Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 236-068-5 | CAS number: 13138-45-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
ENDPOINT SUMMARY INFORMATION FROM THE 2008/2009 NICKEL DINITRATE RISK ASSESSMENT
Inhalation Absorption:
No data regarding the absorbed fraction of nickel in humans or experimental animals following inhalation of nickel nitrate have been located.
The deposition of particles in the respiratory tract depends on the particle sizes (MMADs) as well as on other characteristics of the particles, and the absorption of nickel from the respiratory tract into the blood stream depends on the solubility of the nickel compound inhaled. Soluble nickel compounds, such as nickel nitrate, are expected to be absorbed from the respiratory tract following inhalation exposure.
One study of nickel sulphate in rats (Medinsky et al. 1987) using intratracheal instillation of nickel sulphate (as a solution in saline) showed that 50 to 80% of a dose (dependent on the dose) of nickel sulphate can be absorbed from the respiratory tract. Studies in rats using intratracheal instillation of nickel chloride (Carvalho & Ziemer 1982, English et al. 1981, Clary 1975) showed that up to approximately 97% of a dose of nickel chloride can be absorbed from the respiratory tract. By assuming that the absorption of nickel following inhalation exposure to nickel chloride is similar to absorption following intratracheal instillation, the absorption of nickel from the respiratory tract following inhalation of nickel chloride might be as high as about 97%. Furthermore, an inhalation study on nickel sulphate (Benson et al. 1995) showed that clearance of nickel sulphate from the lungs of rats and mice is extensive (up to 99% in rats and 80 to 90% in mice). By assuming that the clearance of nickel sulphate particles (respirable particles, MMADs ranging from 2.0 to 2.4 μm) from the lungs in the inhalation study is due to absorption rather than to deposition or by mucociliary action, the absorption of nickel from the lungs following inhalation of nickel sulphate might be as high as up to 99% (at concentrations up to 0.11 mg Ni/m3 in rats and up to 0.22 mg Ni/m3 in mice). For further details, the reader is referred to the Risk Assessment Reports on nickel sulphate and nickel chloride as well as to the Background document in support of the individual Risk Assessment Reports.
In conclusion, the available data on nickel chloride and nickel sulphate indicate that the absorption of nickel following inhalation of these nickel compounds might be as high as up to 97-99%; it should be noted that the fraction absorbed apparently depends on the concentration of the nickel compound in the inhaled air as well as on the duration of exposure. For the purpose of risk characterisation, a value of 100% will be taken forward to the risk characterisation for the absorbed fraction of nickel from the respiratory tract following exposure by inhalation of nickel nitrate for particulates with an aerodynamic diameter below 5 μm (respirable fraction). For nickel particulates with aerodynamic diameters above 5 μm (non-respirable fraction), the absorption of nickel from the respiratory tract is considered to be negligible as these particles predominantly will be cleared from the respiratory tract by mucociliary action and translocated into the gastrointestinal tract and absorbed. Hence, for the non-respirable fraction, 100% clearance from the respiratory tract by mucociliary action and translocation into the gastrointestinal tract is assumed and the oral absorption figures can be taken.
For the purpose of risk characterisation, as described in the 2008/2009 European Union Risk Assessment for Nickel Dinitrate a value of 100% is taken forward for the risk characterisation as the absorbed fraction of nickel from the respiratory tract following inhalation exposure to nickel dinitrate (respirable size particles, 100% deposition) in rats.
Endpoint Summary Information from the European Union Risk Assessment for Nickel Dinitrate (2008-2009):
Oral Absorption:
Absorption of nickel following oral ingestion of nickel nitrate has been evaluated in one study in rats (Ishimatsu et al. 1995), which showed an absorption of 34% when nickel nitrate was administered in a 5% starch saline solution. No human data on nickel nitrate have been located.A study on volunteers (Nielsen et al. 1999), in which the nickel compound administered was not specified, showed that 25.8% of the administered dose was excreted in the urine following administration of nickel in drinking water to fasting individuals compared with 2.5% when nickel was mixed into a meal. Based on experimental data from various human studies, Diamond et al. (1998) have used a biokinetic model to estimate nickel absorption; the results showed that estimated nickel absorption ranged from 12-27% of the dose when nickel was ingested after a fast, to 1-6% when nickel was administered either in food, in water, or in a capsule during (or in close proximity to) a meal. For further details, the reader is referred to the Background document in support of the individual Risk Assessment Reports.
In conclusion, the available data indicate that the absorption of nickel following administration in the drinking water to fasting individuals might be as high as up to about 25-27% and about 1-6% when administered to nonfasting individuals and/or together with (or in close proximity to) a meal.
For the purpose of risk characterisation, as described in the European Union Risk Assessment for Nickel Dinitrate (2008-2009), a value of 30% is taken forward for the risk characterisation as the absorbed fraction of nickel from the gastrointestinal tract following oral exposure to nickel dinitrate under fasting conditions. For absorption of nickel from food, soil, dust and from water consumed with food , a value of 5% will be used. When extrapolating rat exposures from the oral route to the inhalation route, a value of 11% is used for absorption by the oral route (Ishimatsu et al., 1995) and 100% for the inhalation route respirable size particles, 100% deposition).
ENDPOINT SUMMARY INFORMATION FROM THE 2008/2009 European Union Risk Assessment for Nickel Dinitrate
Dermal Absorption:
When considering dermal absorption, a distinction should be made between penetration of nickel into skin and percutaneous transport, where nickel is transported through the skin and into the blood stream. For further details, the reader is referred to the Background document in support of the individual Risk Assessment Reports.
No in vivo studies providing specific information about the absorbed fraction of nickel in humans or experimental animals following dermal contact to nickel nitrate have been located. In an in vitro study (Tanojo et al. 2001) using human skin (stratum corneum from cadaver leg skin), about 82.5% of the dose was recovered in the donor solution after 96 hours, with about 0.5% in the receptor fluid and 1% in the stratum corneum.
Recent human in vivo studies of nickel sulphate and nickel metal (Hostýnek et al. 2001a, 2001b) has shown that a large part of the administered dose remained on the surface of the skin after 24 hours or had penetrated into the stratum corneum. For further details, the reader is referred to the Risk Assessment Reports on nickel sulphate and nickel metal.
In vitro studies using human skin support the findings in the human in vivo studies as most of the dose remained in the donor solution and only minor amounts were found in the receptor fluid; the in vitro studies also indicate that absorption following dermal contact may have a significant lag time. For further details, the reader is referred to the Background document in support of the individual Risk Assessment Reports.
In conclusion, the available data indicate that absorption of nickel following dermal contact to various nickel compounds can take place, but to a limited extent with a large part of the applied dose remaining on the skin surface or in the stratum corneum. The data are too limited for an evaluation of the absorbed fraction of nickel following dermal contact to nickel nitrate. The in vitro study of soluble nickel compounds (nickel sulphate, nickel chloride, nickel nitrate, and nickel acetate) using human skin (Tanojo et al. 2001) showed about 98% of the dose remained in the donor solution, whereas 1% or less was found in the receptor fluid and less than 1% was retained in the stratum corneum. According to the revised TGD, the amount absorbed into the skin, but not passed into the receptor fluid, should also be included in the estimate of dermal absorption. For the purpose of risk characterisation, a value of 2% will be taken forward to the risk characterisation for the absorbed fraction of nickel following dermal contact to nickel nitrate.
Distribution and Elimination:
No studies regarding distribution and elimination in humans or in experimental animals following exposure to nickel nitrate have been located.
Generally, nickel tends to deposit in the lungs of workers occupationally exposed to nickel compounds and in experimental animals following inhalation or intratracheal instillation of nickel compounds. The tissue distribution of nickel in experimental animals does not appear to depend significantly on the route of exposure(inhalation/intratracheal instillation or oral administration)although some differences have been observed.Low levels of accumulation in tissues are observed (generally below 1 ppm). A primary site of elevated tissue levels is the kidney. In addition, elevated concentrations of nickel are often found in the lung, also after oral dosing, and in the liver. Elevated nickel levels are less often found in other tissues. Limited information exists on tissue distribution in humans.
Absorbed nickel is excreted in the urine, regardless of the route of exposure. Most ingested nickel is excreted via faeces due to the relatively low gastrointestinal absorption. In humans, nickel excreted in the urine following oral intake of nickel sulphate accounts for 20-30% of the dose administered in drinking water to fasting subjects or to fasting subjects compared with 1-5% when administered together with food or in close proximity to a meal.
From biological monitoring in small groups of electroplaters exposed to nickel sulphate and nickel chloride, the half-life for urinary elimination of nickel has been estimated to range from 17 to 39 hours.
Inhaled nickel particles can be eliminated from the respiratory tract by absorption, by deposition in the lung tissues, by removal via the mucociliary action and subsequently swallowed into the gastrointestinal tract, and by exhalation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.