Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-247-9 | CAS number: 80-07-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in water and sediment: simulation tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: sediment simulation testing
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- September 2013- April 2014
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Reliable experimental study following OECD Guideline 308 and compliant with GLP standards.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 308 (Aerobic and Anaerobic Transformation in Aquatic Sediment Systems)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Radiolabelling:
- yes
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- natural water / sediment
- Details on source and properties of surface water:
- The water/sediment systems were from Tift County, Georgia, USA, and Grand Forks County, North Dakota, USA. The Tift water/sediment was sampled on 16 September 2013 from a natural surface water pond. The only known chemical or fertilizer applications within the last four years to this site was of diquat dibromide in the years 2009, 2010, and 2012. The Goose River water/sediment was sampled on 08 October 2013. For this site there were no direct applications of chemicals or fertilizers within the last 4 years.
- Details on source and properties of sediment:
- The water/sediment systems were from Tift County, Georgia, USA, and Grand Forks County, North Dakota, USA. The Tift water/sediment was sampled on 16 September 2013 from a natural surface water pond. The only known chemical or fertilizer applications within the last four years to this site was of diquat dibromide in the years 2009, 2010, and 2012. The Goose River water/sediment was sampled on 08 October 2013. For this site there were no direct applications of chemicals or fertilizers within the last 4 years. Both sediment samples were taken from the below the overlaying water surfaces.
- Duration of test (contact time):
- 100 d
- Initial conc.:
- 0.356 other: ug/g water
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Initial conc.:
- 0.293 other: ug/g water
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- CO2 evolution
- radiochem. meas.
- Reference substance:
- other: The reference substance was the non-radiolabeled test substance, DCDPS, provided by BASF, Ludwigshafen, Germany. The non-radiolabeled reference substance was stored at ambient temperature and was determined to have 99.9% purity.
- Compartment:
- other: water / sediment, material (mass) balance
- Remarks on result:
- other: The mean material balance for the Tift sediment/water system was 100.3 ± 1.9% of the applied radioactivity (%AR). The mean material balance for the Goose River sediment/water system was 99.5 ± 3.3% of the %AR
- % Degr.:
- 4
- Parameter:
- radiochem. meas.
- Sampling time:
- 100 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Tift (sandy loam) total water/sediment system amount of extractable test substance decreased from 98.1% at 0 d to 94.1% at 100d.
- % Degr.:
- 14.7
- Parameter:
- radiochem. meas.
- Sampling time:
- 100 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Goose River (clay loam) total water/sediment system amount of extractable test substance decreased from 96.9% at day 0 to 82.2% at 100 d.
- Compartment:
- water
- DT50:
- 7.1 d
- Type:
- other: double first order in parallel (DFOP) using ModelMaker 4.0
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Remarks on result:
- other: Tift (sandy loam) water layer
- Compartment:
- water
- DT50:
- 6.2 d
- Type:
- other: double first order in parallel (DFOP) using ModelMaker 4.0
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Remarks on result:
- other: Goose River (clay loam) water later
- Compartment:
- entire system
- DT50:
- 1 287.2 d
- Type:
- other: single first order model (SFO) using ModelMaker 4.0
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Remarks on result:
- other: Tift (sandy loam) entire system extrapolation beyond the 100 d study duration
- Compartment:
- entire system
- DT50:
- 394.3 d
- Type:
- other: single first order model (SFO) using ModelMaker 4.0.
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Remarks on result:
- other: Goose River (clay loam) entire system extrapolation beyond the 100 d study duration
- Transformation products:
- no
- Details on transformation products:
- No transformation products were detected.
- Evaporation of parent compound:
- no
- Volatile metabolites:
- no
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The processing/extracting procedures (100.0% - 102.2% of radioactivity at Day 0), test substance identity and purity at Day 100, and HPLC analysis (recovery of radioactivity within the acceptable range of 90-110%) each met the validity criteria.
- Conclusions:
- This study showed that aerobic transformation in the aquatic/sediment system is not a major pathway of degradation of the test substance. Instead, the test substance increasingly migrates from the water column to the sediment layer over time. Therefore, the test substance is expected to show persistence in the aerobic aquatic environment.
Reference
In the sediment phase, the maximum levels of 4,4’-DCDPS were 81.8 and 79.8% AR (Day100) for the Tift and Goose River systems respectively. No known or unknown metabolites occurred at =3.4% AR in the sediment for either system.
For the total water/sediment system, the amount of extractable 4,4’-DCDPS in the Tift system generally decreased over the course of the study, from 98.1% AR at Day 0 to 92.7% AR at Day 50, and then slightly increasing to 94.1% AR at Day 100. The amount of extractable 4,4’-DCDPS in the Goose River system generally decreased over the course of the study, from 96.9% AR at Day 0 to 80.7% AR at Day 50 where it leveled off (81.2 and 82.2% AR at Days 75 and 100, respectively).
The DT50 values for 4,4’-DCDPS were calculated by the single first order model (SFO), first order multi-compartment model (FOMC), hockey stick (HS), and the double first order in parallel (DFOP) using ModelMaker® 4.0. The best fit visually and statistically for the data from the total system was obtained using the SFO model, and that for the water layer only was obtained using the DFOP model. The rate constants (kp), DT50values obtained for4,4’-DCDPS dissipation in the water phase (DFOP model) and overall degradation in the total system (SFO model) are summarized in the table below.
Water / Sediment Type |
Layer |
4,4’-DCDPS |
4,4’-DCDPS |
4,4’-DCDPS |
r2 |
Tift |
Water layer |
0.223 |
0.011 |
7.1 |
0.994 |
Total system |
0.001 |
N/A |
1287.2* |
0.31 |
|
Goose River (Clay Loam) |
Water layer |
0.147 |
0.016 |
6.2 |
0.994 |
Total system |
0.002 |
N/A |
394.3* |
0.64 |
* These values are extrapolations beyond the duration of the study (100 days)
No major degradation product, which is defined as =10% AR or at =5% AR at two consecutive sampling intervals, was observed during the course of the study in either of the test systems. No significant radioactivity (=10% AR) was found in the Tift sediment layer as non-extractable residues (NER). However, for the Goose River test system, the NER residues increased over time from 0.3% (Day 0) to over 10% AR by Day 30, reaching a mean maximum of 16.6% AR by Day 75.
For all practical purposes, no degradation of the 4,4’-DCDPS was observed in either test system over the course of this study, which indicates that 4,4’-DCDPS would show persistence in aerobic aquatic systems in the environment.
Description of key information
The experimental study concluded that the half-life of DCDPS in a water/sediment system would exceed 100 days.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Half-life in freshwater:
- 6.2 d
- at the temperature of:
- 20 °C
- Half-life in freshwater sediment:
- 394.3 d
- at the temperature of:
- 20 °C
Additional information
In the study entitled “ [14C] 4,4’-Dichlorodiphenyl Sulphone: Aerobic Trans formation in Aquatic Sediment Systems” (Talken, 2014), the biotransformation of the test substance was studied in two different flooded sediment systems under aerobic conditions. The study showed that the test substance increasingly migrates from the water column to the sediment layer over time and that aerobic transformation is not a major pathway of degradation. Although the values for half-life in water between the two test systems were similar (6.2 d in Goose River, 7.1 d in Tift), the values for half-life in sediment were more divergent (394.3 d in Goose River, 1287.2 d in Tift). The 100-d study concluded that no degradation of the substance (4,4’-DCDPS) was observed in either of the two water/sediment test systems over the course of this study, indicating that the substance would show persistence in aerobic aquatic systems in the environment.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.