Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-211-0 | CAS number: 117-81-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.6 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 7.5
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 11.85 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
After oral or inhalative exposure only sytemic but no local effects were observed.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance - NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance - long-term study
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance - inhalation route
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 3
- Justification:
- EU Risk Asseessment Report, see REACH Annex 1, 0.5
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 3.4 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 30
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 100.8 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
After oral and dermal exposure especially sytemic toxicity was observed.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance - NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance - long-term study
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 3
- Justification:
- EU Risk Asseessment Report, see REACH Annex 1, 0.5
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
Long –term – inhalation, systemic toxicity
NOAEL of 4.8 mg/kg bw/d for reproductive and developmental effects observed in 3-generation oral study in rats (Wolfe and Layton, 2004).
Description |
Value |
Remark |
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor |
NOAEL: 4.8 mg/kg bw/day |
NOAEL from 3-Generation study in rats |
Step 2) Modification of starting point |
0.38 m3/kg bw 75/75 6.7 m3/10 m3 7/5 |
- Conversion into inhalation NAEC (in mg/m3) by using an 8-hour respiratory volume for the rat. - Correction for 75% bioavailability for inhalation in humans and 75% for oral absorption in adult rats - Correction for activity driven differences of respiratory volumes in workers compared to workers in rest (6.7 m3/10 m3). - Correction for use of NOAEL from feeding study with 7d exposure/week compared to worker's exposure 5 d/week |
Step 3) Assessment factors |
||
Interspecies |
2.5 |
Only a factor 2.5 is used, and no allometric scaling factors is used |
Intraspecies |
3 |
In the EU RA of DEHP anassessment factors of 3 is used for potential intraspecies differences for the worker (see also see REACH Annex 1, 0.5 for justification). |
Exposure duration |
1 |
The NOAEL is based on a 3-Generation study |
Dose response |
1 |
|
Quality of database |
1 |
|
DNEL |
Value |
|
based on NOAELrat |
1.6 mg/m3 = 4.8 x 1/0.38 x 75/75 x 6.7/10 x 7/5 x1/(2.5 x 3 x 1 x 1 x 1) |
This DNEL of 1.6 mg/m3 corresponds to an oral intake of 230 µg/kg bw/day (assuming equal absorption rates of 75% for oral and inhalation exposure, 70 kg body weight, respiratory volume 10 m3 /work day: 1.6 mg/m3 x 10 m3/day x 1/70 kg bw).
Long –term – dermal, systemic toxicity
NOAEL of 4.8 mg/kg bw/d for reproductive and developmental effects observed in 3-generation oral study in rats (Wolfe and Layton, 2004).
Description |
Value |
Remark |
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor |
NOAEL: 4.8 mg/kg bw/day |
NOAEL from 3-Generation study in rats |
Step 2) Modification of starting point |
75/5 7/5 |
- Correction for 5%bioavailability for dermal exposure in human and 75% for oral absorption in adults rats - Correction for use of NOAEL from feeding study with 7d exposure/week compared to worker's exposure 5 d/week |
Step 3) Assessment factors |
||
Interspecies |
2.5 x 4 |
|
Intraspecies |
3 |
In the EU RA of DEHP anassessment factors of 3 is used for potential intraspecies differences for the worker (see also see REACH Annex 1, 0.5 for justification). |
Exposure duration |
1 |
The NOAEL is based on a 2-year study |
Dose response |
1 |
|
Quality of database |
1 |
|
DNEL |
Value |
|
based on NOAELrats |
3.4 mg/kg bw/day = 4.8 x 75/5 x 7/5 x 1/(10 x 3 x 1 x 1 x 1) |
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.13 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 4.2 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
After oral or inhalative exposure only sytemic but no local effects were observed.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance - NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance - long-term study
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance - inhalation route
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.72 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 72 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
After oral and dermal exposure especially sytemic toxicity was observed.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance - NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance - long-term study
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.036 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 3.6 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
no route to route extrapolation
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance - NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance - long-term study
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Guidance
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
Long –term – inhalation, systemic toxicity
NOAEL of 4.8 mg/kg bw/d for reproductive and developmental effects observed in 3-generation oral study in rats (Wolfe and Layton, 2004).
Description |
Value |
Remark |
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor |
NOAEL: 4.8 mg/kg bw/day |
NOAEL from 3-Generation study in rats |
Step 2) Modification of starting point |
1.15 m3/kg bw 75/100 (children) |
- Conversion into inhalation NAEC (in mg/m3) by using a 24-hour respiratory volume for the rat. - no difference in inhalative bioavailability assumed: 75% bioavailability for inhalative exposure in adult humans and 75% for oral absorption in adult rats - correction factor 75/100 for children |
Step 3) Assessment factors |
||
Interspecies |
2.5 |
Only a factor 2.5 is used, and no allometric scaling factors is used |
Intraspecies |
10 |
|
Exposure duration |
1 |
The NOAEL is based on a 3-Generation study |
Dose response |
1 |
|
Quality of database |
1 |
|
DNEL |
Value |
|
based on NOAELrats |
0.17 mg/m3(0.04 ppm) for adults = 4.8 x 1/1.15 x 75/75 x 1/(2.5 x 10 x 1 x 1 x 1) 0.13 mg/m3(0.04 ppm) for children = 4.8 x 1/1.15 x 75/100 x 1/(2.5 x 10 x 1 x 1 x 1) |
Long –term – oral, systemic toxicity
NOAEL of 4.8 mg/kg bw/d for reproductive and developmental effects observed in 3-generation oral study in rats (Wolfe and Layton, 2004).
Description |
Value |
Remark |
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor |
NOAEL: 4.8 mg/kg bw/day |
NOAEL from 3 -Generation study in rats |
Step 2) Modification of starting point |
75/75 (adults) 75/100 (children) |
- no difference in oral bioavailability assumed: 75% bioavailability for oral exposure in adult humans and 75% for oral absorption in adult rats - correction factor 75/100 for children |
Step 3) Assessment factors |
||
Interspecies |
2.5 x 4 |
|
Intraspecies |
10 |
|
Exposure duration |
1 |
The NOAEL is based on a 3 -Generation study |
Dose response |
1 |
|
Quality of database |
1 |
|
DNEL |
Value |
|
based on NOAELrats |
0.048 mg/kg bw/d for adults = 4.8 x 75/75 x 1/(10 x 10 x 1 x 1 x 1) 0.036 mg/kg bw/d for children = 4.8 x 75/100 x 1/(10 x 10 x 1 x 1 x 1) |
Long –term – dermal, systemic toxicity
NOAEL of 4.8 mg/kg bw/d for reproductive and developmental effects observed in 3-generation oral study in rats (Wolfe and Layton, 2004).
Description |
Value |
Remark |
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor |
NOAEL: 4.8 mg/kg bw/day |
NOAEL from 3-Generation study in rats |
Step 2) Modification of starting point |
75/5 |
Correction for 5%bioavailability for dermal exposure in humans and 75% for oral absorption in adult rats |
Step 3) Assessment factors |
||
Interspecies |
2.5 x 4 |
|
Intraspecies |
10 |
|
Exposure duration |
1 |
The NOAEL is based on 3-Generation study |
Dose response |
1 |
|
Quality of database |
1 |
|
DNEL |
Value |
|
based on NOAELrats |
0.72 mg/kg bw/d = 4.8 x 75/5 x 1/(10 x 10 x 1 x 1 x 1) |
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.