Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 429-270-1 | CAS number: 136210-30-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
- Report date:
- 2013
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- (2001)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.31 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.3700 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Japanese MAFF guidelines: Guideline on the Compiling of Test Results on Toxicity “Teratology Study”, 12-Nousan No. 8147 of November 24, 2000, amended June 26, 2001
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 136210-32-7
- EC Number:
- 603-947-3
- Cas Number:
- 136210-32-7
- IUPAC Name:
- 136210-32-7
- Reference substance name:
- Bis(4-(1,2-bis(ethoxycarbonyl)ethylamino)-3-methylcyclohexyl)methane
- EC Number:
- 412-060-9
- EC Name:
- Bis(4-(1,2-bis(ethoxycarbonyl)ethylamino)-3-methylcyclohexyl)methane
- Cas Number:
- 136210-32-7
- Molecular formula:
- C31H54N2O8
- IUPAC Name:
- bis(4-(1,2-bis(ethoxycarbonyl)ethylamino)-3-methylcyclohexyl)methane
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Nederlands, 5960 AD Horst, The Netherlands
- Age at study initiation: 12 - 19 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: males 397 - 586 g, females 225 - 276 g
- Housing: Starting from gestation day 0 individually in Type IIIh Makrolon cages on low-dust wood shavings.
- Diet and water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 7 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 2°C
- Humidity (%): approximately 55 %
- Air changes (per hr): > 10 per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Type of inhalation exposure (if applicable):
- other: not applicable
- Vehicle:
- polyethylene glycol
- Details on exposure:
- Administration volume: 5 mL/kg bw
VEHICLE
Polyethylene glycol 400
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): The vehicle was suitable as analytical investigations revealed that the test substance was stable in the vehicle for at least 8 days. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The results of the homogeneity tests and content checks in samples with concentrations of 20, 60 (content checks, only), and 200 mg/mL during the study showed no meaningful deviation of the active ingredient content from the nominal value, except for the 20 mg/kg sample of August 23, 2011, which was therefore not used for administration.
- Details on mating procedure:
- The animals were mated by placing one female overnight into a Type IIIh cage together with one male rat. If sperm was detected in the vaginal smear taken on the morning following mating, this day was regarded as day 0 of gestation.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Day 6 - 20 p. c.
- Frequency of treatment:
- once daily (between 06:00 and 12:00 CET)
- Duration of test:
- From experimental starting to end of in-life-Phase 22 days.
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw
Basis:
actual ingested
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 25 female rats
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: The dose levels were selected based on the results of a previous pilot prenatal developmental toxicity study in rats with the test substance (T2081689).
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- CLINICAL EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: The females were inspected once daily from day 0 to 21 p.c. (once daily only on weekends, on public holidays, and on day 21 p.c.), and all findings were recorded. Attention was paid to disturbances in the general condition of the rats (appearance, behavior), and any alterations concerning their excretory products.
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: The body weights of the females were determined on day 0 p.c. and daily from days 6 to 21 p.c. Corrected body weight gain was determined by subtracting the uterus weight on day 21 p.c. from the body weight gain from days 0 to 21 p.c.
FOOD AND WATER CONSUMPTION: Yes
- The food intake of the animals was determined from the difference in weight between the food offered and the food not consumed for the following days of gestation: Days 0 - 3, 3 - 6, 6 - 9, 9 - 12, 12 - 15, 15 - 18, and 18 -21.
Water intake was assessed daily by visual estimation of the quantities left over and reported together with clinical findings.
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- The females were subjected to gross pathological evaluation at cesarean section on day 21 p.c. Necropsy was performed without knowledge of treatment groups. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Necropsies/cesarean sections were performed on day 21 p.c. without knowledge of treatment groups.
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes
- Number of dead and live fetuses: Yes
- Other: individual weight and appearance of the placentas - Fetal examinations:
- - Sex of live fetuses
- Individual weights of live fetuses
- External examinations: Yes, findings in alive and dead fetuses are included
- Soft tissue and head examinations: Yes, evaluation of about half of alive fetuses per litter
- Skeletal and cartilage abnormalities: Yes, evaluation in about half of alive fetuses per litter - Statistics:
- Differences between the control and test item treated groups were considered to be significant when p < 0.05. Significant differences from the control group are indicated with * for p < 0.05 and ** for p < 0.01.
Statistical evaluation was performed on an Alpha 800 5/500 computer using the following methods:
- Analysis of Variance (ANOVA); in case of significance Dunnett's test for feed intakes, body weights, body weight gains, and corrected body weight gains, uterine weights, number of corpora lutea per female, number of implantations per female, number of live fetuses per female and as percentage of implantations per female, placental weights per female, fetal weights per female.
- 2 by N CHI2 test; in case of significant differences Fisher's exact test with Bonferroni correction for fertility rate, gestation rate, number of implantations per group, number of preimplantation losses per group, number of postimplantation losses, early resorptions, late resorptions or dead fetuses per group, number of live fetuses per group as percentage of implantations per group, number of male or female fetuses or fetuses with indeterminable sex per group, number of placentas with findings or litters with placental findings per group, number of fetuses or litters with external, visceral or skeletal findings, with malformations or with external or visceral deviations per group.
- Kruskal-Wallis test and in case of significant differences Dunn's test for number of preimplantation losses per female, number of postimplantation losses, early resorptions, late resorptions or dead fetuses per female, number of male or female fetuses or fetuses with indeterminable sex per female, number of placentas with findings per female, number of fetuses with external or visceral findings, with malformations or with external or visceral deviations per female.
- CHI2 test (correction according to yates) for number of fetuses or litters with cartilaginous tissue observations. - Indices:
- gestation rate
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:no effects
Details on maternal toxic effects:
Salivation after administration occurred in all dose groups, which is most likely related to the bad taste of the test item and considered as not adverse. One female of the 100 mg/kg group revealed piloerection for a single day, for which a treatment related effect is excluded due to a lacking dose dependency and because of the single occurrence.
Thus, appearance, behavior, mortality, absolute and corrected body weight gains, food intake, water intake, and fecal and urinary excretions were unaffected at dose levels up to 1000 mg/kg.
No treatment related gross pathological findings occurred at dose levels up to 1000 mg/kg.
Fertility rate (percentage of inseminated females with implantations), the mean numbers of corpora lutea, preimplantation losses, and implantation sites in the dose groups did not differ to a meaningful extent from the control group values indicating a homogeneous distribution regarding these parameters.
Effect levels (maternal animals)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Basis for effect level:
- other: developmental toxicity
Results (fetuses)
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
The gestation rate, appearance and weights of placentas, postimplantation loss and correspondingly the number of fetuses, fetal sex distribution, and fetal weights were unaffected by treatment at dose levels up to 1000 mg/kg.
A treatment related effect on malformations, external, visceral, and skeletal (including cartilage) deviations was not evident at dose levels up to 1000 mg/kg.
The overall incidences of fetuses or litters with malformations lay within the range of historical control data, revealed no statistical significance, and were thus unaffected by treatment at dose levels up to 1000 mg/kg. The types of malformations observed in this study are generally a representative sample of spontaneous malformations in the rat strain used (e.g. microphthalmia, dilation of lateral brain ventricles missing thyroid gland, ventricular septal defect of the heart, vertebral malformations with pelvis shift, malformation of ribs, supernumerary vertebrae) and comparable with spontaneous findings in the current control group and/or historical control groups. Malformations of the eyes (eye ball reduced in size) occurred in all dose groups and the control group in comparable incidences of affected fetuses and litters without a dose dependency and were thus unaffected by treatment at dose levels up to 1000 mg/kg. At the 1000 mg/kg level, one fetus revealed a hairline ventricular septal defect of the heart, for which a treatment related effect is not assumed due to its single occurrence, and since this finding lay well within the range of historical control data of the rat strain used. Furthermore, each one fetus of the 1000 mg/kg and 300 mg/kg groups showed a multiple malformation of cervical vertebrae with/without fusion of ribs, which is comparable with spontaneous findings in the rat strain used. Therefore, a treatment related effect is not assumed for these findings. All remaining findings were isolated findings, revealed no dose dependency and were thus also considered as incidental. Thus, a treatment related effect on malformations (incidence or type) was not evident at dose levels up to 1000 mg/kg.
The overall incidences of fetuses or litters with external and visceral deviations were unaffected at dose levels up to 1000 mg/kg and revealed the highest value on a fetal basis in the control group. The external and visceral deviations observed in this study were of a common type and comparable with spontaneous findings in the current control group and/or historical control groups and represented the normal range of scattering in the rat strain used. Histopathological evaluation of additional circumscribed hard whitish tissue in the nasopharynx was performed in a prenatal developmental toxicity study with the same rat strain (T0076746) and revealed calcium concrements without connection to the underlying tissue in the affected localizations. Calcium might have been dissolved from the fetal bones by the Wilson fixative and precipitated in the nasopharyngeal duct so that these findings were regarded as artifacts. Thus, a treatment related effect on external and visceral deviations was not evident at dose levels up to 1000 mg/kg.
At the 1000 mg/kg level, fetal examinations for skeletal retardations and variations revealed statistically significantly progressed ossification of a few localizations (1st, 4th-5th distal phalanges of toes left, 2nd-3rd 3rd distal phalanges of toes bilateral), when calculation was done on a fetal basis and partially also on a litter basis, for which a treatment related effect is not assumed, since this is caused by the incidentally higher incidence of retarded ossification in the current control group. At the 300 mg/kg level, fetal examinations for skeletal retardations and variations revealed statistically significantly progressed ossification of several localizations ((2nd, 4th-5th proximal phalanges of digits bilateral, 3rd proximal phalanges of digits left, 4thdistal phalanges of toes left, 4th proximal phalanges of toes left), when calculation was done on a fetal basis, for which a treatment related effect is not assumed, since this is caused by the incidentally higher incidence of retarded ossification in the current control group. At the 100 mg/kg level, fetal examinations for skeletal retardations and variations revealed statistically significantly progressed ossification of two localizations (1st distal phalanges of toes left, 7th caudal vertebral bodies, parietal bones bilateral), when calculation was done on a fetal basis and litter basis (1st distal phalanges of toes, only), for which a treatment related effect is not assumed, since this is caused by the incidentally higher incidence of retarded ossification in the current control group, and because a dose dependency was lacking. Evaluation of fetal cartilaginous tissue revealed no treatment related findings at dose levels up to 1000 mg/kg. Thus, a treatment related effect on skeletal deviations (retardations, variations, including cartilaginous tissue findings) was not evident at dose levels up to 1000 mg/kg.
Fetal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
Study was performed with Aspartic acid, N,N'-[methylenebis(2-methyl-4,1-cyclohexanediyl)]bis-, 1,1',4,4'-tetraethyl ester which is a structural analogue to Aspartic acid, N,N'-(methylenedi-4,1-cyclohexanediyl)bis-, 1,1',4,4'-tetraethyl ester. Both substances are diethyl esters of aspartic acid linked to a dicyclohexylmethyldiamine moiety. The difference between these two substances is merely the presence of two methyl groups connected to the cyclohexane rings. This structural analogy was confirmed by the responsible for the notification of both substances under the NONS regulation. They decided that test results obtained for one substance can be transferred to the other substance and that testing of both substances is usually not required. This decision is in accordance with the grouping of substances and read-across approach in Annex XI, 1.5 of the REACH Regulation.
Study key results in tabular form:
General Reproduction Data:
Dose (mg/kg b.w./day) |
0 |
100 |
300 |
1000 |
inseminated females |
25 |
25 |
25 |
25 |
inseminated females evaluated |
25 |
25 |
25 |
25 |
females with implantations |
23 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
in % of those inseminated |
92.0 |
88.0 |
88.0 |
88.0 |
mean values per female with implantation sites |
||||
corpora lutea |
14.4 |
15.0 |
15.8 |
14.5 |
preimplantation loss |
0.9 |
0.9 |
2.0 |
1.1 |
implantations |
13.5 |
14.2 |
13.8 |
13.4 |
A treatment related effect for the slightly increased preimplantation loss at the 300 mg/kg level is not assumed due to a lacking dose dependency, and because this value lay within the range of historical control data of the rat strain used.
Gestation Rate:
Dose |
Females with |
||
|
viable fetuses on day 21 p.c. |
total resorption |
|
mg/kg b.w./day |
n |
in % of females with implantations |
n |
0 |
23 |
100.0 |
0 |
100 |
22 |
100.0 |
0 |
300 |
22 |
100.0 |
0 |
1000 |
22 |
100.0 |
0 |
Mean Values of the Prameters of Intrauterine Development:
Dose (mg/kg b.w./day) |
0 |
100 |
300 |
1000 |
number of females |
||||
with implantations (a) |
23 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
with viable fetuses (b) |
23 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
mean values per female |
||||
placental weight in gb |
0.60 |
0.58 |
0.61 |
0.62 |
number of fetusesb |
12.6 |
13.1 |
13.2 |
12.9 |
postimplantation lossa, b |
1.0, 1.0 |
1.1, 1.1 |
0.6, 0.6 |
0.5, 0.5 |
males in %b |
49.9 |
46.9 |
53.8 |
44.4 |
fetal weight in gb |
4.92 |
4.94 |
4.90 |
4.90 |
Fetal Malformations:
Malformation |
Dose (mg/kg b.w./day) |
|||
|
0 |
100 |
300 |
1000 |
eyeball reduced in size right |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
dilation of lateral brain ventricles bilateral |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
thyroid gland missing |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
hairline ventricular septal defect of the heart |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
multiple malformation of thoracic vertebrae and ribs |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
multiple malformation of cervical vertebrae with/without fusion of ribs |
- |
- |
1 |
1 |
head of 1strib missing right |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
1stsacral vertebral arch has the shape of a lumbar vertebral arch right, pelvis shift to caudal right |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
one supernumerary lumbar vertebra |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
number of fetuses per group |
289 |
288 |
290 |
283 |
number of fetuses with malformations |
2 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
malformed fetuses per group (%) |
0.7 |
0.7 |
1.4 |
0.7 |
number of litters per group |
23 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
number of litters with malformations |
2 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
malformed litters per group (%) |
8.7 |
9.1 |
13.6 |
9.1 |
() number of litters affected |
Fetal External and Visceral Deviations:
Deviation |
Dose (mg/kg b.w./day) |
|||
|
0 |
100 |
300 |
1000 |
circumscribed hard whitish area at nasal cavities |
3 (3) |
2 (1) |
2 (2) |
- |
slight dilation of lateral brain ventricle(s) |
- |
- |
2 (2) |
- |
thyroid gland reduced in size |
1 |
1 |
1 |
- |
thymus extended cranially |
10 (8) |
9 (6) |
9 (7) |
7 (6) |
thoracic cavity filled with brown mass |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
abdominal cavity filled with brown mass |
9 (8) |
7 (5) |
5 (4) |
4 (3) |
brown spot(s) in the liver |
12 (8) |
6 (6) |
12 (9) |
4 (4) |
slight dilation of renal pelvis |
4 (4) |
5 (5) |
2 (1) |
5 (5) |
dilation of renal pelvis |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
slight dilation of ureter |
- |
3 (3) |
2 (1) |
1 |
dilation of ureter |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
testi(e)s lying on bladder |
4 (4) |
3 (3) |
3 (2) |
3 (2) |
testi(e)s lying slightly more cranially |
3 (3) |
1 |
6 (6) |
5 (5) |
brown spot(s) at the throat under the skin |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
number of fetuses per group |
289 |
288 |
290 |
283 |
number of fetuses with deviations |
36 |
28 |
35 |
27 |
fetuses with deviat. per group (%) |
12.5 |
9.7 |
12.1 |
9.5 |
number of litters per group |
23 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
number of litters with deviations |
15 |
16 |
19 |
13 |
litters with deviat. per group (%) |
65.2 |
72.7 |
86.4 |
59.1 |
() number of litters affected |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Executive summary:
A developmental toxicity study according to OECD TG 414 was performed with the structural analogue Aspartic acid, N,N'-[methylenebis(2 -methyl-4,1 -cyclohexanediyl)]bis-,1,1',4,4'-tetraethyl ester. Twenty-five inseminated female Wistar rats were treated daily orally by gavage with doses of 0 (vehicle control), 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw from day 6 to day 20 p.c. The fetuses were delivered by cesarean section on day 21 of gestation. Investigation was performed on general tolerance of the test substance by the females as well as on its effect on intrauterine development.
Appearance, behavior, mortality, absolute and corrected body weight gains, food intake, water intake, and fecal and urinary excretions were unaffected at dose levels up to 1000 mg/kg bw.
No treatment related gross pathological findings occurred at dose levels up to 1000 mg/kg.
The gestation rate, appearance and weights of placentas, postimplantation loss and correspondingly the number of fetuses, fetal sex distribution, and fetal weights were unaffected by treatment at dose levels up to 1000 mg/kg.
A treatment related effect on malformations, external, visceral, and skeletal (including cartilage) deviations was not evident at dose levels up to 1000 mg/kg.
Summarizing and evaluating all data investigated the NOAELs were determined to be 1000 mg/kg bw for maternal toxicity and 1000 mg/kg bw for developmental toxicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.