Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 300-212-6 | CAS number: 93924-19-7 Hollow ceramic spheres formed as a part of the ash in power stations burning pulverized coal. Composed primarily of the oxides of aluminium, iron and silicon and contain carbon dioxide and nitrogen within the sphere.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Basic toxicokinetics
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- basic toxicokinetics in vivo
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 10 Dec 1950 - 14 Apr 1954
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 955
Materials and methods
- Objective of study:
- absorption
- distribution
- excretion
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Fly ash derived from coal combustion was fed at 0, 300 and 1500 g / animal / day to cows over a period of 2 years.
After two years, the chemical composition of milk, blood, urine and faeces samples were analysed. - GLP compliance:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Ashes (residues), coal
- EC Number:
- 931-322-8
- Molecular formula:
- Not applicable (UVCB substance)
- IUPAC Name:
- Ashes (residues), coal
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Fly ash from (black) coal combustion, Scholven, Germany
- Other: Further details are given in the tables below
Constituent 1
- Radiolabelling:
- no
Test animals
- Species:
- cattle
- Strain:
- other: Schwarzbunte Niederungsrasse
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Oldenburg, Germany (a geographical region which was assumed to be free of fly ash from coal combustion)
- Age at study initiation: 2.75 - 6.75 years
- Weight at study initiation: 535 - 710 kg
- Housing: Cattle pen; the animals were allowed to graze.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): fodder beed, hay and straw (ad libitum) supplemented with mash.
At their arrival the animals were carefully clinically examined. All animals were in good nutritional state and showed no symptoms of illness.
Some animals were seropositive for tuberculosis.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
All animals were kept on farm without contact to other cattle.
The cattle pen was always kept clean, dry and ventilated with fresh air.
IN-LIFE DATES:
Exposure period: From: December 10th, 1950 To: December 15th, 1953
Post exposure observation period: From: December 16th, 1953 To: April 14th, 1954
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
The test substance was mixed with the daily food.
Animals were fed twice a day in individual boxes to assure the intake of the individual portions.
DIET PREPARATION
In the high dose group, the fly ash was mixed with soaked fodder beed and mash, to improve the taste and to ascertain the daily intake of the high amounts of fly ash. - Duration and frequency of treatment / exposure:
- 2 years, twice daily
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 300 other: g/animal/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 500 other: g/animal/day
- Remarks:
- 2 high-dose animals received temporarily up to 1800 g/animal/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose / concentration:
- 3
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Positive control reference chemical:
- not applicable
- Details on dosing and sampling:
- PHARMACOKINETIC STUDY (Absorption, distribution, excretion)
- Body fluids sampled: urine, faeces, blood, milk
- Time and frequency of sampling: once on December 10, 1952 - Statistics:
- not applicable
Results and discussion
Any other information on results incl. tables
Analysis of milk samples collected on December 10th, 1952:
(Average values in % determined from two different laboratories in parallel)
Animal |
Treatment up to the sampling date |
Dry residue |
Ash |
CaO |
MgO |
P2O5 |
1 |
concurrent no treatment |
12.9 |
0.74 |
0.172 |
0.0144 |
0.212 |
2 |
concurrent no treatment |
15.8 |
0.89 |
0.267 |
0.0222 |
0.276 |
3 |
concurrent no treatment |
10.3 |
0.71 |
0.136 |
0.0155 |
0.185 |
4 |
300 g fly ash per day |
11.2 |
0.78 |
0.173 |
0.0170 |
0.235 |
5 |
300 g fly ash per day |
14.7 |
0.82 |
0.197 |
0.0194 |
0.299 |
6 |
300 g fly ash per day |
14.1 |
0.71 |
0.152 |
0.0204 |
0.159 |
7 |
1500 - 1800 g fly ash per day |
15.3 |
0.69 |
0.161 |
0.0161 |
0.220 |
8 |
1500 - 1800 g fly ash per day |
14.1 |
0.73 |
0.155 |
0.0144 |
0.213 |
9 |
1500 - 1800 g fly ash per day |
10.3 |
0.73 |
0.151 |
0.0153 |
0.224 |
Applicant's conclusion:
Two years of oral administration of two different doses of fly ash did not influence the composition of the milk regarding the analysed parameters.
Analysis of blood samples collected on December 10th, 1952:
(Average values in % determined from two different laboratories in parallel)
Animal |
Treatment up to the sampling date |
Dry residue |
Ash |
CaO |
MgO |
P2O5 |
Fe2O3 |
1 |
concurrent no treatment |
19.2 |
1.37 |
0.0127 |
0.0058 |
0.0374 |
0.0534 |
2 |
concurrent no treatment |
19.9 |
1.03 |
0.0110 |
0.0060 |
0.0380 |
0.0544 |
3 |
concurrent no treatment |
18.7 |
1.15 |
0.0116 |
0.0061 |
0.0371 |
0.0435 |
4 |
300 g fly ash per day |
19.5 |
1.22 |
0.0133 |
0.0062 |
0.0396 |
0.0502 |
5 |
300 g fly ash per day |
19.2 |
1.36 |
0.0094 |
0.0077 |
0.0333 |
0.0572 |
6 |
300 g fly ash per day |
19.6 |
1.13 |
0.0101 |
0.0068 |
0.0350 |
0.0430 |
7 |
1500 - 1800 g fly ash per day |
20.3 |
1.16 |
0.0105 |
0.0071 |
0.0359 |
0.0480 |
8 |
1500 - 1800 g fly ash per day |
18.3 |
0.98 |
0.0112 |
0.0062 |
0.0362 |
0.0489 |
9 |
1500 - 1800 g fly ash per day |
19.3 |
1.12 |
0.0116 |
0.0077 |
0.0345 |
0.0547 |
Applicant's conclusion:
Two years of oral administration of two different doses of fly ash did not influence the composition of the blood regarding the analysed parameters.
Analysis of urine samples collected on December 10th, 1952
(Average values in % determined from two different laboratories in parallel)
Animal |
Treatment up to the sampling date |
pH |
Glucose |
Protein |
Dry residue |
CaO |
MgOa |
P2O5 |
1 |
concurrent no treatment |
8.14 |
neg. |
neg. |
6.84 |
0.0055 |
0.0170 |
0.0027 |
2 |
concurrent no treatment |
8.20 |
neg. |
neg. |
5.18 |
0.0018 |
0.0221 |
0.0024 |
3 |
concurrent no treatment |
8.18 |
neg. |
neg. |
5.41 |
0.0011 |
0.0261 |
0.0016 |
4 |
300 g fly ash per day |
8.36 |
neg. |
neg. |
5.33 |
0.0066 |
0.0090 |
0.0013 |
5 |
300 g fly ash per day |
8.26 |
neg. |
neg. |
4.53 |
0.00097 |
0.0080 |
0.0014 |
6 |
300 g fly ash per day |
8.34 |
neg. |
neg. |
5.11 |
0.0043 |
0.0302 |
0.0031 |
7 |
1500 - 1800 g fly ash per day |
8.08 |
neg. |
neg. |
3.85 |
0.0084 |
0.0100 |
0.0013 |
8 |
1500 - 1800 g fly ash per day |
8.40 |
neg. |
neg. |
6.33 |
0.0041 |
0.0357 |
0.0022 |
9 |
1500 - 1800 g fly ash per day |
8.38 |
neg. |
neg. |
5.80 |
0.0233 |
0.0411 |
0.0025 |
aMgO was only analysed from one laboratorium
Applicant's conclusion:
Two years of oral administration of two different doses of fly ash did not influence the composition of the urine regarding the analysed parameters.
Analysis of faeces sampled on December 10th, 1952
(Values in % of fresh faeces)
Animal |
Treatment up to the sampling date |
Ash |
SiO2 |
Al2O3 |
Fe2O3 |
MgO |
CaO |
SO3 |
P2O5 |
1 |
concurrent no treatment |
2.77 |
1.51 |
0.119 |
0.066 |
0.118 |
0.270 |
0.057 |
0.183 |
2 |
concurrent notreatment |
2.23 |
1.11 |
0.086 |
0.054 |
0.150 |
0.250 |
0.044 |
0.164 |
3 |
concurrent no treatment |
2.28 |
1.13 |
0.091 |
0.062 |
0.111 |
0.259 |
0.052 |
0.167 |
4 |
300 g fly ash per day |
2.68 |
1.32 |
0.296 |
0.142 |
0.131 |
0.255 |
0.054 |
0.190 |
5 |
300 g fly ash per day |
2.36 |
1.17 |
0.240 |
0.148 |
0.111 |
0.240 |
0.054 |
0.170 |
6 |
300 g fly ash per day |
2.98 |
1.55 |
0.431 |
0.201 |
0.131 |
0.350 |
0.077 |
0.270 |
7 |
1500 - 1800 g fly ash per day |
4.81 |
2.49 |
0.716 |
0.615 |
0.286 |
0.372 |
0.107 |
0.182 |
8 |
1500 - 1800 g fly ash per day |
6.21 |
2.84 |
0.827 |
0.643 |
0.352 |
0.477 |
0.135 |
0.246 |
9 |
1500 - 1800 g fly ash per day |
4.76 |
2.31 |
0.644 |
0.506 |
0.288 |
0.492 |
0.105 |
0.208 |
aMgO was only analysed from one laboratorium
Applicant's conclusion:
Two years of oral administration of two different doses of fly ash influenced the ash and mineral contents of the faeces in a dose-dependent manner.
Analysis of trace elements in liver and bone samples:
At the end of the 3-year experiment duration, liver and bone samples of all animals were analysed for their contents of Arsenic, Manganese, Lead, Iron, Copper, Zinc and Cobalt. Bones were additionally analysed for their CaO and P2O5content.
In summary, there was no significant influence of the fly ash administration on the trace element contents in liver and bone samples.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- No bioaccumulation potential based on study results
The chemical analyses of milk, blood, urine and faeces indicate, that no systemic absorption after oral administration of 1850 mg/kg/day of the test substance occured. - Executive summary:
Fly ash derived from coal combustion in Scholven, Germany was fed at 0, 300 and 1500 g/animal/day to cows over a period of 3 years. After two years the control and intermediate dose groups were exchanged and therefore as far as possible only the results from this time point were taken into the present considerations.
Body weight development in cows were not disturbed by the oral administration of fly ash. Because treated animals showed a slightly higher milk production rate than control animals, the general condition of treated animals was considered to be better. Chemical analyses of milk, blood, urine and faeces samples after two years indicate that the test substance was practically not bioavailable for resorption.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.