2870 | 2871 | 2872 | 2873 | 2874 | 2875 | 2876 | 2877 | Mean |
Vol test material administered (mL) | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | ||
Pre-dose body weight (g) | 224 | 238 | 250 | 247 | 200 | 239 | 223 | 230 | 231.4 | |
Terminal body weight (g) | 247 | 242 | D | 282 | 212 | 246 | 226 | 239 | 242.0 | |
Gain/Loss (g) | +23 | +4 | - | +35 | +12 | +7 | +3 | +9 | +13.3 | |
3100 mg/kg bw | Animal No. | 2878 | 2879 | 2880 | 2881 | 2882 | 2883 | 2884 | 2885 | Mean |
Vol test material administered (mL) | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | ||
Pre-dose body weight (g) | 223 | 204 | 226 | 238 | 254 | 226 | 225 | 220 | 227.0 | |
Terminal body weight (g) | D | D | D | 261 | 263 | D | 239 | 222 | 246.3 | |
Gain/Loss (g) | - | - | - | +23 | +9 | - | +14 | +2 | +12.0 | |
4000 mg/kg bw | Animal No. | 2854 | 2855 | 2856 | 2857 | 2858 | 2859 | 2860 | 2861 | Mean |
Vol test material administered (mL) | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | ||
Pre-dose body weight (g) | 236 | 232 | 238 | 230 | 228 | 228 | 225 | 247 | 233.0 | |
Terminal body weight (g) | 255 | 247 | D | 225 | D | D | D | D | 242.3 | |
Gain/Loss (g) | +19 | +15 | - | -5 | - | - | - | - | +9.7 | |
5000 mg/kg bw | Animal No. | 2786 | 2787 | 2788 | 2789 | 2790 | 2791 | 2792 | 2793 | Mean |
Vol test material administered (mL) | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | ||
Pre-dose body weight (g) | 221 | 248 | 215 | 248 | 218 | 248 | 230 | 247 | 234.4 | |
Terminal body weight (g) | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | - | |
Gain/Loss (g) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Table 2: Mortality
Dose (mg/kg bw) | Male | % | Female | % |
2000 | 0/8 | 0 | 0/8 | 0 |
2500 | 0/8 | 0 | 1/8 | 12.5 |
3100 | 1/8 | 12.5 | 4/8 | 50.0 |
4000 | 0/8 | 0 | 5/8 | 62.5 |
5000 | 1/8 | 12.5 | 8/8 | 100.0 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 3 100 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- Two studies available with a Klimisch score of 2 (one study based on read-across). The quality of the database is therefore high.
Additional information
In line with Column 2, point 8.5.2, Annex VIII of Regulation 1907/2006, an acute inhalation study does not need to be performed as the substance has a low vapour pressure and the use of this substance will not result in aerosols, particles or droplets of an inhalable size, so exposure to humans via the inhalatory route will be unlikely to occur. The acute toxicity endpoint has been addressed by assessing the toxicity via the oral and dermal routes, which is more appropriate when considering the properties of this substance.
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – oral endpoint
The key study for acute oral toxicity (Freeman, 1980a) was determined in a GLP compliant study performed in accordance with the standardised guideline OECD 401 with a sufficient level of detail to assess the quality of the presented data. The study was performed to a good standard however some limitations were present in the level of detail in the reporting of the methods and so was assigned a reliability score of 2, in accordance with Klimisch (1997) and considered suitable to fulfil the data requirement. The acute oral LD50 of the test substance was determined to be 1850 mg/kg bw (based on the female results).
The supporting study for acute oral toxicity (Anon., 1980) was performed in accordance with the standardised guideline OECD 401 with a sufficient level of detail to assess the quality of the presented data. The study was reported to a good standard and reported to an acceptable standard, although it lacks detail in certain areas, and so was assigned a reliability score of 2, in accordance with Klimisch (1997). The results of the study supported the LD50 of 2300 mg/kg bw from the key study.
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – inhalation endpoint
Data waiver has been submitted to address acute toxicity via the inhalation route.
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – dermal endpoint
The key study for acute dermal toxicity, Freeman (1980b), was determined in a GLP compliant study performed to a method similar to standardised guideline OECD 402. The study was performed to a good standard in line with good scientific principles however some limitations were present in the methods and the level of detail in the reporting and so was assigned a reliability score of 2, in accordance with Klimisch (1997), and considered suitable to fulfil the data requirement. The acute dermal LD50 of the test substance was determined to be 3100 mg/kg bw (based on the female results).
The supporting study for acute dermal toxicity (Driscoll, 1999) was a GLP compliant study performed in accordance with the standardised guideline OECD 402. The study was performed to a good standard and was assigned a reliability score of 2, in accordance with Klimisch (1997), as the study was performed on a structurally similar substance to 3-methyl-5-phenylpentanol and has been submitted on the basis of read-across. The test substance is considered sufficiently similar to be representative of the effects of 3-methyl-5-phenylpentanol. Under the conditions of the test, the acute dermal LD50 of the test substance was determined to be >2000 mg/kg bw.
Justification for classification or non-classification
According to Regulation EC 1272/2008 and Directive 67/548/EEC, the substance meets the criteria for classification as Acute toxicity category 4 (H302: Harmful if swallowed) and Harmful (R22: Harmful if swallowed), respectively.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.