Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-848-3 | CAS number: 75-20-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Specific investigations: other studies
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- specific investigations: other studies
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Justification for type of information:
- As calcium carbide instantly hydrolyses to Ca(OH)2 and C2H2 upon contact with water/moisture the assessment is based on the degradation products. For details please refer to the read across report in section 13.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Details on results:
- There was no difference in the lung function parameters (FVC, FEV1, peak flow (PF), forced expiratory flow after exhalation of 50% and 75% of the vital capacity (FEF50 and FEF75)), adjusted for age, sex, race, height and smoking. However, the dust caused an acute decrease in PF with increasing exposure level; the decrease was 1-2% per mg/m3 of respirable dust.
- Conclusions:
- In a cross-sectional study in 16 Portland cement manufacturing plants in the US, respiratory symptoms and lung function parameters were compared in 2736 cement workers and 755 controls, exposed to 0.57 (0.01-46) mg/m3 (respirable dust) and 2.9 (0.01-79) mg/m3 (total dust). There was no difference in the lung function parameters.
- Executive summary:
In a cross-sectional study in 16 Portland cement manufacturing plants in the US, respiratory symptoms and lung function parameters were compared in 2736 cement workers and 755 controls, exposed to 0.57 (0.01-46) mg/m3 (respirable dust) and 2.9 (0.01-79) mg/m3 (total dust). There was no difference in the lung function parameters (FVC, FEV1, peak flow (PF), forced expiratory flow after exhalation of 50% and 75% of the vital capacity (FEF50 and FEF75)), adjusted for age, sex, race, height and smoking. However, the dust caused an acute decrease in PF with increasing exposure level; the decrease was 1-2% per mg/m3 of respirable dust.
This information is used in a read-across approach in the assessment of the target substance. For justification of read-across please refer to the read-across report attached to IUCLID section 13.
- Endpoint:
- specific investigations: other studies
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Justification for type of information:
- As calcium carbide instantly hydrolyses to Ca(OH)2 and C2H2 upon contact with water/moisture the assessment is based on the degradation products. For details please refer to the read across report in section 13.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Details on results:
- The SCOEL concludes on an OEL of 1 mg/m3 of respirable dust and a STEL of 4 mg/m3 for calcium oxide and calcium hydroxide.
- Conclusions:
- The SCOEL concludes on an OEL of 1 mg/m3 of respirable dust and a STEL of 4 mg/m3 for calcium oxide and calcium hydroxide.
- Executive summary:
The SCOEL concludes on an OEL of 1 mg/m3 of respirable dust and a STEL of 4 mg/m3 for calcium oxide and calcium hydroxide.
This information is used in a read-across approach in the assessment of the target substance. For justification of read-across please refer to the read-across report attached to IUCLID section 13.
- Endpoint:
- specific investigations: other studies
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Justification for type of information:
- As calcium carbide instantly hydrolyses to Ca(OH)2 and C2H2 upon contact with water/moisture the assessment is based on the degradation products. For details please refer to the read across report in section 13.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Details on results:
- No effects in lung function parameters, nasal peak expiratory flow or in eosinophilic cationic protein, myeloperoxidase and hyaluronic acid in the nasal lavage fluid, has been observed at 1.2 mg/m3 total dust (range: 0.4-5.8 mg/m3). In contrast, the nasal mucociliary clearance was significantly longer (mean and range: 13.4 min and 6.0-26 min) in the exposed group compared to the controls (10.0 min and 4-20 min), determined by the saccharin test. This effect is most probably a result of the different in temperature (42 to 28°C).
- Conclusions:
- No effects in lung function parameters, nasal peak expiratory flow or in eosinophilic cationic protein, myeloperoxidase and hyaluronic acid in the nasal lavage fluid, has been observed at 1.2 mg/m3 total dust (range: 0.4-5.8 mg/m3).
- Executive summary:
No effects in lung function parameters, nasal peak expiratory flow or in eosinophilic cationic protein, myeloperoxidase and hyaluronic acid in the nasal lavage fluid, has been observed at 1.2 mg/m3 total dust (range: 0.4-5.8 mg/m3). In contrast, the nasal mucociliary clearance was significantly longer (mean and range: 13.4 min and 6.0-26 min) in the exposed group compared to the controls (10.0 min and 4-20 min), determined by the saccharin test. This effect is most probably a result of the different in temperature (42 to 28°C).
This information is used in a read-across approach in the assessment of the target substance. For justification of read-across please refer to the read-across report attached to IUCLID section 13.
Referenceopen allclose all
Fifteen Finnish pulp-mill workers were compared with 15 matched unexposed referents from the transportation and office departments. The mean total dust level among the kiln workers was 1.2 mg/m3 (range: 0.4-5.8 mg/m3) and the temperature was 42°C. There was no statistically significant difference in self-reported symptoms, nasal bleeding, crusts in the nose, nasal blockage and nasal secretion. Neither did the clinical examination reveal statistically significant more inflammation in the nose and throat among the exposed workers, nor was any statistically significant difference observed in lung function parameters, nasal peak expiratory flow or in eosinophilic cationic protein, myeloperoxidase and hyaluronic acid in the nasal lavage fluid. In contrast, the nasal mucociliary clearance was significantly longer (mean and range: 13.4 min and 6.0-26 min) in the exposed group compared to the controls (10.0 min and 4-20 min), determined by the saccharin test. After rebuilding the kiln, the mean total dust level was reduced to 0.2 mg/m3 (range: 0.1-0.6 mg/m3) and the temperature to 28°C. The mean saccharin transition time normalized in the exposed workers (8.6 min and 1.4-15 min) and it was no longer different from the mean value in the controls (10.2 min and 5.5-20 min). The authors interpreted the normalization to be due to the decrease in the lime dust level, but mentioned that some influence of reduced temperature cannot be excluded. Overall, the NOAEL for all effects, except the nasal mucociliary clearance, is 1.2 mg/m3 total dust.
Description of key information
Adverse effects of CaC2 are considered to be limited to local reactions. Systemic effects from exposure to the breakdown products are not expected: Decomposition of CaC2 leads to Ca(OH)2 and C2H2. Compared to a daily intake level of 2,500 mg/kg/d (EFSA, 2012) resorption of calcium ions from dissociated Ca(OH)2 (inhaled CaC2 particles) is considered to be negligible. The second decomposition product, C2H2, is a gas and therefore expected to be exhaled.
At low-level exposures, sensory irritation and a decrease of the lung function parameters at long-term exposures are considered to be the critical effects. Sensory irritation is expected to be prevented by 1mg/m³ respirable CaO dust (Cain et al., 2004). No relevant respiratory effect was found at an exposure level of 1 mg/m³ (range: 0.4-5.8 mg/m³) of total lime dust (Torén et al. 1996). A limit of 1 mg/m³ is protective against long-term exposure to Ca(OH)2, as furthermore supported by studies on cement dust exposures that has a similar alkalinity compared to CaC2 in aqueous solution (SCOEL, 2008). It should be emphazised that this value is conservative as the effects reported by Cain et al. (2004) are based on sensory irritation but not on lung function parameters.
Additional information
In aqueous solution, calcium carbide (CaC2) rapidly decomposes into calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) and acetylene (C2H2). For local effects in the lung the main effects are related to calcium hydroxide, which liberates OH- ions, affecting the skin and the mucous membranes.
Potential respiratory irritation of calcium hydroxide and calcium oxide has been assessed in several epidemiological studies and studies in volunteers. The systemic effects of CaC2 is considered to be negligible at normal occupational exposures. The fraction of calcium in CaC2 is 63 % (w/w). Assuming an exposure level of 1 mg/m³ and an air volume of 10 m³ inhaled during an 8-hour workday, this results in an inhaled dose of 6.3 mg calcium per day. Thus, occupational exposures makes negligible contribution to the daily systemic calcium uptake as the Tolerable Upper Intake Level for calcium is 2500 mg/day (EFSA Journal 2012;10(7): 2814).
Key studies for the assessment of respiratory irritation are Cain et al. (2004, 2008), Toren et al. (1996), Abrons et al. (1988). Several other studies on occupational exposure to limestone, Portland cement and various sources of CaO and Ca(OH)2 have been summarized by the Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL) in 2008.
In Torén et al. (1996), 15 Finnish pulp-mill workers were compared with 15 matched unexposed referents from the transportation and office departments. The mean total lime dust level was 1.2 mg/m³ (range: 0.4-5.8 mg/m³) and the temperature was 42 °C. No effects on lung function parameters, nasal peak expiratory flow or in eosinophilic cationic protein, myeloperoxidase and hyaluronic acid in the nasal lavage fluid have been observed at 1.2 mg/m³ total dust (range: 0.4-5.8 mg/m³). In contrast, the nasal mucociliary clearance was significantly longer (mean and range: 13.4 min and 6.0-26 min) in the exposed group compared to the controls (10.0 min and 4-20 min), determined by the saccharin test. This effect is most probably a result of the difference in temperature (42 to 28 °C). Overall, the NOAEL for all effects, except the nasal mucociliary clearance, is 1.2 mg/m³ total dust.
Abrons et al. reported on a cross-sectional study in 16 Portland cement manufacturing plants in the US. Respiratory symptoms and lung function parameters were compared in 2736 cement workers and 755 controls, exposed to 0.57 (0.01-46) mg/m³ (respirable dust) and 2.9 (0.01-79) mg/m³ (total dust). There was no difference in lung function parameters.
Cain et al. (2004) exposed 12 lightly exercising volunteers (breathing through the nose) for 20 min to 1 to 5 mg/m³ CaO. Nasal resistance, nasal secretion, mucociliary transport time, and chemaesthetic magnitude (for example, irritation, pungency, piquancy, cooling and burning), were assessed. The mass median aerodynamic diameter was 6.53±0.76 µm. The CaO exposures caused a steady increase in irritation during the 20 min period and no steady state level was reached. In the nose, 1 and 2 mg/m³ gave rise to an equivalent effect at the end of the exposure, which corresponded to the irritation effect of about 15 % CO2. The 5 mg/m³ level had an effect equivalent to 20 % CO2. The values were significantly above the background. No significant effect occurred in nasal secretion and mucociliary clearance, determined by the saccharin test. The study interpreted the effects as “very few people used the term irritation to describe the nasal sensation evoked by 10 % CO2. Some would use that term at 15 % CO2 and the majority would use it at 20 % CO2” and also the authors conclude “that the psychophysical judgements produced results consistent with the
known effect that calcium oxide would evoke irritating chemesthesis at exposures in the range of 2 to 5 mg/m³”. It was concluded that the effects of CaO, which were not dose dependent in the range from 1 to 2 mg/m³, were of no adverse health significance. The effect had not reached the maximum within the 20 min of exposure although the effect was levelling off. Taking these two facts into account, an exposure limit of 1 mg/m³ is deemed to protect against adverse sensory irritation.
Cain et al. (2008) investigated the airway effects of 2.5 mg/m³ CaO in 6 male and 6 female volunteers, aged 18-35 years, who were exposed for 45 min. The mass mean aerodynamic diameter was 6.5 μm and the geometric standard deviation 2.6. The sensory effects were highest in the nose, lower in the throat and lowest in the eyes. The maximum effect was reached about 30 min after the initiation of the exposure, followed by adaptation.
The authors interpreted their results as “people would agree that feel in the nose becomes irritating at about 17-18 % carbon dioxide”. Thus, the 2.5 mg/m³ level can be considered at the LOAEL. Overall, considering the effect at the 2.5 mg/m³ level, the limited number of subjects in the study and sensory irritation increasing as a monotonic function, this suggests that an OEL of 1 mg/m³ can be derived from this study which is in agreement with the results from Cain et al. (2004).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.