Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 263-093-9 | CAS number: 61789-86-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian cell study: DNA damage and/or repair
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: DNA damage and/or repair
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Start Date of Experimental Work: October 28,1987 Completion Date of Experimental Work: December 14, 1987
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with some minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which limit the reliability of the relevant results. The study report was conclusive, done to a valid guideline and the study was conducted under GLP conditions.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 988
- Report date:
- 1988
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: The study was conducted in compliance with the Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) regulations of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), (40 CFR, Part 792) and according to the protocol and. standard operating procedures.
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Sulfonic acids, petroleum, calcium salts
- EC Number:
- 263-093-9
- EC Name:
- Sulfonic acids, petroleum, calcium salts
- Cas Number:
- 61789-86-4
- Molecular formula:
- Cannot be adequately determined for this UVCB substance
- IUPAC Name:
- Petroleum mixture of C10 to 47 saturated linear alkaryl derivatised cyclopentan cyclohexanbenzene sulfonic acid and C10 to 47 saturated linear alkaryl derivatised cyclopentan phenobenzene sulfonic acid calcium salts
- Details on test material:
- Physical State :Liquid
Odour :Pungent
Specific Gravity :1.22 at 15.6°C
Solubility :See below for explanation
Storage Conditions :Room temperature
Safety Precautions :Avoid topical and respiratory contact
The test compound was provided by the sponsor. Portions were aliquoted into smaller containers prior to use. Due to difficulty in dissolving it in common vehicles such as saline or corn oil, the test material was administered to mice by oral gavage without use of a solvent.
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- B6C3F1
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Strain B6C3Fl mice were used in the study. Male and female mice were obtained from a reputable supplier. The males were dosed when they
were 13 weeks old while the females were dosed when they were 12-14 weeks old. Mice were quarantined at least one week and were group housed in cages with Easi-litter bedding. All animals were fed Agway Prolab R-MH 3000. They were given untreated Cambridge tap water supplied ad libitum. Animals were housed in a room with automatic light/dark cycle of approximately 12 hours each. Temperature of the environment was maintained at 72°F (± 10%). Each mouse was randomly assigned to code groups using computer generated random numbers, identified by ear punch, and individually caged following a quarantine period. Approximately eight hours prior to dosing feed was removed from the animals. One male mouse, 63, dosed with cyclophosphamide had some food in its cage at the time of dosing; but this did not affect the study since a positive result was observed in-this animal
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- Due to difficulty in dissolving it in common vehicles such as saline or corn oil, the test material was administered to mice by oral gavage without use of a solvent
- Details on exposure:
- The induction of micronuclei in the bone marrow polychromatic erythrocyte cells as a result of chemical treatment is an established test for determining the genotoxic effect of chemicals. Micronuclei are cytoplasmic bodies with the appearance of small nuclei in the cell. These entities arise from chromosomal lagging at anaphase, from acentric chromosomal fragments, or from spindle fiber malformation during cell division. In mouse bone marrow, the cell population tested consists of erythroblasts undergoing their final mitosis before expulsion of the nucleus. The frequency of occurrence
of micronuclei in the polychromatic erythrocyte cells of treated animals provides an indicator of in vivo cytogenetic damage. Polychromatic erythrocytes or young red blood cells mature into normochromatic erythrocytes (NCEs) in the bone marrow. In normal untreated bone marrow cells, polychromatic erythrocytes and normochromatic erythrocytes are approximately in equal ratio. If a test agent is cytotoxic to nucleated ·cells, the proportion of polychromatic erythrocytes is reduced. The ratio of polychromatic erythrocytes to normochromatic erythrocyte is often used as an index of cytotoxicity of a test material.
A total of 80 mice, 40 males and 40 females, were used for the study.
Ten animals were used per test group. The animals were dosed once by oral gavage. Dosing volumes for each animal were determined from the weight of the animal, the specific gravity of the chemical, and the final dose desired. Dose volumes less than 0.1 ml were rounded to 0.1 ml. The target dose of the test chemical was 5 g/kg and the negative control was mineral oil at 5 ml/kg.
Time of Sacrifice (hours)
18 24 48
Test material 10 10 10
Mineral Oil 10 10 10
Cyclophosphamide(50mg/kg) 10 - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 and 48 hours
- Frequency of treatment:
- once only
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
Basis:
other: neat 5g/kg
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- A total of 80 mice, 40 males and 40 females, were used for the study.
Ten animals were used per test group 5 x male 5x female - Control animals:
- yes
- Positive control(s):
- Cyclophosphamide 50mg/kg
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone Marrow
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- Bone Marow Collection
Following each exposure period (18, 24 and 48 hours), mice were killed by cervical dislocation and the femurs were removed and the ends cut. Bone marrow cells were collected by flushing the cavity with a phosphate buffered saline solution (pH 7.4).
Slide preparation
After collection of the bone marrow, the suspension was centrifuged and the supernatant was removed. Cells were resuspended in phosphate buffered saline solution. Slides were made by placing one drop of suspension on a clean slide and spreading the cells evenly with a second slide. At least two slides were made from each animal. Slides were labelled with the case number, chemical number, animal group number, animal identification number and an alphabet letter to designate replicate slides. Slides were than air dried at least 24 hours and fixed in 100% methanol for five minutes. Slides from mice treated with the test substance, and the negative control were coded, and the code was recorded in the original data notebook.
Staining
Acridine orange stain supplied by Sigma Chemical Co. (Lot No. l24F-3708) was made at a final concentration of 0.125mg/ml in sterile phosphate buffer saline solution (pH 7.4). Slides were stained a few minutes prior to analysis using a fluorescent microscope. - Evaluation criteria:
- For each animal a minimum of 1000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCEs) were counted for the presence of micronucleated PCEs. The frequency of micronucleated cells per animal was expressed as the number of micronucleated PCEs per 1000 PCEs' counted. The ratio of PCEs to normochromatic erythrocytes (NCEs) in 1000 total erythrocytes for each animal was recorded. The data were analyzed for statistical significance based on a binomial distribution, a level of significance of 0.05, and the tables of Kastenbaum and Bowman (Mutat Res ~ 527-549, 1970)
- Statistics:
- The data were analyzed for statistical significance based on a binomial distribution, a level of significance of 0.05, and the tables of Kastenbaum and Bowman (Mutat Res ~ 527-549, 1970)
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- not examined
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not examined
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- One male mouse, 63, dosed with cyclophosphamide had some food in its cage at the time of dosing; but this did not affect the study since a positive result was observed in-this animal.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
The test material was tested for its genotoxicity using the mouse in vivo micronucleus screening assay. There was no significant increase in micronucleated PCEs in animals exposed to the test substance. Thus, the test material was negative in this in vivo assay. - Executive summary:
The test material was tested for its genotoxic activity using a mouse in vivo micronucleus screening assay. Male and female B6G3Fl mice were dosed once at 5 g/kg. The mice were killed at 18, 24 and 48 hours after dosing, and the bone marrow cells were collected. Ten animals, five males and five females were included in each group. At least one thousand polychromatic erythrocytes (PGEs) from each mouse were examined for micronuclei.
The negative control was mineral oil dosed at 5 ml/kg for 18, 24 and 48 hours, while the positive control was cyclophosphamide dosed at 50 mg/kg for 24 hours.
The mean micronucleated PGEs for negative control male mice were 2.6, 3.0 and 2.4 per 1000 PGEs for the three time periods. The average number of micronucleated PCEs for the positive control male mice was 14.5.
The mean micronuc1eated PCEs for the test chemical were 1.7, 4.3 and 3.6 per 1000 PCEs for the three time points, respectively. These means are not significantly higher than the negative control values.
The mean number of micronucleated PCEs for negative control female mice were 1.9, 2.1 and 2.9 per 1000 PCEs for the three time periods, while the positive control female mice had an average of 20.5. The frequencies of micronucleated PCEs in female mice treated with the test chemical were 2.9, 3.2 and 2.1 per 1000 PCEs for the three time points, respectively. These means are not significantly higher than the negative control values.
Based on these data, the test material which was tested at the maximum dose of 5 g/kg, did not induce a significant increase in micronuclei in bone marrow cells from either male or female B6G3Fl mice. Thus, the chemical was negative in this in vivo genetic toxicity test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.