Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 234-722-4 | CAS number: 12027-67-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- May 22, 2008 - June 7, 2008
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- study conducted under GLP principles
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 009
- Report date:
- 2009
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: UKEMS Guidelines
- Deviations:
- not specified
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guidelines
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 10102-40-6
- Cas Number:
- 10102-40-6
- IUPAC Name:
- 10102-40-6
- Reference substance name:
- sodium molybdate dihydrate
- IUPAC Name:
- sodium molybdate dihydrate
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Sodium Molybdate Dihydrate
- Molecular formula (if other than submission substance): Na2MoO4⋅2H2O
- Molecular weight (if other than submission substance): 241.95 g/mol
- Physical state: solid (white crystalline powder)
- Analytical purity: 99.9% (dihydrate form) based on an analysed Molybdenum content of 39.6%
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 31 December 2008
- Storage condition of test material: at room temperature (10-30°C) in the dark, dry
- Other: All Sodium Molybdate concentrations in this report are expressed in terms of the anhydrous test article Sodium Molybdate (CAS 7631-95-0 Na2MoO4), which has a molecular weight of 205.97.
- no further significant details stated
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Method
- Target gene:
- not applicable
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- rat liver metabolising system (S-9)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- - range-finder experiment: 1.6, 8, 40, 200, 1000, and 5000 µg/plate
- concentrations for experiment 1 were selected based on the results of the range-finder experiment: 1.6, 8, 40, 200, 1000, and 5000 µg/plate
- concentrations for experiment 2: 156.25, 200, 312.5, 625, 1250, 2500, 5000 µg/plate
- concentrations for experiment 2 (TA102 plate-incorporation): 1.6, 8, 40, 200, 1000, and 5000 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - preparations were made in purified water
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- purified water
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-nitrofluorene
- Remarks:
- Stock solution was formulated in anhydrous analytical grade dimethyl sulphoxide
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- Stock solution was formulated in water
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Remarks:
- Stock solution was formulated in anhydrous analytical grade dimethyl sulphoxide
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- Stock solution was formulated in water
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Remarks:
- Stock solution was formulated in anhydrous analytical grade dimethyl sulphoxide
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- Stock solution was formulated in anhydrous analytical grade dimethyl sulphoxide
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Preparation of the stock solution:
- Formulation of Sodium molybdate in purified water, stirred where required. Then, the stock solution was membrane filter-sterilised (Pall Acrodisc 32. filter, 0.2 μm pore size) and subsequent dilutions were made using purified water. The solutions were protected from light and used within approximately 5 hours.
- 0.1 mL volume additions of test article solution were used for all treatments
BACTERIA
- the inocula were taken from master plates or vials of frozen cultures, which had been checked for strain characteristics
RANGE-FINDER TEST
- strain TA100 with and without metabolic activation; triplicate plates
- negative (vehicle) and positive controls were included in quintuplicate and triplicate, respectively; with and without metabolic activation
- 0.1 mL bacterial culture, 0.1 mL test article solution or control and 0.5 mL 10% S-9 mix or buffer solution were added to 2.5 mL molten agar at 46±1°C followed by incubation at 37±1°C in the dark for 3 days
- pH measurements were performed: no pH shifts were observed
EXPERIMENTS
- triplicate plates test material
- negative (vehicle) and positive controls were included in quintuplicate and triplicate, respectively; with and without metabolic activation
- the activity of the S-9 mix used in each experiment was confirmed by AAN or B[a]P treatments (again in triplicate) of the strains in the presence of S-9
- 0.1 mL bacterial culture, 0.1 mL test article solution or control and 0.5 mL 10% S-9 mix or buffer solution were added to 2.5 mL molten agar at 46±1°C followed by incubation at 37±1°C in the dark for 3 days (Experiment 1) and for 4 days (experiment 2)
- as the results of Experiment 1 were negative/equivocal, treatments in the presence of S-9 in Experiment 2 included a pre-incubation step: quantities of test article or control solution, bacteria and S-9 mix, were mixed together and incubated for 1 hour at 37±1°C, before the addition of 2.5 mL molten agar
- additional treatments using plate incorporation methodology were performed in strain TA102 in the absence and presence of S-9, to investigate the reproducibility of increases in revertants observed in Experiment 1
COLONY COUNTING
- electronically using a Sorcerer Colony Counter (Perceptive Instruments) or manually where confounding factors such as bubbles in the agar or split agar affected the accuracy of the automated counter
-no further significant details stated - Evaluation criteria:
- The test article was considered to be mutagenic if:
1. Dunnett's test gave a significant response (p ≤ 0.01) which was concentration related
2. the positive responses described above were reproducible.
Individual plate counts from all experiments were recorded separately and the mean and standard deviation of the plate counts for each treatment were determined. Control counts were compared with the accepted normal ranges for our laboratory for numbers of spontaneous revertants on vehicle control plates and numbers of induced revertants on positive control plates. The ranges that are quoted are based on a large volume of historical control data accumulated from experiments where the correct strain and assay functioning are considered to have been confirmed. - Statistics:
- Dunnett's test was used to compare the counts at each concentration with the control. The presence or otherwise of a concentration response was checked by non-statistical analysis, up to limiting levels (for example toxicity, precipitation or 5000 μg/plate).
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- - for more detailed results see tables in "Attachment documents"
EXPERIMENT 1
- no evidence of toxicity was observed
- Statistically significant increases in revertant numbers were observed in strain TA102 in the presence of S-9 at 200 μg/plate following Experiment 1 treatments (1% level using Dunnett’s test). The increases observed are small and there is no evidence of a dose-related response, which would be evident given the narrowed concentration spacing in the pre-incubation treatment. The increases are therefore not considered to be biologically relevant.
EXPERIMENT 2
- narrowed concentration ranges were employed (156.25 – 5000 μg/plate), in order to examine more closely those concentrations of Sodium molybdate approaching the maximum test concentration and therefore considered most likely to provide evidence of any mutagenic activity
- in addition, treatments in the presence of S-9 were further modified by the inclusion of a pre-incubation step (it was hoped to increase the range of mutagenic chemicals that could be detected using this assay system)
- following these treatments no evidence of toxicity was observed
- Statistically significant increases in revertant numbers were observed in strain TA102 in the presence of S-9 at 200 μg/plate following Experiment 2 pre-incubation treatments (1% level using Dunnett’s test). In addition, statistically significant increases were observed when the data were analysed at the 1% level using Dunnett’s test in Experiment 2 treatments of strain TA100 in the absence of S-9 at 200 μg/plate and in strain TA1535 in the absence of S-9 at 2500 μg/plate. The increases observed are small and there is no evidence of a dose-related response, which would be evident given the narrowed concentration spacing in the pre-incubation treatment. The increases are therefore not considered to be biologically relevant.
ADDITIONAL TREATMENTS
- additional treatments in strain TA102 were conducted using plate incorporation methodology to determine the reproducibility of increases in revertants observed in Experiment 1
- following these treatments no evidence of toxicity was observed
- no statistically significant increases were observed in revertant numbers
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
- no significant changes in pH were observed at the highest concentration formulated (50 mg/mL) as compared to the concurrent vehicle controls. No adjustment for pH was made and no further measurements were considered necessary
- in the range-finder treatments with Sodium molybdate no clear evidence of toxicity was observed (These data were considered to be acceptable for toxicity assessment only, due to the mean vehicle controls in the absence and presence of S-9 being outside the 99% confidence interval with only two of the five replicates in the presence of S-9 being within the 99% reference range. Correct strain functioning could therefore not be confirmed.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
- the test article was completely soluble in the aqueous assay system at all concentrations treated
- no further significant details stated
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- It was concluded that Sodium molybdate did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes or frame shifts in the genome of the five histidine-requiring strains (TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA102) of Salmonella typhimurium when tested under the conditions of this study. These conditions included treatments at concentrations up to 5000 μg/plate, in the absence and in the presence of a rat liver metabolic activation system (S-9). Therefore, Sodium molybdate is considered to be non-mutagenic in this Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.