Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 247-852-1 | CAS number: 26628-22-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Immunotoxicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- immunotoxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- In vivo and in vitro effects of sodium azide on mouse complement
- Author:
- Johnson K.W. et al.
- Year:
- 1 984
- Bibliographic source:
- PMID: 6719470, Tox. Appl. Pharmacol. 73:559-63.
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Principle of test:
A microtiter hemolytic assay was utilized to determine sodium azide (NaN3) modulation of B6C3Fl and C3H mouse serum complement levels in vivo.
- Short description of test conditions: In three in vivo experiments, female B6C3Fl mice were exposed to NaN3 and physiological saline (vehicle control). Complement hemolytic ability was evaluated after a 1-day, single intravenous (iv) injection of 0.2, 2.0, and 20.0 mg/kg NaN3; at days 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 of a 6 day time course study after intraperitoneal (ip) administration of 20 mg/kg NaN3; and at the end of an 11-day study involving daily injections of 10, 15, and 20 mg/kg NaN3 administered via ip. - GLP compliance:
- no
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Sodium azide
- EC Number:
- 247-852-1
- EC Name:
- Sodium azide
- Cas Number:
- 26628-22-8
- Molecular formula:
- N3Na
- IUPAC Name:
- sodium azide
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Sodium azide, NaN3
- Substance type: no data
- Physical state: no data
- Analytical purity: no data
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): no data
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: no data
- Isomers composition: no data
- Purity test date: no data
- Lot/batch No.: no data
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: no data
- Stability under test conditions: no data
- Storage condition of test material: no data
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- B6C3F1
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Litton (Frederick, MD, US)
- Age at study initiation: 5-6 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 17-20 grams
- Fasting period before study: no data
- Housing: no data
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 1 week quarantine
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- other: 1- and 6-day study: intravenous; 11-day study: intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- physiological saline
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: Sodium azide was prepared weekly in physiol. saline (0.15 M NaCl).
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- no
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 1-day, single injection
single injection with 6-day follow up
11-day, daily injections
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0.2 other: mg/kg bw
- Remarks:
- 1-day study
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 other: mg/kg bw
- Remarks:
- 1-day study
- Dose / conc.:
- 10 other: mg/kg bw
- Remarks:
- 11-day study
- Dose / conc.:
- 15 other: mg/kg bw
- Remarks:
- 11-day study
- Dose / conc.:
- 20 other: mg/kg bw
- Remarks:
- 1-day study; single injection with 6-day follow up study and 11-day study
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 1-day, single injection and 6-day follow up: 6 animals (female) per group
11-day, daily injections: 8 animals (female) per group - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
Examinations
- Other functional activity assays:
- OTHER ASSAYS : Complement system determination
- Method: Based on Van Dijk's work (Van Dijk, 1980). However, the following modifications were made for a microtiter assay with a homologous system of mouse IgM and mouse complement. Following in vivo sodium azide treatment, blood was collected from chloroform-anesthetized mice by cardiac puncture. After allowing the blood to clot at room temperature for 2 h, serum was harvested and diluted 15 in ice cold Tris buffer (0.01 M Tris; 0.14 M NaCI; 0.15 mM CaCl2; 0.5 mM MgCl2; 0.1% gelatin; pH 7.3). Diluted serum was added in volumes of 20, 30, 50, 100, and 200 µL to 96 well V-bottom microtiter plates (Dynatech) and placed on ice. Each well contained 1.5 X 10^7 rabbit erythrocytes sensitized with a proper dilution of heat inactivated mouse anti-rabbit sera. Tris buffer was added to each well such that a total volume of 250 µL/well was obtained. After incubating at 30°C for 30 min, the plates were centrifuged at 650 g at 4°C for 10 min to pellet the erythrocytes and halt complement-mediated lysis.
From each well, 200 µL of supernatant fraction was placed in ABA-100 (bichromatic analyzer; Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Ill.) multicuvettes. The bichromatic analyzer measured amounts of hemoglobin present in two wavelengths (550 and 650 nm). The percentage of lysis was determined for each sample via comparison to a 100% water-lysed control. A Tris buffer blank containing opsonized erythrocytes and no serum was automatically subtracted from each reading to correct for spontaneous lysis. The ABA-100 data were analyzed by a program based on the Von Krogh equation (Mayer, 1961) which derives the CH50 value from the percentage lysis data for each sample. The functional complement activity was expressed in CH50 units per milliliter. The CH50 referred to the amount of complement lysing 50% of sensitized erythrocytes under standard conditions. Expressing functional complement activity in CH50 units was first proposed by Mayer ( 1961) and is the most acceptable method in both clinical and research settings.
Results and discussion
Results of examinations
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- For more details see "details on results" section below.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- not examined
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Endocrine findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- For more details see "details on results" section below.
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- not examined
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Details on results:
- As seen in Table 1, the effect of sodium azide on B6C3F1 complement haemolytic activity was limited.
The CH50 values (the amount of compartment lysing 50% of sensitized erythrocytes under standard conditions) for sodium azide-treated animals in the 1-day acute study were neither dose related nor significantly different from saline controls.
Animals exposed to 20 mg/kg sodium azide in the 6-day time course experiment displayed no significant changes in CH50 values. Of 36 treated animals, 3 died shortly after dosing during the 6-day study.
In the 11-day study, animals exposed to 10 mg/kg sodium azide exhibited significantly higher CH50 values. However, this effect was not considered biologically significant due to low control values and the lack of a dose-dependent relationship. Lethality also occurred among animals in the 11-day study. Two mice in the 15-mg/kg group and all animals in the 20-mg/kg group died of sodium azide-induced respiratory paralysis.
Specific immunotoxic examinations
- Cell viabilities:
- not examined
- Humoral immunity examinations:
- not examined
- Specific cell-mediated immunity:
- not examined
- Non-specific cell-mediated immunity:
- not examined
- Other functional activity assays:
- no effects observed
Effect levels
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- acute study (1-day)
- Effect level:
- <= 20 mg/kg bw (total dose)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: other functional activity assays (mouse complement mediated lysis of IgM sensitized rabbit erythrocytes)
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Remarks:
- subacute study (11-day)
- Effect level:
- 15 mg/kg bw (total dose)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Mortality
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: The effect of sodium azide on B6C3F1 mouse complement levels following in vivo exposure
Experiment |
Route |
N |
Exposure group |
CH50 valuea |
1-day, single injection |
i.v. |
6 |
Vehicle (NaCl) |
107 ± 11.5 |
0.2 mg/kg |
144 ± 20.6 |
|||
2.0 mg/kg |
98 ± 2.5 |
|||
20 mg/kg |
114 ± 11.2 |
|||
6-day time course after single dose (20 mg/kg) |
i.v. |
6 |
Vehicle |
106 ± 6.6 |
Day 1 |
136 ± 9.5 |
|||
Day 2 |
112 ± 9.6b |
|||
Day 3 |
102 ± 7.0 |
|||
Day 4 |
124 ± 15.9c |
|||
Day 6 |
117 ± 4.5 |
|||
11-day, daily injection |
i.p. |
8 |
Vehicle |
79 ± 2.0 |
10 mg/kg |
101 ± 7.5d |
|||
15 mg/kg |
89 ± 9.9e |
|||
20 mg/kg |
---f |
aThe CH5O value reflects functional complement levels.
bOne animal died (within 24 hr of dosing).
cTwo animals died (within 24 hr of dosing).
dValue differed significantly from control (p < 0.05).
eTwo animals died by Day 11.
fAll animals died by Day 4.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Sodium azide does not affect mouse complement levels in vivo.
- Executive summary:
A microtiter hemolytic assay was utilized to determine sodium azide modulation of B6C3F1 and C3H mouse serum complement levels in vivo and in vitro. Functional complement was expressed in CH50 units per milliliter. Experiments were performed to determine the in vitro effect of Sodium azide on complement mediated lysis of IgM sensitized rabbit erythrocytes.
Concentrations of 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 60, and 80 mM sodium azide were added to microtiter wells containing Tris buffer, IgM sensitized rabbit erythrocytes, and serum complement from naïve female C3H mice. Although NaCl and KCl controls had an inhibitory effect, Sodium azide demonstrated a significant dose-dependent inhibition of complement-mediated lysis.
In the three in vivo experiments, female B6C3FI mice were exposed to Sodium azide and physiological saline (vehicle control). Complement hemolytic ability was evaluated after a 1-day, single iv injection of 0.2, 2.0, and 20.0 mg/kg sodium azide; at Days 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 of a 6-day time course study after ip administration of 20 mg/kg sodium azide; and at the end of an 11-day study involving daily injections of 10, 15, and 20 mg/kg sodium azide given ip.
No significant changes in complement-mediated hemolysis were observed in the in vivo experiments. These studies indicate that Sodium azide does not affect mouse complement levels in vivo.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
