Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
3 Jul - 31 Jul 1987
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
(No reliability check included.)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1987

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
no reliability check included
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
A non-LLNA test is available that was performed prior to the current data requirements, stipulated in Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. In accordance with the same Regulation, the data was included to avoid unnecessary testing.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Sodium N-lauroylsarcosinate
EC Number:
205-281-5
EC Name:
Sodium N-lauroylsarcosinate
Cas Number:
137-16-6
Molecular formula:
C15H29NO3.Na
IUPAC Name:
sodium [dodecanoyl(methyl)amino]acetate
Test material form:
other: aqueous solution

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Supplied by David Hall Limited
- Age at study initiation: young adult (less than one year old)
- Weight at study initiation: 358-461 g
- Housing: The test comprised of 20 test group and 20 control group guinea pigs housed 5 to a cage and 6 dose ranging guinea pigs housed in a ninth cage. Each aluminium cage had a grid floor beneath which was a peat moss filled tray.
- Diet: The animals were fed on Special Diet Services FD1 guinea pig diet, supplemented with hay, ad libitum.
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 9 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19-21
- Humidity (%): 58
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal and epicutaneous
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
Main test:
Induction:
Intradermal: 0.05% (v/v)
Epicutaneous: 5 % (v/v)

Challenge:
5 % (v/v)
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
Main test:
Induction:
Intradermal: 0.05% (v/v)
Epicutaneous: 5 % (v/v)

Challenge:
5 % (v/v)
No. of animals per dose:
20 (control and test groups)
2 (preliminary test)
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TEST
A preliminary range finding test was carried out to assess suitable concentrations for injection and topical application on 4 previously untreated guinea pigs. Injections were in the shaved scapular region and topical application was on the shaved flanks. Two guinea pigs were subjected to intradermal injections and a further 2 guinea pigs were exposed to topical application of the test substance for 48 h at various concentrations.
Injections - 10%, 5%, 2% and 1% (v/v) in distilled water
Topical application - 10%, 5%, 2% and 1% (v/v) in distilled water
Injection responses were assessed 24, 48 and 72 h after injection. Responses to the topical application were assessed 24, 8 and 72 h after patch removal. Before challenging the test animals, a maximum non-irritant concentration of the test material was determined in a preliminary experiment on 2 dose ranging guinea pigs. The animals were pretreated at the induction phase with Freund's Complete Adjuvant only.
The test material was applied to the shaved flanks of the guinea pigs for 24 h at concentrations of 10%, 5%, 2% and 1% v/v (A.I) in distilled water under the same system used for the topical induction except that the patches were left in position for 24 h.

MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: Example: 2 (intradermal and epicutaneous, respectively)
- Exposure period: Example: single injection (intradermal) and 48 h (epicutaneous)
- Test groups:
Intradermal (3 pairs of injections):
Injection 1: 0.10 mL Freund's Complete Adjuvant
Injection 2: 0.10 mL test material
Injection 3: test substance 0.05% (v/v) in a 1:1 mixture (v/v) FCA/water
- Epicutaneous: test substance in water. Six days after the injection phase, the injection site of each of the test and control group animals was shaved again and then wetted with 10% aqueous SLS to provoke a mild inflammatory response to enhance the possibility of sensitisation.

- Control group:
Intradermal (3 pairs of injections):
Injection 1: 0.10 mL Freund's Complete Adjuvant
Injection 2: 0.10 mL water
Injection 3: a 1:1 mixture (v/v) FCA/water
- Epicutaneous: test substance in water. Six days after the injection phase, the injection site of each of the test and control group animals was shaved again and then wetted with 10% aqueous SLS to provoke a mild inflammatory response to enhance the possibility of sensitisation.

- Site: 4 x 6 cm across the scapular region
- Frequency of applications: 7 days
- Duration: Days 0-8
- Concentrations:: intradermal 0.05%, epicutaneous 5%.

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: 20 (challenge)
- Exposure period: 24 h
- Test groups: test substance and vehicle
- Control group: test substance and vehicle
- Site: Example: right flank (test substance) and left flank (vehicle)
- Concentrations: 5%
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 48 and 72 h

Positive control substance(s):
no

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
Induction 0.05 and 5%, Challenge: 5%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: Induction 0.05 and 5%, Challenge: 5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
Challenge: 5%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: Challenge: 5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
Induction 0.05 and 5%, Challenge: 5%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: Induction 0.05 and 5%, Challenge: 5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
Challenge: 5%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: Challenge: 5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.

Any other information on results incl. tables

PRELIMINARY STUDY

Dose Ranging for Induction:

Severe irritation was noted at sites injected at concentrations of 10%, 5%, 2% and 1% (v/v) in distilled water. A concentration of 0.05% (v/v) in distilled water was selected for injection at induction.

Slight-moderate irritation was noted after 48 h topical exposure under occlusion at a concentration of 10% (v/v) in distilled water. No irritation was observed at 5 % (v/v) after 24 h. Therefore, a concentration of 5% (v/v) in distilled water was selected for topical application at induction.

Dose Ranging for Challenge:

Slight irritation was noted a concentration of 10% (v/v) in distilled water. A concentration of 5% (v/v) in distilled water was selected for challenge.

MAIN STUDY

Induction:

Moderate erythema was noted in test group animals and slight erythema was noted in control group animals.

Challenge:

No reactions were noted in test and control animals after challenge.

Body Weight:

Bodyweights were recorded at test commencement and on test completion. Body weight gains were within acceptable range.

Clinical Signs:

No clinical signs, except skin reactions induced by treatment, were noted at any time point during the study.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: CLP/EU GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation(EC) No. 1272/2008
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified