Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 266-928-5 | CAS number: 67701-03-5 This substance is identified by SDA Substance Name: C16-C18 alkyl carboxylic acid and SDA Reporting Number: 19-005-00.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
Studies on reproductive toxicity by the oral route are available for the
following category members:
CAS# 112-85-6, C22: NOAEL oral (fertility) = 1000 mg/kg bw/d; highest
dose tested (Nagao 2002), OECD 422
No data are available for reproductive toxicity after dermal exposure and inhalation, respectively.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- GLP-Guideline Study, tested with the source substance CAS 112-85-6. In accordance to ECHA guidance document "Practical guide 6: How to report read-across and categories (May 2010)", the reliability was changed from RL1 to RL2 to reflect the fact that this study was conducted on a read-across substance.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Japan, Hino, Tokyo
- Age at study initiation: 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: male: 312.1 - 363.7 g; female: 205.3 - 230.8 g
- Housing: metal wire floor cages
- Diet (ad libitum): CE-2, CLEA Japan
- Water (ad libitum): tap water
- Acclimation period: 7 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 24 ± 1
- Humidity (%): 50 - 65
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- olive oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
prepared more frequently than once a week; aliquots were kept by each concentration refrigerated in airtight conditions
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): due to insolubility in water
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 5 mL/kg bw
- Lot/batch no. (if required): V6H2050 - Details on mating procedure:
- - M/F ratio per cage: 1/1
- Length of cohabitation: up to two weeks
- Proof of pregnancy: sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- Further mating after two unsuccessful attempts: no
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged (how): individually - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- - males: 42 days
- females: from 14 days prior to mating to day 3 of lactation - Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Details on study schedule:
- - Age at mating of the mated animals in the study: 10 weeks
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 13 in each group
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: based on preliminary result in a 14 day-repeated dose toxicity study, where no signs of toxicity were found
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: at least once a day
- Cage side observations checked in table were not included.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: No
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: males: days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 42; pregnancy females: premating days 1, 8, 15; pregnancy days: 0, 7, 14, 20; lactation days: 0, 4; non pregnancy females: day 1, 8, 15, 22, 25
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study):
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes (males only)
- Time schedule for collection of blood: prior to autopsy
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: Yes (identity): pentobarbital sodium
- Animals fasted: 18 - 24 hours before sacrifice
- How many animals: all surviving animals
- Parameters checked: red blood cell count (RBC), white blood cell count (WBC), haemoglobin content (Hb), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), ahematocrit (Ht), mean corpuscular haemoglobin content (MCH), mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC)
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes (males only)
- Animals fasted: 18 - 24 hours before sacrifice
- How many animals: all surviving animals
- Parameters checked: total protein, albumin, total cholesterol concentration, glucose, urea nitrogen, creatinine, alkaline phosphatase activity, GOT, GPT, γ-GTP, triglyceride concentration, inorganic phosphorus, total bilirubin, calcium, sodium, potassium, chlorine, A/G ratio
URINALYSIS: No - Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- Parameters examined in all male parental generations:
testis weight, epididymis weight - Litter observations:
- STANDARDISATION OF LITTERS
- Performed on day 4 postpartum: no
PARAMETERS EXAMINED
The following parameters were examined in F1 offspring:
number and sex of pups, stillbirths, live births, postnatal mortality, presence of gross anomalies
GROSS EXAMINATION OF DEAD PUPS:
yes, for external and internal abnormalities; possible cause of death was determined for pups born or found dead. - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- SACRIFICE
- Male animals: all surviving animals
- Maternal animals: all surviving animals
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS
Organ weights:
male: heart, liver, kidneys, thymus, testes, epididymides
female: heart, liver, kidneys, thymus
Pathological findings and Histopathology (control and 1000 mg/kg bw group):
male: heart, liver, spleen, kidney, adrenal, testis, epididymis, brain, thymus, bladder
female: brain, liver, spleen, thymus, kidney, adrenal, bladder, heart, ovary, uterus - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- SACRIFICE
- The F1 offspring not selected as parental animals were sacrificed at 4 days of age.
- These animals were subjected to postmortem examinations (macroscopic examination) as follows: external malformations, visceral malformations - Statistics:
- Yates test, Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher exact test, Bartlett test, Dunnett test, Scheffe test, Kruskal-Wallis test
- Reproductive indices:
- - Copulation index = (number of copulated pairs / number of pairs mated) x 100
- Fertility index = (number of pregnant animals / number of copulated pairs) x 100
- Gestation index = (number of pregnant females with pups alive / number of pregnant females) x 100
- Implantation index = (number of implantation sites / number of corpora lutea) x 100 - Offspring viability indices:
- - Delivery index = (number of pups born / number of implantation sites) x 100
- Birth index = (number of pups alive on day 0 / number of implantation sites) x 100
- Live birth index = (number of pups alive on day 0 / number of pups born) x 100
- Sex ratio on day 0 = (number of males pups alive on day 0 / number of female pups alive on day 0) x 100
- Viability index = (number of pups alive on day 4 / number of pups alive on day 0) x 100 - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no adverse substance -related findings on fertility were noted
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no adverse substance-related findings were noted
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
Reference
- Males: no deaths or abnormalities in general condition were observed in any of the treated groups
- Females: no deaths were observed in any treated group
BODY WEIGHT AND FOOD CONSUMPTION (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
Males: significant increase (p<0.01) compared to control was observed in 100 mg/kg group between 8 - 15 days and between 15 - 29 days. However, since no change was observed in other groups, the effect was not considered to be related to the dosing of compound. No changes in food consumption related to the dosing of compound were observed
- Females: no significant changes in body weight were noted and there were no changes related to the dosing of compound in body weight gain and food consumption. A significant decrease (p<0.01) compared to control was observed during lactation in 100 mg/kg dosing group. However, since no other changes in food consumption were noted in 300 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg dosing groups, the effect was not considered to be related to the dosing of compound.
REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
There were no significant differences in number of corpora lutea, implantation rate, number of implantations and all other reproductive parameters in all treated groups compared to the control group.
ORGAN WEIGHTS (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
Males: in 100 mg/kg bw males, the actual weight ratio of liver weight (p <0.05) compared to control values were increased. No other significant differences were found in all groups. Thus, this finding lacks a dose-dependency and was regarded as incidental.
- Females: kidney weight was significantly reduced (p<0.05) in the 300 mg/kg bw group. No other weight changes were noted. Thus, this finding lacks a dose-dependency and was regarded as incidental.
GROSS PATHOLOGY (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
Males:
- Heart: myocardial degeneration was noted in one animal of the control group and the 1000 mg/kg bw group, respectively
- Liver: periportal fatty change of the liver was found in all animals of the control and the high dose group. Focal necrosis was noted in one animal of the high-dose group.
- Spleen: all animals of the control and the high-dose group showed brown pigment deposits of the spleen as well as extramedullary haematopeiosis
- Kidney: while fibrosis was only found in 1/13 animals of the control group, eosinophilic bodies and basophilic tubuli in the cortex were noted in animals of both control and high dose groups, respectively
- Adrenal gland: one animal of the high-dose group showed fibrosis
- Testis: atrophy of the seminiferous tubules was observed in two animals of the 1000 mg/kg dose group, with one animal affected on both sides and one side affected in the other animal. No other abnormalities were noted.
- Epididymis: abnormal sperm granuloma was found in one animal of the control group
- Brain: no abnormal findings noted
- Thymus: no abnormal findings noted
- Bladder: no abnormal findings noted
Females:
- Brain: one animal of the high-dose group showed abnormal mineral deposition in the thalamus
- Liver: focal necrosis and fibrosis was found in one animal of the control group, while one animal of the high-dose group showed only focal necrosis
- Spleen: brown pigmentation and extramedullary haematopeiosis was found in animals of the control and the high-dose group, but no varying degrees of frequency was observed
- Thymus: atrophy and bleeding was observed in animals of both groups, control and high-dose group, respectively
- Kidney: basophilic tubuli of the cotex and a dilatation of the renal pelvis was seen in the control and high-dose group
- Adrenal gland: cortical necrosis was observed in one animal of the control group
- Heart: no abnormal findings noted
- Bladder: no abnormal findings noted
No change in number of birth, birth rate, infant live birth rate, infant survival and birth rates at day 4 was found in all dose groups compared to the values of the control group.
BODY WEIGHT (OFFSPRING)
No difference in bodyweight of pups of the dose groups and the control group was found.
GROSS PATHOLOGY (OFFSPRING)
No morphological abnormalities were found in all groups.
Table 1. Summary of development up of pups from dams treated orally with docosanoic acid in the combined repeat dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity screening test: Mean± S.D (N)
Dose group (mg/kg) |
0 |
100 |
300 |
1000 |
Number of pregnant females |
13 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
Number of pregnant females with live pups |
13 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
Gestation index |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Gestation length in days |
22.2±0.4 (13) |
22.4±0.5 (12) |
22.3±0.5 (12) |
22.2±0.4 (13) |
Number of corpora lutea |
16.6±1.6 (13) |
16.7±1.8 (12) |
16.8±2.3 (12) |
16.2±1.5 (13) |
Number of implantation sites |
16.1±1.5 (13) |
15.8±2.1 (12) |
16.0±1.5 (12) |
15.2±3.1 (13) |
Implantation index |
96.9±5.1 (13) |
94.8±7.1 (12) |
96.1±6.0 (12) |
93.1±15.2 (13) |
Day 0 of lactation |
|
|
|
|
Number of pups born |
15.2±1.6 (13) |
14.8±2.2 (12) |
15.2±1.5 (12) |
14.3±2.7 (13) |
Delivery index |
94.5±8.0 (13) |
93.5±3.9 (12) |
94.9±4.3 (12) |
94.9±6.2 (13) |
Number of live pups |
14.9±1.6 (13) |
14.3±2.2 (12) |
15.1±1.6 (12) |
14.1±2.7 (13) |
Birth index |
93.1±8.8 (13) |
90.7±8.7 (12) |
94.3±5.1 (12) |
93.5±7.2 (13) |
Live birth index |
98.5±2.8 (13) |
97.0±8.5 (12) |
99.4±2.2 (12) |
98.5±4.0 (13) |
Sex ration on day 0 |
50.0±11.3 (13) |
46.7±9.8 (12) |
54.8±12.3 (12) |
48.9±13.4(13) |
Day 4 of lactation |
|
|
|
|
Number of live pups |
14.7±1.4 (13) |
13.0±4.7 (12) |
15.1±1.6 (12) |
14.1±2.7 (13) |
Viability index |
98.6±2.7 (13) |
89.4±28.8 (12) |
100.0±0.0 (12) |
100.0±0.0 (13) |
Sex ration on day 4 |
49.8±11.5 (13) |
46.3±10.3 (11) |
54.8±12.3 (12) |
48.9±13.4(13) |
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Fatty acids are found in all living organisms fulfilling fundamental physiological functions within the body. Based on this role within the body, no potential of fatty acids for affecting reproduction is expected as it could be demonstrated with fatty acids C22.
A NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg bw/d for fertility was found in a combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction / developmental toxicity screening test performed according to OECD Guideline 422 with C22 fatty acid (Nagao et al., 2002). Groups of 13 male and 13 female Sprague-Dawley rats received daily doses of 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/d of docosanoic acid by gavage. While the males were treated for 42 days, the females received the test substance form 14 days prior to mating until day 3 of lactation. As result, neither mortality nor abnormalities in general condition were observed in all dose groups. Since also no difference in number of corpora lutea, implantation rate, number of implantations and all other reproductive parameters was noted in all treated groups and in the control group, there were no indications of any adverse effects on reproduction.
Short description of key information:
Studies on reproductive toxicity by the oral route are available for
the following category members:
CAS# 112-85-6, C22: NOAEL oral (fertility) = 1000 mg/kg bw/d; highest
dose tested (Nagao 2002), OECD 422
No data are available for reproductive toxicity after dermal exposure
and inhalation, respectively.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
Studies on developmental toxicity/teratogenicity by the oral route are available for the following category members:
CAS# 124-07-2, C8: NOAEL oral (developmental toxicity/teratogenicity) = 2704 mg/kg bw/d (Scott 1994)
CAS# 57-10-3, C16: NOAEL oral (developmental toxicity/teratogenicity) = 1500 mg/kg bw/d (Narotzky 1994)
CAS# 112-85-6, C22: NOAEL oral (developmental toxicity/teratogenicity) = 1000 mg/kg bw/d; highest dose tested (Nagao 2002), OECD 422
CAS# 124-07-2, C8: NOAEL oral (developmental toxicity/teratogenicity) = 600 mg/kg bw/d (Nau and Loescher 1986) RL4
No data are available for developmental toxicity/teratogenicity after dermal exposure and inhalation, respectively.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- GLP-Guideline Study, tested with the source substance CAS 112-85-6. In accordance to ECHA guidance document "Practical guide 6: How to report read-across and categories (May 2010)", the reliability was changed from RL1 to RL2 to reflect the fact that this study was conducted on a read-across substance.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Japan, Hino, Japan
- Age at study initiation: 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: male: 312.1 - 363.7 g; female: 205.3 - 230.8 g
- Housing: metal wire floor cages
- Diet (ad libitum): CE-2, CLEA Japan
- Water (ad libitum): tap water
- Acclimation period: 7 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 24 ± 1
- Humidity (%): 50 - 65
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
prepared more frequently than once a week; aliquots were kept by each concentration refrigerated in airtight conditions
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): due to insolubility in water
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 5 mL/kg bw
- Lot/batch no. (if required): V6H2050 - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- If cohoused:
- M/F ratio per cage: 1/1
- Length of cohabitation: up to two weeks
- Proof of pregnancy: sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- Further mating after two unsuccessful attempts: no
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged (how): individually - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- - males: 42 days
- females: from 14 days prior to mating to day 3 of lactation - Frequency of treatment:
- once daily
- Duration of test:
- from 14 days prior to mating to day 3 of lactation
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 13 in each group
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: based on preliminary result in a 14 day-repeated dose toxicity study, where no signs of toxicity were found
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: at least once a day
- Cage side observations checked in table were not included.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: No
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: males: days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 42; pregnancy females: premating days 1, 8, 15; pregnancy days: 0, 7, 14, 20; lactation days: 0, 4; non pregnancy females: day 1, 8, 15, 22, 25
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study):
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Organs examined: brain, liver, spleen, thymus, kidney, adrenal, bladder, heart, ovary, uterus - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: No
- Number of late resorptions: No - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Skeletal examinations: No
- Head examinations: No - Statistics:
- Yates test, Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher exact test, Bartlett test, Dunnett test, Scheffe test, Kruskal-Wallis test
- Indices:
- Reproductive indices
- Copulation index = (number of copulated pairs / number of pairs mated) x 100
- Fertility index = (number of pregnant animals / number of copulated pairs) x 100
- Gestation index = (number of pregnant females with pups alive / number of pregnant females) x 100
- Implantation index = (number of implantation sites / number of corpora lutea) x 100
Offspring viability indices
- Delivery index = (number of pups born / number of implantation sites) x 100
- Birth index = (number of pups alive on day 0 / number of implantation sites) x 100
- Live birth index = (number of pups alive on day 0 / number of pups born) x 100
- Sex ratio = (number of males pups alive on day 0 / number of female pups alive on day 0) x 100
- Viability index = (number of pups alive on day 4 / number of pups alive on day 0) x 100 - Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
- Females: no deaths were observed in any treatment group
BODY WEIGHT AND FOOD CONSUMPTION (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
- Females: no significant changes in body weight were noted and there were no changes related to the dosing of compound in body weight gain and food consumption. A significant decrease (p<0.01) compared to control was observed during lactation in 100 mg/kg group. However, since no other changes in food consumptio was noted in 300 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg, it was considered not to be related to the dosing of compound.
REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
There were no significant differences in number of corpora lutea, implantation rate, number of implantations and all other reproductive parameters in all treated groups compared to the control group
ORGAN WEIGHTS (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
- Females: kidney weight was significantly reduced in the 300 mg/kg bw group. No other weight changes were noted. Thus, this finding lacks a dose-dependency and was regarded as incidental.
GROSS PATHOLOGY (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
Females:
- Brain: one animal of the high-dose group showed abnormal mineral deposition in the thalamus
- Liver: focal necrosis and fibrosis was found in one animal of the control group, while one animal of the high-dose group showed only focal necrosis
- Spleen: brown pigmentation and extramedullary haematopeiosis was found in animals of the control and the high-dose group, but no varying degrees of frequency was observed
- Thymus: atrophy and bleeding was observed in animals of both groups, control and high-dose group, respectively
- Kidney: basophilic tubules of the cortex and a dilatation of the renal pelvis was seen in the control and high-dose group
- Adrenal gland: cortical necrosis was observed in one animal of the control group
- Heart: no abnormal findings noted
- Bladder: no abnormal findings noted - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects. Remark: no adverse substance -related findings were noted
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
VIABILITY (OFFSPRING)
No change in numbers of birth, birth rate, infant live birth rate, infant survival and birth rates at day 4 was found in all dose groups when compared to the values of the control group.
BODY WEIGHT (OFFSPRING)
No difference in body weight of pups of the dose groups and the control group was found.
GROSS PATHOLOGY (OFFSPRING)
No morphological abnormalities were found in all groups. - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no adverse substance-related findings were noted
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Acceptable, well documented publication which meets basic scientific principles
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Screening for developmental toxicity with a Chernoff/Kavlock assay.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- on gestation days 6-15
- Frequency of treatment:
- once daily
- Duration of test:
- 28 d
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 125 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 16
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- < 11 250 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: teratogenicity
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Basic data given
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Developmental toxicity study with rats, which reveived a single dose of 18.75 mmol/kg bw octanoic acid by gavage on day 12 of gestation. Fetuses were analyzed on day 20 of gestation.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River (Portage, MI).
- Housing: in small groups in hanging wire cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Purina Rodent Laboratory Chow; ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): water; ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 - 6 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21 - 23
- Humidity (%): 45 - 55
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: purchased timed pregnant
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug referred to as day 0 of pregnancy - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single dosing
- Frequency of treatment:
- single dosing
- Duration of test:
- 9 days (from day 12 to day 20 of gestation)
- Dose / conc.:
- 18.75 other: 18.75 mmol/kg bw (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 704 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Basis: nominal in water (calculated)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Octanoic acid: 12
Control: 10 - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: No
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: No
BODY WEIGHT: No:
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): No
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: No
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day #20
- Organs examined: Uterus
OTHER
- Pharmacokinetics: Content of octanoic acid inmaternal plasma at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h after dosing - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: No
- Number of corpora lutea: No
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: 1/3 per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: 2/3 per litter
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: 2/3 per litter
- Head examinations: Yes: 2/3 per litter
-Other: Content of octanoic acid in embryo at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h after dosing - Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
Severe maternal toxicity was noted (not specified) - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 2 704 mg/kg bw (total dose)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: developmental toxicity
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
Octanoic acid was essentially devoid of embryotoxic effects except for a slight reduction of fetal weight, most likely attributable to the severe maternal toxicity that accompanied the administration of this agent. - Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1. Summary of development up of pups from dams treated orally with docosanoic acid in the combined repeat dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity screening test: Mean ± S.D. (N)
Dose group (mg/kg) |
0 |
100 |
300 |
1000 |
Number of pregnant females |
13 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
Number of pregnant females with live pups |
13 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
Gestation index |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Gestation length in days |
22.2±0.4 (13) |
22.4±0.5 (12) |
22.3±0.5 (12) |
22.2±0.4 (13) |
Number of corpora lutea |
16.6±1.6 (13) |
16.7±1.8 (12) |
16.8±2.3 (12) |
16.2±1.5 (13) |
Number of implantation sites |
16.1±1.5 (13) |
15.8±2.1 (12) |
16.0±1.5 (12) |
15.2±3.1 (13) |
Implantation index |
96.9±5.1 (13) |
94.8±7.1 (12) |
96.1±6.0 (12) |
93.1±15.2 (13) |
Day 0 of lactation |
|
|
|
|
Number of pups born |
15.2±1.6 (13) |
14.8±2.2 (12) |
15.2±1.5 (12) |
14.3±2.7 (13) |
Delivery index |
94.5±8.0 (13) |
93.5±3.9 (12) |
94.9±4.3 (12) |
94.9±6.2 (13) |
Number of live pups |
14.9±1.6 (13) |
14.3±2.2 (12) |
15.1±1.6 (12) |
14.1±2.7 (13) |
Birth index |
93.1±8.8 (13) |
90.7±8.7 (12) |
94.3±5.1 (12) |
93.5±7.2 (13) |
Live birth index |
98.5±2.8 (13) |
97.0±8.5 (12) |
99.4±2.2 (12) |
98.5±4.0 (13) |
Sex ration on day 0 |
50.0±11.3 (13) |
46.7±9.8 (12) |
54.8±12.3 (12) |
48.9±13.4(13) |
Day 4 of lactation |
|
|
|
|
Number of live pups |
14.7±1.4 (13) |
13.0±4.7 (12) |
15.1±1.6 (12) |
14.1±2.7 (13) |
Viability index |
98.6±2.7 (13) |
89.4±28.8 (12) |
100.0±0.0 (12) |
100.0±0.0 (13) |
Sex ration on day 4 |
49.8±11.5 (13) |
46.3±10.3 (11) |
54.8±12.3 (12) |
48.9±13.4(13) |
Sprague Dawley rats (n=16/group) gavaged on gestation days 6-15 with caprylic acid in corn
oil at dose levels of 0, 1 125 or 1 500 mg/kg bw/day exhibited maternal toxicity (rale and
dyspnoea) and maternal mortality (21 % and 44 % respectively). Most deaths occurred shortly
after dosing and were attributed to the respiratory effect of the treatment. However, according
to the authors, the high percentage of deaths could have been due to tracheal intubation. There
was a decrease in the number of live pups on post-gestational day 6, while no teratogenic
effect was observed
Results on embryotoxicity:
Octanoic acid | Control | |
Dose (mg/kg bw) | 2704 | 0 |
No. surv. females/no. Treated | 11/12 | 10/10 |
No. impl. Sites | 131 | 108 |
No. res. or dead (%) | 10 (9) | 6 (6) |
No. surv. malf. (%) | 4 (3) | 1 (1) |
Mean fetal wt., M/F | 3.48/3.23 | 3.90/3.71 |
Weight of day 20 rat fetuses exposed to an organic acid on day 12 of pregnancy:
Control | Octanoic acid | |||
Litter No. | Male | Female | Male | Female |
1 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.8 | 3.7 |
2 | 4.2 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.5 |
3 | 4 | 3.7 | 2.5 | 2.2 |
4 | 4 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 3.3 |
5 | 4 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
6 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
7 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 3.8 | 3.7 |
8 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 3.9 |
9 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 2.2 | 2 |
10 | 3.9 | 3.6 | - | - |
mean | 3.99 ± 0.30 | 3.77 ± 0.27 | 3.19 ± 0.65 | 3.19 ± 0.66 |
% variability | 7.5 | 7.2 | 19.1 | 20.7 |
Transplacental Pharmacokinetics:
Based on the data presented in figures, ca. 70 µg/ml octanoic acid was found in maternal plasma and ca. 200 µg/g fetus directly after administration, respectively. While octanoic acid could not be detected anymore in maternal plasma after ca. 2 hours, it took 5 hours until octanoic acid could not be detected anymore within the embry.
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Fatty acids are found in all living organisms fulfilling fundamental physiological functions within the body. Based on this role within the body, no potential of fatty acids for affecting development is expected as it could be demonstrated with C8 fatty acid (octanoic acid), C16 fatty acid (palmitic acid) and C22 fatty acid (docosanoic acid), respectively.
Developmental toxicity by octanoic acid was evaluated in a published study, where 12 Sprague-Dawley rats received a single dosage of 18.75 mmol/kg bw by gavage on day 12 of gestation (Scott et al, 1994). As a result of the dosing, severe maternal toxicity was noted, but not further specified. The analysis of fetuses was performed on day 20 of gestation. In addition, the content of octanoic acid in fetuses and in maternal fluid was analyzed 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours after dosing. According to the author, the observed maternal toxicity was the reason for the slight reduction in the fetal body weight when compared to control values. However, no significant differences to control values were found regarding number of living fetuses, number of implantation sites, number of resorptions and number of malformations, respectively. Thus, the NOAEL for developmental toxicity was found to be 18.75 mmol/kg bw (total dose) corresponding to 2704 mg/kg bw octanoic acid.
The effect of palmitic acid on development was analyzed in a screening study with a Chernoff/Kavlock assay (Narotsky et al., 1994). Groups of 16 Sprague-Dawley rats received a daily dosage of 1125 and 1500 mg/kg bw/d in corn oil on gestation days 6 - 15 via gavage. A maternal mortality rate of 21% and 44% was found where ,according to the authors, most of the deaths could have been attributed to intubation error. However, maternal toxicity like rale and dyspnea was noted. There was a decrease in the number of live pups on post-gestational day 6, while no teratogenic effect was observed. Based on these findings, the NOAEL for teratogenicity is 1500 mg/kg bw/d, whereas the NOAEL for maternal toxicity was found to be below 1125 mg/kg bw/d.
A NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg bw/d was found for docosanoic acid in a combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test performed according to OECD Guideline 422 with C22 fatty acid (Nagao et al., 2002). Groups of 13 male and 13 female Sprague-Dawley rats received daily doses of 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/d of docosanoic acid by gavage. While the males were treated for 42 consecutive days, the females received the test substance form 14 days prior to mating until day 3 of lactation. Since the viability, the body weights, and the results of pathological examination of the pups did not reveal any differences between the dose groups and the control groups, there was no indication for any adverse effects on development.
In another study which is insufficient for assessment due to limited documentation, octanoic acid was injected subcutaneously once to mice at a dose of 600 mg/kg bw/d on day 8 of gestation (Nau and Loescher 1986). According to the authors, no significant differences compared to control were found for octanoic acid. No further information was provided.
Taking all the results together, the study data do not provide any evidence of developmental toxicity/teratogenicity of fatty acids which is supported by the physiological function of fatty acids within the body.
Justification for classification or non-classification
According to CLP (1272/2008/EC) classification criteria for toxicity to reproduction/developmental toxicity/teratogenicity, fatty acids do not fulfill the criteria for classification and thus a non-classification is warranted for this endpoint.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.