Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 233-899-5 | CAS number: 10421-48-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Carcinogenicity
Administrative data
Description of key information
An oral carcinogenicity study is available for the read-across substance iron chloride.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Carcinogenicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- carcinogenicity: oral
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study appears to have been conducted according to an appropriate OECD test guideline but full details are not available and the GLP status of the study is not known.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 451 (Carcinogenicity Studies)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Limited reporting of methods and results in publication
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Fischer 344
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Japan Inc
- Age at study initiation: Six weeks
- Weight at study initiation: No data
- Fasting period before study: No data
- Housing: Three to four males or five females in plastic cages.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Acclimation period: One week
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 24± 1
- Humidity (%): 55±5
- Air changes (per hr): No data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): No data
IN-LIFE DATES: No data - Route of administration:
- oral: drinking water
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: Ferric chloride was dissolved in distilled water to give concentrations of 0.25 and 0.5% (w/v).
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- no
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Two years
- Frequency of treatment:
- Continuous
- Post exposure period:
- Eight weeks
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 0.25% or 0.5%
Basis:
nominal in water - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
Equivalent to mean daily doses of 170 and 320 mg/kg for males and of 188 and 336 mg/kg for females.
Basis:
actual ingested - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 50
- Control animals:
- other: drinking water only
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: Based on a 13-week dose range-finding study.
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): Random
- Rationale for selecting satellite groups: To investigate the reversibility of any adverse effects observed.
- Post-exposure recovery period in satellite groups: Eight weeks
- Section schedule rationale (if not random): No data - Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Daily
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: No data
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Weekly
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study):
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: No
FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Body weight gain in kg/food consumption in kg per unit time X 100 calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Continuous
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No
HAEMATOLOGY: No data
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: No data
URINALYSIS: No data
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes - Statistics:
- Body weight and the daily water intake data were analysed statistically using Student's t-test. The survival times were analysed using the generalised Wilcoxon test. The incidences of tumours were analysed statistically by Fisher's exact probability test.
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Details on results:
- CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY: No clinical signs of toxicity were reported. The cumulative mortality at termination in males of the 0.5% group was significantly decreased compared with the controls.
BODY WEIGHT AND WEIGHT GAIN: The mean body weights of the treated males and females were significantly lower than those of the control groups (see Table 1).
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): The mean daily water intake of the treated groups were significantly lower than those of the controls (see Table 1).
GROSS PATHOLOGY: No findings reported.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: NON-NEOPLASTIC: Age-related non-neoplastic lesions, such as chronic nephropathy and testicular atrophy, were observed in all groups. There were no specific lesions considered to be attributable to ferric chloride treatment.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: NEOPLASTIC: There were no statistically significant differences in the overall tumour incidence between control and treated groups of either sex. All tumours observed in this study were similar to those that are known occur spontaneously in this strain of rats.
- Relevance of carcinogenic effects / potential:
- No carcinogenic activity was evident in F344 rats administered ferric chloride at concentrations of 0.25 or 0.5% in drinking water for up to two years.
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- > 0.5 other: %
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Approximately equivalent to 320 mg/kg bw/day for males and 336 mg/kg bw/day for females.
- Remarks on result:
- other: Effect type: carcinogenicity (migrated information)
- Conclusions:
- In a two year carcinogenicity study (reliability score 2) conducted using a study protocol similar to OECD 451 (no information on GLP status), there was no evidence that ferric chloride has carcinogenic properties in rats.
- Executive summary:
In a two year carcinogenicity study (reliability score 2) conducted using a study protocol similar to OECD 451 (no information on GLP status), ferric chloride was dissolved in distilled water at concentrations of 0.25 and 0.5%, and the solutions were given ad libitum, to F344 rats (50/sex/dose) as their drinking water for up to two years. Control animals received untreated drinking water. The mean body weights of the treated rats were lower than control group values for males and females. A variety of tumours developed in all groups, including the controls, but all of these neoplasms were histologically similar to those of those known to occur spontaneously in this strain of rat. There was no statistically significant increase in the incidence of any tumour found in the treated animals compared with the controls. Therefore it was concluded that ferric chloride did not exert any carcinogenic potential in F344 rats.
Reference
Final body weight, intake of drinking water and test substance, and survival times.
Average daily intake | |||||
Group | Final body weight (mean± SD) | Drinking water (g/kg bw) | Test substance (mg/kg bw) | Final survival (%) | Mean survival time and range |
Males | |||||
Control | 458.4 ± 40 | 95.8 | 0 | 62 | 107.0 (69 -112) |
0.25% | 431.0 ± 35* | 67.4* | 169.7 | 54 | 104.5 (60 -112) |
0.5% | 430.6 ± 24* | 63.2* | 319.7 | 82* | 109.3 (64 -112) |
Females | |||||
Control | 317.6 ± 33 | 105.0 | 0 | 72 | 106.5 (50 -112) |
0.25% | 287.3 ± 29* | 73.6* | 187.9 | 56 | 106.9 (73 -112) |
0.5% | 271.1 ± 24* | 67.2* | 336.0 | 62 | 105.6 (49 -112) |
*Significantly different from control value at P<0.05
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 320 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- chronic
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- A guideline-comparable published study is available for the read-across substance iron chloride.
Carcinogenicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Carcinogenicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Available data for the read-across substance do not indicate carcinogenicity. No classification for carcinogenicity is therefore proposed.
Additional information
In a good quality carcinogenicity study iron trichloride was administered to F344 rats in their drinking water for two years. Control animals received untreated drinking water. The mean body weights of the treated rats were lower than control group values for males and females. A variety of tumours developed in all groups, including the controls, but all of these neoplasms were histologically similar to those of those known to occur spontaneously in this strain of rat. There was no statistically significant increase in the incidence of any tumour found in the treated animals compared with the controls. Therefore it was concluded that iron trichloride did not exert any carcinogenic potential in F344 rats. The NOAEL was >0.5% (equivalent to 219.7 and 336 mg/kg bw/day in males and females, respectively and to 76 and 116 mgFe/kg bw/day in males and females, respectively).
Justification for selection of carcinogenicity via oral route endpoint:
Only one study available
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.