Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-659-6 | CAS number: 67-56-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Acute oral LD50 in rats was determined to be greater than 1187 but less than 2769 mg/kg bw in an Study performed according to internal company standards (BASF-test) before actual guideline was adopted.
Acute inhalation LD50 in cats was found to be 43700 mg/m³ after 6 -hour exposure.
LD50 after dermal application in rabbits was
found to be about 17100 mg/kg bw.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Test substance applied as 50 % aqueous solution, postobservation period only 7 days
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Study was performed before actual guideline was adopted. BASF-test.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- not specified
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on oral exposure:
- VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: 50 %
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 3.2 ml/kg
MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED: 6.4 ml/kg - Doses:
- 2528 mg/kg bw (6.4 ml/kg)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10 (sex not specified)
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 7 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: no data
- Necropsy of survivors performed: no data
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs - Key result
- Sex:
- not specified
- Dose descriptor:
- LD0
- Effect level:
- >= 2 528 mg/kg bw
- Remarks on result:
- other: application as 50% aqueous solution
- Mortality:
- No mortality occurred.
- Clinical signs:
- other: Staggering, narcotic effects.
- Gross pathology:
- no data
- Other findings:
- - Potential target organs: CNS
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 1 187 mg/kg bw
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: inhalation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- No further details given
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Test type:
- other: no details reported
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- cat
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- not specified
- Route of administration:
- inhalation
- Type of inhalation exposure:
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- other: no data
- Analytical verification of test atmosphere concentrations:
- not specified
- Duration of exposure:
- 6 h
- Concentrations:
- 44.69 mg/L (corresponding to 33600 ppm)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- no data
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Key result
- Sex:
- not specified
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect level:
- 43.68 mg/L air
- Exp. duration:
- 6 h
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Value:
- 43 700 mg/m³ air
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- secondary literature
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- No further details given
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- not specified
- Type of coverage:
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Duration of exposure:
- no data
- Doses:
- no data
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- no data
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Key result
- Sex:
- not specified
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- 17 100 mg/kg bw
- Remarks on result:
- other: corresponding to 20 ml/kg bw according to the authors
Reference
No detailed data: LD50 given as 20 mL/kg.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 17 100 mg/kg bw
Additional information
Animal data
Oral:
In rats, LD50 values after single oral administration range from 1187 to 2769 mg/kg bw, depending on the concentration of the aqueous solution used (BASF 1975, concentrations 15 to 35%, not further specified).
In Rhesus monkeys orally dosed with 6000 mg/kg bw, the retina and the optic papilla showed extended oedema, and the pupils were wide and non-responsive. Six of 8 animals exhibited cystic degeneration of the outer retinal granular layer, and in one animal there was evidence of significant demyelinisation of the optic nerve. Histological lesions were seen in the putamen and nucleus caudatus in 3 of 8 animals. All of these effects were most pronounced after early compensation of acidosis using bicarbonate application, because the monkeys generally did not survive those high doses of methanol but after early treatment with bicarbonate (Potts, 1955; Potts et al., 1955).
There was no evidence of marked acidosis in 12 Rhesus monkeys (28 applications) after sublethal doses up to 6000 mg/kg bw. Specifically, there was no hyperventilation, no increase in urinary excretion of organic acids, or shift in serum bicarbonate. Blindness was seen in only one surviving monkey dosed with 9000 mg/kg bw; the effect was transient four days after exposure. The LD50 was between 7000 and 9000 mg/kg bw (Cooper and Felig, 1961).
Inhalation:
In male and female rats, LC50 values of 87.5 mg/L (6 hours) and 128.2 mg/L (4 hours) were determined (BASF, 1980a,b). Clinical signs of toxicity were aqueous secretion of eyes and nose, labored breathing, staggering, apathy, and narcosis.
A similar range of toxicity values is reported for the mouse: LC50 (2.25 h) = approx. 79 mg/L (Von Burg, 1994).
In cats, a LC50 value of approx. 43.7 mg/L was obtained after a 6-hour exposure (Von Burg, 1994). A shorter duration of 4.5 hours led to a LC50 value of 85.4 mg/L (Von Burg, 1994).
Studies in Rhesus monkeys indicate lethal concentrations (% mortality not reported) of 1.3 mg/L (after 41 hours), 13 mg/L (after 18 hours) and 52 mg/L methanol (after 1–4 hours). Blindness associated with optic nerve atrophy was reported. Eventual recovery from this lesion was observed (McCord, 1931; only limited documentation).
Dermal:
Methanol is classified as acute toxic Cat.3 (H301,H311,H331) according to the EU Regulation 1272/2008. Therefore, animal testing regarding acute dermal toxicity is not necessary.
In rabbits, a dermal LD50 of about 17,000 mg/kg bw was found. No further details were reported (Rowe and McCollister, 1981).
Human data:
Due to misuse of methanol in the production of alcoholic beverages oral ingestion is the most frequent route of poisoning, death and blindness from methanol. However, there are also case reports from percutaneous absorption or vapor inhalation having elicited the methanol acute toxic syndrome.
A blood level of 500 mg/L methanol in acutely poisoned patients is generally regarded as an indication for hemodialysis. This blood concentration can transiently be achieved in an adult person (70 kg) by ingestion of 0.4 mL methanol/kg bw (Kavet and Nauss, 1990). Generally in humans, transient central nervous system (CNS) effects appear at blood methanol levels of 200 mg/L and serious ocular symptoms appear above 500 mg/L ranging from mild photophobia, misty or blurred vison to markedly reduced visual acuity and total blindness (Kavet and Nauss, 1990; Dethlefs and Naraqi, 1978). Acute methanol intoxication evolves in a well-defined pattern. First, a mild depression of the CNS occurs which is followed by an asymptomatic latent period commonly lasting 12 to 14 hours. Clinical symptoms include headache, dizziness, nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain, and labored, periodic breathing and mag progress to coma and death from respiratory failure (Kavet and Nauss, 1990).
The minimal acute methanol dose to humans that can result in death is considered to be 300 to 1000 mg/kg by ingestion. Fatalities have occurred in untreated patients with initial methanol blood levels in the range of 1500 to 2000 mg/L (IPCS/WHO, 1997). In general, coma, seizures and prolonged acidosis were poor prognostic signs (Naraqi et al., 1979). Such high and potentially lethal blood methanol levels are less likely to be achieved from inhalation exposure. Exposure to 0.26 mg/L methanol for 4 hours was without significant physiologic effects in human volunteers (Muttray et al., 2001).
In conclusion, there are two dominating acute effects from methanol: blindness and metabolic acidosis. For the latter, formate is considered to be the ultimate toxicant in acute methanol intoxication in humans. Acidosis and ophthalmologic changes are typical effects in primates. They do not occur in rodents or rabbits, which are able to remove formate more efficiently. In these animals, CNS depression, narcosis and death are the leading symptoms of intoxication.Although the mechanism for optic nerve damage from exposure to methanol has not been established, potential mechanisms and the possible role of formate are discussed in section 5.10.3.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification,
Labelling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
The
available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for
classification purposes under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. Although
the lethal dose of methanol is high for most experimental animals (>
2000 mg/kg bw after single oral administration) these data are not
employed for classification. The classification is only based upon the
experiences in humans and classifies methanol as acutely toxic by oral,
dermal and inhalative exposure and, furthermore, as capable of inducing
serious irreversible effects upon single exposure by all of these
routes. As a result the substance is considered to be classified for
acute toxicity category 3: toxic if swallowed; toxic in contact with
skin; toxic if inhaled (H301, H311, H331) and STOT single exposure
category 1 (oral, dermal, inhalation; H370) under
Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, as amended for the tenth time in
Regulation (EU) No 2017/776
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.