Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-163-5 | CAS number: 92-52-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
Only two studies were identified reporting results of algal growth inhibition tests. One study was conducted as part of a testing program organized by the Japanese Ministry of the Environment, however, the full study report was not available and therefore the reliability of the results of this study could not be evaluated. The other study was available but was considered not reliable. Therefore, QSAR predictions were added to the available information, among with a prediction by the latest version of US EPA's ECOSAR (2009), which can be considered reliable. Further, two studies were added for read across purposes, one with diphenyl oxide, a structurally related compound, and the other with Therminol VP1, which is an eutectic mixture of diphenyl oxide and biphenyl containing 26.3% biphenyl. These studies were not reliable because test concentrations were not verified. All information mentioned above was considered sufficient for covering this REACH endpoint using a weight-of-evidence approach. The key values for the aquatic hazard assessment were the 96-h EC50 of 1.772 mg/L estimated by ECOSAR v.1.00 and a 96-h NOEC of 0.66 mg/L estimated based on the chronic value predicted by ECOSAR v.1.00.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for freshwater algae:
- 1.772 mg/L
- EC10 or NOEC for freshwater algae:
- 0.66 mg/L
Additional information
The only available experimental study (Hutchinson et al., 1980) investigated the effect of biphenyl on photosynthesis of the unicellular algae Chlorella vulgaris and Chlamydomonas angulosa and reported 3-h EC50 values of 3.86 and 1.28 mg/L, respectively. However, the study could not be considered reliable because of several reasons. The study conducted by the Japanese Ministry of the Environment was not available and therefore its reliability could not be evaluated. This study was claimed to be conducted according to OECD guideline 201 and GLP and reported a growth rate-based 72-h EC50 and NOEC of 0.78 and 0.007 mg/L, respectively. Because it is suspected that the spacing factor between the (most likely) measured concentrations was way too high, and because the NOEC is dependent on this, the NOEC was considered not reliable and should not be used in a weight of evidence approach. Instead, the EC50 value should be used. Further, non-testing data have been added to the dossier consisting of 1) predictions of a 96-h EC50 and chronic value of 2.121 and 0.587 mg/L, respectively, using an outdated version of ECOSAR (ECOWIN v.0.99e, 2000) (Escuder-Gilabert, 2001), 2) a 96-h EC50 of 1.47 mg/L predicted by a not further specified QSAR (Vighi et al., 2001), and 3) predictions of a 96-h EC50 and chronic value of 1.772 and 0.945, respectively, using the latest version of ECOSAR (v1.00, 2009) and using input values of 4.0 for log Kow, 69°C for melting point, and 7.35 mg/L for water solubility. The latter predictions were considered as the most reliable data available for biphenyl toxicity to algae and were consistent with all other non-testing and testing results. Therefore, these results were considered as key values for the chemical safety assessment. Because a chronic value represents the geometric mean of NOEC and LOEC, a NOEC was estimated of 0.66 mg/L, assuming a maximum spacing factor of 2 between adjacent test concentrations. Finally, the testing data with diphenyl oxide and Therminol VP1 (eutectic mixture of diphenyl oxide and biphenyl) yielded a 96-h EC50 and NOEC of 2.5 and 1.2 mg/L, respectively, for pure diphenyl oxide, and 1.3 and 1.0 mg/L, respectively, for the eutectic mixture containing 26.3% biphenyl. These experimental results indicate that the toxicity of biphenyl and diphenyl oxide is comparable or that biphenyl may be slightly more toxic to algae than diphenyl oxide. The EC50 and NOEC predicted by ECOSAR and used for the chemical safety assessment are in line with the outcome of this comparison and therefore additional testing for the toxicity of biphenyl to algae is considered not needed.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.