Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-845-5 | CAS number: 111-20-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
The test substance was not mutagenic in the reverse bacterial mutation assay, performed according to Ames (Mut. Res., 31, 1975).
The analogue substance adipic acid (CAS: 124-04-9) was tested negative
in the HPRT in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test (according
to OECD 476) and in the in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration
test.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- GLP status unknown
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- According to Ames et al., Mut. Res., 31, 1975
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source of test material: Tokyo Kasei Kogyo Co. LTD. Tokyo, Japan - Target gene:
- S. typhimurium: his-
E. coli: trp- - Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS USED
- Type and source of cells:
S. typhimurium provided by B.N. Ames (USA)
E.coli provided by M. Ishizawa (Japan) - Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS USED
- Type and source of cells:
S. typhimurium provided by B.N. Ames (USA) - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 1; 5; 10; 50; 100; 500; 1,000; 5,000 ug/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- benzo(a)pyrene
- other: without S9-mix: 2-(2 furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl) acrylamide, with S9-mix: 2-Aminoanthracene
- Species / strain:
- other: Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, TA1538 and E.coli WP2uvrA
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- The test substance was not found mutagenic in the strains specified.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- The justification for the type of information are discussed in the attached read-across document.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Justification for type of information:
- The justification for the type of information are discussed in the attached read-across document.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Species / strain:
- mammalian cell line, other: human fibroblasts (WI-38)
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 400 mg/L, preliminary cytotoxicity test
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1: Mutagenic acitivities of the test substances and the positive control
Compound |
Dose µg/plate |
Revertant colonies/plate |
|||||||||||
|
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP3 uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
TA1538 |
|||||||
|
|
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
Decanedioic acid |
1 |
130 |
130 |
29 |
9 |
17 |
26 |
43 |
49 |
17 |
23 |
23 |
38 |
|
5 |
119 |
138 |
34 |
11 |
24 |
22 |
52 |
50 |
13 |
25 |
26 |
38 |
|
10 |
131 |
130 |
26 |
15 |
23 |
27 |
39 |
46 |
14 |
24 |
31 |
33 |
|
50 |
125 |
123 |
34 |
13 |
18 |
24 |
47 |
56 |
11 |
24 |
27 |
33 |
|
100 |
136 |
119 |
36 |
16 |
26 |
29 |
50 |
47 |
13 |
27 |
36 |
39 |
|
500 |
140 |
122 |
28 |
13 |
24 |
32 |
42 |
56 |
11 |
18 |
20 |
36 |
|
1,000 |
127 |
132 |
26 |
12 |
27 |
23 |
34 |
45 |
18 |
12 |
28 |
33 |
|
5,000 |
112 |
134 |
36 |
14 |
24 |
27 |
45 |
47 |
12 |
20 |
30 |
32 |
Control |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AF-2 |
0.01 |
501 ± 84.7 |
- b |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
0.05 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1,082± 293.7 |
- |
278± 64.8 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
ENNG |
5.0 |
- |
- |
1,101± 683.1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
9-AC |
80.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
889 ± 275.7 |
- |
- |
- |
4-NQO |
0.25 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
270 ± 66.2 |
- |
B(a)P |
5.0 |
- |
1,084± 236.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
809± 108.4 |
- |
313± 41.6 |
- |
354± 89.4 |
2-AA |
5.0 |
- |
- |
- |
440± 198.6 |
- |
359± 127.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
b: not tested
AF-2: 2-(2 furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl) acrylamide, ENNG: N-Ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine, 9 -AC: 9-Aminoacridine, 4 -NQO: 4-Nitroquinoline-l-oxide, B(a)P: Benzo(a)pyrene, 2-AA: 2-Aminoanthracene
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
The analogue substance adipic acid (CAS: 124-04-9) was tested negative in the in vivo mammalian chromosome aberration test.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian germ cell study: cytogenicity / chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Justification for type of information:
- The justification for the type of information are discussed in the attached read-across document.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
IN VITRO:
In an Ames test, no mutagenicity was observered after exposure of S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 1538, TA 100, and E.coli WP2 uvrA with up to 5000 µg/plate of the test substance with or without metabolic activation. No cytotoxicity was observed within the used concentration range. Supportingly, in the supporting Ames test, similar results were obtained after exposure of S. typhimurim strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 1538 and TA 100 with up to 5000 µg/plate with or without metabolic activation.
In vitro studies, using the structural analogon adipic acid, CAS 124-04-9 (for read-across justification see attached document):
In a mammalian chromosome aberration test, no abberation was observed after exposure of human embryonic lung fibroblast cells (WI-38) with up to 200 mg/L with the test substance, without metabolic activation. Cytotoxicity was observed at 400 mg/l. The positive and negative controls were functional.
In a mammalian cell gene mutation assay (GLP, according to OECD guideline 476) no biologically relevant increase of mutants was found after exposure of Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79) with up to 10 mM test substance, with and without metabolic activation. No precipitation of the test item was noted in any experiment; no biological relevant growth inhibition was observed with and without metabolic activation. DMBA and EMS were used as positive controls and showed distinct and biologically relevant effects in mutation frequencies.
IN VIVO:
In vivo study with the structural analogon adipic acid, CAS 124-04-9 (for read-across justification see attached document):
In a chromosome abberation test (cited in OECD SIDS for dicarboxylic acid category, July 2001) male rats were gavaged with adipic acid; either once with up to 5000 mg/kg bw or once per day on 5 consecutive days with up to 2500 mg/kg bw. 200 - 500 metaphase chromosomes of bone marrow cells per dose were scored for chromatid gaps and breaks, chromosome gaps and breaks, reunions, cells with more than 10 aberrations, polyploidy, pulverization and other chromosomal aberrations. The mitotic indices for all dose groups were considered to be within the normal limits of the controls and there was no evidence of chromosomal damage. The positive control groups, performed only during the acute studies, were functional.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation 1272/2008, as amended for the thirteenth time in Regulation (EU) No 2018/1480. As a result the substance is not considered to be classified for genotoxicity under Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.