Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 214-946-9 | CAS number: 1222-05-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Key studies:
HHCB (>99% pure) in acetone was tested in the Ames test in absence or presence of Aroclor-induced rat liver S9 at a dose ranging from 10 to 5000 mg/plate according to OECD guideline 471 using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, TA1538 and Escherichia Coli strain WP2 UVRA and appropriate positive controls. Based on preliminary range-finding studies, doses of 10 (not tested in confirmation assay), 33, 100, 333, 1000, 3333 (only tested in confirmation assay) or 5000 µg HHCB/plate were used. Slight precipitation was seen at the three highest doses (≥333 µg/plate). All dose levels of HHCB, acetone (negative control) and positive controls were plated in triplicate. All positive controls gave positive responses to the systems within acceptable ranges. No significant increase in the number of revertant colonies was observed for HHCB at any dose with any of the six strains with or without activation. (San et al., 1994, Api and San, 1999a)
A cytogenetic assay with Chinese Hamster ovary cells (CHO-K1) was conducted on HHCB (purity >99%) according to OECD Guideline 473. Concentrations of 5, 10 and 20 μg HHCB/ml were used without metabolic activation, using 4/20, 20/20 and 44/44 hr exposure/harvest periods. In the study with metabolic activation (S9 from rat liver induced by Aroclor 1254), dose levels of 8.7, 17.3 and 34.5 μg HHCB/ml were tested for the 4-hr period with a 20-hr harvest time and dose levels of 22.6, 28.2 and 30.0 μg/ml for the 4-hr period with a 44-hr harvest time. At the 20 and 44-hr harvest times, the cells were assessed for structural chromosome aberrations, and at the 44-hr harvest time, also for numerical chromosome aberrations. The mitotic index was significantly lowered at the highest dose in all cases. N-methyl-N’-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine was used as a positive control in the non-activated study and benzo(a)pyrene in the activated study. Positive controls caused increases in structural (significantly) aberrations in all cases. No significant increase in structural or numerical chromosome aberrations was observed with or without activation with HHCB at any dose. HHCB was concluded to be negative for chromosome aberrations in this test. (Curry and Putman, 1995, Api and San, 1999a)
An in vitro unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) assay in accordance with OECD guideline 482 was conducted with HHCB (purity >99%) in acetone in primary rat hepatocytes at concentrations of 0.15, 0.50, 1.5, 5.0, 15 mg/ml (50-5000 µg/ml proved too toxic to test). The positive control 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene induced a significant increase in the average net nuclear grain count over controls. No increase in net nuclear grain count was seen for HHCB up to and including 15 µg/ml although this dose did induce significant cytotoxicity as determined by LDH leakage. 50 µg/ml proved too toxic to be evaluated. (San and Sly, 1995, Api and San, 1999a)
Additional information:
A second test is available to assess the genotoxic potential of HHCB in bacteria (Mersch-Sundermann et al., 1998a), as well as a SOS chromotest in Escherichia coli (Mersch-Sundermann et al., 1998b). Both studies showed no genotoxic potential of HHCB. Furthermore, two in vitro micronucleus tests are available (both Kevekordes et al., 1997), as well as an in vivo micronucleus test (Api and San, 1999a, Gudi and Ritter, 1997). All three studies showed no significant increase of micronuclei after HHCB-treatment. Additionally, a sister-chromatid exchange (SCE) is available (Kevekordes et al., 1998). No effects were observed after treatment with HHCB.
An overview of the available mutagenicity studies is presented in the table below.
Type | Species | Activation | Doses | Results | GLP | OECD | Reference |
In vitro Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay | Salmonella typhimurium (TA98, 100, 1535, 1537, 1538) & E. coli (WP2 UVRA) | w & w/o S9 | 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 3333, 5000 µg/plate | negative | Yes | 471 | Api and San, 1999, San and Sly, 1994 |
In vitro Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay | Salmonella typhimurium (TA97, 98, 100 and 102) | w & w/o S9 | 5, 16.6, 50, 166.6, or 500 µg/plate | negative | No |
| Mersch-Sunderman, 1998a |
In vitro SOS induction | E. coli PQ37 | w & w/o S9 | 0.39, 0.78, 1.56, 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50µg/assay | negative | No |
| Mersch-Sunderman, 1998b |
In vitro cytogenetic assay | Chinese hamster ovary cells | w & w/o S9 | 9, 17, 34µg/ml & 23, 28, 30 µg/ml | negative | Yes | 473 | Api and San, 1999a, Curry and Putman, 1995 |
In vitro micronucleus test | Human lymphocytes | w & w/o S9 | 0.05, 0.49, 4.85, 48.5, 97, 194µM (=0.013, 0.13, 1.25, 12.5, 25, 50 µg/ml) | negative | No |
| Kevekordes et al., 1997 |
In vitro micronucleus test | Human hepatoma cells | None added, some inherent | 0.1, 0.97, 9.7, 97, 194, 387 µM (=0.036, 0.25, 2.5, 25, 50, 100 µg/ml) | negative | No |
| Kevekordes et al., 1997 |
In vitro sister chromatid exchange test | Human lymphocytes | w & w/o S9 | 0.025, 0.25, 2.43, 24.25, 48.5, 97µM (= 0.007, 0.07, 0.6, 6, 12.5, 25 µg/ml) | negative | No |
| Kevekordes et al., 1998 |
In vitro unscheduled DNA synthesis | Primary rat hepatocytes | Inherent | 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50µg/ml | negative | Yes | 482 | Api and San, 1999, San and Sly, 1994 |
In vivo micronucleus test | mice |
| 380, 750, 1500 mg/kg bw | negative | yes | 474 | Api and San, 1999, Gudi and Ritter, 1997 |
Conclusion and discussion:
HHCB has been tested in a wide array of in vitro tests and in an in vivo mouse micronucleus test. In vitro, HHCB was negative in gene mutation tests with bacteria, in an SOS chromotest with bacteria, in SCE and micronucleus tests with human cells, in an UDS test with primary rat hepatocytes and in a chromosome aberration assay in CHO cells. HHCB also did not induce significant chromosome aberrations in the in vivo micronucleus test. Hence, it can be judged that HHCB is a non-genotoxic substance.
(Summary in line with EU-RAR, 2008)
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
Three required in vitro genotoxicity tests were performed in accordance with OECD and under GLP conditions.
Short description of key information:
In vitro:
- gene mutation in bacteria (Ames test): negative with and without metabolic activation (OECD471)
- cytogenicity (chromosome aberration test): negative with and without metabolic activation (OECD 473)
- gene mutation in mammalian cells (UDS test): negative with an without metabolic activation (OECD482)
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available in vitro and in vivo mutagenicity studies, HHCB does not have to be classified as mutagenic in accordance with 67/548/EEC (DSD) and 1272/2008/EC (CLP).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

Route: .live2