Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-127-4 | CAS number: 116-15-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.62 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 61.4 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- The NOAEC is the concentration where no significant adverse effects were seen in a subchronic toxicity inhalation study in mice. Adjustments were applied for animal exposure as compared to worker exposure time (6 hr/8 hr), and to account for the increased respiratory volumes in active workers as compared to individuals at rest (6.7 m3/10 m3) per REACH guidance R.8.4.2. A factor of 1 was applied to route-to route extrapolation since the animal exposure was via inhalation.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The robust database supports the confidence in the dose descriptor.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- A factor to account for subchronic to chronic exposure was applied. Value adopted per REACH guidance R.8.4.3.1.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- A factor of 1 is appropriate since the adjusted start point was via mg/m3.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- A default factor of 2.5 is appropriate per REACH guidance R.8.4.3.1.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- This is a default assessment factor for workers per REACH Guidance R.8.4.3.1.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 2
- Justification:
- A high quality, reasonably robust toxicity database exists for this substance. However, to account for the lack of a carcinogenicity test, a factor of 2 was applied.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 46 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 12.5
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 859 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- The NOAEC is the concentration where no significant adverse effects were seen in an acute toxicity inhalation study in rats. Adjustment was applied to account for the increased respiratory volumes in active workers as compared to individuals at rest (6.7 m3/10 m3) per REACH guidance R.8.4.2. A factor of 1 was applied to route-to route extrapolation since the animal exposure was via inhalation.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The robust database supports the confidence in the dose descriptor.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- A factor of 1 is appropriate since the adjusted start point was via mg/m3.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- A default factor of 2.5 is appropriate per REACH guidance R.8.4.3.1.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- This is a default assessment factor for workers per REACH Guidance R.8.4.3.1.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- High quality acute inhalation data exists for this substance.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Exposure duration: A factor of 1 is appropriate since the acute inhalation study exceeded the exposure time associated with the acute inhalation worker DNEL.
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
Additional information - workers
This is a volatile substance and potential worker exposure would likely occur via the inhalation route. Therefore, no worker oral or dermal route DNELs were derived.
No local effects were observed in acute or repeated exposure studies; therefore no DNEL for local effects was derived.
Worker Long-Term Inhalation:
The substance is classified as Acute Toxicity Category 4 (Harmful if inhaled) and Specific Target Organ Toxicity – Single Exposure Category 2 (May cause damage to kidneys if inhaled), Specific Target Organ Toxicity – Single Exposure Category 3 (may cause respiratory irritation) and Specific Target Organ Toxicity Repeated Exposure Category 2 (Kidney) according to the EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
The rat 4-hr inhalation LC50 is 3060 ppm (18776 mg/m3). The NOAEL for systemic toxicity effects after 90 days of inhalation exposure in mice is 10 ppm (61.4 mg/m3). At concentrations of approximately 50 ppm and greater, adverse kidney effects were observed. The substance was not mutagenic and did not produce damage to genetic material. Based on this information, the NOAEL for significant effects was determined to be 10 ppm (61.4 mg/m3).
Worker Acute (15 -Minute) Inhalation:
Rats were exposed via whole-body inhalation to 140, 320, 690, 1090, 1520, 1980, 2220, 2520, 2600, 2870, 3020 or 3440 ppm HFP for 4 hours. The 4-hour inhalation LC50 for rats was found to be 3060 ppm. A pathological exam was conducted at the end of the post-exposure period. Kidney morphology effects (healing nephrosis) and kidney function effects were seen at 320 ppm and higher. The observed effects from 320 ppm to 2600 were predominantly healing (reversible) nephrosis. However, at concentrations of 2870 and higher, kidney effects were identified as nephrosis without evidence of reversibility. The lowest level at which an effect was observed was 320 ppm. At 140 ppm, (859 mg/m3) the rats appeared normal in all respects.
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.15 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 61.4 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- The NOAEC is the concentration where no significant adverse effects were seen in a subchronic toxicity inhalation study in mice. Adjustment was applied for animal exposure as compared to general population exposure time (6 hr/24 hr) per REACH guidance R.8.4.2. A factor of 1 was applied to route-to route extrapolation since the animal exposure was via inhalation.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The robust database supports the confidence in the dose descriptor.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- A factor to account for subchronic to chronic inhalation exposure was applied. Value adopted per REACH guidance R.8.4.3.1
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- A factor of 1 is appropriate since the adjusted start point was via mg/m3.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- A default factor of 2.5 is appropriate per REACH guidance R.8.4.3.1.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- This is a default assessment factor for general population per REACH Guidance R.8.4.3.1.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 2
- Justification:
- A high quality, reasonably robust toxicity database exists for this substance. However, to account for the lack of a carcinogenicity test, a factor of 2 was applied.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 34 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 859 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- The NOAEC is the concentration where no significant adverse effects were seen in an acute toxicity inhalation study in rats. A factor of 1 was applied to route-to route extrapolation since the animal exposure was via inhalation.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The robust database supports the confidence in the dose descriptor
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- A factor of 1 is appropriate since the adjusted start point was via mg/m3.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- A default factor of 2.5 is appropriate per REACH guidance R.8.4.3.1.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- This is a default assessment factor for general population per REACH Guidance R.8.4.3.1.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- High quality acute inhalation data exists for this substance.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Exposure duration:A factor of 1 is appropriate since the acute inhalation study exceeded the exposure time associated with the acute inhalation general population DNEL.
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
Additional information - General Population
This is a volatile substance and potential worker exposure would likely occur via the inhalation route. Therefore, no general population oral or dermal route DNELs were derived.
No local effects were observed in acute or repeated exposure studies; therefore no DNEL for local effects was derived.
General Population Long-Term Inhalation:
The substance is classified as Acute Toxicity Category 4 (Harmful if inhaled) and Specific Target Organ Toxicity – Single Exposure Category 2 (May cause damage to kidneys if inhaled), Specific Target Organ Toxicity – Single Exposure Category 3 (may cause respiratory irritation) and Specific Target Organ Toxicity Repeated Exposure Category 2 (Kidney) according to the EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
The rat 4-hr inhalation LC50 is 3060 ppm (18776 mg/m3). The NOAEL for systemic toxicity effects after 90 days of inhalation exposure in mice is 10 ppm (61.4 mg/m3). At concentrations of approximately 50 ppm and greater, adverse kidney effects were observed. The substance was not mutagenic and did not produce damage to genetic material. Based on this information, the NOAEL for significant effects was determined to be 10 ppm (61.4 mg/m3).
Genera Population Acute (15 -Minute) Inhalation:
Rats were exposed via whole-body inhalation to 140, 320, 690, 1090, 1520, 1980, 2220, 2520, 2600, 2870, 3020 or 3440 ppm HFP for 4 hours. The 4-hour inhalation LC50 for rats was found to be 3060 ppm. A pathological exam was conducted at the end of the post-exposure period. Kidney morphology effects (healing nephrosis) and kidney function effects were seen at 320 ppm and higher. The observed effects from 320 ppm to 2600 were predominantly healing (reversible) nephrosis. However, at concentrations of 2870 and higher, kidney effects were identified as nephrosis without evidence of reversibility. The lowest level at which an effect was observed was 320 ppm. At 140 ppm, (859 mg/m3) the rats appeared normal in all respects.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
