Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 205-358-3 | CAS number: 139-33-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Comparable to guideline study with acceptable restriction (limited documentation)
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- uninduced and arochlor induced liver S9 mix of male Fischer 344 rats, B6C3F1 mice, and Syrian hamsters
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 10; 33; 100; 333; 1000; 3333; 10000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- dest. water
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: - S9 mix: 2-Nitrofluorene; n-Methyl-N`-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine; +S9: 2-aminoanthracene; 2-2(furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
3
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- NTP-Standard Protocol
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254-induced male Sprague Dawley rat liver S9 enzymes and cofactor mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 50; 75; 100 µg/mL
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: -S 9: Mitomycin C; + S9: Cyclophosphamide
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- NTP-Standard Protocol
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 from the livers of either Aroclor 1254-induced or non-induced male Fischer 344 rats
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 3000, 4000, 5000 µg/mL
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: - S9 mix: methyl methanesulfonate; + S9 mix: methylcholanthrene
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Comparable to guideline study without detailed documentation
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 250, 500, 1000, 1500, 2000 µg/mL
- Vehicle / solvent:
- water
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: - S9: ethyl methane sulfonate; + S9: 3-methylcholanthrene
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 2000 µg/ml
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Endpoint:
- genetic toxicity in vitro
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: genome mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study meets generally accepted scientific principles
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- BALB/c-3T3 transformation assay: BALB/c-3T3 cells were grown in soft agar. Non-malignant cells grow at low frequencies in soft agar, transformed cells readily grew in soft agar and were tumorigenic in vivo. Chemical-induced morphologically transformed cells are easily recognized and induced at relatively high frequencies in this assay.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell transformation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: BALB/c-3T3
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- First Experiment: 0.907; 1.36; 1.81; 2.72 mM
Second Experiment: 0.837; 1.67; 2.33; 2.79 mM - Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Evaluation criteria:
- The number of type I-III transformed foci of BALB/c-3T3 cells were identified microscopically using published criteria, and type III foci had three phenotypic properties: piling and overlapping cells, disorientation of cells at the periphery of the focus, and invasion of transformed cells into a contact-inhibited monolayer of WT cells. Type I and II foci also appeared in many different sizes, but they lacked one or more of the three phenotypic properties of the type III transformed focus.
- Statistics:
- rank t-statistics
- Species / strain:
- other: BALB/c-3T3
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Comparable to OECD 471 guideline study with acceptable restrictions (missing strain for crosslinking/oxidizing agents)
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- missing strain for crosslinking/oxidizing agents
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA97, TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Arochlor 1254-induced, male Sprague- Dawley rat and male Syrian hamster livers S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 100; 333; 1000; 3333; 6666; 10,000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Water
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: -S9 mix: sodium azide, 9-aminoacridine, 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine; +S9-mix: 2 aminoantracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION:
preincubation: 50 µL of the TS were mixed with 100 µL Salmonella culture and 500 µL S-9 mix of buffer
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 min
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 2 days - Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA97, TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Endpoint:
- genetic toxicity in vitro
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: genome mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP-Study, meets accepted scientific standard and is described in sufficient detail
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- A cell transformation assay was performed at pH 6.7 using Syrian hamster embryo cells.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell transformation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: Syrian hamster embryo (SHE)
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 24 h exposure: 25; 50; 75; 100 µg/mL
7-day exposure: 25; 50; 75; 100; 125; 150 µg/mL - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- DURATION
Upon treatment of the cultures with test chemical, they were either refered with control medium after a 24-h exposure and then left undisturbed for the 7-day clonal expression period or exposed to chemical for the entire 7-day clonal expression period.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
2
- Statistics:
- one-tailed Fisher's Exact
- Species / strain:
- other: Syrian hamster embryo (SHE)
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- With a 24-h exposure, EDTA (in culture medium) was tested at concentrations up to 100 µg/mL (49 % RPE) and failed to induce a statistically significant
increase in MTF compared with controls. With a 7-day exposure, EDTA was tested at concentrations up to 150 µg/mL (14 % RPE) and failed to induce a
statistically significant increase in transformation frequency compared with controls (see table 1)
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1: Results of the Chromosome Aberrations Test for Na3EDTA. | |||||||||||||||
Study Result: Negative | |||||||||||||||
Activation | Trial | Trial Call | |||||||||||||
No Activation | 1 | Negative | |||||||||||||
Induced Rat Liver S9 | 2 | Negative | |||||||||||||
Trial #:1 Activation: No Activation Date: 10/17/1984 Harvest Time: 13.5 hrs Trial Call: Negative | |||||||||||||||
Dose | Total Cells Examined | Total Aberrations | Complex Aberrations | Simple Aberrations | Other Abs. | ||||||||||
µg/mL | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | |||
Abs. | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | ||||
Cell | Abs. | Cell | Abs. | Cell | Abs. | Cell | Abs. | ||||||||
Abs: Aberrations | |||||||||||||||
Vehicle Control: | Dimethylsulfoxide | 10 | 100 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Positive Control: | Mitomycin C | 0.25 | 100 | 29 | 0.29 | 26 | 24 | 0.24 | 22 | 5 | 0.05 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 50 | 31 | 0.62 | 46 | 24 | 0.48 | 44 | 7 | 0.14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Test Chemical: | Ethylenediamine tetraacetate, trisodium salt (EDTA) | 25 | 100 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
50 | 100 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
75 | 100 | 5 | 0.05 | 5 | 3 | 0.03 | 3 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
100 | 100 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Trend: | 1.106 | 1.331 | 0.333 | ||||||||||||
Probability: | 0.134 | 0.092 | 0.37 | ||||||||||||
Trial #:2 Activation: Induced Rat Liver S9 Date: 10/31/1984 Harvest Time: 14.0 hrs Trial Call: Negative | |||||||||||||||
Dose | Total Cells Examined | Total Aberrations | Complex Aberrations | Simple Aberrations | Other Abs. | ||||||||||
µg/mL | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | |||
Abs. | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | ||||
Cell | Abs. | Cell | Abs. | Cell | Abs. | Cell | Abs. | ||||||||
Abs: Aberrations | |||||||||||||||
Positive Control: | Cyclophosphamide | 15 | 100 | 55 | 0.55 | 40 | 29 | 0.29 | 22 | 26 | 0.26 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Vehicle Control: | Dimethylsulfoxide | 10 | 100 | 3 | 0.03 | 3 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Test Chemical: | Ethylenediamine tetraacetate, trisodium salt (EDTA) | 25 | 100 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
50 | 100 | 4 | 0.04 | 4 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
75 | 100 | 4 | 0.04 | 4 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
100 | 100 | 3 | 0.03 | 3 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Trend: | 0.686 | -0.156 | 1.164 | ||||||||||||
Probability: | 0.247 | 0.562 | 0.122 | ||||||||||||
Tables: Results of the mouse lymphoma test with Na3EDTA
Nonactivation Trial: 1 Experiment Call: Negative and Non-Toxic | |||||||
Conc. | Cloning | Relative Total | Mutant Colonies | Mutant Frequency | AVG Mutant Frequency | ||
µg/mL | Efficiency | Growth | |||||
Vehicle Control: | H2O | 0 | 64 | 87 | 113 | 59 | 69 |
63 | 112 | 132 | 70 | ||||
65 | 108 | 133 | 68 | ||||
64# | 92 | 148.5 | 78 | ||||
Test Chemical: | 60 | 65 | 107 | 177 | 91 | 83 | |
74 | 109 | 165 | 74 | ||||
70 | 58 | 110 | 97 | 56 | 68 | ||
67 | 113 | 162 | 81 | ||||
80 | 67 | 100 | 131 | 65 | 59 | ||
63# | 116 | 99 | 52 | ||||
90 | 58 | 86 | 119 | 69 | 72 | ||
63 | 93 | 140 | 75 | ||||
100 | 71 | 111 | 142 | 67 | 73 | ||
66 | 101 | 159 | 80 | ||||
Positive Control: | MMS | 15 | 49 | 42 | 293 | 198 | 181* |
53 | 45 | 261 | 164 | ||||
Trial Notes: | |||||||
Nonactivation Trial: 2 Experiment Call: Negative and Non-Toxic | |||||||
Conc. | Cloning | Relative Total | Mutant Colonies | Mutant Frequency | AVG Mutant Frequency | ||
µg/mL | Efficiency | Growth | |||||
Vehicle Control: | FOP | 0 | 78 | 103 | 24 | 10 | 18 |
93 | 91 | 50 | 18 | ||||
103 | 104 | 57 | 18 | ||||
84 | 102 | 63 | 25 | ||||
Test Chemical: | 1000 | 80 | 42 | 61 | 25 | 23 | |
76 | 51 | 45 | 20 | ||||
2000 | 87 | 53 | 52 | 20 | 21 | ||
88 | 52 | 61 | 23 | ||||
3000 | 79 | 38 | 47 | 20 | 21 | ||
77 | 50 | 50 | 22 | ||||
4000 | 93 | 32 | 80 | 29 | 27 | ||
65 | 30 | 49 | 25 | ||||
5000 | 79 | 23 | 49 | 21 | 22 | ||
76 | 29 | 54 | 24 | ||||
Positive Control: | MMS | 15 | 52 | 25 | 146 | 93 | 93* |
38 | 18 | 107 | 93 | ||||
Trial Notes: | |||||||
Nonactivation Trial: 3 Experiment Call: Negative and Non-Toxic | |||||||
Conc. | Cloning | Relative Total | Mutant Colonies | Mutant Frequency | AVG Mutant Frequency | ||
µg/mL | Efficiency | Growth | |||||
Vehicle Control: | FOP | 0 | 69 | 94 | 88 | 43 | 38 |
62 | 109 | 48 | 26 | ||||
58 | 87 | 79 | 46 | ||||
76 | 110 | 84 | 37 | ||||
Test Chemical: | 1000 | 61 | 59 | 95 | 52 | 57 | |
55 | 60 | 101 | 61 | ||||
2000 | 68 | 73 | 111 | 55 | 49 | ||
61 | 61 | 77 | 42 | ||||
3000 | 62 | 64 | 110 | 59 | 60 | ||
52 | 50 | 95 | 61 | ||||
4000 | 61 | 45 | 74 | 40 | 42 | ||
61 | 51 | 81 | 45 | ||||
5000 | 50 | 34 | 68 | 45 | 46 | ||
55 | 37 | 77 | 47 | ||||
Positive Control: | MMS | 15 | 23 | 24 | 163 | 235 | 217* |
26 | 23 | 156 | 200 | ||||
EMS | 250 | 41 | 61 | 427 | 347 | 325* | |
52 | 59 | 474 | 302 | ||||
Trial Notes: | |||||||
Induced S9 Trial: 1 Experiment Call: Negative and Non-Toxic | |||||||
Conc. | Cloning | Relative Total | Mutant Colonies | Mutant Frequency | AVG Mutant Frequency | ||
µg/mL | Efficiency | Growth | |||||
Vehicle Control: | FOP | 0 | 108 | 93 | 101 | 31 | 36 |
102 | 109 | 98 | 32 | ||||
109 | 101 | 119 | 36 | ||||
97 | 97 | 130 | 45 | ||||
Test Chemical: | 1000 | 105 | 74 | 137 | 43 | 47 | |
100 | 78 | 152 | 51 | ||||
2000 | 82 | 58 | 101 | 41 | 42 | ||
97 | 67 | 126 | 43 | ||||
3000 | 99 | 56 | 159 | 54 | 44 | ||
109 | 62 | 113 | 35 | ||||
4000 | 99 | 55 | 106 | 36 | 38 | ||
85 | 45 | 101 | 40 | ||||
5000 | 77 | 36 | 124 | 54 | 55 | ||
85 | 36 | 145 | 57 | ||||
Positive Control: | MCA | 2.5 | 72 | 44 | 615 | 286 | 305* |
70 | 40 | 680 | 323 | ||||
Trial Notes: | |||||||
Induced S9 Trial: 2 Experiment Call: Negative and Non-Toxic | |||||||
Conc. | Cloning | Relative Total | Mutant Colonies | Mutant Frequency | AVG Mutant Frequency | ||
µg/mL | Efficiency | Growth | |||||
Vehicle Control: | FOP | 0 | 60 | 96 | 36 | 20 | 20 |
64 | 110 | 35 | 18 | ||||
56 | 92 | 48 | 29 | ||||
66 | 103 | 25 | 13 | ||||
Test Chemical: | 1000 | 52 | 61 | 41 | 26 | 21 | |
63 | 75 | 31 | 16 | ||||
2000 | 67 | 63 | 56 | 28 | 27 | ||
62 | 61 | 48 | 26 | ||||
3000 | 61 | 40 | 41 | 22 | 31 | ||
71 | 48 | 85 | 40 | ||||
4000 | 66 | 41 | 56 | 28 | 29 | ||
57 | 35 | 51 | 30 | ||||
5000 | 70 | 34 | 65 | 31 | 28 | ||
59 | 36 | 45 | 25 | ||||
Positive Control: | MCA | 2.5 | 34 | 19 | 231 | 229 | 232* |
34 | 17 | 237 | 236 | ||||
Trial Notes: | |||||||
Footnotes: | |||||||
Asterisks(*) indicate significant responses. | |||||||
r = rejected value due to quality control criteria | |||||||
# = reduced sample size because of the loss of one culture dish due to contamination | |||||||
MMS = methyl methanesulfonate | |||||||
MCA = methylcholanthrene | |||||||
DMSO = dimethylsulfoxide (solvent) |
Table 1: Mutagenicity and Cytotoxicity of Na2EDTA
Concentration [µg/mL] | S9 | Relative growth | Mutant frequency/ 106survivors |
0 | - | 100 | 24 |
250 | - | 95.5 | 27 |
500 | - | 79.5 | 27 |
1000 | - | 87 | 20 |
1500 | - | 83.5 | 30 |
2000 | - | 65.5 | 29 |
0.25 µg/mL EMS | - | 42 | 693 |
0 | + | 100 | 48 |
250 | + | 78.5 | 55 |
500 | + | 95.5 | 56 |
1000 | + | 80.5 | 47 |
1500 | + | 107 | 40 |
2000 | + | 87.5 | 42 |
5 µg/mL MCA | + | 22 | 542 |
Na3EDTA was moderately cytotoxie to the BALB/c-3T3 cells and had an average LD50 of 1.89 mM. The statistical sensitivities of transformation assay trials 1 and 2 were 80 and 67/110, respectively; the detection sensitivities for BaP of trials 1 and 2 were 89 and 78/110, respectively. The test chemical had an limited activity transformation response in the first experiment, and an sufficient negative response in the second experiment. Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, trisodium salt, was evaluated as inactive in the transformation assay, and its actual and estimated rank t-statistics were 1.41 and 2.01, respectively.
Table 1: Results of the cell transformation assay:
RPE (%) | Number of MT/ Total Colonies | MTF (%) | ||
7-day | Control | 100 | 3/1269 | 0.24 |
50 µg/mL | 95 | 2/1187 | 0.17 | |
75 µg/mL | 88 | 0/736 | 0.00 | |
100 µg/mL | 75 | 0/932 | 0.00 | |
125 µg/mL | 51 | 1/424 | 0.24 | |
150 µg/mL | 14 | 0/180 | 0.00 | |
24 h | Control | 100 | 7/1293 | 0.54 |
25 µg/mL | 102 | 7/1317 | 0.53 | |
50 µg/mL | 94 | 13/1182 | 1.10 | |
75 µg/mL | 77 | 4/995 | 0.40 | |
100 µg/mL | 49 | 10/1225 | 0.82 |
RPE = relative plating efficiency; MT = morphologically transformed colonies; MTF = morphological transformation frequency
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- BASF AG, Experimental Toxicology and Ecology
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Batch No. of test material: 31-9412
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Purity test date: 31 October 1996
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature
- Stability under test conditions: The stability of the test substance at room temperature in the vehicle water over a period of 4 hours has been verified analytically - Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Deutschland GmbH
- Weight at study initiation: Mean 29 g
- Housing: Makrolon cages type Mill, in groups of 5
- Diet: Kliba, standardized pelleted feed, Provimi Kliba SA, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland, ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 - 24
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle used: water
- Details on exposure:
- - The low dose group was given 500 mg test substance/kg body weight or 20 mL/kg body weight of a solution with a concentration of 2.5 g/100 mL.
- The intermediate dose group was given 1000 mg test substance/kg body weight or 20 ml/kg body weight of a solution with a concentration of 5.0 g/100 mL.
- The top dose group was given 2000 mg test substance/kg body weight or 20 mL/kg body weight of a solution with a concentration of 10.0 g/100 mL. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 48 h (animals were treated twice at 24 h intervals)
- Frequency of treatment:
- twice
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- 20 mg of cyclophosphamide (CPP)/kg body weight or 0 .15 mg of vincristine sulphate (VCR)/kg body weight, both, dissolved in purified water, were administered to male animals once, orally each in a volume of 10 mL/kg body weight.
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- bone marrow
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
2,000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) from each of the male animals of every test group are evaluated and investigated for micronuclei (MN). The normochromatic erythrocytes (NCE) which occur are also scored. The following parameters have been evaluated:
- Number of polychromatic erythrocytes
- Number of polychromatic erythrocytes containing micronuclei
- Number of normochromatic erythrocytes
- Number of normochromatic erythrocytes containing micronuclei
- Ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes
- Number of small micronuclei (d < D/4) and of large micronuclei (d > D/4) (d = diameter of micronucleus, D = cell diameter ) - Evaluation criteria:
- The test chemical is to be considered positive in this assay if the following criteria are met:
- A dose-related and significant increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes was observed .
- The proportion of cells containing micronuclei exceeded both the values of the concurrent negative control range and the negative historical control range .
A test substance is generally considered negative in this test system if:
- There was no significant increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes at any dose above concurrent control frequencies.
- The frequencies of cells containing micronuclei were within the historical control range. - Statistics:
- The statistical evaluation of the data was carried out using the program system MUKERN. A comparison of the dose group with the vehicle control was carried out using the Wilcoxon test for the hypothesis of equal medians.
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Remarks:
- As clinical signs only piloerrection were observed
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- - After two administrations of the highest dose of 2000 mg/kg body weight, 0.4 ‰ polychromatic erythrocytes containing micronuclei were found after 24 hours.
- In the two lower dose groups, rates of micronuclei of about 0.6 ‰ (1000 mg/kg group) and 0.7 ‰ (500 mg/kg group) were detected.
- With 12.7 %o the positive control substance cyclophosphamide for clastogenicity led to the expected increase in the number of polychromatic erythrocytes containing exclusively small micronuclei at a dose level of 20 mg/kg body weight.
- With 81 .7%o the positive control vincristine for induction of spindle poison effects also led to a clearly enhanced number of polychromatic erythrocytes containing micronuclei with the expected amount of large micronuclei, i .e. 10.5 ‰.
- The number of normochromatic erythrocytes containing micronuclei did not differ to any appreciable extent in the negative control or in the various dose groups
Thus, the test substance Trilon BD did not lead to any increase in the rate of micronuclei. The number of normochromatic or polychromatic erythrocytes containing small micronuclei (d < D/4) did not deviate from the vehicle control value and was within the historical control range. Nor were large micronuclei (d > D/4) observed either in the negative control group or in the three dose groups of Trilon BD.
No inhibition of erythropoiesis, induced by the treatment of mice with Trilon BD was detected; the ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes was always in the same range as that of the control values in all dose groups. - Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Micronuclei induction in germ cells of the mouse was evaluated after after i.p. application. Due to the very alkaline character of the test and its application very close to the gonads the route of application chosen in this test is not suitable and results obtained are considered to be equivocal.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Micronuclei induction in germ cells of the mouse were evaluated after after i.p. application. In a second set of experiments chromosomal aberrations in mouse spermatogonia were determined.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- Balb/c
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Italy
- Age at study initiation: 8 -12 weeks - Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Details on exposure:
- - Application volume: 10 ml/kg bw
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 or 48 h (2 treatment sacrifice intervals)
- Frequency of treatment:
- single treatment
- Dose / conc.:
- 186 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 6 control animals
3 for the 24 h interval
at least 4 for the 48 h interval - Control animals:
- yes
- Positive control(s):
- 5.5 mg/kg bw Adriamycin
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- spermatids
- Evaluation criteria:
- The presence of MN was assessed on both Golgi and Cap phases of spermatid development, by scoring a minimum of 1000 Golgi phase spermatids per animal, and the Cap phase cells observed at the same time.
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Remarks:
- see table 1
- Toxicity:
- not specified
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- In vivo mouse micronucleus assay
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- Balb/c
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Italy
- Age at study initiation: 8 -12 weeks - Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Details on exposure:
- - Application volume: 10 mL/kg bw
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 or 48 h (2 treatment sacrifice intervals)
- Frequency of treatment:
- single treatment
- Dose / conc.:
- 186 mg/kg bw/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 6 control animals
3 for the 24 h interval
at least 4 for the 48 h interval - Control animals:
- yes
- Positive control(s):
- 1 mg/kg bw Mitomycin C
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- bone marrow; polychromatic erythrocytes
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- Bone marrow smears were prepared following a standard protocol (MacGregor et al., 1987).
- Evaluation criteria:
- The frequency of MN induced in bone marrow was estimated by scoring 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) per animal at both time intervals. The frequency of normochromatic erythrocytes (NCE) was also assessed, to verify the possible cytotoxicity of each tested dose through the PCE/NCE ratio.
- Statistics:
- The frequencies of MN observed in each experimental group were pooled and the significance of differences between treated and control groups were evaluated by using the G test. The mean frequency of aberrations per cell and the PCE/NCE ratio were compared by the Student t-test after square root transformation of values.
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian germ cell study: cytogenicity / chromosome aberration
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Documentation insufficient for assessment
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- mammalian germ cell cytogenetic assay
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- Balb/c
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Italy - Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- 10 mL/kg bw
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 6 h and 5 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- single treatment
- Dose / conc.:
- 93 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 186 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 (within 2 independent experiments)
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- secondary spermatocytes
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- Clinical observations are not reported
- Toxicity:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- not applicable
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1: Frequency of MN in early spermatids
Golgi phase |
Cap phase |
|||
Total |
+MN (‰ ± SE) |
Total |
+MN (‰ ± SE) |
|
Controls |
6,201 |
5 (0.8 ± 0.4) |
5,836 |
3 (0.5 ± 0.3 ) |
ADM 24 hr |
3,327 |
0 |
4,493 |
3 (0 .7 ± 0 .4) |
ADM 48 hr |
4,023 |
18 (4 .5 ± 1. 1)*** |
4,070 |
17 (4.2 ± 1.0)** * |
EDTA 24 hr |
2,993 |
9 (3.0 ± 1.0)* |
3,436 |
2 (0 .6 ± 0 .4) |
EDTA 48 hr |
4,010 |
15 (3 .8 ± 1 .0)*** |
3,541 |
2 (0 .9 ± 0 .4 ) |
It was speculated by the authors whether EDTA induced MN either because of an S-independent clastogenic action of the compound under study, or for chromosome lagging.
CHROMOSOMAL ABERRATIONS
- No induction of chromosomal aberration by EDTA
Table 1: Frequency of MN in Bone Marrow PCEs After Treatment With EDTA at Two Time Intervals
PCE |
NCE |
PCE/NCE ratio |
|||
Total |
+MN ( ‰ ± SE) |
Total |
+MN ( ‰ ± SE) |
PCE/NCE |
|
Controls |
11,810 |
21 (1 .8 ± 0.4) |
12,014 |
14 (1.2 ± 0.3) |
1.09 ± 0.09 |
MMC 24 hr |
6,149 |
93 (15.1 ± 1.6) |
6,085 |
22 (3.6 ± 0.8) |
1.01 ± 0.05 |
MMC 48 hr |
8,302 |
89 (10.7 ± 1.1) |
9,881 |
70 ( .1 ± 0.8) |
0.87 ± 0.08 |
EDTA 24 hr |
12,153 |
18 (1 .5 ± 0.3) |
13,820 |
15 (1 .1 ± 0 .3) |
0 .94 ± 0.1 1 |
EDTA 48 hr |
8,019 |
20 (2 .5 ± 0.6) |
7,514 |
15 (2 .0 ± 0.5) |
1 .05 ± 0 .09 |
PCE: polychromatic erythrocytes
NCE: normochromatic erythrocytes
EDTA did not induce significant increases in aneuploidy in secondary spermatocytes at both exposure levels and meiotic stages tested.
Additional information
IN VITRO
Na3EDTA was negative in a reverse gene mutation assay using bacteria Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 as well as E. Coli WP2uvrA without and with uninduced and arochlor induced liver S9 from male Fischer 344 rats, B6C3F1 mice or Syrian hamsters. The substance was tested up to concentrations of 10,000 µg/plate (Dunkel, 1985).
Similar results were obtained by Zeiger (1988), who tested up tp 10,000 µg/plate Na3EDTA on Salmonella typhimurium strains TA97, TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537 with and without Arochlor 1254-induced, male Sprague-Dawley rat and male Syrian hamster livers S9 mix.
Several mammalian cell line gene mutations assays are available. In a mouse lymphoma assay with Na3EDTA, the mutant frequency was not increased at concentrations of 3000, 4000, 5000 µg/mL and a treatment time of 4 h. The assay was conducted with and without metabolic activation and no cytotoxicity was detected (NTP, 1984).
Another mouse lymphoma assay with Na2EDTA was also negative at concentrations of 250, 500, 1000, 1500 and 2000 µg/mL with and without metabolic activation. However, 2000 µg/mL Na2EDTA reduced the relative growth to 65.5 % compared to the control in cells without metabolic activation. This was not the case if cells were treated with S9 mix (Whittaker, 2001).
Cell transformation assays with Na2 and Na3 salts of EDTA were negative.
One test was performed on SHE cells with exposure of up to 100 µg/mL for 24 h or 150 µg/ml Na2EDTA for up to 7 days without metabolic activation (LeBoef, 1996).
Additionally a cell transformation assay using BALB/c-3T3 cells was performed without metabolic activation. Cells were exposed to up to up to 770 µg/mL Na3EDTA for 48 h without metabolic activation (Matthews, 1993).
IN VIVO
Several in vivo tests for genotoxicity on somatic cells have been performed. The key study which was performed according to OECD 474 guideline and GLP, concluded that no micronuclei were induced in polychromatic erythrocytes of NMRI mice after repeated oral administration (twice with a 24-hour interval between administrations) of 500, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg bw Na2EDTA. As clinical sign only piloerection was observed after the second administration of 2000 mg/kg. No lethal effects or cytotoxicity (PCE/NCE ratio) were induced. Only males (5 per group) were used because no distinct symptomatic differences between males and females were noticed in a pre-test (BASF SE, 2000).
In another well-conducted in vivo micronucleus assay Na2EDTA was negative in bone marrow cells of mice (strain: BALB/c). Mice were treated with a single intraperitoneal dose of 186 mg/kg bodyweight; the sampling times were 24 hours and 48 hours after treatment. The tested dose was near to the LD50 value. No cytotoxic effects (PCE/NCE) were induced; information about clinical signs or lethal effects were not given. Only males (3 per 24-hour group; 4 per 48-hour group) were used (Russo & Levis, 1992).
Additionally, in vivo mutagenicity tests have been performed on rodent germ cells. Na2EDTA induced micronuclei in germ cells at the late stages of spermacytogenesis of mice (strain: BALB/c) after intraperitoneal administration of a very high dose of 186 mg/kg bw in the range of the i.p. LD50 value.
The frequency of micronuclei was analysed in Golgi phase and Cap phase, representing the two earliest phases of spermatids development. The sampling times were 24 hours and 48 hours after administration. Na2EDTA induced micronuclei in Golgi phase spermatids (0.30 % and 0.38 % micronucleated spermatids at 24 hours and 48 hours sampling as compared to 0.08 % in controls); in Cap phase spermatids negative results were obtained. Toxicity data were not given. Aneuploidy is discussed as most probable origin of micronuclei produced by NA2EDTA in secondary spermatocytes because the substance generally induced micronuclei of larger size in comparison with other substances.
Micronuclei induction in germ cells was evaluated after after i.p. application in this study. Due to the very alkaline character of the test item and its application very close to the gonads the route of application chosen in this test is not suitable and results obtained are considered to be equivocal.
In addition, Na2EDTA does not induce chromosomal aberrations in the spermatogonial phase, the most suitable germ cell population to detect chromosomal aberrations. An in vivo chromosomal aberration assay with mouse spermatogonia (strain: BALB/c) led to a negative result after a single i.p. administration of 186 mg/kg bw Na2EDTA. The sampling time was 24 hours sampling time after administration (Russo & Levis, 1992).
Zordan et al. (1990) investigated aneugenic properties of Na2EDTA in primary and secondary spermatocytes of mouse (strain: BALB/c). After single i .p. administration of 93 and 186 mg/kg bw no increases in aneuploid spermatocytes were observed. The sampling was 6 hours and 5 days after administration; higher doses resulted in lethality.
Short description of key
information:
Several in vitro and in vivo tests using Na2EDTA are available.
Additional information of EDTA free acid and other Na salts of EDTA have
been used for the overall risk assessment. Na salts of EDTA were tested
negative in several ames tests. Na salts of EDTA were tested negative in
several mouse lymphoma assays. Only one mouse lymphoma assay using
edetic acid was positive. However, it was not clear whether this effect
was due to the test substance or the pH change. Several other in vitro
tests have been performed, and in general EDTA was not genotoxic in
vitro.
In vivo, somatic cells in mice (bone marrow cells) showed negative
results with respect to the endpoints micronuclei, aneuploidy and sister
chromatid exchanges. In germ line cells negative results were obtained
for induction of structural chromosomal aberrations in spermatogonia,
for induction of aneuploidy in primary and secondary spermatocytes, and
also for induction of dominant lethals. A positive result was obtained
in a micronucleus test with spermatids after ip application, indicating
that aneugenic effects may be induced in specific phases of
spermatogenesis (late spermacytogenesis). The effect was linked to the
use of an extremely high dose in the LD50 range. Since the induction of
aneuploidy is based on a threshold mode of action, the potential for
induction of aneuploidy will not be expressed at low doses. Furthermore,
the effects may be indirect, resulting from the lower intracellular
bioavailability of essential elements. On balance, EDTA and its sodium
salts may show a low aneuploidogenic potential at extremely high doses.
On the basis of the various negative findings and the assumption of a
threshold mode of action for aneugens, it can be concluded that EDTA and
its sodium salts are not mutagenic for humans.
This result was also confirmed by the independent evaluation of the MAK
Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds
in the work area (MAK, 46. Lieferung, 2009).
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. Based on the available data, the substance is not considered to be classified for genetic toxicity under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, as amended for the tenth time in Regulation (EU) No 2017/776.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.