Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Additional physico-chemical information

Administrative data

Endpoint:
other: representative mineralogy
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: non GLP but other quality assurance
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2010
Report date:
2010

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Chemistry /elemental analysis was determined using ICP (inductively Coupled Plasma spectroscopy). Metal speciation/metal mineralogy was assessed from Sequential extraction/metal analysis and mineralogical analysis (XRD and microscopes equipped with EDS (Energy Dispersive Spectrometry) and WDS (Wavelength Dispersive Spectrometry) analysers. The interpretation of the overall results was performed by expert (with profound knowledge of metal particularities).
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
other quality assurance
Other quality assurance:
other: not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
slags lead smelting
IUPAC Name:
slags lead smelting

Results and discussion

Results:
The studied slag sample 09TT07600 contains 24% CaO, 21% SiO2, 14.3% iron, 13.6% Zn, 3.9% MgO, 2.8% lead, 2.5% Al2O3, 2.2% sulphur, 1.4% Na2O, 0.3% antimony, 0.2% arsenic and traces of other elements.
The studied slag sample 09TT08045 contains 27% SiO2, 23% iron, 21% CaO, 5% Al2O3, 4.3% Zn, 1.7% lead, 1.6% MgO, 1.2% sulphur, 1.2% Na2O, 0.08% antimony, 0.07% arsenic and traces of other elements.
The studied slag sample 09TT07596 contains 30% iron, 29% SiO2, 13.6% CaO, 7.2% Al2O3, 1.8% Na2O, 1.6% sulphur, 1.3% MgO, 1.2% lead, 0.08% antimony, 0.005% arsenic and traces of other elements.

The studied slag sample 09TT07600 consists mainly of Ca-silicates; merwinite / bredigite (29.0%) and amphibole-type silicate (24.0%). Other notable mineral phases are iron oxides (20.7%), metallic lead (11.2%), sulphides (6.8%), zinc iron oxides (5.7%) and magnetite (2.4%). Metallic lead is the main lead carrier (98.5%) in this sample. Iron is mainly carried by iron oxides (59%).
The studied slag sample 09TT08045 consists mainly of mainly of hardystonite (34.5%), other Ca-silicates (19.6%), iron oxides (13.8%), fayalite (9.9%), chabazite (5.2%) and magnetite (5.2%). Metallic lead is the main lead carrier and sorosite carries most of the copper in this sample.
The studied slag sample 09TT07596 consists mainly of fayalite (49.6%) and other silicates (38.0%). Other notable mineral phases are troilite (4.5%), iron sulphates, (4.0%) and FeCrNi –alloys (2.6%). Wüstite, metallic lead, sorosite and arsenides occur as accessory minerals.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Chemcical and minerological composition of the reference samples of slags lead smelting

ORC ref.

 

 

OR05

OR21

OR13

Sample

 

 

20000171/2

20000171/12

20000171/6

Lab code

 

 

09TT07600

09TT08045

09TT07596

Substance

 

Slags, lead smelting

Slags, lead smelting

Slags, lead smelting

EINECS

 

 

273-825-9

273-825-9

273-825-9

Consortium reference No.

7

7

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ag

KEM

%

0.006

<0.002

<0.002

B

KEM

%

N/A

N/A

N/A

Bi

TOT

%

<0.010

< 0.010

<0.011

Cd

TOT

%

<0.004

< 0.004

<0.005

Co

TOT

%

0.009

0.098

<0.005

Mo

TOT

%

0.018

< 0.002

0.016

Sb

TOT

%

0.26

0.079

0.081

Se

TOT

%

<0.004

< 0.01

<0.005

Sn

TOT

%

0.44

0.54

0.17

Te

TOT

%

<0.019

< 0.019

<0.023

Zn

TOT

%

13.6

4.34

0.39

 

 

 

 

 

 

SiO2

KEM

%

21.3

27.1

29.3

Al2O3

TOT

%

2.51

4.98

7.19

CaO

TOT

%

24.0

20.6

13.6

Cr2O3

TOT

%

0.25

0.29

0.69

K2O

TOT

%

0.24

0.53

0.51

MgO

TOT

%

3.91

1.56

1.25

MnO

TOT

%

0.50

0.53

0.92

Na2O

TOT

%

1.43

1.15

1.79

(SO4)2

KEM

%

0.024

0.045

0.025

 

 

 

 

 

 

S

LECO

%

2.19

1.2

1.59

C

LECO

%

0.15

0.1

0.08

 

 

 

 

 

 

Satmagan

 

%

2.39

5.21

0.98

Sample

 

09TT07600

Type

 

Slags, lead smelting

Mineral composition

 

%

Merwinite / Bredigite

Ca3Mg(SiO4)2/ Ca7Mg(SiO4)4

29.04

Amphibole-type silicate

Ca2(Fe,Mg)4Al(Si7Al)O22(OH,F)2

24.06

Iron oxides (Zn-bearing)

Fe(Zn)O

20.72

Lead

Pb

11.19

Fe-Zn-Cu-Pb sulphides

(Fe,Zn,Cu,Pb) S

6.76

Zinc iron oxide

ZnFe2O4

5.70

Magnetite

Fe3O4

2.39

PbZnMo - alloy

PbZnMo

0.15

Total

 

100.00

 

 

 

Distribution of lead, -%

 

 

Lead

 

98.47

PbZnMo - alloy

 

1.30

Zinc iron oxide

 

0.23

 

 

 

Distribution of iron, -%

 

 

Iron oxides (Zn-bearing)

 

58.63

Magnetite

 

12.08

Lead

 

10.71

Zinc iron oxide

 

9.06

Amphibole-type silicate

 

3.95

Merwinite / Bredigite

 

3.55

Fe-Zn-Cu-Pb sulphides

 

2.00

PbZnMo - alloy

 

0.02

 

 

 

Distribution of zinc, -%

 

 

Iron oxides (Zn-bearing)

 

30.25

Fe-Zn-Cu-Pb sulphides

 

29.69

Zinc iron oxide

 

20.07

Amphibole-type silicate

 

16.54

Merwinite / Bredigite

 

2.93

Lead

 

0.36

PbZnMo - alloy

 

0.15

Sample

 

09TT08045

Type

 

Slags, lead smelting

Mineral composition

 

%

Hardystonite

Ca2ZnSi2O7

34.50

Ca-silicates (other than Hr & Cbz)

CaSiO

19.59

Iron oxides

FeO

13.78

Fayalite

Fe2SiO4

9.86

Chabazite

CaAl2Si4O12*6(H2O)

5.22

Magnetite

Fe3O4

5.21

Zinc Iron Sulphide

ZnFeS2

2.38

Metallic lead 

Pb

1.78

Sorosite

Cu(Sn,Sb)

1.05

Pyrrhotite

FeS

0.64

Bornite

Cu5FeS4

0.38

Arsenides

FeAs, NiSnSbAs

0.22

Chalcocite

Cu2S

0.20

SnNiSbCu -alloy

SnNiSbCu

0.12

Lead oxides

PbO

0.10

Others

 

4.98

Total

 

100.00

 

 

 

Distribution of lead, -%

 

 

Lead

 

94.83

Lead oxides

 

5.17

 

 

 

Distribution of iron, -%

 

 

Iron oxides

 

31.82

Ca-silicates (other than Hr & Cbz)

 

18.31

Magnetite

 

16.31

Fayalite

 

16.98

Hardystonite

 

10.71

Zinc Iron Sulphide

 

3.50

Pyrrhotite

 

1.70

Arsenides

 

0.25

Bornite

 

0.24

Lead & galena 

 

0.08

Sorosite

 

0.07

Lead oxides

 

0.02

SnNiSbCu -alloy

 

0.01

 

 

 

Distribution of copper, -%

 

 

Sorosite

 

59.62

Bornite

 

20.64

Chalcocite

 

15.23

SnNiSbCu -alloy

 

1.51

Zinc Iron Sulphide

 

1.43

Pyrrhotite

 

0.93

Arsenides

 

0.64

Sample

 

09TT07596

Type

 

Slags, lead smelting

Mineral composition

 

%

Fayalite

Fe2SiO4

49.59

Other silicates

xSiO2

37.95

Troilite

FeS

4.48

Fe-sulphates

FeSOx

4.05

Iron Chromium Nickel -alloy

FeCrNi

2.59

Wüstite

FeO

0.98

Lead

Pb

0.98

Sorosite

Cu(Sn,Sb)

0.05

Iron Arsenide

FeAs

0.02

Total

 

100.70

 

 

 

Distribution of lead, -%

 

 

Lead

 

99.32

Iron Arsenide

 

0.68

 

 

 

Distribution of iron, -%

 

 

Fayalite

 

73.55

Troilite

 

9.22

Fe-sulphates

 

8.78

FeCrNi

 

5.88

Wüstite

 

2.53

FeAs

 

0.02

CuSn

 

0.01

Lead oxide

 

0.01

ORC ref.

 

 

OR05

OR21

OR13

Sample

 

 

20000171/2

20000171/12

20000171/6

Lab code

 

 

09TT07600

09TT08045

09TT07596

Substance

 

Slags, lead smelting

Slags, lead smelting

Slags, lead smelting

EINECS

 

 

273-825-9

273-825-9

273-825-9

Consortium reference No.

7

7

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

As

P1

%

<0.008

<0.007

<0.008

 

P2

%

0.019

0.025

<0.020

 

P3

%

<0.010

<0.009

<0.010

 

P4

%

0.01

0.041

<0.004

 

PSUM

%

0.029

0.066

<0.004

 

TOT

%

0.209

0.073

0.005

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cu

P1

%

<0.008

<0.007

<0.008

 

P2

%

0.23

0.09

<0.020

 

P3

%

0.12

0.16

0.019

 

P4

%

0.018

0.13

0.011

 

PSUM

%

0.37

0.37

0.03

 

TOT

%

0.37

0.38

0.029

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fe

P1

%

<0.008

<0.007

<0.008

 

P2

%

6.05

10.90

24.10

 

P3

%

0.033

0.057

0.17

 

P4

%

7.68

8.90

4.26

 

PSUM

%

13.76

19.86

28.53

 

TOT

%

14.30

23.10

30.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ni

P1

%

<0.008

<0.007

<0.008

 

P2

%

<0.19

<0.017

<0.020

 

P3

%

<0.010

<0.009

<0.010

 

P4

%

0.006

0.027

<0.004

 

PSUM

%

0.006

0.027

<0.004

 

TOT

%

0.014

0.04

0.008

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pb

P1

%

0.009

0.007

0.053

 

P2

%

0.14

0.09

0.074

 

P3

%

0.40

0.29

0.24

 

P4

%

2.11

1.37

0.85

 

PSUM

%

2.66

1.76

1.22

 

TOT

%

2.82

1.74

1.15

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Good quality study that assessed full chemistry and mineralogy of three representative samples of slags lead smelting. The mineralogy (and the distribution pattern for each key element, i.e. % from Total into the various mineralogical forms/species present into the UVCB) of the reference samples can be used to derive the classification of slags lead smelting samples (mixture toxicity rules).
Executive summary:

The studied slag sample 09TT07600 consists mainly of Ca-silicates; merwinite / bredigite (29.0%) and amphibole-type silicate (24.0%). Other notable mineral phases are iron oxides (20.7%), metallic lead (11.2%), sulphides (6.8%), zinc iron oxides (5.7%) and magnetite (2.4%). Metallic lead is the main lead carrier (98.5%) in this sample. Iron is mainly carried by iron oxides (59%).

The studied slag sample 09TT08045 consists mainly of mainly of hardystonite (34.5%), other Ca-silicates (19.6%), iron oxides (13.8%), fayalite (9.9%), chabazite (5.2%) and magnetite (5.2%). Metallic lead is the main lead carrier and sorosite carries most of the copper in this sample.

The studied slag sample 09TT07596 consists mainly of fayalite (49.6%) and other silicates (38.0%). Other notable mineral phases are troilite (4.5%), iron sulphates, (4.0%) and FeCrNi –alloys (2.6%). Wüstite, metallic lead, sorosite and arsenides occur as accessory minerals.

The mineralogy of the reference samples can be used to derive the classification of these samples but also to predict the mineralogy of other slags lead smelting samples. Differences in speciation between the reference samples, and anticipated differences in classification, initially suggested the need for two grades of this intermediate based on the form in which lead was maily present (compounds/metal). As a consequence, company specific classifications were calculated using one of the two different speciation patterns.The calculator sheets, which are used to derive the classification and which reflect particular assumptions that are made, can be found in attachment above (attached background material).