Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-584-7 | CAS number: 108-45-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
In Vitro (Mutagenic effects - bacterial): NOAEL; OECD 471; Ames study;
mutagenic; reliability = 2.
NOT CLASSIFIED
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Remarks:
- No reference to OECD guideline. Deviation from OECD guideline with the use of 4-o-Tolylazo-o-toluidine as positive control. Study conducted in 1975.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Only 4 strains of bacteria were used. Strain TA1538 was used and Strain TA98 was not. Positive controls deviate from those recommended in guideline.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbitol-stimulated rat liver homogenate
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 1, 10, 50, 100, 250, 500, 750, 1000 micrograms/plate.
- Vehicle / solvent:
- no data
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 4-o-Tolylazo-o-toluidine (for TA1538 and metabolic activation) and N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- In the absence of metabolic activation, approximately 5E8 bacteria were added to 2 mL of top agar (0.6% Difco agar, 0.6% NaCl, 0.050 mM of L-histidine, 0.05 mM of biotin). After the test chemical was added to the top agar, the solution was mixed and poured onto the surface of a minimal agar plate with Vogel-Bonner E medium containing 1.5% agar and 2% glucose.
The metabolic activation system consisted of 0.15 mL of the 9000 x g supernatant of homogenized rat liver, MgCl2, KCl, glucose-6-phosphate, TPN, and a sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). This mixture (0.25 mL) was added directly to the top agar immediately before it was poured over the minimal agar plate. The plates were incubated at 37 deg C for 40 hours. The number of histidine-positive (his+) revertant colonies on each plate then was counted. All tests were performed in duplicate.
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION: 40 hours
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): histidine
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 5E8 - Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- not specified
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- not specified
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- not specified
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- not specified
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- The test substance was mutagenic in strain TA 1538 with metabolic activation in the S. typhimurium assay, but negative when activation was not used. It was negative in all other strains, with or without activation.
- Executive summary:
The test substance was mutagenic in strain TA 1538 with metabolic activation in the S. typhimurium assay, but negative when activation was not used. It was negative in all other strains, with or without activation.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- an in vitro cytogenicity study in mammalian cells or in vitro micronucleus study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo cytogenicity test are available
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Data waiving:
- other justification
- Justification for data waiving:
- other:
Referenceopen allclose all
In Vitro Salmonella Typhimurium Assay With m-PDA.
Chemical |
Metabolic Activation |
Amount of Compound Added per Plate (µg) |
Average Number of Histidine-Positive Revertants per Plate |
|||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
TA1538 |
|||
Negative Control |
- |
|
72 |
11 |
5 |
9 |
+ |
|
84 |
11 |
6 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4-o-Tolylazo-o-toluidine (Positive control for TA1538 and metabolic activation) |
- |
25 |
|
|
|
10 |
+ |
25 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N-methyl-N’-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine |
- |
2 |
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
m-phenylenediamine |
- |
1 |
65 |
9 |
4 |
4 |
|
- |
10 |
64 |
8 |
4 |
2 |
|
- |
50 |
78 |
9 |
5 |
9 |
|
- |
100 |
80 |
10 |
3 |
12 |
|
- |
250 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
- |
500 |
83 |
8 |
2 |
17 |
|
- |
750 |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
1000 |
74 |
11 |
5 |
21 |
|
+ |
1 |
87 |
14 |
8 |
10 |
|
+ |
10 |
78 |
11 |
7 |
17 |
|
+ |
50 |
80 |
9 |
6 |
79 |
|
+ |
100 |
85 |
14 |
6 |
177 |
|
+ |
250 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
+ |
500 |
84 |
14 |
11 |
570 |
|
+ |
750 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
+ |
1000 |
79 |
10 |
8 |
971 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
In Vivo (Clastogenic effects - mammalian): NOAEL; OECD 474; GLP; In vivo
mouse micronucleus study; no mammalian mutagenesis was observed at any
exposure level; reliability = 2.
NOT CLASSIFIED
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- September 6, 1990 to January 9, 1991
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- documentation insufficient for assessment
- Remarks:
- This study was selected as the key study because the information provided for the hazard endpoint is sufficient for the purpose of classification and labelling and/or risk assessment. Conclusion based on scoring 1000 PCEs/animal for MNPCEs versus 2000 PCEs/animal as per OECD 474.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- scored fewer PCEs/animal than recommended.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- other: Crl:CD-1(ICR)BR
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Canada Inc., Breeding Area 62, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
- Age at study initiation: 50 days old
- Weight at study initiation: Males were 28.6 to 33.5 g, females were 21.3 to 26.1 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: By computer-generated random numbers
- Housing: Individually housed in standard wire mesh cages
- Diet: Purina certified Rodent Chow #5002, Lots # Aug 07 901A and Aug 10 901B) ad libitum
- Water: Ad libitum
- Acclimation period: Quarantined and acclimated for 6 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 23 ± 2°C
- Humidity (%): 50 ± 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours light, 12 hours dark
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- Deionized water
- Frequency of treatment:
- Twice, with doses administered approximately 24 hours apart.
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
16, 33, 65 mg/kg/day
Basis: actual ingested - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 males/females per dose
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- Cyclophosphamide
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- Immediately following sacrifice at 24 or 48 hours after the administration of the second dose, the marrow from both femurs of each animals was collected. A Miniprep automatic blood smearing instrument was used to make the bone marrow smears. At least 2 slides/animal were prepared.
- Evaluation criteria:
- Representative slides from each animal were examined in a blind manner using incident light fluorescence microscopy. Only cells showing good morphology and staining were selected for scoring. Polychromatic erythrocytes (PCEs) were identified by their characteristic reddish staining. Normochromatic erythrocyte (NCEs) appeared dark green. One thousand PCEs/animal were scored for the presence of micronuclei, which are typically round, bright yellow-green fluorescent bodies. Cellular inclusions that were irregularly shaped or stained, or were not in the focal plane of the cell were considered artifacts. The unit of scoring was the micronucleated cell. PCEs containing more than one micronucleus were counted as a single micronucleated cell. The number of micronucleated NCEs seen in the optic fields scored to obtain 1000 PCEs was also recorded. The proportion of PCEs among 1000 erythrocytes was determined for each animal.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Dose range: 25, 50, 65, 75 mg/kg/day, 2X ~24 hours apart.
- Clinical signs of toxicity in test animals: 75 mg/kg/day group, 3/3 males and 1/3 females died within 30 hours of second dosing.
65 mg/kg/day-lethargic and had labored breathing; these signs were observed in all animals and occurred within 2 hrs of dosing on both days. Mild clinical signs (ruffled fur and partially closed eyes) persisted for 2 days following the final exposure, however, all animals recovered within 4 days post-treatment. 50 and 25 mg/kg/day-face pawing, labored breathing, gasping, lethargy and half closed eyes.
- Dose range: 85, 100, 200 or 300 mg/kg-a second treatment at these levels was not conducted due to excessive mortality or the severity of the clinical signs observed 24 hrs after the initial treatment
RESULTS OF DEFINITIVE STUDY
- Clinical signs of toxicity in test animals: 65 mg/kg/day-within 1 hour of initial dose, mice exhibited lethargy, gasping, face pawing, spasms, tremors, or half-closed eyes. Lethargy, half-closed eyes and labored and/or rapid breathing were still evident in the majority of the animals, 3-4 hrs after initial observations. Clinical signs following the second dose were similar to those observed the preceding day. One male was found dead 24 hrs after the final treatment. 16 and 33 mg/kg/day-lethargy, half closed eyes and rapid breathing within 24 hrs of final dose. The majority of the 16 mg/kg/day treated group appeared to recover, and only slight clinical sign were still evident in the 33 mg/kg/day treated group.
Weight loss-there was a statistically significant weight loss in 33 and 65 mg/kg/day treated groups at the 24 hour sacrifice, and in the 65 mg/kg/day treated group at the 48 hr sacrifice.
There were no statistically significant increases in MN-PCEs among test substance treated mice at any dose level or sampling interval. - Conclusions:
- Mice exposed to the test substance did not exhibit statistically significant increases in micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes at any dose level or sampling interval.
- Executive summary:
No statistically significant increases in the frequency of micronucleated PCEs were observed in test substance-treated animals at any sampling time. A significant depression in the ratio of young, polychromatic erythrocytes to mature, normochromatic erythrocytes was observed in the high dose males at the 48 -hr sampling interval. Under the conditions of this assay, the test substance did not induce micronuclei; the test substance is negative.
Reference
Table 1. Mouse Micronucleus Assay of m-PDA
m-PDA Treatment (mg/kg/day) |
Sampling Time (hrs) |
Sex |
Animals Per Group |
Change in Body Weight (g) x ± S.E. |
0 |
24 |
M |
5 |
0.0 ± 0.2 |
|
|
F |
5 |
-0.4 ± 0.5 |
16 |
24 |
M |
4a |
-0.9 ± 0.6 |
|
|
F |
5 |
-0.7 ± 0.4 |
33 |
24 |
M |
5 |
-3.3 ± 0.7** |
|
|
F |
5 |
-2.8 ± 0.2** |
65 |
24 |
M |
6 |
-5.3 ± 0.4** |
|
|
F |
6 |
-4.5 ± 0.3** |
0 |
48 |
M |
5 |
0.4 ± 0.4 |
|
|
F |
5 |
0.8 ± 0.9 |
65 |
24 |
M |
4a,b |
-3.4 ± 0.9** |
|
|
F |
6 |
-3.3 ± 0.5** |
CP, 20 |
24 |
M |
5 |
0.2 ± 0.3 |
|
|
F |
5 |
-0.6 ± 0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
CP = cyclophosphamide
a animal misdosed and removed from study.
b animal died before scheduled sacrifice time.
** p < 0.01
Table 2. Data Summary. Mouse Micronucleus Assay of m-PDA.
m-PDA Treatement (mg/kg/day) |
Sampling Time (hrs) |
Mean % Micronucleated PCEs ± S.E.a |
|
Mean PCE:NCE Ratio ± S.E. |
|||||
N |
Males |
N |
Females |
|
Males |
|
Females |
||
0 |
24 |
5 |
0.16 ± 0.05 |
5 |
0.02 ± 0.02 |
|
1.16 ± 0.11 |
|
1.12 ± 0.03 |
16 |
24 |
4b |
0.15 ± 0.09 |
5 |
0.16 ± 0.05 |
|
0.96 ± 0.05 |
|
1.13 ± 0.08 |
33 |
24 |
5 |
0.24 ± 0.07 |
5 |
0.10 ± 0.04 |
|
0.91 ± 0.07 |
|
1.14 ± 0.07 |
65 |
24 |
6 |
0.28 ± 0.07 |
6 |
0.13 ± 0.05 |
|
0.77 ± 0.10 |
|
1.13 ± 0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
48 |
5 |
0.40 ± 0.13 |
5 |
0.28 ± 0.05 |
|
0.98 ± 0.12 |
|
1.34 ± 0.09 |
65 |
48 |
4b,c |
0.50 ± 0.27 |
6 |
0.18 ± 0.03 |
|
0.58 ± 0.08* |
|
0.87 ± 0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CP, 20 |
24 |
5 |
0.96 ± 0.09** |
5 |
0.82 ± 0.09** |
|
0.71 ± 0.03** |
|
1.00 ± 0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CP = cyclophosphamide
a 1000 PCEs scored per animal.
b animal misdosed and removed from study.
c animal died before scheduled sacrifice time.
* p < 0.05
** p < 0.01
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
The test substance produced mutagenicity when evaluated in bacterial cultures, however it did not produce mutagenicity when evaluated in vivo (in animal studies). Further, the test substance was not carcinogenic in lifetime mammalian testing.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The test substance produced mutagenicity when evaluated in bacterial cultures, however it did not produce mutagenicity when evaluated in vivo (in animal studies including an in vivo micronucleus test). Further, the test substance was not carcinogenic in lifetime mammalian testing. The substance does not need to be classified for mutagenicity according to EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008. Although this classification deviates from the harmonized classification, the harmonized classification will be adhered as it is stricter.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.