Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 233-788-1 | CAS number: 10361-37-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Long-term toxicity to fish
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- fish early-life stage toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2014-02-06 to 2014-06-30
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 210 (Fish, Early-Life Stage Toxicity Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 1992-07-17
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- signed 2011-11-21
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Sampling: nominal concentrations of 6.25, 12.5, 25.0, 50.0, and 100 mg test item/L were sampled for chemical analysis on the following occasions:
∙ Total Barium: Day 0 (immediately after preparation), Day 7 (aged solutions), Day 14 (fresh solutions), Day 16 (aged solutions), Day 28 (fresh solutions), Day 30 (aged solutions). Control (0 mg/L) at day 0
∙ Dissolved Barium: Day 0 (immediately after preparation), Day 7 (aged solutions), Day 12 (aged solutions), Day 19 (aged solutions), Day 28 (aged solutions), at the end of the test (aged solutions). Control (0 mg/L) at day 0, 19 and at the end.
- Sampling method: The analytical samples of freshly prepared and aged stock solutions were taken during stirring, to ensure a homogenous dispersion (dissolved and precipitated Barium). The analytical samples were filtered before analyses if used to determine dissolved Barium.
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: ambient conditions - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: Several stock solutions of the test item were prepared by weighing:
∙ 1003.2 mg of the test item into 10 L of dilution medium, day 0–6;
∙1502.0 mg of the test item into 15 L of dilution medium, day 7–13;
∙ 2001.1–2006.0 mg of the test item into 20 L of dilution medium, day 14–21;
∙ 4001.4–4001.6 mg of the test item into 40 L of dilution medium day 23–28.
The test item was mixed into the test medium by intense stirring (magnetic or stainless steel propeller stirrer). After addition of the test item a cloudy white preparation of the stock solution occurss, a whithout stirringcloudy, white precipitate was visible which can be explained by the precipitation of barium sulfate in the test medium. The stock solution was directly used or stored at ambient temperature in the dark until further use.
Immediately before and meanwhile the stock solution was used to prepare the lower concentrated test solutions by dilution with reconstituted water, the stock solution was homogenised by intense stirring (magnetic or stainless steel propeller stirrer).
The stock solution was prepared once to three-times per week. After the stirring period, the stock solution (dispersion) was stored at room temperature in the dark.
The test solutions were prepared by diluting desired volume of stock solution (S1) with test medium. The volume of stock solution and dilution medium used to prepare were measured using graduated glass flasks, graduated glass cylinder or was weighed using a balance. The test solutions were homogenised before use, using a magnetic stirrer, stirred for about 2 minutes or were shaken upside down a several times. - Test organisms (species):
- Danio rerio (previous name: Brachydanio rerio)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: zebrafish
- Strain: Hamilton-Buchanan 1822
- Source: fertilised eggs were collected from adult zebrafish from in-house cultures, which have been maintained and bred at the laboratory since August 2011, August/September 2012 and May 2013.
METHOD FOR PREPARATION AND COLLECTION OF FERTILIZED EGGS
- glass bowls covered with stainless steel mesh were introduced in the holding tanks of the adult zebrafish
- water plants were placed on the mesh, allowing the fish to spawn
- the spawning bowls were removed from the holding tanks on the day of test start
- the content of the bowls was poured over a sieve, rinsed with tempered reconstituted water and collected in a glass vessel filled with tempered reconstituted water
- immediately afterwards groups of eggs were transferred to glass dishes containing test solution of each designated exposure vessel
- dishes were placed into an incubator set to 26°C (measured: 25.4°C) for 1.17 hour
- unfertilized and damaged eggs were removed and the number of eggs per dish was reduced to 30. Subsequently the eggs were transferred to the exposure vessels.
POST-HATCH FEEDING
- Start date: when the first larva per test vessel was recorded to swim up (day 3 of exposure), feeding was started.
- Type/source of feed: dry food (NovoBaby 01 and NovoBaby 02, JBL), live Artemia nauplius larvae and paramaecia (Paramecium caudatum) ad libitum.
- Amount given: food ration was adjusted to the number of living fish per test vessel.
- Frequency of feeding: daily ration was fed in 3–4 equal portions on workdays. On weekends the daily ration was fed in 2–3 portions, except on day 3 and 4 the daily ratio was fed in one portion. Food was withheld from the fish for 24 hours prior to test end. - Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 33 d
- Hardness:
- During the test (total hardness):
minimum: 9.2 °dH; maximum: 10.2 °dH
minimum: 164 mg CaCO3/L; maximum: 182 mg CaCO3/L - Test temperature:
- During the test:
minimum: 23.4°C; maximum: 26.2°C - pH:
- During the test:
minimum: 7.2; maximum: 7.6 - Dissolved oxygen:
- During the test:
minimum: 3.43 mg/L; maximum: 8.4 mg/L
minimum: 42.5%; maximum: 102% - Salinity:
- not applicable
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- - Nominal concentrations: 6.25, 12.5, 25.0, 50.0, and 100 mg test item/L
- Measured concentrations: Based on the results of the study only the 100 mg/L test samples were analysed. The geometric mean concentration of total Barium throughout the test period was 40.3 mg total Ba/l, equivalent to 71.9% of nominal Ba-concentrationThe geometric mean concentration of dissolved Barium throughout the test period was 1.26 mg dissolved Ba/l, equivalent to 2.25% of nominal Ba-concentration. The low recovery of dissolved barium could be explained by the precipitation of barium-sulfates in the test medium.
(For details see Table 2 and 3 in 'Any other information on results incl. tables'). - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
Test vessel, material, size, headspace, fill volume :
- Vessels of glass and stainless steel
- Dimensions of test vessels:
∙ Day 0–7: 150 mL glass vessels were used (inner-diameter: 5.5 cm, high: 8 cm).
∙ Day 7–14: 1000 ml glass vessels (inner diameter: 13.6 cm, high: 8 cm), with inner-vessels (plastic vessels, the bottom covered with a 250µm-mesh (diameter: 10.5 cm, high: 5 cm).
∙ Day 14 to 21: 4000 mL stainless steel vessels (length: 26 cm, depth: 16, high: 15 cm), with inner-vessels (plastic vessels, the bottom covered with a 250 µm-mesh (diameter: 10.5 cm, high: 5 cm)).
∙ until end of exposure: 4000 mL stainless steel vessels (length: 26 cm, depth: 16, high: 15 cm).
- Volume of test solution per test vessel: 50–3250 mL (nominal).
- Aeration: from day 0–3 the test solutions were not aerated. At day 4 the test solutions were gently aerated using smal pieces of teflon tubes.
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate):
∙ Day 0: 50 ml of freshly prepared test solution was added to the test vessel.
∙ Day 2: addition of 50 mL of freshly prepared test solution to the test vessel containing 50 ml aged test solution.
∙ Day 7: transfer of larvae and remaining eggs (not hatched larvae) in freshly prepared test solution. The young larvae were slowly poured in the fine meshed inner-vessels
(plastic vessels, the bottom covered with a fine mesh) and thereafter gently transferred in the new test solution by dip the inner-vessels into the test solution.
∙ Day 7–21 days: three times per week (usually Monday, Wednesday and Friday). The young larvae were transferred by transpose the inner-vessel in a new set of test
vessels containing fresh test solutions, except on day 12, see section 16.
∙ Until end of exposure: three times per week (Monday, Wednesday and Friday). The young larvae were slowly poured in the fine meshed inner-vessels (plastic vessels, the bottom covered with a fine mesh) and thereafter gently transferred in the new test solution by dip the inner-vessels into the test solution.
- No. of fertilized eggs/embryos per vessel: 30
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 2
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 2
- Biomass loading rate: theoretical maximum loading was 0.82 g fish/L
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: reconstituted water (OECD guideline No. 203) mixed with deionised water (1:1; v/v), supplemented with 1% artificial seawater. Local tap water was treated by reverse osmosis and ion-exchanger to prepare deionised water. Therefore a contamination with heavy metals, pesticides and total organic carbon is excluded. The required amount of reconstituted water was prepared within four weeks before use. During storage reconstituted water was aerated.
- Culture medium different from test medium: reconstituted water was used for both media
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod (light/dark): 12/12
- Light intensity (measured): 314–894 lx, measured on day 1 (climate chamber); 735–989 lx, measured on day 5.
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED:
The following biological parameters were recorded during and/or at the end of the test:
- cumulative mortality
- numbers of healthy fish
- time to start of hatching and end of hatching
- number of larvae hatching each day
- number of deformed larvae
- number of organisms exhibiting abnormal behaviour
- length and weight of surviving fish
The following biological parameters were assessed:
- time to start of hatching and end of hatching
- number of larvae hatching each day
- macroscopic morphological abnormalities
- behavioural abnormalities - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 33 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: hatching success, mortality (post-hatch success), numbers of healthy fish, length of the surviving fish, dry weight of the surviving fish
- Duration:
- 33 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 40.3 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- other: total barium
- Basis for effect:
- other: hatching success, mortality (post-hatch success), numbers of healthy fish, length of the surviving fish, dry weight of the surviving fish
- Duration:
- 33 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 1.26 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- dissolved
- Remarks:
- barium
- Duration:
- 33 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: hatching success, mortality (post-hatch success), numbers of healthy fish, length of the surviving fish, dry weight of the surviving fish
- Duration:
- 33 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 40.3 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- other: total barium
- Basis for effect:
- other: hatching success, mortality (post-hatch success), numbers of healthy fish, length of the surviving fish, dry weight of the surviving fish
- Duration:
- 33 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 1.26 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- dissolved
- Remarks:
- barium
- Details on results:
- - Mortality/survival at embryo, larval, juvenile, and adult stages: an influence of the test item concentrations on the post-hatch success and survival of fish could not be observed. Statistically significant differences of post-hatch success and survival of fish were not observed between treated and control groups at p ≤0.05. No correlation was observed between the concentration of the test item and the post-hatch success and survival of fish (See Table 1 in 'Any other information on results incl. tables').
- Days to hatch: hatching on day 2 to day 4 for all treatments. A concentration-response relationship could not be observed.
- Hatching success: controls: mean hatching success was 100%; treatments: mean hatching success ranged between 98.3%–100%. An influence of the test item concentrations on the hatching success could not be observed. Statistically significant differences on the hatching success were not observed between treated and control groups at p ≤0.05. No correlation was observed between the concentration of the test item and the hatching success.
- Numbers hatched: in all groups (including the control group) 60/60 fish hatched, except in the 100 mg test item/L group in which 1/60 fish did not hatch
- Number of healthy fish at end of test: all surviving fish (control: 59/60; 6.25 mg test item/L: 50/60; 12.5 mg test item/L: 55/60; 25.0 mg test item/L: 59/60; 50.0 mg test item/L: 56/60; 100 mg test item/L: 52/60)
- Type of and number with morphological abnormalities: all surviving fish appeared healthy at the end of exposure, morphological abnormalities were not observed.
- Type of and number with behavioural abnormalities: all surviving fish appeared healthy at the end of exposure, behavioural abnormalities were not observed. A meaningful correlation of abnormal behaviour of fish larvae were not observed with increasing test item concentrations. Some observations were determined in all test item concentrations at a lower level (fish lying on the bottom of the test vessel, larvae showing reduced swimming activity, fish were showing curved spine, fish showed loss of equilibrium).
- Other biological observations:
· Weight of the surviving fish at test end: an influence of the test item concentrations on the weight of the surviving fish could not be observed. Statistically significant differences
of weight were not observed between treated and control groups at p≤0.05. No correlation was observed between the concentration of the test item and the dry weight of fish.
· Length of the fish at test end: an influence of the test item concentrations on the length of the surviving fish could not be observed. Statistically significant differences of length
were not observed between treated and control groups at p≤0.05. No correlation was observed between the concentration of the test item and the length of fish.
- Validity criteria:
· The hatching success of the fertilised eggs in the control was 98.3% which meets the validity criterion of ≥70%
· The water temperature did not differ by more than ± 1.5°C between test vessels or between successive days at any time during the test
· The water temperature of 25°C did not differ by more than ± 2°C of the desired test temperature during the test.
· The dissolved oxygen level during routine water quality analyses fell below 60% of air saturation at some occasions. The measured dissolved oxygen ranged between 43–59%,
measured at five occasions in different replicates (control, day 4; C3b and C4a, day 14; C1a and C3a, day 21). Since no adverse effects were observed (e.g. increased mortality or
other observation) a negative influence on the hatched fish larvae could be excluded. Therefore, this deviation does not invalidate the study. - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Endpoints: NOEC, LOEC
The following biological parameters were evaluated statistically in comparison to the control fish where the data allowed such comparisons:
- hatching success, mortality (post-hatch success): Fisher exact binomial-test
- numbers of healthy fish (Data are identical with data for post-hatch success, therefore no separate statistical evaluation)
- dry weight of the surviving fish, per treatment means, length of the surviving fish, per treatment means: Williams multiple sequential t-test
The normal distribution was checked with Shapiro-Wilk's Test (dry weight and length of the surviving fish).
Variance homogeneity was checked with Bartlett´s (dry weight and length of the surviving fish).
Due to a lack of concentration-response relationship LCx or ECx values were not calculated.
The statistical software package ToxRat 2.10 Professional (ToxRat Solutions GmbH, Naheweg 15, D-52477 Alsdorf) was used for these calculations. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- for details see "Details on results"
- Conclusions:
- The NOECs (33 d, hatching success, mortality (post-hatch success), numbers of healthy fish, length of the surviving fish, dry weight of the surviving fish) based on nominal concentrations were >=100 mg barium dichloride dihydrate/L. The corresponding LOECs based on nominal concentrations were higher than 100 mg barium dichloride dihydrate/L. Since the recovery rates (RR) are < 80% the results are given as actual (geometric mean measured) concentrations.
- The NOEC >= 61.1 mg BaCl2/L (>= 40.3 mg barium/L) based on total barium concentration.
- The NOEC >= 1.91 mg BaCl2/L (>= 1.26 mg barium/L) based on dissolved barium concentration. - Executive summary:
A GLP-compliant Fish Early-Life Stage Toxicity Test was conducted with barium chloride dihydrate according to OECD 210 with Danio rerio under semi-static conditions. Based on the results of a range finding test, the final test was conducted a nominal concentrations of 100, 50, 25.0, 12.5 and 6.25 mg/L plus a control. The treatment groups and control group had two replicates, each containing 30 fertilised eggs and the test duration was 33 days. Since barium chloride forms precipitates with sulphates present in the test medium, a semi-static test design was used to ensure stable and not increasing test concentration during exposure. Inner-vessels were used to insure cautious transfer of young fish larvae at each water exchange and to enable observations also in cloudy solutions.
To determine the actual test item concentrations, samples of the test solution were taken at regular intervals and analysed with a validated ICP-OES method. Samples of the test solutions were either filtered (0.45 µm) or extracted to determined the concentration of dissolved and total barium, respectively.
Under the test conditions, all embryos were hatched within 4 days. No concentration-response relationship was observed for the parameter hatching success, mortality (post-hatch success), numbers of healthy fish, dry weight and length of the surviving fish. Therefore the No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) was ≥100 mg/L based on nominal concentrations. Since the recovery rates of the analytical verification of the test material in test solution are < 80% the results are given as actual (geometric mean measured) concentrations.
- The NOEC ≥40.3 mg barium/L based on total barium concentration.
- The NOEC ≥1.26 mg barium/L based on dissolved barium concentration.
Reference
Table 1: Summary of the total numbers of pre- and post-hatch mortality/survival and sub-lethal data in the control and treatments at test end
Nom. Concentration |
Introduced eggs |
Dead before hatch |
Hatched fish |
Dead fish after hatch |
Survived fish |
Deformed fish/ different behaviour |
Healthy fish |
0 |
60 |
0 |
60 |
1 |
59 |
0 |
59 |
6.25 |
60 |
0 |
60 |
10 |
50 |
0 |
50 |
12.5 |
60 |
0 |
60 |
5 |
55 |
0 |
55 |
25.0 |
60 |
0 |
60 |
1 |
59 |
0 |
59 |
50.0 |
60 |
0 |
60 |
4 |
56 |
0 |
56 |
100 |
60 |
1 |
59 |
7 |
52 |
0 |
52 |
Table 2: Summary of measuredtotal Bariumconcentrations in solutions throughout the test
Nominal concentration [mg test item/l] |
Test period [d] |
Nominal concentration [mg Ba/l] |
Measured concentration [mg total Ba/l] |
Recovery [% of nominal Ba-concentration] |
0 (Control) |
0 |
0 |
<LOQ |
- |
100 |
0 |
56.22 |
40.81 |
72.6 |
100 |
7 |
56.22 |
90.48* |
n.d.* |
100 |
14 |
56.22 |
44.30 |
78.8 |
100 |
16 |
56.22 |
37.34 |
66.4 |
100 |
28 |
56.22 |
42.13 |
74.9 |
100 |
30 |
56.22 |
37.49 |
66.7 |
*The value was excluded from further evaluation. The high concentration of total Barium determined in this sample was cause by a sampling failure.
The geometric mean concentration of total Barium in freshly prepared test solutions (day 0, 14 and 28) was 42.4 mg total Ba/l, equivalent to 75.4% of nominal Ba-concentration. The geometric mean concentration of total Barium throughout the test period was 40.3 mg total Ba/l, equivalent to 71.9% of nominal Ba-concentration.
Table 3: Summary of measureddissolved Bariumconcentrations in solutions throughout the test
Nominal concentration [mg test item/l] |
Test period [d] |
Nominal concentration [mg Ba/l] |
Measured concentration [mg dissolved Ba/l] |
Recovery [% of nominal Ba-concentration] |
0 (Control) |
33 |
0 |
<LOQ |
- |
100 |
0 |
56.22 |
1.16 |
2.07 |
100 |
7 |
56.22 |
1.20 |
2.14 |
100 |
12 |
56.22 |
1.14 |
2.02 |
100 |
19 |
56.22 |
1.35 |
2.40 |
100 |
28 |
56.22 |
1.37 |
2.44 |
100 |
33 |
56.22 |
1.36 |
2.43 |
The geometric mean concentration of dissolved Barium throughout the test period was 1.26 mg dissolved Ba/l, equivalent to 2.25% of nominal Ba-concentration. The low recovery of dissolved barium could beexplained by the precipitation of barium-sulfates inthe test medium.
Description of key information
One reliable long term toxicity study (Klimisch 1, GLP) with the zebrafish (Danio rerio) was conducted. No effects were noted at the highest test concentration of nominal 100 mg barium dichloride dihydrate/L. Since the recovery rates of the analytical verification of the test material in test solution are < 80% the results are given as actual (geometric mean measured) concentrations.
- The NOEC ≥ 40.3 mg barium/L based on total barium concentration.
- The NOEC ≥ 1.26 mg barium/L based on dissolved barium concentration.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.