Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
distribution modelling
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
not applicable
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
QSAR prediction: US EPA accepted QSAR method for organic chemicals properties assessment. Recognised method of fugacity calculations.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
other: QSAR
Title:
EPI Suite v 4.1/Level III Fugacity Model
Author:
US EPA
Year:
2014
Bibliographic source:
http://epa.gov/oppt/exposure/pubs/episuite.htm

Materials and methods

Model:
calculation according to Mackay, Level III
Calculation programme:
EPI Suite v 4.1/Level III Fugacity Model
Release year:
2 014
Media:
other: all

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Benzyl alcohol
EC Number:
202-859-9
EC Name:
Benzyl alcohol
Cas Number:
100-51-6
Molecular formula:
C7H8O
IUPAC Name:
phenylmethanol
Test material form:
liquid

Study design

Test substance input data:
- Parameters as per physicochemical summary data.
- Reaction half-life estimates for:
Air: 11.21
Water: 360
Soil: 720
Sediment: 3240



Environmental properties:
- Environmental compartment sizes and character as per the TGD

Results and discussion

Percent distribution in media

Air (%):
1.03
Water (%):
34
Soil (%):
64.8
Sediment (%):
0.093
Susp. sediment (%):
0
Biota (%):
0
Aerosol (%):
0
Other distribution results:
The figures above represent the first emission scenario shown below

Any other information on results incl. tables

 

Level III Fugacity Model (Full-Output):

=======================================

Chem Name  : Benzenemethanol

 Molecular Wt: 108.14

 Henry's LC : 3.37e-007 atm-m3/mole (Henry database)

 Vapor Press : 0.0535 mm Hg (Mpbpwin program)

 Log Kow    : 1.1 (Kowwin program)

 Soil Koc   : 21.5 (KOCWIN MCI method)

  

TABLE 1

 

Mass Amount

(percent)

Half-Life

(hr)

Emissions

 

(kg/hr)

Air

1.03

11.2

1000

 

Water

34

360

1000

 

Soil

64.8

720

1000

 

Sediment

0.0929

3.24e+003

0

 

                  

 

TABLE 2A

 

Fugacity

(atm)

Reaction

(kg/hr)

Advection

(kg/hr)

Reaction

(percent)

Advection

(percent)

Air

2.95e-011

807

131

26.9

4.35

Water

6.75e-012

834

433

27.8

14.4

Soil

1.75e-010

794

0

26.5

0

Sediment

6.08e-012

0.253

0.0237

0.00843

0.000788

 

 

Persistence Time: 424 hr

  Reaction Time:   523 hr

  Advection Time:  2.26e+003 hr

  Percent Reacted: 81.2

  Percent Advected: 18.8

 

  Half-Lives (hr), (based upon Biowin (Ultimate) and Aopwin):

     Air:     11.21

     Water:   360

     Soil:    720

     Sediment: 3240

       Biowin estimate: 3.142 (weeks      )

 

  Advection Times (hr):

     Air:     100

     Water:   1000

     Sediment: 5e+004

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Benzyl alcohol has no affinity to be in air and sediment. The direct emissions to soil and surface water are significant, therefore Benzyl alcohol will be almost exclusively be found in soil and surface water.
Executive summary:

Mackay fugacity modelling (level 3) indicates that, taking into account degradation and using inflow parameters which are consistent with the known production tonnage of this substance in, fugacity coefficient indicates that environmental concentrations in water are predicted to be 6.75e-012 (atm), in air (atm) 2.95e-011 and soil 1.75e-010 (atm) and sediment to be  6.08e-012 (atm).

These are negligible low levels. This can be considered a worse case prediction as it assumes all product is emitted with no emission control systems used.