Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-722-6 | CAS number: 7704-34-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP compliant, guideline study, unpublished report available, no restrictions, fully adequate for assessment
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 005
- Report date:
- 2005
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Sulfur
- EC Number:
- 231-722-6
- EC Name:
- Sulfur
- Cas Number:
- 7704-34-9
- Molecular formula:
- S
- IUPAC Name:
- sulfur
- Details on test material:
- Common Name (active ingredient): sulfur
Name to be used in the report: Sulphur Technical
Chemical name (IUPAC): sulfur
CAS No.: 7704-34-9
Batch No.: SML/RD/T/S-191
Manufactured and Supplied by: Sulphur Mills Limited;604/605, Business Point, 6th floor, Plot No.349;Western Express Highway, Andheri (E);Mumbai – 400 069, INDIA;Tel.: 91-22-5691 0011;Fax.: 91-22-5691 0308
Date of manufacture: January 2005
Date of expiry: December 2006
Purity to be stated in the report: 99.6 % w/w
Density: 2.07g/mL (rhombic)
Physical appearance: Yellow coloured solid powder
Storage conditions: Ambient (+18 to +36°C)
Analysed purity (as per certificate of analysis): 98.6% w/w
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- Swiss
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
Source: Rallis Research Centre; Toxicology department; Bangalore –560 058; India
No. of mice per group: 10 (5 males + 5 females)
No. of groups: Three (One test item concentration, one positive control and one vehicle control).
Age at the start of acclimatisation: 12 weeks
Body weight range at the start of treatment: Male : 28.19 – 35.58 g; Female : 20.92 – 27.21 g
Acclimatisation: Five days under experimental conditions after veterinary examination.
Grouping: Mice were assigned to 3 study groups by body weight stratification during acclimatisation.
Identification: At the start of acclimatisation, mice were identified by serial numbers and crystal violet body marking. After grouping, they were identified by turmeric body marking, cage cards and permanent accession numbers.
Accommodation: The mice were housed individually during acclimatization and treatment in standard polypropylene mice cages (size: Length 290 x
Width 220 x Height 140 mm) with stainless steel top grill having free access to feed and drinking water in glass bottles with stainless steel sipper tubes.
Bedding: Clean paddy husk was provided and changed thrice a week.
Feed: Pelletted Ssniff rats/mice diet-maintenance meal, low in germs (manufactured by Ssniff Spezialdiäten GmbH., Ferdinand-Gabriel-Weg 16, D-59494 Soest, GERMANY) was provided ad libitum.
Water: Bore-well water passed through activated charcoal filter and exposed to UV rays in Aquaguard water filter cum purifier (manufactured by Eureka Forbes Ltd., Mumbai 400 001, INDIA) was provided ad libitum in glass bottles.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
Air conditioned with 12 to 15 air changes per hour, temperature 21 to 24°C, relative humidity 30 to 70% and artificial lighting with 12 hours light / dark cycle.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- 0.5% aqueous carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) with Tween 80 (1 ml/l)
- Details on exposure:
- Route of Administration: oral, as gavage. This route is most commonly used because it maximizes the effect of the dose on the target tissue.
The test item and the positive control were administered orally as gavage twice with a 24 hour interval to the treatment group and to the positive control group respectively at an equivolume of 10 ml/kg body weight. The mice in the vehicle and the positive control groups were handled in an identical manner to those in the treatment group, however, they were administered the vehicle [0.5% aqueous carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) with Tween 80
(1 ml/l)] and cyclophosphamide (monohydrate), respectively. The sampling of the femur bone marrow cells was done 23 to 24 hours after the second treatment. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 2 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- the test item was administered twice at 24 hour interval
- Post exposure period:
- 23-24 hour after the second treatment
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
2000 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
actual ingested
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- cyclophosphamide (monohydrate)
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- femur bone marrow cells
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- Terminal Sacrifice
All mice sacrificed at term were subjected to gross pathological observations. The mice were killed by cervical dislocation and the femora from both sides were removed after clearing the musculature. Femur heads were trimmed to expose the marrow canals, the bone marrow was flushed with 0.9% sodium chloride and collected in a centrifuge tube.
Bone Marrow Smear Preparation
The cell suspensions were centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 10 minutes and supernatants discarded. Approximately 10 μl of the cell suspension was spread evenly on a glass slide and air dried. The slide was etched with the study number, mouse accession number, slide number and sex immediately thereafter. The smears were fixed in methanol for 30 minutes. Four to five slides were prepared for each animal.
Staining
Slides were stained by a combination of May-Gruenwald and Giemsa stain in succession. The slides were blow dried, immersed in xylene and cover slips mounted with DPX. The slides were then coded after which blind evaluation was carried out.
Microscopic Evaluation of Erythrocytes
A minimum of 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) was scored from each animal for the incidence of PCE with micronuclei. The proportion of immature erythrocytes among total RBC (number of PCE divided by number of total RBC) was determined for each animal by counting 386 to 821 erythrocytes per animal. From these observations, the following were derived for each animal:
• Total RBC/erythrocytes scored
• No. of PCE differentiated
• No. and percentage of PCE with micronuclei
• Mean and SD of PCE with micronuclei
• Ratio of PCE : total RBC
Clinical Signs and Mortality
Twice a day (except on weekends, holidays and on the days of sacrifice when mice were observed once).
Body Weight
The body weights were recorded on day 1 (initial), day 2 and day 3 (sacrifice). - Evaluation criteria:
- A statistically significant increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes indicates a positive result and a test item, which does not meet the above criterion, is considered non-mutagenic.
- Statistics:
- Intragroup comparison: The body weight on day 2 and at sacrifice was compared with the initial body weight and the body weight at sacrifice was also compared with the body weight on day 2 by the paired T-test.
Intergroup comparison: The net body weight change was analysed by Bartlett’s test for homogeneity of intragroup variances followed by ANOVA and Dunnett's test.
The data of the treatment group and the positive control was compared with the vehicle control by Bartlett's test followed by ANOVA and Dunnett's test for the percentage of PCE with micronuclei and the proportion of PCE among total RBC.
The statistical analyses was carried out using in-house developed and validated software.
All analyses and comparisons are evaluated at 5% (P<0.05) level.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- The stability of the test item in gavage sample was tested for ‘0’ and ‘3’ hours for 200 mg/ml concentration. The test item was found to be stable after 3 hours at the dose level of 200 mg/ml when admixed with the test medium and stored at ambient condition. The homogeneity of the test item was carried out at 200 mg/ml concentration and the analysed test item concentration conformed to the nominal concentration in all the layers (top, middle and bottom) within the acceptable limits of ± 10%.
The analysed test item concentration conformed to the nominal concentration (200 mg/ml) with in the acceptable limits of ± 10% level.
There were no clinical signs, mortality and necropsy findings in the vehicle control, positive control and the treatment (limit dose) group except for an incidence of liver and kidney congestion in a male mouse in the positive control group.
The intra group comparison of the body weights in the treatment group showed a statistically significant increase in the sacrifice body weights
1. of males and combined sex as compared to their initial body weights.
2. as compared to the body weights at 24 hour in combined sex
The inter group comparison of net body weight change in the treatment group showed a statistically significant increase in males and combined sex
as compared to the vehicle control group. These results clearly indicate that the body weights of mice were unaffected by the treatment.
In the positive control group, the intragroup comparison of body weights showed a statistically significant decrease in
• sacrifice body weights as compared to the initial body weights in males,
• body weight at 24 hours as compared to initial body weight in males, females and combined sex.
The net body weight change in the positive control group did not differ from the vehicle control group.
MICRONUCLEUS ASSAY IN ERYTHROCYTES
Vehicle Control Group: The percentage of micronucleated PCE and the PCE : total RBC ratio in the concurrent vehicle control group in males, females and combined sex was within the historical data range.
Treatment Group: The percentage of micronucleated PCE in males was comparable to the vehicle control group. There was no incidence of micronucleated PCE in females in the limit dose group. Although there was a statistically significant reduction in the PCE : total RBC ratio in the limit dose group in females and combined sex as compared to the vehicle control group, the decrease was marginal and the values were within the historical data range and thus was not of biological significance.
Positive Control Group: Cyclophosphamide (monohydrate) significantly increased the percentage of micronucleated PCE and significantly altered (reduced) the PCE : total RBC ratio in males, females and combined sex. In the positive control group, the percentage of micronucleated PCE and the
PCE : total RBC was within the historical data range in males, females and combined sex. This result indicated the effectiveness of the methodology adopted and that the test system used was sensitive to a known mutagen.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
Sulfur was not clastogenic in the micronucleus test in Swiss albino mice at the tested limit dose of 2000 mg/kg bw. - Executive summary:
Sulfur was tested for its potential to induce cytogenetic damage in bone marrow cells of Swiss albino mice by the micronucleus test (OECD guideline 474 and GLP compliant). The test item was administered twice with at 24 hour interval by oral gavage at the limit dose of 2000 mg/kg bw at the dosage volume of 10 ml/kg. A concurrent vehicle control group (0.5% aqueous carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) with Tween 80 (1 ml/L)) and a concurrent positive control group (cyclophosphamide) were also included. The mice were sacrificed 23 to 24 hour after the second treatment. From each animal, a minimum of 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) were scored for the incidence of micronucleated PCE. Sulfur, at the tested limit dose of 2000 mg/kg bw, did not affect the body weights of mice and there were no clinical signs, mortality and necropsy findings except for an incidence of liver and kidney congestion in a male mouse in the positive control group. The percentage of micronucleated PCE in the treatment group was comparable to the concurrent vehicle control group. Cyclophosphamide significantly increased the percentage of micronucleated PCE and significantly altered (reduced) the PCE:total RBC ratio in males, females and combined sex indicating the effectiveness of the methodology adopted and the sensitivity of the test system.
The test item sulfur was not clastogenic in this micronucleus test in Swiss albino mice at the tested limit dose of 2000 mg/kg bw.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.