Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 229-176-9 | CAS number: 6422-86-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Water solubility
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- water solubility
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2001-07-20 through 2001-08-14 (Experiment 1); 2001-10-05 through 2001-10-29 (Experiment 2)
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Method Reference: Ellington, JJ, 1999, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 44, 1414-1418.
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The slow-stir technique has been used to measure the aqueous solubility of phthalate esters, a class of chemicals similar to DOTP. Restricting the agitation of the test solution, and allowing several days for equilibration achieved reproducibility and accurate results. Even though the duration of the published tests was often several weeks, steady-state equilibration was observed within a few days.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of method:
- other: Slow-stir technique
- Key result
- Water solubility:
- ca. 0.4 µg/L
- Temp.:
- 22.5 °C
- pH:
- ca. 5
- Details on results:
- A relative response factor (RRF) was determined for each test substance standard analyzed by multiplying the nominal concentration (6.024 mg/L) of internal standard by the area of the test substance peak and dividing that by the area of the internal standard peak and the nominal concentration of the test substance. The mean RRF based on the test substance standards was calculated on each day of analysis.
The concentration of test substance in each sample was calculated by multiplying the area of the test substance peak by the nominal concentration (approx. 3 µg/L) of internal standard spiked into the sample and dividing that by the area of the internal standard peak and the mean RRF.
The potential for biodegradation during these long term tests (>20 d) was evaluated in Experiment #2 with one of the test solutions containing HgCl2. The data from Experiment #2 show that there was no difference in the results for the test solutions with and without HgCl2.
The mean measured solubility determined in Experiment #1 was 0.6 µg/L, and in Experiment #2 was 0.2 µg/L. The average of the solubility values from both experiments resulted in an estimated aqueous solubility value of 0.4 µg/L. - Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: insoluble (< 0.1 mg/L)
DOTP had extremely low solubility in water. - Executive summary:
Two experiments were performed to detemine aqueous solubility of DOTP in distilled water using the slow-stir method. The solubility of DOTP in distilled deionized water was determined to be approximately 0.4 µg/L at 22.5±1.5 °C.
Reference
Results from the Water Solubility Test of DOTP Using the Slow Stir Method | ||||
Concentration of DOTP (µg/L) | ||||
Experiment #1 Sample ID |
Day 10 | Day 20 | Day 25 | Mean Value |
Blank A | ND (<0.2) | ND(<0.2) | ND(<0.3) | ND(<0.2) |
Blank B | ND (<0.2) | ND(<0.2) | ND(<0.2) | ND(<0.2) |
Tank A | 0.43 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.6 |
Tank B | 0.36 | 0.68 | 0.50 | 0.51 |
Experiment #2 Sample ID |
Day 3 | Day 20 | Day 24 | Mean Value |
Blank | ND(<0.1) | ND(<0.1) | ND(<0.1) | ND(<0.1) |
Tank A* | 0.14 | 0.32 | 0.19 | 0.22 |
Tank B | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.15 |
Note: | ||||
*contains mercuric chloride to inhibit microbial growth |
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Water solubility:
- 0.4 µg/L
- at the temperature of:
- 20 °C
Additional information
Determining the aqueous solubility of a test substance that is a hydrophobic chemical is inherently difficult. This test substance is a liquid at room temperature and has a density similar to that of water. Using a standard OECD 105 shake flask water solubility method promotes the formation of micelles and suspensions, which can be stable and difficult to discern from dissolved chemical. Also, trace amounts of particulate matter can serve as adsorptive sites for the test substance effectively increasing its apparent solubility. The presences of undissolved or adsorbed test substance in these forms can bias the results high, an effect that has been evident in much of the earlier solubility data on chemicals with these characteristics. Researchers have sucessfully demonstrated the use of a slow-stirring technique to measure the aqueous solubility of substances of this type. The slow-stir technique has been incorporated into OECD Method 123 for determining octanol-water partitioning coefficient. OECD 105 column elution and nephelometric methods can also be utilized.
The solubility of bis(2-ethylhexyl)terephthalate was determined in two experiments using the slow-stir water solubility method. Sample aliquots were extracted using solid phase extraction (SPE) and the resulting extracts were analyzed using gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection (GC/MS). Due to the length of the tests (up to 25 days), if bacteria were present, the test substance could biodegrade yielding inaccurate water solubility results. The use of a biocide in the second experiment ensured that the results of experiment #1 were not affected by biodegradation. The mean measured solubility detennined in Experiment #1 was 0.6 ug/L, and in Experiment #2 was 0.2 ug/L. The result from the first experiment appears to be higher. This could be due to the presence of a very small amount of micelle, suspended or adsorbed test chemical stable in solution. It is more likely however that the apparent difference between the results of the two tests is due to the day-to-day and test-to-test analytical variability (at least a factor of 2X). Thus, the average of the results of both experiments provides the most reliable value for the water solubility of bis(2-ethylhexyl)terephthalate,
0.4 ug/L.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.