Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
31 Jul 1989 - 31 May 1990
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1991
Report date:
1991

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
limited details on test material
GLP compliance:
no
Type of assay:
micronucleus assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-(2-ethoxyethoxy)ethyl acetate
EC Number:
203-940-1
EC Name:
2-(2-ethoxyethoxy)ethyl acetate
Cas Number:
112-15-2
Molecular formula:
C8H16O4
IUPAC Name:
2-(2-ethoxyethoxy)ethyl acetate
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Ethanol, 2- (2-Ethoxyethoxy)-, acetate
- Analytical purity: no data
- Other: in the report it is also stated, that a combination aerosol was tested, whoever the combination is not named as the study report is sanitized.

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
not specified
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Housing: the animals were housed continously in groups of 2-5 animals in Hazelton H-1000 exposure chambers.
- Diet: was removed during exposure
- Water: was removed during exposure

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
inhalation: aerosol
Vehicle:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: air
Details on exposure:
TYPE OF INHALATION EXPOSURE: whole body

GENERATION OF TEST ATMOSPHERE / CHAMBER DESCRIPTION
GENERATION OF TEST ATMOSPHERE / CHAMBER DESCRIPTION
- Exposure apparatus: Hazelton H-1000 exposure chamber
- Method of holding animals in test chamber: whole body exposure
- System of generating aerosols: Laskin nebulizers in each chamber were immersed in water bath at approximately 180 °F (82.2 °C) during each exposure to simulate the temperature under normal conditions of use. The output of the nebulizer went through a glass impactor to remove the larger particles before being diluted by the main air stream entering the exposure chamber.
- Temperature, humidity, pressure in air chamber: recorded every 30 min during exposure; 24.6 °C (mean), 66.5% (mean)
- Air change rate: 12
- Method of particle size determination: at least once daily with a cascade impactor.

Duration of treatment / exposure:
13 weeks
Frequency of treatment:
6 h/day, 5 days/week
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
0.05, 0.15 and 0.5 mg/L
Basis:
nominal conc.
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
50, 150 and 500 mg/m³
Basis:
nominal conc.
No. of animals per sex per dose:
15 (core groups)
10 (additional ancilliary males in each group for specialized endpoints)
Control animals:
yes, concurrent no treatment
yes, sham-exposed

Examinations

Tissues and cell types examined:
Bone marrow, erythrocytes
Statistics:
ANOVA, GLM nodel, SAS, Tukey´s Studentized Range Test, SCheffe´s Test

Results and discussion

Test results
Sex:
male/female
Genotoxicity:
negative
Toxicity:
no effects
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
not examined

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1. Result of assay as averaged data.

Treatment

Sex

N

PCE/NCE

% MNPCE

%MNN-CE

Negative control (sham-exposed)

F

5

0.92(0.37)

0.04(0.09)

0(0)

M

5

0.52(0.11)

0.02(0.04)

0(0)

Negative control (not-treated)

F

5

0.74 (0.23)

0(0)

0(0)

M

5

0.59(0.21)

0(0)

0(0)

0.05

F

5

0.81(0.29)

0.04(0.05)

0(0)

M

5

0.62(0.24)

0(0)

0(0)

0.15

 

F

5

1.17(0.49)

0(0)

0(0)

M

5

0.63(0.24)

0.02(0.04)

0(0)

0.5

 

F

5

0.82(0.30)

0.06(0.09)

0(0)

M

5

0.57(0.12)

0.02(0.04)

0(0)

(): SD

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results: negative