Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-473-0 | CAS number: 96-05-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 1984-04-09 to 1984-04-16
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Equivalent or similar to OECD guideline, GLP
Data source
Referenceopen allclose all
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 984
- Report date:
- 1984
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 998
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Eye Irritation : Updated Reference Chemicals Data Bank
- Author:
- Bagley, D. M.; Gardner, J. R.; Holland; Lewis, R. W.; Vrijhof, H. and Walker, A. P.
- Year:
- 1 999
- Bibliographic source:
- Toxicology in Vitro 13 (1999), 505-510
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The study was based on the method described in the Journal Officiel de la Republique Francaise 21 April 1971 and 5 June 1973. The eyes of six New Zealand White rabbits were treated with the undiluted test substance to examine the eye irritating potential of the test substance.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Allyl methacrylate
- EC Number:
- 202-473-0
- EC Name:
- Allyl methacrylate
- Cas Number:
- 96-05-9
- Molecular formula:
- C7H10O2
- IUPAC Name:
- allyl methacrylate
- Test material form:
- other: liquid
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Nottingham University, School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington,Leics, and Rosemead Rabbits Ltd., Lea Valley, Essex
- Age at study initiation: approximately 12-16 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.47 - 2.71 kg
- Housing: individually
- Diet: standard laboratory diet (Rabbit Diet, A.W. Tindall Limited, Holbeach, Lincolnshire) ad libitum
- Water: free access to tap water
- Acclimation period: for a minimum period of five days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17 - 25
- Humidity (%):Humidity was not controlled but remained within a range of 55-65 % RH recorded daily on a wet and dry bulb hygrometer.
- Air changes (per hr): approximately 10 changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single treatment (no washing out conducted)
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 7 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: no washing conducted
SCORING SYSTEM: according to Draize J.H. 1959, Assoc. of Food and Drug Officials of the USA, Austin, Texas, "The Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Foods, Drugs and Cosmetics"
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: Examination of the eye was facilitated by the use of a standard ophthalmoscope (Keeler). Observation of corneal opacity may be carried out under ultra-violet illumination (Mineralight UVSL-58) preceded by the instillation into the eye of 0.05 mL of fluorescein.
Results and discussion
In vivo
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5,
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #4
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 4 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal: #2, #3, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.7
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 4 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 4 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #5
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 4.0
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #4
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The test material produced slight ocular irritation in 6/6 rabbits. A dulling of the normal lustre of the cornea was observed in two rabbits on Day 1 only. Iritis was observed in one rabbit on Day 1 only. Mild inflammation or a diffuse crimson-red colouration of the conjunctivae, with or without slight swelling was observed in all six rabbits on Day 1. The reactions had ameliorated in one rabbit by Day 2, in three further rabbits by Day 3 and in the two remaining rabbits by Day 4.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Cornea | Iris | Conjunctiva | |||||
Animal | Reading | Opacity | Area involved | Redness | Chemosis | Discharge | |
1 | 24 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
2 | 24 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
3 | 24 hrs | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
4 | 24 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
5 | 24 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
6 | 24 hrs | D | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
1 | 48 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 48 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
3 | 48 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 48 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5 | 48 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
6 | 48 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 72 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 72 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 72 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 72 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5 | 72 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
6 | 72 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 4 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 4 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 4 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 4 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5 | 4 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6 | 4 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 7 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 7 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 7 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 7 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5 | 7 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6 | 7 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 24/48/72 hrs | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.3 | ||
2 | 24/48/72 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | ||
3 | 24/48/72 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | ||
4 | 24/48/72 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0.3 | 0 | ||
5 | 24/48/72 hrs | 0 | 0 | 1.3 | 0.3 | ||
6 | 24/48/72 hrs | 0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | ||
mean animal 1-3 | 24/48/72 hrs | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.3 | ||
D = Dulling of the cornea |
The test material produced a Maximum Mean Score of 5.8
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Allymethacrylate was not irritating according to EU-criteria in this eye irritation study.
- Executive summary:
Allymethacrylate was not irritating according to EU-criteria in this eye irritation study.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.