Distillates (petroleum), hydrotreated middle

Repeated dose toxicity: dermal

Administrative data

Endpoint:

sub-chronic toxicity: dermal

Type of information:

migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)

Adequacy of study:

key study

Study period:

1985-07-03

Reliability:

2 (reliable with restrictions)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

other: This study is classified as reliable with restriction because it is an acceptable and well documented study report.

Justification for type of information:

Concawe believes that dermal is the most relevant exposure route, and is sufficiently robust, to identify any potential hazards from repeated exposures to petroleum products to be able to adequately manage the potentially associated risks.

This study will be replaced as key study by the 90-day dermal study currently being proposed.

Data source

Reference

Reference Type:

study report

Title:

Unnamed

Year:

1985

Report date:

1985

Materials and methods

Test guideline

Qualifier:

equivalent or similar to guideline

Guideline:

OECD Guideline 411 (Subchronic Dermal Toxicity: 90-Day Study)

GLP compliance:

no

Limit test:

no

Test material

Test material information

Constituent 1

Reference substance name:

64741-59-9

Cas Number:

64741-59-9

IUPAC Name:

64741-59-9

Constituent 2

Reference substance name:

Light Catalytically Cracked Distillate

IUPAC Name:

Light Catalytically Cracked Distillate

Test material form:

other: low viscosity liquid hydrocarbon

Details on test material:

- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Light cycle oil (CAS# 64741-59-9)

Test animals

Species:

rat

Strain:

Sprague-Dawley

Sex:

male/female

Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:

TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Not reported
- Age at study initiation: not reported
- Weight at study initiation: not reported
- Fasting period before study: not reported
- Housing: not reported
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):ad libitum
- Acclimation period: no data


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): no data
- Humidity (%): no data
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): no data

Administration / exposure

Type of coverage:

open

Vehicle:

unchanged (no vehicle)

Details on exposure:

TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: back of animals
- % coverage: no reported
- Time intervals for shavings or clippings: weekly


USE OF RESTRAINERS FOR PREVENTING INGESTION: yes. Cardboard Elizabethan collars were fitted to the rats to minimize ingestion of Light Cycle Oil.

Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:

not specified

Duration of treatment / exposure:

substance remained on the skin throughout the study.

Frequency of treatment:

The rats were treated 5 days a week for 13 consecutive weeks.

Doses / concentrations

Remarks:

Doses / Concentrations:
0, 8, 25, 125, and 500 and 1,250 mg/kg/day
Basis:
no data

No. of animals per sex per dose:

10 male and 10 female rats were exposed per dose.

Control animals:

yes, concurrent no treatment

Details on study design:

- Dose selection rationale: no data
- Rational for animal assignment [if not random]: Toxicity studies by other routes of administration are most frequently conducted in rats because of their predictive value for human risk assessment; therefore rats were chosen as the experimental model for this study. Additionally, since rats have a much shorter lifespan than humans, this study, which covers approximately 1/10 the lifespan of rats, is intended to elicit the toxic phenomena that might occur during occupational exposure for a similar fraction of the human lifespan.
- Rationale for selecting satellite groups: no data
- Post-exposure recovery period in satellite groups: no data
- Section schedule rationale (if not random):no data

Positive control:

No data

Examinations

Observations and examinations performed and frequency:

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Clinical observations were made daily


DERMAL IRRITATION (if dermal study): Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Weekly

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Body weights were taken daily.

FOOD CONSUMPTION:
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: No data


FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Body weight gain in kg/food consumption in kg per unit time X 100 calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data


WATER CONSUMPTION: No data

OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No data

HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: Blood samples were collected from control animals and those dosed at 500 mg/kg/day during weeks 4 and 13.
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: No data
- Animals fasted: No data
- How many animals: No data

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: No data

URINALYSIS: No data
- Metabolism cages used for collection of urine: No data
- Animals fasted: No data

NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No data

CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: No data

Sacrifice and pathology:

GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes

Statistics:

none reported

Results and discussion

Results of examinations

Clinical signs:

effects observed, treatment-related

Dermal irritation:

effects observed, treatment-related

Mortality:

mortality observed, treatment-related

Body weight and weight changes:

effects observed, treatment-related

Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):

not examined

Food efficiency:

not examined

Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):

not examined

Ophthalmological findings:

effects observed, treatment-related

Haematological findings:

not specified

Clinical biochemistry findings:

not specified

Urinalysis findings:

not specified

Behaviour (functional findings):

not examined

Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:

effects observed, treatment-related

Gross pathological findings:

effects observed, treatment-related

Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:

effects observed, treatment-related

Histopathological findings: neoplastic:

not specified

Details on results:

CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY -
Animals dosed at 1250 mg/kg/day were terminated after two weeks due to lack of body weight gain and thymus weight and dermal effects. Observed effects at the site of application were severe erythema, edema, stiff cracking skin (500 mg/kg/day and 1250 mg/kg/day) occurred within one week of exposure. The epidermis began to slough off for those exposed to 1250 mg/kg/day. Rats dosed at 500 /mg/kg/day were reported to experience ulceration, with a moderate degree of chronic inflammation of the skin and hair follicles.

BODY WEIGHT AND WEIGHT GAIN - Body weight effects were reported to be dose-related.
Male and female animals treated at dose level 1250 mg/kg/day and males treated at 500 mg/kg/day gained less weight than the controls. Animals dosed as 1250 mg/kg/day were sacrificed at the end of the second week of treatment, due to their poor appearance. Females dosed at 500 mg/kg/day and males dosed at 125 mg/kg/day had slightly lower body weights than the respective control rats.


FOOD CONSUMPTION - no data


FOOD EFFICIENCY - no data


WATER CONSUMPTION - no data


OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION - no data


HAEMATOLOGY - no data


CLINICAL CHEMISTRY - no data


URINALYSIS - no data


NEUROBEHAVIOUR - no data


ORGAN WEIGHTS -The thymus of male and females animals dosed at 500 mg/kg/day was reported to be smaller than normal, based on visual inspection and weight. The slight reduction in thymus weight in males treated at 125 mg/kg/day was attributed to be a minimal effect of Light Cycle Oil. Compared to the livers of the control animals, the size of the liver in both male and female animals dosed at 500 mg/kg/day was slightly increased.

HISTOPATHOLOGY: NON-NEOPLASTIC: Microscopic findings in the thymus was greater in males than in females. Examination of the thymus of rats treated at 500 mg/kg/day revealed a depletion of lymphocytes and a slight increase in the amount of connective tissue in the thymus; this was most more prevalent in the males than in the females. The reduced thymus size was judged to have resulted from the depletion of lymphocytes within the thymus. Slight decreases in lymphocytes are not easily detected during microscopic examination; therefore, the thymus weight was considered to be the most sensitive indicator of the effect of Light Cycle Oil on the thymus. For males treated at 125 mg/kg/day, there was slight reduction in thymus weight; this was judged to represent a minimal effect of Light Cycle Oil on the thymus.

Effect levels

1

Dose descriptor:

NOAEL

Effect level:

25 mg/kg bw/day

Sex:

male

Basis for effect level:

other: overall effects clinical signs;body weight; haematology; gross pathology; organ weights;

2

Dose descriptor:

NOAEL

Effect level:

125 mg/kg bw/day

Sex:

female

Basis for effect level:

other: overall effects clinical signs; mortality; body weight; haematology; gross pathology; organ weights (liver and thymus)

Target system / organ toxicity

Critical effects observed:

not specified

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:

The dermal administration of Light Catalytically Cracked Distillate at doses of 125, 500 and/or 1,250 mg/kg/day resulted in reduction in body weight, reduction in thymus weights and an increase in liver weight. Severe erythema and edema was also reported. Histopathologic evaluation was limited to control animals and those dosed at 500 mg/kg/day. A NOEL was calculated as 25 mg/kg/day for males and 125 mg/kg/day for females.

Executive summary:

Read across from Cracked Gas Oils to Other Gas Oils is justified based on similar physical/chemical composition and properties to Other Gas Oils.

In an 90 -day dermal toxicity study, Light Catalytically Cracked Distillate was applied to the shaved skin of 10 males and 10 females per dose at dose levels of 8, 25, 125, and 500 and 1,250 mg/kg/day, for 5 days/week during a 90 -day period.

Dermal treatment with Light Catalytically Cracked Distillate at doses of 125, 500 and/or 1,250 mg/kg/day resulted in reductions in body weight, thymus weight and an increase in liver weight. Severe erythema and edema was also reported. Histopathologic evaluation was limited to control animals and those dosed at 500 mg/kg/day. A NOEL was calculated as 25 mg/kg/day for males and 125 mg/kg/day for females.

This study received a Klimisch score of 2 and is classified as reliable with restrictions because it is an acceptable and well documented study report.