Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 701-480-0 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Well documented study performed according to internationally accepted method
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 000
- Report date:
- 2000
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- A bacterial reverse mutation test was performed that used amino-acid requiring strains of Escherichia coli to detect point mutations, which involve substitutions of the genome of the organism. Bacteria was exposed to the test substance with and without metabolic activation.
In addition bacterial survival test was performed that measured the influence of the test substance on the growth of the strain that is used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of the sample - GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- other quality assurance
- Type of assay:
- bacterial gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Iron silicate, copper smelting and refining
- EC Number:
- 701-480-0
- Cas Number:
- 67711-92-6
- IUPAC Name:
- Iron silicate, copper smelting and refining
- Details on test material:
- Granulated copper slag with the following chemical composition.
Cu 0.78%
Pb 0.48%
As <0.005%
Ni 0,025 %
Cd 0.006%
Cr 0.25%
Cr VI <0.005%
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Five different conentrations were tested: 312, 625, 1250 , 2500 and 5000 mcg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- The sample was subjected to an extraction in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) Then resulting liquid after filtering is being used to carry out the test
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- for plates without activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- dimethylsulfoxide(DMSO)
- Positive controls:
- no
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2 Aa- Aminoantraceno
- Remarks:
- for plates with activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- 0.1 ml of fresh bacterial culture and and 0.1 ml of DMSO (in the control plates) were added to the different concentrations of the test solution .Approximate cell density of bacterial culture, as measured by colorimetry based on a growth curve was 10~8 cells / mm. To test the effect of enzyme activation the same number of plates were prepared by adding 0.5 ml of enzyme activity in each.
The contents of each tube are mixed and poured over a surface plate contining ET5 media ( E5 media supplemented with tryptophan)
All plates were incubated at 37°+/- 2C for 48 hours. After the incubation period, the number of revertant colonies per plate was counted.
Triplicate plating was used at each dose level.
The survival test was performed by adding 0.1 ml of DMSO or the solution of the sample (at the same concentrations as the test for mutagenicity) and 0.1 ml of bacterial culture (diluted to a density of bacterial population as appropriate) to tubes with 2 agir ml surface.
The plates were incubated 48 h at 37 / - 2C and then number of colonies was counted. All plates were prepared in triplicate.
In parallel tests were performed with MMS( metil metano sulfonad) and 2 Aa-Aminoantraceno) to verify the sensitivity of the strain, following the same methodology. - Evaluation criteria:
- Substance is considered as mutagenic if the number of revertant colonies appearing on the treated plates is significantly greater than the number that appeared in the control culture plates.
Substance is considered as cytotoxic if the number of colonies appearing on the treated plates is significantly lower than the number that appeared in the control culture plates.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Any other information on results incl. tables
Statistical comparison of the data in each column was made relative to the control. Muragenicity
|
Without metabolic activation |
||||
Plate1 |
Plate2 |
Plate3 |
Media |
SD |
|
Control |
110 |
91 |
84 |
95 |
13 |
312 |
74 |
80 |
85 |
80 |
6 |
625 |
88 |
82 |
75 |
82 |
7 |
1250 |
122 |
98 |
76 |
99 |
23 |
2500 |
65 |
82 |
108 |
85 |
22 |
5000 |
76 |
85 |
72 |
78 |
7 |
|
With metabolic activation |
||||
Plate1 |
Plate2 |
Plate3 |
Media |
SD |
|
Control |
138 |
126 |
109 |
124 |
15 |
312 |
135 |
120 |
130 |
128 |
8 |
625 |
130 |
123 |
121 |
125 |
5 |
1250 |
139 |
117 |
128 |
128 |
11 |
2500 |
131 |
123 |
113 |
122 |
9 |
5000 |
112 |
119 |
114 |
115 |
4 |
Bacteria survival
|
Without metabolic activation |
||||
Plate1 |
Plate2 |
Plate3 |
Media |
SD |
|
Control |
66 |
73 |
58 |
66 |
8 |
312 |
73 |
78 |
89 |
80 |
8 |
625 |
73 |
83 |
84 |
80 |
6 |
1250 |
73 |
99 |
78 |
83 |
14 |
2500 |
62 |
115 |
75 |
84 |
28 |
5000 |
78 |
55 |
73 |
69 |
12 |
|
With metabolic activation |
||||
Plate1 |
Plate2 |
Plate3 |
Media |
SD |
|
Control |
84 |
76 |
87 |
82 |
6 |
312 |
88 |
76 |
76 |
80 |
7 |
625 |
78 |
75 |
67 |
73 |
6 |
1250 |
81 |
86 |
81 |
83 |
3 |
2500 |
77 |
87 |
83 |
82 |
5 |
5000 |
87 |
63 |
78 |
76 |
12 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative with metabolic activation
negative without metabolic activation
This is a good quality study. Under the conditions of the study, the sample is not mutagenic and does not affect bacterial survival. - Executive summary:
To evaluate the mutagenicity potential of the copper slag a bacterial reverse mutation test was performed with Escherichia coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101 according to EU method B13 "Mutagenicity – reverse mutation test using bacteria"
In addition bacterial survival test was performed that measured the influence of the test substance on the growth of the strain that is used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of the sample
Mutagenicity
Results indicate that at tested concentrations, the increase in the number of revertants compared to the control is not significant. Therefore at these concentrciones the copper slag is considered as non-mutatagenic.
Bacteria survival
Results indicate that at tested concentrations the decrease in the number of colonies comparing to the control is not significant. Therefore at these concentrations the copper slag does not affect bacterial survival.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.