Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 298-697-1 | CAS number: 93821-12-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Direct observations: clinical cases, poisoning incidents and other
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- direct observations: clinical cases, poisoning incidents and other
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: This study is classified as reliable with restrictions because there are no statements indicating if the study was conducted according to GLPs or other acceptable guidelines
- Justification for type of information:
- A discussion and report on the read across strategy is given as an attachment in Section 13.
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
Reference
- Endpoint:
- direct observations: clinical cases, poisoning incidents and other
- Type of information:
- read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: This study is classified as reliable with restrictions because there are no statements indicating if the study was conducted according to GLPs or other acceptable guidelines
- Justification for type of information:
- A discussion and report on the read across strategy is given as an attachment in Section 13.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Study type:
- study with volunteers
- Endpoint addressed:
- eye irritation
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- This study was conducted in humans, not animals, so there are no applicable regulatory guidelines.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of population:
- general
- Subjects:
- 16 human subjects (7 male, 9 female)
- Ethical approval:
- confirmed and informed consent free of coercion received
- Route of exposure:
- ocular
- Reason of exposure:
- intentional
- Details on exposure:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0, 6000, 10400, or 18000 mg/m3
- Exposure 1 and 3: 15 minutes each, Exposure 2: 60 minutes. Each person was subjected to 3 exposures once a week for 5 consecutive weeks with 2nd eye of subjects used as a control by exposure to increasing concentrations of carbon dioxide. - Results of examinations:
- - Other: The threshold for irritation was exceeded at two of the higest concentrations tested (10,400 and 18,000 mg/m3) during run 2. Additionally, there was a slight increase in perceived eye irritation intensity at the lowest concentration tested (6000 mg/m3).
- Conclusions:
- The human irritation threshold for 1-octene was only exceeded at 10,400 and at 18,000 mg/m3.
- Executive summary:
In a primary eye irritation study 16 human volunteers (7 male; 9 female) were exposed to vapors of 1-octene at concentrations of 0; 6000; 10,400; and 18,000 mg/m3. Each volunteer was subjected to three constant exposures (Runs 1, 2, and 3) once a week for five consecutive weeks with the first and third run lasting 15 minutes and the second run lasting 60 minutes. The untreated eyes of each person were exposed to increasing concentrations of carbon dioxide (runs 1 and 3) or air (run 2) through the exposure period. A visual analog rating scale (VAS) was used to estimate the average percentage of irritation intensity in the exposed subjects. The authors reported that during run 2, the threshold for irritation was clearly exceeded at the two highest concentrations of 1-octene, whereas at the lower concentration, there was a slight increase in perceived eye irritation intensity. Based on these results, the authors concluded that the threshold for irritation in the exposed human subjects was clearly exceeded at 10,400 and 18,000 mg/m3.
This study received a Klimisch score of 2 and is classified as reliable with restrictions because there are no statements indicating if the study was conducted according to GLPs or other acceptable guidelines.
This study was selected as a supporting study because it received a lower Klimisch score than the selected key study; however, this study contains relevant and useful data, allowing it to qualify as a supporting study.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 999
Materials and methods
- Study type:
- study with volunteers
- Endpoint addressed:
- eye irritation
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- This study was conducted in humans, not animals, so there are no applicable regulatory guidelines.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1-Octene
- IUPAC Name:
- 1-Octene
- Reference substance name:
- Reference substance 001
- Cas Number:
- 111-66-0
- Molecular formula:
- C8H16
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): 1-Octene
- Substance type: C8 alpha olefin
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Method
- Type of population:
- general
- Subjects:
- 16 human subjects (7 male, 9 female)
- Ethical approval:
- confirmed and informed consent free of coercion received
- Route of exposure:
- ocular
- Reason of exposure:
- intentional
- Details on exposure:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0, 6000, 10400, or 18000 mg/m3
- Exposure 1 and 3: 15 minutes each, Exposure 2: 60 minutes. Each person was subjected to 3 exposures once a week for 5 consecutive weeks with 2nd eye of subjects used as a control by exposure to increasing concentrations of carbon dioxide.
Results and discussion
- Results of examinations:
- - Other: The threshold for irritation was exceeded at two of the higest concentrations tested (10,400 and 18,000 mg/m3) during run 2. Additionally, there was a slight increase in perceived eye irritation intensity at the lowest concentration tested (6000 mg/m3).
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The human irritation threshold for 1-octene was only exceeded at 10,400 and at 18,000 mg/m3.
- Executive summary:
In a primary eye irritation study 16 human volunteers (7 male; 9 female) were exposed to vapors of 1-octene at concentrations of 0; 6000; 10,400; and 18,000 mg/m3. Each volunteer was subjected to three constant exposures (Runs 1, 2, and 3) once a week for five consecutive weeks with the first and third run lasting 15 minutes and the second run lasting 60 minutes. The untreated eyes of each person were exposed to increasing concentrations of carbon dioxide (runs 1 and 3) or air (run 2) through the exposure period. A visual analog rating scale (VAS) was used to estimate the average percentage of irritation intensity in the exposed subjects. The authors reported that during run 2, the threshold for irritation was clearly exceeded at the two highest concentrations of 1-octene, whereas at the lower concentration, there was a slight increase in perceived eye irritation intensity. Based on these results, the authors concluded that the threshold for irritation in the exposed human subjects was clearly exceeded at 10,400 and 18,000 mg/m3.
This study received a Klimisch score of 2 and is classified as reliable with restrictions because there are no statements indicating if the study was conducted according to GLPs or other acceptable guidelines.
This study was selected as a supporting study because it received a lower Klimisch score than the selected key study; however, this study contains relevant and useful data, allowing it to qualify as a supporting study.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.