Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-838-7 | CAS number: 7758-29-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 141 mg/kg bw/day
Additional information
In the prenatal developmental toxicity studies, pregnant females received STPP (anhydrous) during gestation period by oral intubation. Control groups received the vehicle only (water). At the end of gestation period, all dams were subjected to caesarean section and the number of implantation sites, resorption sites, as well as live and dead foetuses were recorded. The body weights of the live pups were taken. The urogenital tract level of dams was examined for abdominal abnormalities. All foetuses were examined for the presence of external congenital abnormalities. One-third of the foetuses were examined for visceral abnormalities and the remaining two-third were examined for skeletal abnormalities. No maternal toxicity or teratogenic effects were observed at up to the maximum dose levels tested in each species. The NOEL for maternal and foetal toxicity corresponded to the maximum dose tested.
Summary of teratogenicity studies with sodium tripolyphosphate
- |
animal / group |
Dose (mg/kg bw) |
Treatment period (gestation day) |
End of gestation |
Result (NOEL) |
Mouse |
24 |
2.4, 11, 52, 238 |
6-16 |
Day 17 |
238 mg/kg |
Rat |
24 |
1.7, 8, 37, 170 |
6-15 |
Day 20 |
170 mg/kg |
Hamster |
22-25 |
1.41, 6.5, 30, 141 |
6-10 |
Day 14 |
141 mg/kg |
rabbit |
20-22 |
2.5, 11.6, 54, 250 |
6-18 |
Day 29 |
250 mg/kg |
Short description of key information:
A series of four prenatal developmental toxicity studies were performed by the US food and drug administration (rabbit, mouse, rat and hamster). Sodium tripolyphosphate was not found to be a teratogen at any of the dose levels tested.
A 3-generation study in rats is available (Hodge et al., 1959). At a dose of 0.5% in the food, STPP showed no evidence of significant alteration of fertility, nor on the litter size, nor on growth and survival of offspring. A slight increase in kidney weights was observed, but was not statistically significant. The macroscopic and microscopic appearances of major organs in the 3rd generation were reported to be comparable in control and treated groups. These results were presented as a summary of unpublished reports from a detergent company, and limited documentation was available. However, any significant effects seem to have been reported by the author. The results provided support the assumption that there is no concern with regard to effects of STPP on reproduction.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
Based on the three-generation reproduction study on STPP (Hodge, 1959), no effects on reproductive performance or fertility were found when STPP was administered to rats for three generations at a dose of 0.5% in the diet with at least two litters per generation
Additional information
The Hodge reproduction study (1959) was conducted prior to the institution of good laboratory practice guidelines and to the current OECD Guideline 416. Therefore, the study has deficiencies when examined according to today’s standards. The study is considered a Klimisch Code 2, reliable with restrictions. The conclusions regarding the hazard identification of STPP are supported by data on sodium hexametaphosphate (SHMP) and sodium trimetaphosphate (STMP), both of which are structurally similar to STPP. All three inorganic phosphate salts had no adverse effects on reproductive toxicity and fertility when tested in rats over three generations (Hodge 1959, 1960).
In theManual for Investigation of HPV Chemicals, Chapter 3: Data Evaluation (2005), Section 3.1.6 Weight-of-the-Evidence Analysis, requires the use of a weight-of-the-evidence analysis during the assessment of data quality and adequacy. The guidance permits the pooling of several studies, one or more of which may be inadequate, to satisfy a specific SIDS element. In the current case, available data exist on two other sodium inorganic phosphate salts which are similar in structure to STPP. Three generation reproduction studies have been conducted on SHMP and STMP which are similar to the one on STPP in that they were conducted prior to good laboratory practice guidelines and the existence of OECD Guideline 416; nevertheless, they provide additional supplemental support for the hazard assessment of STPP (IUCLID Robust Study Summary included as supplemental information). Because all three sodium phosphates showed no effects on reproductive performance, these data show similar responses which allows a more robust conclusion for the individual salts. STPP and SHMP were both tested at a dose level of 0.5% in the diet. STMP was tested at a dose of 0.05% in the diet. These dose levels were viewed as appropriate levels based on the results of the chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity studies for each salt.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
