Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 931-312-3 | CAS number: 53880-05-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2006-09-09-2007-01-04
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study; GLP study without deviations
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 007
- Report date:
- 2007
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- (1997)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Benzophenone-3,3':4,4'-tetracarboxylic dianhydride
- EC Number:
- 219-348-1
- EC Name:
- Benzophenone-3,3':4,4'-tetracarboxylic dianhydride
- Cas Number:
- 2421-28-5
- Molecular formula:
- C17H6O7
- IUPAC Name:
- 5,5'-carbonylbis(2-benzofuran-1,3-dione)
- Test material form:
- solid
- Details on test material:
- Physical State: solid
Colour: amber
Purity: 97.2%
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Species/cell type: CHO cells as originally isolated by Kao and Puck (1968), obtained from Prof. Dr. A.T. Natarajan (University of Leiden,
The Netherlands) - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9-mix based on liver homogenate fraction from male Wistar rats, induced with Aroclor 1254 (i.p.)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- up to 100 mg/l, see below
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle: dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- vehicle (DMSO)
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- +S9-mix
Migrated to IUCLID6: 5 mg/l
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- vehicle (DMSO)
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- -S9-mix
Migrated to IUCLID6: Test 1: 0.1 mg/l; Test 2: 0.05 mg/l
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- - No. of metaphases analyzed: 100/culture = 200/concentration. At least 500 nuclei/slide examined for mitotic index
ADMINISTRATION:
- Dosing:
Stock solution (50 or 10 g/l) in vehicle dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).
Solubility test: 1; 2; 3.9; 7.8; 15.6; 31.3; 62.5; 125; 250; 500 mg/l
Test 1: 0.1; 0.2; 0.39; 0.78; 1.56; 3.13; 6.25; 12.5; 25; 50; 75; 100 mg/l
Selected for sampling: 6.25; 12.5; 25; 50; 75; 100 mg/l
Test 2: 30; 40; 50; 60; 80; 100 mg/l, all sampled. 2.5; 5; 10; 20 mg/l only -S9, not sampled.
Both for presence and absence of S9-mix, 3 relevant concentration levels per test were analyzed for chromosomal aberrations. The highest level
selected should have reduced the mitotic index by 50-70 %.
- Number of replicates: 2
- Application:
Test 1: after 4 hours exposure visual inspection; replace medium with test substance by medium without test substance;
12 hours later (i.e. at 16 hours) visual inspection, addition of colcemid (resulting concentration 0.1 mg/l);
at 18 hours harvest
Test 2: similar to Test 1, except continuos exposure for 18 hours (i.e. no replacement of medium) of samples without S9-mix
- Positive and negative control groups and treatment:
negative: vehicle (DMSO)
positive (+S9): cyclophosphamide (5 mg/l)
positive (-S9): mitomycin C (Test 1: 0.1 mg/l, Test 2: 0.05 mg/l) - Evaluation criteria:
- The study is considered valid if:
(1) the positive controls show a significant increase in the number of aberrant cells and
(2) the negative controls are within historical ranges.
A response is considered to be positive if:
a statistically significant increase in the number of aberrant cells is observed which is
(1) either concentration-related
(2) or reproduced in the second experiment at a similar dose level.
A response is considered to be equivocal if:
0.05 - Statistics:
- Fisher's exact probability test (two-sided) for significant differences between treated and control cultures
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- approx. 100 mg/l (-S9); > 100 mg/l (+S9)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- In the first chromosomal aberration test, in both the absence and presence of a metabolic activation system, the test substance was weakly to
slightly toxic to the cells, at three concentrations analysed. In the second chromosomal aberration test, in the presence of S9-mix, the test
substance was not toxic to the cells at comparable dose levels. In the second chromosomal aberration test, in the absence of S9-mix, the test
substance was slightly toxic for the cells at two lowest concentrations analysed and clearly toxic at the highest concentration analysed.
Both chromosomal aberration tests did not induce a statistically significant increase in the number of aberrant cells, when compared to the
number of aberrant cells found in the negative (DMSO) control cultures. - Remarks on result:
- other: other: Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
RESULT:
PRECIPITATION CONCENTRATION: 30 mg/l and higher
-------------------------------------------
MITOTIC INDEX AND CHROMOSOMAL ABERRATIONS (excl. gaps):
-------------------------------------------
Concentration % M.I. % C.A.
-------------------------------------------
- Test 1, with S9
neg. control 100 1.5
100 mg/l 83 0.5
75 mg/l 98 0.0
50 mg/l 87 1.0
25 mg/l 117 not inspected
pos. control 38 29.5 ***
-------------------------------------------
- Test 1, without S9
neg. control 100 0.0
100 mg/l 91 0.0
75 mg/l 97 0.0
50 mg/l 78 0.0
25 mg/l 111 not inspected
pos. control 100 26.5 ***
-------------------------------------------
- Test 2, with S9
neg. control 100 0.0
100 mg/l 110 1.0
80 mg/l 118 1.0
60 mg/l 108 not inspected
30 mg/l 127 1.0
pos. control 51 39.5 ***
-------------------------------------------
- Test 2, without S9
neg. control 100 0.0
100 mg/l 53 0.5
80 mg/l 73 0.0
60 mg/l 92 not inspected
30 mg/l 86 1.0
pos. control 77 42.0 ***-
-------------------------------------------
*** p<=0.001 / ** p<=0.01 / * p<=0.05
-------------------------------------------
CYTOTOXIC CONCENTRATION:
- With metabolic activation: > 100 mg/l
- Without metabolic activation: approx. 100 mg/l
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- In both the first and second chromosomal aberration test, the test substance IPDI homopolymer did not induce a statistically significant increase in
the number of aberrant cells, at any of the concentrations and treatment periods analysed, when compared to the number of aberrant cells found in
the vehicle (DMSO) control cultures. Thus, under the conditions used in this study, IPDI homopolymer was not clastogenic for CHO cells. - Executive summary:
The test substance IPDI homopolymer was examined for its potential to induce structural chromosomal aberrations in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells, in both the absence and presence of a metabolic activation system (S9 -mix). The study was carried out according to OECD method no. 473 in compliance with the current OECD Principles of Good Laboratory Practice. Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) was used as vehicle for the test substance. Two separate chromosomal aberration tests were conducted. In all instances, duplicate cultures were used. The highest concentration tested was based on solubility of the test substance.
In both the first and second chromosomal aberration test, the test substance IPDI homopolymer did not induce a statistically significant increase in the number of aberrant cells, at any of the concentrations and treatment periods analysed, when compared to the number of aberrant cells found in the vehicle (DMSO) control cultures.
The data obtained support the conclusion that, under the conditions used in this study, the test substance IPDI homopolymer was not clastogenic for Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.