Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-630-6 | CAS number: 108-93-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Vapour pressure
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- vapour pressure
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Valid method for temperature/pressure range, substance purity given, very good number of data points, and raw data tabulated with deviations from fitted curve. However, limited experimental details, no equipment calibration details, and no measurements in 0-50°C range.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 104 (Vapour Pressure Curve)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- no measurement in 0-50°C range
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- dynamic method
- Remarks:
- comparative ebulliometry
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 86.86 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Calculated from Wagner equation
- Temp.:
- 35 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 200.3 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Calculated from Wagner equation
- Temp.:
- 45 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 429.3 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Calculated from Wagner equation
- Conclusions:
- The liquid phase vapour pressure of cyclohexanol was determined experimentally and could be extrapolated from the Wagner equation to be 86.86 Pa at 25 °C.
- Endpoint:
- vapour pressure
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Valid method for temperature/pressure range, substance purity given, good number of data points, raw data tabulated, accuracy of temperature and pressure reading given, and good experimental details. However, no equipment calibration details, and no measurements in 0-50°C range.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 104 (Vapour Pressure Curve)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- no measurement in 0-50°C range
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Apparatus described by Walas, S.M., Phase Equilibria in Chemical Engineering, Butterworth, London, 1985.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- dynamic method
- Remarks:
- glass recirculation still
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 75.74 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Calculated from Antoine equation
- Temp.:
- 35 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 184.4 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Calculated from Antoine equation
- Temp.:
- 45 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 409.9 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Calculated from Antoine equation
- Conclusions:
- The liquid phase vapour pressure of cyclohexanol was determined experimentally and could be extrapolated from the Antoine equation to be 75.74 Pa at 25 °C.
- Endpoint:
- vapour pressure
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Valid method for temperature/pressure range, substance purity given, good number of data points, raw data tabulated with deviations from fitted curve, accuracy of temperature and pressure reading given, good experimental details. However, no measurements in the data range 0-50°C.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 104 (Vapour Pressure Curve)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- No measurement in 0-50°C range
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Method and equipment ask described by Rogalski, M., et al, Fluid Phase Equilibria, 1980, 5, 97-112
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- dynamic method
- Remarks:
- Swietoslawski ebulliometer
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 70.22 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Calculated from Antoine equation
- Temp.:
- 35 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 174.3 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Calculated from Antoine equation
- Temp.:
- 45 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 393.4 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Calculated from Antoine equation
- Conclusions:
- The liquid phase vapour pressure of cyclohexanol was determined experimentally and could be extrapolated from the Antoine equation to be 70.22 Pa at 25 °C.
- Endpoint:
- vapour pressure
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Valid method for temperature/pressure range, substance impurities reported, required number of data points, raw data tabulated, accuracy of pressure reading given, adequate experimental details, measurements down to 45.5°C and 3 in range 0-50°C. However, no temperature calibration reported, some uncertainty surrounding temperature/pressure methods used below 30mmHg.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 104 (Vapour Pressure Curve)
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Flow still described by Dawe, R.A., et al, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 1973, 18, 44.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- dynamic method
- Remarks:
- flow still
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 79.97 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Calculated from Antoine equation
- Temp.:
- 35 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 191.4 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Calculated from Antoine equation
- Temp.:
- 45 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 420 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Calculated from Antoine equation
- Conclusions:
- The liquid phase vapour pressure of cyclohexanol was determined experimentally and could be extrapolated from the Antoine equation to be 79.97 Pa at 25 °C.
- Endpoint:
- vapour pressure
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Valid method for temperature/pressure range, good number of data points, raw data tabulated with deviations from fitted curve, accuracy of temperature and pressure reading given, adequate experimental details. However, high purity of substance implied but not determined, no measurement below 50°C, no equipment calibration details.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 104 (Vapour Pressure Curve)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- no measurements in 0-50°C range
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Cyclohexanol vapour pressures were reported as by-products of other research.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- dynamic method
- Remarks:
- Swietoslawski-Ebulliometer
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 57.06 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Calculated from Antoine equation
- Temp.:
- 35 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 150.7 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Calculated from Antoine equation
- Temp.:
- 45 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 355.9 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Calculated from Antoine equation
- Conclusions:
- The liquid phase vapour pressure of cyclohexanol was determined experimentally and could be extrapolated from the Antoine equation to be 57.06 Pa at 25 °C.
- Endpoint:
- vapour pressure
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Valid method for temperature/pressure range, substance purity given, required number of data points, raw data tabulated with deviations from calculated values, accuracy of temperature and pressure reading given, adequate experimental details (referenced), measurements down to 30°C (3 in range 0-50°C).
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 104 (Vapour Pressure Curve)
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Static apparatus similar to McGlashan, M.L., et al, Trans. Faraday Soc., 1961, 57, 588.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- static method
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 105.7 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Calculated from Antoine equation
- Temp.:
- 35 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 233.1 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Calculated from Antoine equation
- Temp.:
- 45 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 480.9 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Calculated from Antoine equation
- Conclusions:
- The liquid phase vapour pressure of cyclohexanol was determined experimentally and could be extrapolated from the Antoine equation to be 105.7 Pa at 25 °C.
- Endpoint:
- vapour pressure
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Valid method for temperature/pressure range, substance purity given, very good number of data points, raw data tabulated with deviations from fitted curve, very good experimental details (referenced), and equipment calibration details. Very carefull study, however, no measurements in range 0-50°C.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 104 (Vapour Pressure Curve)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- no measurement in 0-50°C range
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Details in Steele, W.V. et al, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 1997, 42(6), -1021.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- dynamic method
- Remarks:
- comparative ebulliometer
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 90.74 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Calculated from Wagner equation
- Temp.:
- 35 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 206.4 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Calculated from Wagner equation
- Temp.:
- 45 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 438.1 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Calculated from Wagner equation
- Conclusions:
- The liquid phase vapour pressure of cyclohexanol was determined experimentally and could be extrapolated from the Wagner equation to be 90.74 Pa at 25 °C.
- Endpoint:
- vapour pressure
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Valid method for temperature/pressure range, substance purity given, required number of data points, raw data tabulated with deviations from fitted curve, accuracy of temperature and pressure reading given, adequate experimental details, measurements down to 50°C. However, no equipment calibration details, pressure gauge uncertainty relatively large at low pressures.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 104 (Vapour Pressure Curve)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Only one measurement in 0-50°C range
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- dynamic method
- Remarks:
- glass recirculation still
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 71 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Calculated from Antoine equation
- Temp.:
- 35 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 174.7 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Calculated from Antoine equation
- Temp.:
- 45 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 391.9 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Calculated from Antoine equation
- Conclusions:
- The liquid phase vapour pressure of cyclohexanol was determined experimentally and could be extrapolated from the Antoine equation to be 71.0 Pa at 25 °C.
Referenceopen allclose all
Tabulated pressure data in temperature range: 350.801K to 456.537K, n=26.
The Antoine equation was only used over a restricted temperature range (398.237K -456.537K) to achieve a good fit: LnP=A+B/(T+C), where P in kPa and T in K. Constants: A=13.56446, B=-2689.899, C=-133.310.
The Wagner equation was used for the full temperature range: ln(P/Pc)=(n1*t+n2*t^1.5 +n3*t^2.5 +n4*t^5)/Tr where Tr=T/Tc and t=(1 -Tr) and the constants Tc=650.0K, lnPc=8.35698, n1=-7.12838, n2=1.40189, n3=-5.60756, n4=-9.57158.
4 samples were used over the temperature range, with the last sample being used for the last 3 measurements only.
Tabulated pressure data in temperature range: 343.45K to 433.55K, n=15.
Curve fitted to LnP=A-B/(T+C), where P in kPa and T in K. Constants: A=13.94898, B=2905.618, C=-122.3649 with mean absolute deviation between experimental and calculated P = 0.070kPa.
Tabulated pressure data in temperature range: 387.34K to 421.87K, n=11.
Curve fitted to LogP=A-B/(C+T), where P in mmHg and T in °C. Constants: A=6.882615(0.012734), B=1227.194(7.087), C=146.370(0.802), where values in brackets are calculated by error propagation.
Deviation of the fitted curve from the experimental points tabulated: maximum ΔP=0.5mbar, stdev=0.3293mbar
Tabulated pressure data in temperature range: 45.5°C to 160.1°C, n=16.
Curve fitted to LogP=A-B/(C+T), where P in mmHg and T in °C. Constants: A=7.0385, B=1318.5, C=156.60
Deviation of the calculated from the experimental boiling points: root mean square 0.18°C.
Tabulated pressure data in temperature range: 93.73°C to 160.70°C, n=16.
Curve fitted to LogP=A-B/(C+t), where P in mmHg and t in °C. Constants: A=6.5562, B=1067.8, C=129.2
Percentage deviation of the fitted curve from the experimental points tabulated: maximum deviation in P=-1.9%.
Tabulated pressure data in temperature range: 303.147K to 373.278K, n=8.
Curve fitted to LogP=A-B/(T-C), where P in kPa and T in K. Constants: A=6.81617, B=1690.118, C=81.245
Deviation of the calculated from the experimental points tabulated: maximum ΔP=0.05kPa
Tabulated pressure data in temperature range: 341.241K to 470.984K, n=22.
Curve fitted to Wagner equation: ln(p/pc)=(1/Tr)[AY+BY^1.5 +CY^2.5 +DY^5] where Tr=T/Tc and Y=(1 -Tr), and constants are A=-7.67095, B=3.19308, C=-8.34213, D=-5.82888, Tc=648K, pc=4075Pa. Tc was determined by DSC.
Last two vapour pressures were not included in the fit due to observation of sample decomposition.
Tabulated pressure data in temperature range: 322.25K to 433.30K, n=9.
Curve fitted to LogP=A-B/(C+T), where P in bar and T in K. Constants: A=4.06566, B=1258.75, C=-123.673
Deviation of the fitted curve from the experimental points tabulated: maximum ΔP=0.5mbar, stdev=0.3293mbar
Description of key information
Mean vapour pressure of 11 independent studies extrapolated to 25 °C: 82.39 Pa
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Vapour pressure:
- 82.39 Pa
- at the temperature of:
- 25 °C
Additional information
A large body of vapour pressure data exists in the literature for cyclohexanol, as a result only data from multipoint vapour pressure vs temperature studies was used (i.e. single point measurements were discarded), as it is considered to be inherently more reliable and closest to guideline approaches to vapour pressure measurement.
12 studies were found which fit these criteria, which ranged in quality from extremely precise measurements done to very high standard (e.g. Steele 1997), to poorer quality older studies. Glaser (1957) was discarded due to experimental deficiencies. However, very few reported data in the temperature range of interest (i.e. 0 -50 °C), which required extrapolation from higher temperature using the supplied curve fitting equations. This is partially explained by the presence of the melting point at ca. 25 °C, necessitating the use of higher temperatures for the method of choice, ebulliometry.
As a result, a statistical approach was taken whereby the mean was calculated from the extrapolated data: 82.39 Pa at 25 °C (n=11, stdev=15.18 Pa) and 95% C.I.=72.19 -92.59 °C (t-distribution). The result is considered to be relevant, reliable, and adequate for risk assessment, and classification purposes. The available data for this endpoint is conclusive.
Further endpoint study record (BASF, 1981) has been included as supporting information.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.