Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-573-9 | CAS number: 64-02-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Concerning Na4EDTA no genotoxicity studies are available, therefore data from other EDTA sodium salts and EDTA free acid have been considered. Natrium salts of EDTA were tested negative in several Ames tests. Natrium salts of EDTA were tested negative in several mouse lymphoma assays. Several other in vitro tests have been performed, and in general EDTA was not genotoxic in vitro.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Non-induced and Aroclor induced liver S9 Mix of male Fischer 344 rats, B6C3F1 mice, and Syrian hamsters
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 10; 33; 100; 333; 1000; 3333; 10000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- dest. water
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-nitrofluorene
- other: - S9 mix: n-Methyl-N`-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine; +S9: 2-aminoanthracene; 2-2(furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- NTP-Standard Protocol
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- other: Mouse lymphoma Assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 Mix from livers of either Aroclor 1254-induced or non-induced male Fischer 344 rats
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 3000, 4000, 5000 µg/ml
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: - S9 mix: methyl methanesulfonate; + S9 mix: methylcholanthrene
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- NTP-Standard Protocol
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- other: Chromosomal aberration Assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254-induced male Sprague Dawley rat liver S9 enzymes and cofactor mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 50; 75; 100 µg/ml
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Referenceopen allclose all
Tables: Results of the mouse lymphoma test with Na3EDTA
Nonactivation Trial: 1 Experiment Call: Negative and Non-Toxic | |||||||
Conc. | Cloning | Relative Total | Mutant Colonies | Mutant Frequency | AVG Mutant Frequency | ||
µg/mL | Efficiency | Growth | |||||
Vehicle Control: | H2O | 0 | 64 | 87 | 113 | 59 | 69 |
63 | 112 | 132 | 70 | ||||
65 | 108 | 133 | 68 | ||||
64# | 92 | 148.5 | 78 | ||||
Test Chemical: | 60 | 65 | 107 | 177 | 91 | 83 | |
74 | 109 | 165 | 74 | ||||
70 | 58 | 110 | 97 | 56 | 68 | ||
67 | 113 | 162 | 81 | ||||
80 | 67 | 100 | 131 | 65 | 59 | ||
63# | 116 | 99 | 52 | ||||
90 | 58 | 86 | 119 | 69 | 72 | ||
63 | 93 | 140 | 75 | ||||
100 | 71 | 111 | 142 | 67 | 73 | ||
66 | 101 | 159 | 80 | ||||
Positive Control: | MMS | 15 | 49 | 42 | 293 | 198 | 181* |
53 | 45 | 261 | 164 | ||||
Trial Notes: | |||||||
Nonactivation Trial: 2 Experiment Call: Negative and Non-Toxic | |||||||
Conc. | Cloning | Relative Total | Mutant Colonies | Mutant Frequency | AVG Mutant Frequency | ||
µg/mL | Efficiency | Growth | |||||
Vehicle Control: | FOP | 0 | 78 | 103 | 24 | 10 | 18 |
93 | 91 | 50 | 18 | ||||
103 | 104 | 57 | 18 | ||||
84 | 102 | 63 | 25 | ||||
Test Chemical: | 1000 | 80 | 42 | 61 | 25 | 23 | |
76 | 51 | 45 | 20 | ||||
2000 | 87 | 53 | 52 | 20 | 21 | ||
88 | 52 | 61 | 23 | ||||
3000 | 79 | 38 | 47 | 20 | 21 | ||
77 | 50 | 50 | 22 | ||||
4000 | 93 | 32 | 80 | 29 | 27 | ||
65 | 30 | 49 | 25 | ||||
5000 | 79 | 23 | 49 | 21 | 22 | ||
76 | 29 | 54 | 24 | ||||
Positive Control: | MMS | 15 | 52 | 25 | 146 | 93 | 93* |
38 | 18 | 107 | 93 | ||||
Trial Notes: | |||||||
Nonactivation Trial: 3 Experiment Call: Negative and Non-Toxic | |||||||
Conc. | Cloning | Relative Total | Mutant Colonies | Mutant Frequency | AVG Mutant Frequency | ||
µg/mL | Efficiency | Growth | |||||
Vehicle Control: | FOP | 0 | 69 | 94 | 88 | 43 | 38 |
62 | 109 | 48 | 26 | ||||
58 | 87 | 79 | 46 | ||||
76 | 110 | 84 | 37 | ||||
Test Chemical: | 1000 | 61 | 59 | 95 | 52 | 57 | |
55 | 60 | 101 | 61 | ||||
2000 | 68 | 73 | 111 | 55 | 49 | ||
61 | 61 | 77 | 42 | ||||
3000 | 62 | 64 | 110 | 59 | 60 | ||
52 | 50 | 95 | 61 | ||||
4000 | 61 | 45 | 74 | 40 | 42 | ||
61 | 51 | 81 | 45 | ||||
5000 | 50 | 34 | 68 | 45 | 46 | ||
55 | 37 | 77 | 47 | ||||
Positive Control: | MMS | 15 | 23 | 24 | 163 | 235 | 217* |
26 | 23 | 156 | 200 | ||||
EMS | 250 | 41 | 61 | 427 | 347 | 325* | |
52 | 59 | 474 | 302 | ||||
Trial Notes: | |||||||
Induced S9 Trial: 1 Experiment Call: Negative and Non-Toxic | |||||||
Conc. | Cloning | Relative Total | Mutant Colonies | Mutant Frequency | AVG Mutant Frequency | ||
µg/mL | Efficiency | Growth | |||||
Vehicle Control: | FOP | 0 | 108 | 93 | 101 | 31 | 36 |
102 | 109 | 98 | 32 | ||||
109 | 101 | 119 | 36 | ||||
97 | 97 | 130 | 45 | ||||
Test Chemical: | 1000 | 105 | 74 | 137 | 43 | 47 | |
100 | 78 | 152 | 51 | ||||
2000 | 82 | 58 | 101 | 41 | 42 | ||
97 | 67 | 126 | 43 | ||||
3000 | 99 | 56 | 159 | 54 | 44 | ||
109 | 62 | 113 | 35 | ||||
4000 | 99 | 55 | 106 | 36 | 38 | ||
85 | 45 | 101 | 40 | ||||
5000 | 77 | 36 | 124 | 54 | 55 | ||
85 | 36 | 145 | 57 | ||||
Positive Control: | MCA | 2.5 | 72 | 44 | 615 | 286 | 305* |
70 | 40 | 680 | 323 | ||||
Trial Notes: | |||||||
Induced S9 Trial: 2 Experiment Call: Negative and Non-Toxic | |||||||
Conc. | Cloning | Relative Total | Mutant Colonies | Mutant Frequency | AVG Mutant Frequency | ||
µg/mL | Efficiency | Growth | |||||
Vehicle Control: | FOP | 0 | 60 | 96 | 36 | 20 | 20 |
64 | 110 | 35 | 18 | ||||
56 | 92 | 48 | 29 | ||||
66 | 103 | 25 | 13 | ||||
Test Chemical: | 1000 | 52 | 61 | 41 | 26 | 21 | |
63 | 75 | 31 | 16 | ||||
2000 | 67 | 63 | 56 | 28 | 27 | ||
62 | 61 | 48 | 26 | ||||
3000 | 61 | 40 | 41 | 22 | 31 | ||
71 | 48 | 85 | 40 | ||||
4000 | 66 | 41 | 56 | 28 | 29 | ||
57 | 35 | 51 | 30 | ||||
5000 | 70 | 34 | 65 | 31 | 28 | ||
59 | 36 | 45 | 25 | ||||
Positive Control: | MCA | 2.5 | 34 | 19 | 231 | 229 | 232* |
34 | 17 | 237 | 236 | ||||
Trial Notes: | |||||||
Footnotes: | |||||||
Asterisks(*) indicate significant responses. | |||||||
r = rejected value due to quality control criteria | |||||||
# = reduced sample size because of the loss of one culture dish due to contamination | |||||||
MMS = methyl methanesulfonate | |||||||
MCA = methylcholanthrene | |||||||
DMSO = dimethylsulfoxide (solvent) |
Table 1: Results of the Chromosome Aberrations Test for Na3EDTA. | |||||||||||||||
Study Result: Negative | |||||||||||||||
Activation | Trial | Trial Call | |||||||||||||
No Activation | 1 | Negative | |||||||||||||
Induced Rat Liver S9 | 2 | Negative | |||||||||||||
Trial #:1 Activation: No Activation Date: 10/17/1984 Harvest Time: 13.5 hrs Trial Call: Negative | |||||||||||||||
Dose | Total Cells Examined | Total Aberrations | Complex Aberrations | Simple Aberrations | Other Abs. | ||||||||||
µg/mL | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | |||
Abs. | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | ||||
Cell | Abs. | Cell | Abs. | Cell | Abs. | Cell | Abs. | ||||||||
Abs: Aberrations | |||||||||||||||
Vehicle Control: | Dimethylsulfoxide | 10 | 100 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Positive Control: | Mitomycin C | 0.25 | 100 | 29 | 0.29 | 26 | 24 | 0.24 | 22 | 5 | 0.05 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 50 | 31 | 0.62 | 46 | 24 | 0.48 | 44 | 7 | 0.14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Test Chemical: | Ethylenediamine tetraacetate, trisodium salt (EDTA) | 25 | 100 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
50 | 100 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
75 | 100 | 5 | 0.05 | 5 | 3 | 0.03 | 3 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
100 | 100 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Trend: | 1.106 | 1.331 | 0.333 | ||||||||||||
Probability: | 0.134 | 0.092 | 0.37 | ||||||||||||
Trial #:2 Activation: Induced Rat Liver S9 Date: 10/31/1984 Harvest Time: 14.0 hrs Trial Call: Negative | |||||||||||||||
Dose | Total Cells Examined | Total Aberrations | Complex Aberrations | Simple Aberrations | Other Abs. | ||||||||||
µg/mL | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | |||
Abs. | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | ||||
Cell | Abs. | Cell | Abs. | Cell | Abs. | Cell | Abs. | ||||||||
Abs: Aberrations | |||||||||||||||
Positive Control: | Cyclophosphamide | 15 | 100 | 55 | 0.55 | 40 | 29 | 0.29 | 22 | 26 | 0.26 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Vehicle Control: | Dimethylsulfoxide | 10 | 100 | 3 | 0.03 | 3 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Test Chemical: | Ethylenediamine tetraacetate, trisodium salt (EDTA) | 25 | 100 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
50 | 100 | 4 | 0.04 | 4 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
75 | 100 | 4 | 0.04 | 4 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
100 | 100 | 3 | 0.03 | 3 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Trend: | 0.686 | -0.156 | 1.164 | ||||||||||||
Probability: | 0.247 | 0.562 | 0.122 | ||||||||||||
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
Concerning Na4EDTA no genotoxicity studies are available, therefore data from other EDTA sodium salts and EDTA free acid have been considered. In vivo, somatic cells in mice (bone marrow cells) showed negative results with respect to the endpoints micronuclei, aneuploidy and sister chromatid exchanges. In germ line cells negative results were obtained for induction of structural chromosomal aberrations in spermatogonia, for induction of aneuploidy in primary and secondary spermatocytes, and also for induction of dominant lethal effects. This result was also confirmed by the independent evaluation of the MAK Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the work area (MAK, 46; 2009).
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- BASF SE, Experimental Toxicology and Ecology
- Type of assay:
- other: Erythrocyte Micronucleus Assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Purity test date: 31.Oct 1996
- Batch No.: 31-9412
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature
- Stability under test conditions: The stability of the test substance at room temperature in the vehicle water over a period of 4 hours has been verified analytically - Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Deutschland GmbH
- Weight at study initiation: Mean 29 g
- Housing: Makrolon cages type Mill, in groups of 5
- Diet: Kliba, standardized pelleted feed, Provimi Kliba SA, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland, ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 - 24°C
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70% .
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle used: water
- Details on exposure:
- - The low dose group was given 500 mg test substance/kg body weight or 20 mL/kg body weight of a solution with a concentration of 2.5 g/100 mL.
- The intermediate dose group was given 1000 mg test substance/kg body weight or 20 mL/kg body weight of a solution with a concentration of 5.0 g/100 mL.
- The top dose group was given 2000 mg test substance/kg body weight or 20 mL/kg body weight of a solution with a concentration of 10.0 g/100 mL. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 48 h (animals were treated twice at 24 h intervals)
- Frequency of treatment:
- twice
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- 20 mg of cyclophosphamide (CPP)/kg body weight or 0.15 mg of vincristine sulphate (VCR)/kg body weight, both, dissolved in purified water, were administered to male animals once, orally each in a volume of 10 mL/kg body weight.
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- bone marrow
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
2000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) from each of the male animals of every test group are evaluated and investigated for micronuclei (MN). The normochromatic erythrocytes (NCE) which occur are also scored. The following parameters have been evaluated:
- Number of polychromatic erythrocytes
- Number of polychromatic erythrocytes containing micronuclei
- Number of normochromatic erythrocytes
- Number of normochromatic erythrocytes containing micronuclei
- Ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes
- Number of small micronuclei (d < D/4) and of large micronuclei (d > D/4) (d = diameter of micronucleus, D = cell diameter ) - Evaluation criteria:
- The test chemical is to be considered positive in this assay if the following criteria are met:
- A dose-related and significant increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes was observed .
- The proportion of cells containing micronuclei exceeded both the values of the concurrent negative control range and the negative historical control range .
A test substance is generally considered negative in this test system if:
- There was no significant increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes at any dose above concurrent control frequencies.
- The frequencies of cells containing micronuclei were within the historical control range. - Statistics:
- The statistical evaluation of the data was carried out using the program system MUKERN. A comparison of the dose group with the vehicle control was carried out using the Wilcoxon test for the hypothesis of equal medians.
- Key result
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Remarks:
- As clinical signs only piloerrection were observed
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- - After two administrations of the highest dose of 2000 mg/kg body weight, 0.4% of polychromatic erythrocytes containing micronuclei were found after 24 hours.
- In the two lower dose groups, rates of micronuclei of about 0.6% (1000 mg/kg group) and 0.7% (500 mg/kg group) were detected.
- With 12.7% the positive control substance cyclophosphamide for clastogenicity led to the expected increase in the number of polychromatic erythrocytes containing exclusively small micronuclei at a dose level of 20 mg/kg body weight.
- With 81.7% the positive control vincristine for induction of spindle poison effects also led to a clearly enhanced number of polychromatic erythrocytes containing micronuclei with the expected amount of large micronuclei, i .e. 10.5%.
- The number of normochromatic erythrocytes containing micronuclei did not differ to any appreciable extent in the negative control or in the various dose groups
Thus, the test substance Trilon BD did not lead to any increase in the rate of micronuclei. The number of normochromatic or polychromatic erythrocytes containing small micronuclei (d < D/4) did not deviate from the vehicle control value and was within the historical control range. Nor were large micronuclei (d > D/4) observed either in the negative control group or in the three dose groups of Trilon BD.
No inhibition of erythropoiesis, induced by the treatment of mice with Trilon BD was detected; the ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes was always in the same range as that of the control values in all dose groups.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
In vitro
Na3EDTA was negative in a reverse gene mutation assay using bacteria Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 as well as E. Coli WP2uvrA without and with non-induced and Aroclor-induced liver S9 Mix from male Fischer 344 rats, B6C3F1 mice or Syrian hamsters. The substance was tested up to concentrations of 10000 µg/plate (Dunkel 1985).
Several mammalian cell line gene mutations assays are available. In a mouse lymphoma assay with Na3EDTA the mutant frequency was not increased at concentrations of 3000, 4000, 5000 µg/mL and a treatment time of 4 h. The assay was conducted with and without metabolic activation and no cytotoxicity was detected (NTP, 1984).
Another mouse lymphoma assay with Na2EDTA was also negative at concentrations of 250, 500, 1000, 1500 and 2000 µg/mL with and without metabolic activation. However, 2000 µg/mL Na2EDTA reduced the relative growth to 65.5% compared to the control in cells without metabolic activation. This was not the case when cells were treated with S9 Mix (Whittaker, 2001).
Additionally, in a chromosome aberration test Na3EDTA was tested negative (NTP, 1984).
Cell transformation assays with Na2 and Na3 salts of EDTA were negative. One test was performed on SHE cells with exposure up to 100 µg/mL for 24 h or 150 µg/mL Na2EDTA for up to 7 days without metabolic activation (LeBoef, 1996).
Additionally a cell transformation assay using BALB/c-3T3 cells was performed without metabolic activation. Cells were exposed to concentrations up to 770 µg/mL Na3EDTA without metabolic activation for 48 h (Matthews, 1993).
In vivo
Several in vivo tests for genotoxicity on somatic cells have been performed. The key study which was performed according to OECD 474 guideline and GLP concluded that no micronuclei were induced in polychromatic erythrocytes of NMRI mice after repeated oral administration (twice with a 24-hour interval between administrations) of 500, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg bw Na2EDTA. As clinical sign only piloerection was observed after the second administration of 2000 mg/kg. No lethal effects or cytotoxicity (PCE/NCE ratio) were induced. Only males (5 per group) were used because no distinct symptomatic differences between males and females were noticed in a pre-test (BASF 2000).
In another well-conducted in vivo micronucleus assay Na2EDTA was negative in bone marrow cells of mice (strain: BALB/c). Mice were treated with a single intraperitoneal dose of 186 mg/kg bodyweight; the sampling times were 24 hours and 48 hours after treatment. The tested dose was near to the LD50 value. No cytotoxic effects (PCE/NCE) were induced; information about clinical signs or lethal effects was not given. Only males (3 per 24-hour group; 4 per 48-hour group) were used (Russo and Levis, 1992).
Additionally in vivo mutagenicity tests have been performed on rodent germ cells. Na2EDTA induced micronuclei in germ cells at the late stages of spermacytogenesis of mice (strain: BALB/c) after intraperitoneal administration of a very high dose of 186 mg/kg bw in the range of the i.p. LD50 value. The frequency of micronuclei was analyzed in Golgi phase and Cap phase, representing the two earliest phases of spermatids development. The sampling times were 24 hours and 48 hours after administration. Na2EDTA induced micronuclei in Golgi phase spermatids (0.30% and 0.38% micronucleated spermatids at 24 hours and 48 hours sampling as compared to 0.08% in controls); in Cap phase spermatids negative results were obtained. Toxicity data were not given. Aneuploidy is discussed as most probable origin of micronuclei produced by NA2EDTA in secondary spermatocytes because the substance generally induced micronuclei of larger size in comparison with other substances. Micronuclei induction in germ cells was evaluated after after i.p. application in this study. Due to the very alkaline character of the test item and its application very close to the gonads the route of application chosen in this test is not suitable and results obtained are considered to be equivocal In addition, Na2EDTA does not induce chromosomal aberrations in the spermatogonial phase, the most suitable germ cell population to detect chromosomal aberrations. An in vivo chromosomal aberration assay with mouse spermatogonia (strain: BALB/c) led to a negative result after a single i.p. administration of 186 mg/kg bw Na2EDTA. The sampling time was 24 hours sampling time after administration (Russo and Levis, 1992).
Zordan et al. (1990) investigated aneugenic properties of Na2EDTA in primary and secondary spermatocytes of mouse (strain: BALB/c). After single i.p. administration of 93 and 186 mg/kg bw no increases in aneuploid spermatocytes were observed. The sampling was 6 hours and 5 days after administration; higher doses resulted in lethality.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification,
Labelling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
The
available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for
classification purposes under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. Based on the
available data, the substance is not considered to be classified for
genetic toxicity under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, as amended for the
ninth time in Regulation (EU) No 2016/1179.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.