Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-163-5 | CAS number: 92-52-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Biodegradation in water and sediment: simulation tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
Five relevant and reliable (with restrictions) studies were allocated to this endpoint: three sediment/water simulation tests and two simulation tests in surface water only. Based on the studies of Bailey et al. (1980, 1983), the half-life of biphenyl in water can be set to 3 days at 20°C. Based on the sediment/water simulation tests of Saeger et al. (1988a,b), the half-life of biphenyl in sediment can be set to 10 days at 22°C. These half-lives were the longest half-lives observed in the respective studies, and represent a reasonable worst-case approach. According to the study of Saeger et al. (1988c), anaerobic biodegradation can be considered of limited importance for the elimination of biphenyl from aquatic systems.
A single study, Pruell & Quinn (1985) reported a half-life for biphenyl of 333 days is a mesocosm study of highly contaminated sediment and is considered to be unreliable (Klimisch 3) for the determination of the biphenyl half-life. The study failed to provide appropriate controls, standard experimental measurments, and failed to provide adequately scientific evidence for speculative results.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Half-life in freshwater:
- 3 d
- at the temperature of:
- 20 °C
- Half-life in freshwater sediment:
- 10 d
- at the temperature of:
- 22 °C
Additional information
The studies of Bailey et al. (1980, 1983) report the results of a river die-away study conducted according to the same principles as described in OECD guideline 309. In these tests, performed in a closed system and using microorganisms present in natural river water, biphenyl was observed to be eliminated with half-lives of around 2 days depending on the initial concentration (1, 10 or 100 µg/L). Based on measurements of trapped 14CO2, it can be concluded that biphenyl is rapidly biodegradable, i.e., > 70% biphenyl is ultimately biodegraded in 28 days. The highest half-life reported in these studies (i.e., 3 days at 20°C) can be used as key value for biodegradation in water in the chemical safety assessment.
In the study by Saeger et al. (1988a), biodegradation of biphenyl was examined during 10 days in a natural river water/sediment system with naturally present microorganisms. Analysis of trapped 14CO2 indicates ultimate biodegradation of 38.5% in the high dose treatment (1 mg/L) and 42.4% in the low dose treatment (0.077 mg/L). Although the exposure duration is relatively short, the results are in agreement with the results of longer simulation tests which indicate rapid biodegradability of biphenyl (Bailey et al., 1980, 1983). Moreover, the half-life for biphenyl was determined to be 2-3 days, which also agrees with results for primary degradation of biphenyl in other simulation tests (Bailey et al., 1980, 1983). In the second study (Saeger et al., 1988b) biodegradation of biphenyl was examined during 10 days in a natural lake water/sediment system with naturally present microorganisms. Analysis of trapped 14CO2 indicates ultimate biodegradation of 17.7% in the high dose treatment (1 mg/L, high variability) and 37.8% in the low dose treatment (0.077 mg/L). The results obtained in the low dose treatments are quite similar to those obtained with low dose ecocores from the Illinois River (42.4% in 10 days, Saeger et al., 1988a). The half-life of biphenyl was estimated to be 6-10 days in the lake water/sediment system, which is longer than the estimated half-life of 2-3 days observed for ecocores from the Illinois River (Saeger et al., 1988b). This may be due to the fact that the lake was more pristine and that the microorganisms in the lake are most likely less frequently exposed to low concentrations of a variety of chemicals. The exposure duration of this study was only 10 days, which is relatively short compared to typical durations of at least 28 days. However, the results are in good agreement with those from longer simulation tests which indicate rapid biodegradability of biphenyl (Bailey et al., 1980, 1983). The results of these tests can be used in a weight of evidence approach. For refinement of exposure calculations, one may consider using the highest half-life reported in these studies (i.e., 10 days at 22°C) as key value for biodegradation in sediment.
In the third study (Saeger et al., 1988c) anaerobic biodegradation of biphenyl was examined during 12 weeks in a water/sediment system obtained from a sewage lagoon. Analysis of trapped 14CO2 and 14CH4 indicated no significant biodegradation of biphenyl via methanogenic or denitrifying processes. Positive controls dosed with glucose however indicated the presence of an active microbial community. The absence of anaerobic biodegradation of biphenyl may have been partly due to the presence of other organic substrates in the highly organic sediment (17.3% OC). However, taking into account its good aerobic biodegradability, anaerobic biodegradation is not expected to play an important role in the elimination of biphenyl from natural sediment/water systems.
Pruell & Quinn (1985) reported a half-life for biphenyl of 333 days is a mesocosm study of highly contaminated sediment and is considered to be unreliable (Klimisch 3) for the determination of the biphenyl half-life. The study experimental design lacked basic controls, water quality measurements including dissolved oxygen and temperature, did not determine if microbial inhibtion was occurring from the presence of other more prevelant substances in the highly contaminated sediment, and did not account for additional imputs of contaminants from sea water renewals or contaminant movement within the sediments.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
