Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
30 March 1975 - 21 April 1975
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Non-GLP performed to sound scientific principles, with limited reporting and methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the presented results.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1975
Report date:
1975

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
other: US 16 CFR 1500.3 Federal Hazardous Substances Act
Deviations:
not specified
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Groups of male rats (5/group) weighing between 200 and 300 g were fasted overnight and administered 0.67, 1.25, 2.5, 5.0, or 10 ml/kg by stomach tube. The animals were observed for 14 days post exposure for mortality.
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
Study predates GLP regulations.
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Thiophene, tetrahydro-, 1,1-dioxide, 3-(C9-11-isoalkyloxy) derivs., C10-rich
EC Number:
800-172-4
Cas Number:
398141-87-2
Molecular formula:
Complex UVCB substance
IUPAC Name:
Thiophene, tetrahydro-, 1,1-dioxide, 3-(C9-11-isoalkyloxy) derivs., C10-rich
Test material form:
liquid

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
other: Sherman-Wistar
Sex:
male
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
No data

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on oral exposure:
Groups of male rats (5/group) weighing between 200 and 300 g were fasted overnight and administered 0.67, 1.25, 2.5, 5.0, or 10 ml/kg by stomach tube. The animals were observed for 14 days post exposure for mortality.
Doses:
0.67, 1.25, 2.5, 5.0, or 10 ml/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5 males/dose
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
Groups of male rats (5/group) weighing between 200 and 300 g were fasted overnight and administered 0.67, 1.25, 2.5, 5.0, or 10 ml/kg by stomach tube. The animals were observed for 14 days post exposure for mortality.
Statistics:
N/A

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Sex:
male
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 10 mL/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
None
Clinical signs:
No data
Body weight:
No data
Gross pathology:
No data

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not classified
Remarks:
Migrated information not classified for acute oral toxicity on the basis of mortality data. It is not possible to assess short term STOT with available data. Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the study none of the animals died up to the maximum dose tested. The LD50 was determined to be > 10 ml/kg which, using information on the density of the substance, is equivalent to > 10,267 mg/kg.
Executive summary:

The acute oral toxicity of the substance was evaluated in rats. Groups of male rats (5/group) weighing between 200 and 300 g were fasted overnight and administered 0.67, 1.25, 2.5, 5.0, or 10 ml/kg by stomach tube. The animals were observed for 14 days post exposure for mortality. No mortality was observed. The LD50 was greater than 10 ml/kg which, using information on the density of the substance, is equivalent to > 10,267 mg/kg. This substance was concluded to be not classified for acute oral toxicity in accordance with EU CLP Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. However, clinical signs, body weight data, and gross pathology observations were not provided and so it was not possible to assess specific organ toxicity.