Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 229-176-9 | CAS number: 6422-86-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 B (Ready Biodegradability: CO2 Evolution Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- activated sludge, domestic, non-adapted
- Details on inoculum:
- The activated sludge used for this study was obtained from the Wareham Wastewater Treatment Plant, Wareham, Massachusetts, which receives primarily domestic waste. Approximately 4 liters of activated sludge was collected on 26 October 2009 and transported to Springborn Smithers. Upon arrival at Springborn Smithers, the sludge was passed through a 2-mm sieve, combined, and centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 10 minutes. The supernatant was discarded, the sludge was washed with mineral medium and the contents were centrifuged at least once again and the supernatant was discarded. The moisture content of the activated sludge was determined, using an automated moisture analyzer (Sartorius MA-150), to be 95.7% and the percent solids determined to be 4.30%. A 15 mg solids/mL inoculum solution was prepared (3.0 g dry weight sludge brought to 200 mL with mineral media) and aerated until used. The test substance flasks, the blank flasks, the procedural control flask and the toxicity control flask all received 6.0 mL of the inoculum to produce an activated sludge concentration of 30 mg/L. In addition, a 50-g aliquot of fresh soil and a 50-g aliquot of Weweantic River sediment were collected near Springborn Smithers Laboratories. Upon arrival at Springborn Smithers, the soil and sediment were suspended in 1 L of Weweantic River water. The suspension was filtered through glass wool and refrigerated until use. A 3-mL aliquot of the soil/sediment filtrate was added to each test vessel containing 2991 mL of mineral medium and 6.0 mL of activated sludge
- Duration of test (contact time):
- 28 d
- Initial conc.:
- 10 mg/L
- Based on:
- other: theoretical total organic carbon
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- CO2 evolution
- Details on study design:
- Solutions were prepared using reagent grade water (meeting ASTM Type Il requirements) obtained with a Sybron/Barnstead NANOpure II system. The source water for this system is well water that has been shown to be free of all contaminants which could affect study results. The 0.2-μm filtered water typically has greater than 16.7 Mohm-cm resistivity and total organic carbon below the 1 mg/L detection limit (routine monthly analyses). The dissolved organic carbon (DOC) content of the reagent grade water was determined to be 0.16 ppm prior to use. All chemicals were at least reagent grade and were obtained from commercial sources. Each test unit consisted of a 4-L glass bottle with a rubber stopper into which one stainless steel needle with a Luer-Lok connection and two pieces of glass tubing were inserted. Prior to test initiation, the test vessels were acid washed and rinsed repeatedly with reagent grade water. The stainless steel needle was extended through the stopper into the test solution serving as a sampling port for solution samples. A rubber cap was used to cover the top of the sample port. The glass tubing provided the inlet and outlet ports for air exchange. CO2-free air was pumped under positive pressure through a hydration flask before entering the test system. The outlet port of each system was connected to two CO2 effluent gas traps, the first consisting of 200 mL of 0.2-N potassium hydroxide (KOH) and the second trap containing 100 mL of 0.2-N KOH. Six test vessels were established: two for the test substance, two inoculum blanks, one sodium benzoate procedural control and one toxicity control. On day -1, each 4-L vessel was established by adding 2991 mL mineral medium. A 6.0-mL aliquot of the activated sludge inoculum and 3.0 mL of soil inoculum were added to each vessel for a total volume of 3 L per vessel. All test vessels were attached to a CO2-free compressed air gas tank and aerated under positive pressure. The vessels were mixed and purged with CO2-free air until day 0 to remove any residual inorganic carbon in the test system prior to test initiation. A 10.0 mg C/mL sodium benzoate stock solution was prepared by dissolving 1.7148 g (1.0 g carbon) of sodium benzoate to 100 mL with sterile purified reagent water. This stock solution was used to prepare the procedural and toxicity controls. Since the test substance is not readily soluble in water, it was adsorbed to silica gel prior to dosing to enhance the contact of the test substance with the innoculum. On day 0, approximately 0.0444 to 0.0459 g of the test substance was added to approximately 100 mg of silica gel (Sigma Aldrich Lot No. 10901CH, 230 to 400 mesh, 60Å) for both test suspension vessels and the toxicity control vessel. At test initiation, the toxicity control vessel received 3.0 mL of the 10.0 mg C/mL sodium benzoate stock solution. The total fortification was 20 mg C/L (10 mg C/L test substance and 10 mg C/L reference substance) in the toxicity control vessels. The sodium benzoate procedural control was fortified with 3.0 mL of the sodium benzoate stock solution for a final concentration of 10 mg C/L. The test vessels were identified with at least the project number, test substance, replicate number and treatment type. Each test vessel was placed on a magnetic stir plate located in a dark environmental chamber set to maintain a temperature of 22 ± 2 ºC. All test systems were aerated continuously for 28 days under positive pressure using CO2-free air in order to provide oxygen for the microbes and to capture evolved carbon dioxide. The temperature of the environmental chamber was recorded throughout the exposure period using a digital VWR minimum-maximum thermometer.
- Reference substance:
- benzoic acid, sodium salt
- Key result
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 73.05
- St. dev.:
- 4.99
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Details on results:
- The 28 day cumulative net percent CO2 production (blank control values subtracted), or percent ultimate biodegradation, for Eastman 168 Plasticizer (terephthalate), procedural control, and toxicity control was calculated to be 73.05, 78.91 and 77.91%, respectively. Based upon a graphical display of the CO2 evolution data for the test substance, the 10 day window for achieving 60% degradation within 10 days after achieving 10% degradation was met. The cumulative net CO2 evolved from the sodium benzoate procedural control was 65.91% of theoretical by day 10 confirming the presence of an active microbial population and system integrity.
- Results with reference substance:
- The cumulative net CO2 evolved from the sodium benzoate procedural control was 65.91% of theoretical by day 10. This rapid biodegradation of sodium benzoate confirmed the presence of an active microbial population and system integrity.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- Based on the CO2 analysis results from this study, Eastman 168 Plasticizer is "readily biodegradable" according to the OECD 301B guideline. The rapid degradation of the reference substance confirmed the presence of an acceptable microbial community and confirmed system integrity.
- Executive summary:
The determination of the biodegradability of Eastman 168 Plasticizer based on OECD Method 301B (CO2 Evolution Test) was conducted. The cumulative net percent CO2production (blank control values subtracted), or percent ultimate biodegradation, for Eastman168 Plasticizer, procedural control, and toxicity control was calculated to be 73.05, 78.91 and 77.91%, respectively. The rapid degradation of the reference substance confirmed the presence of an acceptable microbial community and confirmed system integrity. Based on the CO2 analysis results from this study, Eastman168 Plasticizer is "readily biodegradable" according to the OECD 301B guideline.
Reference
Description of key information
Two OECD 301B Ready Biodegradation Studies
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Biodegradation in water:
- readily biodegradable
- Type of water:
- freshwater
Additional information
In 1985 an OECD 301B ready biodegradation study was conducted with Eastman 168 Plasticizer ( Bis (2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate). The results of that study indicated significant degradation occurred (40.2%), but not enough to classifiy the substance as readily biodegradable. After review of the degradation potential of the substance, it was believed that it was likely that there may be an issue with the low solubility of the substance reducing the bioavailability to the test micro-organisms in the study. A second OECD 301B study was conducted in 2009 where the substance was introduced into the test system through application to fine silica gel to increase the surface area and bioavailability of the substance to the microorganisms. This study resulted in 73.05% degradation over 28 days and meeting the 10 day window criteria. Therefore, the test substance is considered to be "readily biodegradable".
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.