Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 931-299-4 | CAS number: 68390-94-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
In vitro gene mutation in bacteria (reverse mutation test (Ames), similar to OECD 471): negative with and without metabolic activation in S. typhimurium TA 1538, TA 1537, TA 1535, TA 100 and TA 98 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae D4
In vitro cytogenicity in mammalian cells (chromosome aberration, similar to OECD 473): negative with and without metabolic activation in Chinese hamster lung (CHL/IU) cells
In vitro gene mutation in mammalian cells (mouse lymphoma assay, OECD 476): negative with and without metabolic activation in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- significant methodological deficiencies
- Remarks:
- Strain to detect cross-linking mutagens missing, analytical purity of test substance not specified.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Strain to detect cross-linking mutagens missingy, analytical purity of test substance not specified.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- His-operon (S. typhimurium), ade/trp-loci (S. cerevisiae)
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- D4
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Liver S9 fraction of Aroclor 1254-pretreated rats
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.1, 1.0, 10.0, 100.0, 500.0 and 1000.0 µg/plate without activation; 0.1, 1.0, 10.0, 100.0 and 500.0 µg/plate with activation
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: water, dimethylsulfoxid (DMSO)
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- TA1535, TA100, D4 without S9
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: QM, 10 µg/plate
- Remarks:
- TA1537 without S9
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-nitrofluorene
- Remarks:
- TA1538, TA98 without S9
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-anthramin, 2.5 µg/plate
- Remarks:
- TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA98, TA 100 with S9
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- N-dimethylnitrosamine
- Remarks:
- D4 with S9
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 48 h for TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98, TA 100; 3 - 5 days for D4
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: other: direct revertant colony counts - Evaluation criteria:
- Strains TA 1535, TA 1537 and TA 1538: If the solvent control value is within the normal range, a chemical that produces a positive dose-response over three concentrations with the lowest increase equal to twice the solvent control value is considered to be mutagenic.
Strains TA 98, TA 100 and D4: If the solvent control value is within the normal range, a chemical that produces a positive dose response over three
concentrations with the highest increase equal to twice the solvent control value for TA 100 and 2 - 3 times the solvent control value for strains TA 98 and D4 is considered to be mutagenic. For these strains, the dose-response increase should start at approximately the solvent control value.
If a chemical produces a response in a single test that cannot be reproduced in one or more additional runs, the initial positive test data lose significance. - Statistics:
- no data
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Slightly toxic to TA 1537 at 500 µg per plate.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
The compound was slightly toxic to the strain TA 1537 at 500 µg per plate.
TA 98 was repeated at 100, 500 and 1000 µg/plate because of the increased number of revertants at 500 µg/plate over the background level. The repeat test was negative. - Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
- Executive summary:
The test substance did not demonstrate mutagenic activity in any of the assays conducted in this evaluation and was considered not mutagenic under these test conditions.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- The Department of Health of the Government of the United Kingdom
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Target gene:
- not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung (CHL/IU)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: Eagles Mimimal Essential Media with 10% Foetal Bovine Serum
- Properly maintained: yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbitone/β-Naphtoflavone-induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 6(18)-h without S9: 4.89, 9.77, 19.53, 39.06, 78.13, 156.25 µg/mL
6(18)-h with S9: 4.89, 9.77, 19.53, 39.06, 78.13, 156.25 µg/mL
24-h without S9: 2.44, 4.89, 9.77, 19.53, 39.06, 78.13 µg/mL
Concentrations selected for metaphase analysis, highest concentration was lowest precipitating concentration:
6(18)-h without S9: 19.53, 39.06, 78.13 µg/mL
6(18)-h with S9: 19.53, 39.06, 78.13 µg/mL
24-h without S9: 9.77, 19.53, 39.06 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 6 and 24 h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 18 h after 6 h treatment
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): Colcemid 0.1 µg/mL
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 200 (100 per plate)
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes - Evaluation criteria:
- Cells with 38 or more chromosomes were classified as polyploid cells and the % incidence of polyploid cells reported. Endoreduplicated cells were recorded separately and are included in the polyploid cell total number. If there was a dose-related increase in endoreduplicated cells then they are reported separately. The percentage of cells showing structural chromosome aberrations (breaks and exchanges) was calculated and reported. The number of gap-type aberrations was recorded and reported.
- Statistics:
- The frequency of cells with aberrations excluding gaps and the frequency of polyploid cells was compared, where necessary with the concurrent vehicle control value using Fisher‘s Exact test.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung (CHL/IU)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: A precipitate of the test material was seen at and above 78.13 µg/mL in both exposure groups and at and above 39.06 µg/mL in the 24 h continuous exposure group
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: In all cases the test material showed no evidence of cell toxicity. The dose selection for the main experiments was based on the lowest precipitating dose level, which was 78.13 µg/mL for both short term exposure groups and 39.06 µg/mL for the continuous exposure group. An additional dose above the lowest precipitating dose was included for all exposures. - Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
- Executive summary:
The test material did not induce any statistically significant, dose-related increases in the frequency of cells with structural or numerical chromosome aberrations either in the presence or absence of a liver enzyme metabolising system or after various exposure times. The test material was therefore considered to be non-clastogenic to CHL cells in vitro.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 10 March - 27 April 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation tests using the thymidine kinase gene
- Target gene:
- thymidine kinase (TK) locus
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: RPMI 1640 Hepes buffered medium (Dutch modification) containing penicillin/streptomycin, sodium pyruvate and L-glutamin + 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum (24-h exposure); for 3-h exposure only 5% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum were included. Selective medium consisted of the basic medium + 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum and 5 µg/mL trifluorothymidine (TFT).
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbital/β-naphtoflavone-induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1:
In the absence and presence of 8% (v/v) S9-mix: 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 µg/mL for 3 h
Experiment 2:
In the absence of S9-mix: 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 µg/mL for 24 h
In the presence of 12% (v/v) S9-mix: 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 µg/mL for 3 h - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: hexane
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: solubility/ability to suspend - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- hexane
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 3 and 24 h, respectively
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 2 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 5 µg/mL trifluorothymidine (TFT) (Sigma)
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 11 - 12 days
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 5 exposure plates in 2 experiments
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: not applicable, number of mutants per well counted; 2000 cells/well inserted, total sum of mutants given
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency; relative total growth, relative survival, suspension growth, relative suspension growth, growth rate - Evaluation criteria:
- A mutation assay was considered acceptable if it met the following criteria:
a) The absolute cloning efficiency of the solvent controls is between 65 and 120%. An acceptable number of surviving cells (10E6) could be analysed for expression of the TK mutation.
b) The spontaneous mutation frequency in the solvent control is ≥ 50 x 10E-6 and ≤ 170 x 10E-6.
c) The growth rate (R) over the 2-day expression period for the negative controls should be between 8 and 32 (3 h treatment) and between 32 and 180 (24 h treatment).
d) The mutation frequency of MMS should not be below 500 x 10E-6, and for CP not below 700 x 10E-6.
The global evaluation factor (GEF) has been identified by the IWTG as the mean of the negative/solvent mutation frequeny (MF) distribution plus one standard deviation. For the micro well version of the assay the GEF is 126.
A test substance is considered positive (mutagenic) in the mutation assay if it induces a MF of more than the MF of the controls + 126 in a dose-dependent manner. An observed increase should be biologically relevant and will be compared with the historical control data range.
A test substance is considered equivocal (questionable) in the mutation assay if no clear conclusion for positive or negative result can be made after an additional confirmation study.
A test substance is considered negative (not mutagenic) in the mutation assay if: a) None of the tested concentrations reaches a mutation frequency of the MF of the controls + 126. b) The results are confirmed in an independently repeated test. - Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Water solubility and precipitation: a slight precipitate of the test substance in the exposure medium was observed after 3 h treatment at the concentration of 0.8 µg/mL and severe precipitate was observed at concentrations of 2.4 µg/mL and above. The test substance was tested beyond the limit of the solubility to obtain adequate cytotoxicity data, the concentration used as the highest test substance concentration for the dose range Ending test was 24 µg/mL.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
Both in the absence and presence of S9-mix, no toxicity in the relative suspension growth was observed up to and including the highest test substance concentration of 24 µg/mL compared to the suspension growth of the solvent control.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: The spontaneous mutation frequencies in the solvent treated control cultures were within the ranges of the historical controls. - Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
- Executive summary:
The test substance did not induce a significant increase in mutation frequency in the absence or presence of metabolic activation in the first experiment. This result was confirmed in an independent experiment with a different concentration of the metabolic activation system or a longer exposure time without activation. The test substance did not induce gene mutation in mammalian cells in vitro under the conditions of the study.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1: Chromosome aberrations and cell viability
Test item |
Concentration |
Cell viability |
Mean |
Aberrant cells in % |
|
|
in µg/mL |
in % |
mitotic index |
Numerical |
Structural |
Exposure period 6 hrs without S9 mix |
|||||
DMSO |
-- |
100 |
100 |
0 |
0.5 |
MMC |
0.1 |
78 |
97 |
0 |
52.0 |
EBS |
19.53 |
93 |
149 |
0.5 |
2.0 |
39.06 |
87 |
104 |
0 |
1.0 |
|
78.13 |
90 |
110 |
0 |
0.5 |
|
Exposure period 24 hrs without S9 mix |
|||||
DMSO |
-- |
100 |
100 |
0 |
0 |
MMC |
0.05 |
54 |
274 |
0 |
34.0 |
EBS |
9.77 |
99 |
116 |
0 |
0.5 |
19.53 |
106 |
179 |
0 |
1.5 |
|
39.06 |
110 |
168 |
0 |
1.0 |
|
Exposure period 6 hrs with S9 mix |
|||||
DMSO |
-- |
100 |
100 |
0 |
0 |
CP |
5.0 |
56 |
58 |
0 |
10.5 |
EBS |
19.53 |
87 |
97 |
0 |
0 |
39.06 |
84 |
112 |
0 |
0 |
|
78.13 |
83 |
89 |
0 |
0 |
MMC: Mitomycin C
CP: Cyclophosphamide
EBS: Ethylene Bis(stearamide)
Table 1: Cytotoxic and mutagenic responses
Treatment |
Concentration [µg/mL] |
Cloning efficiency [%] |
Relative total growth [%] |
Mutation frequency x 10-6
|
||
total |
small colonies |
large colonies |
||||
3 h treatment without S9-mix |
||||||
Solvent control (mean) |
-- |
99 |
100 |
114 |
62 |
46 |
Test substance |
0 |
116 |
126 |
110 |
59 |
43 |
0.1 |
123 |
126 |
99 |
53 |
40 |
|
0.2 |
113 |
111 |
110 |
63 |
41 |
|
0.3 |
110 |
124 |
118 |
67 |
44 |
|
0.4 |
113 |
139 |
128 |
60 |
59 |
|
0.5 |
110 |
154 |
118 |
63 |
48 |
|
0.6* |
108 |
125 |
126 |
71 |
48 |
|
0.8* |
118 |
125 |
105 |
52 |
47 |
|
1.0* |
115 |
125 |
119 |
67 |
45 |
|
MMS |
15 |
58 |
55 |
1227 |
675 |
354 |
3 h treatment with 8% (v/v) S9-mix |
||||||
Solvent control (mean) |
-- |
106 |
100 |
102 |
55 |
42 |
Test substance |
0 |
105 |
102 |
80 |
38 |
38 |
0.1 |
94 |
89 |
119 |
66 |
46 |
|
0.2 |
105 |
55 |
89 |
51 |
34 |
|
0.3 |
93 |
76 |
113 |
64 |
43 |
|
0.4 |
120 |
81 |
93 |
47 |
41 |
|
0.5 |
121 |
127 |
97 |
55 |
37 |
|
0.6* |
101 |
86 |
87 |
53 |
30 |
|
0.8* |
97 |
94 |
72 |
44 |
25 |
|
1.0* |
121 |
112 |
79 |
45 |
30 |
|
CP |
7.5 |
47 |
23 |
1431 |
876 |
351 |
24 h treatment without S9-mix |
||||||
Solvent control (mean) |
-- |
93 |
100 |
58 |
29 |
27 |
Test substance |
0 |
86 |
138 |
66 |
34 |
31 |
0.1 |
72 |
108 |
77 |
43 |
32 |
|
0.2 |
79 |
121 |
78 |
38 |
38 |
|
0.3 |
98 |
150 |
47 |
26 |
19 |
|
0.4 |
90 |
151 |
55 |
27 |
26 |
|
0.5 |
81 |
133 |
69 |
37 |
30 |
|
0.6* |
80 |
125 |
67 |
35 |
31 |
|
0.8* |
90 |
143 |
61 |
37 |
22 |
|
1.0* |
88 |
131 |
63 |
34 |
27 |
|
MMS |
5 |
66 |
81 |
629 |
357 |
211 |
3 h treatment with 12% (v/v) S9-mix |
||||||
Solvent control (mean) |
-- |
106 |
100 |
82 |
50 |
29 |
Test substance |
0 |
85 |
294 |
83 |
52 |
28 |
0.1 |
107 |
58 |
109 |
48 |
55 |
|
0.2 |
118 |
60 |
77 |
42 |
32 |
|
0.3 |
91 |
161 |
88 |
50 |
34 |
|
0.4 |
85 |
127 |
86 |
55 |
28 |
|
0.5 |
101 |
146 |
74 |
49 |
23 |
|
0.6* |
86 |
42 |
103 |
66 |
32 |
|
0.8* |
93 |
155 |
67 |
40 |
25 |
|
1.0* |
62 |
66 |
130 |
55 |
70 |
|
CP |
7.5 |
37 |
43 |
1905 |
1113 |
500 |
*precipitation of test substance in the exposure medium
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
There is data from in vitro assays available addressing gene mutation in bacteria, clastogenic activity in mammalian cells and gene mutation in mammalian cells.
In vitro gene mutation in bacteria
Gene mutation in bacteria was assessed by the Reverse Mutation Assay (Ames test) conducted with 5 Salmonella typhimurium strains (TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA98 and TA 100) and the yeast strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae D4, which was comparable to OECD guideline 471 (Litton Biometics, 1978). All assays were conducted in presence and absence of a metabolic activation system consisting of Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S9 with test substance concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 500 µg/plate; additionally 1000 µg/plate was included in a repetition test with TA98. Although there was no strain included to detect cross-linking mutagens according to the actual version of the guideline, the study was acceptable according to the standards used when the study was conducted. In this study no mutagenic effects on bacteria or yeast were observed with or without metabolic activation at any of the concentrations tested.
In vitro chromosome aberration
The clastogenic activity of the test substance was investigated by a Chromosomal Aberration Assay conducted with a Chinese Hamster lung cell line according to OECD guideline 473 (Safepharm, 2006). Duplicate cell cultures were exposed for either 6 h to concentrations up to 156.25 µg/mL in presence or absence of a metabolic activation system consisting of Phenobarbital/β-Naphtoflavone-induced rat liver S9-mix, followed by an 18-h recovery period, or for 24 h to concentrations up to 78.13 µg/mL in the absence of metabolic activation. Three concentrations and the vehicle control were chosen for analysis of 200 metaphases; the highest concentration chosen was the lowest one at which precipitation occurred. The chromosomes were analysed for structural aberrations comprising chromosome and chromatid breaks and exchanges, gaps, numerical aberrations and multiple aberrations. Under the conditions of this study the test substance did not induce any statistically significant, dose-related increases in the frequency of cells with structural or numerical chromosome aberrations either in presence or absence of a metabolic activation system after various exposure times. The test material was therefore considered to be non-clastogenic to CHL cells in vitro.
In vitro gene mutation in mammalian cells
Mutagenicity of the test substance in mammalian cells in vitro was determined in the L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell line according to OECD guideline 476 (NOTOX, 2010). The number of mutants derived from 5 exposure plates was determined in 2 independent exeriments. In the first experiment the mouse lymphoma cells were exposed for 3 h to test substance concentrations in the range of 0 to 1.0 µg/mL in the absence and presence of a metabolic activation system consisting of 8% (v/v) Phenobarbital/β-Naphtoflavone-induced rat liver S9-mix. In this setup precipitation occurred at concentrations ≥ 0.6 µg/mL, no cytotoxicity was observed, and there was no significant increase of mutant frequencies at the TK locus compared to the control groups. These findings were confirmed by a second independent experiment conducted with the same test substance concentrations, but with 3-h exposure in the presence of 12% (v/v) rat liver S9-mix or 24-h exposure without metabolic activation. In conclusion the test material did not induce gene mutations in mammalian cells in vitro.
According to Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006, Annex IX, Item 8.4., Column 2, testing for genetic toxicity in vivo is not indicated as the test substance did not demonstrate any genotoxic activity in bacteria or mammalian cells in vitro.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available data on genetic toxicity of the test substance do not meet the criteria for classification according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 and are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.