Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-202-3 | CAS number: 79-39-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Jun 27 - Aug 22, 2008
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 008
- Report date:
- 2008
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted July 21, 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test using the Hprt and xprt genes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Methacrylamide
- EC Number:
- 201-202-3
- EC Name:
- Methacrylamide
- Cas Number:
- 79-39-0
- Molecular formula:
- C4H7NO
- IUPAC Name:
- methacrylamide
- Test material form:
- solid
- Details on test material:
- Batch (Lot) Number: 11110320
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Supplier: Evonik Röhm GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany
- Purity: 99.9%
- Lot/batch No.: 11171114
- Expiration date of the lot/batch:
- Stability under test conditions: stable
- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature (+15 to +25°C), light protected
Method
- Target gene:
- Gene mutations at the HPRT locus
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung (CHL/IU)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- V79
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Mammalian liver microsomal fraction S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I:
-S9 mix; 26.9, 53.8, 107.5, 215.0, 430.0, 860.0 µg/ml
+S9 mix; 26.9, 53.8, 107.5, 215.0, 430.0, 860.0 µg/ml
Experiment II:
-S9 mix; 26.9, 53.8, 107.5, 215.0, 430.0, 860.0 µg/ml
+S9 mix; 26.9, 53.8, 107.5, 215.0, 430.0, 860.0 µg/ml
In both main experiments the cultures at the lowest concentration without metabolic activation (26.9 µg/mL) were not continued since a minimum of only four analysable concentrations is required by the guidelines. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: deionised water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle:
Controlsopen allclose all
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- concurrent solvent controls (deionised water)
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in suspension
DURATION
- Exposure duration: Experiment I: 4 hours with and without metabolic activation
Experiment II: 4 hours with and 24 hours without metabolic activation. The experimental parts of the second experiment with
and without metabolic activation were performed in two separate experiments (experiment II and IIA) for technical reasons. The
results are combined and reported as experiment II.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: The stained colonies with more than 50 cells were counted. In doubt the colony size was checked with a preparation
microscope (Nikon, 40407 Düsseldorf, Germany). - Evaluation criteria:
- Acceptability of the Assay
The gene mutation assay is considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:
- the numbers of mutant colonies per 10exp+6 cells found in the negative and/or solvent controls fall within the laboratory historical control data
range of 2001 – 2006.
- the positive control substances must produce a significant increase in mutant colony frequencies (Historical data).
- the cloning efficiency II (absolute value) of the negative and/or solvent controls must exceed 50 %.
Evaluation of Results
A test item is regarded as positive if it induces either a concentration-related increase of the mutant frequency or a reproducible and positive
response at one of the test points.
A test item producing neither a concentration- related increase of the mutant frequency nor a reproducible positive response at any of the test
points is considered non-mutagenic in this system.
A positive response is described as follows:
A test item is regarded as mutagenic if it reproducibly induces a mutation frequency that is three times above the spontaneous mutation frequency
at least at one of the concentrations in the experiment.
The test item is regarded as mutagenic if there is a reproducible concentration-related increase of the mutation frequency. Such evaluation may be
considered also in the case that a threefold increase of the mutant frequency is not observed.
However, in a case by case evaluation this decision depends on the level of the corresponding solvent control data. If there is by chance a low
spontaneous mutation rate in the range normally found (0.5 – 31.8 mutants per 10exp+6 cells) a concentration-related increase of the mutations
within this range has to be discussed. The variability of the mutation rates of solvent controls within all experiments of this study was also taken into consideration. - Statistics:
- Statistical Analysis
A linear regression (least squares) was performed to assess a possible dose dependent increase of mutant frequencies using SYSTAT®11 (SYSTAT
Software, Inc., 501, Canal Boulevard, Suite C, Richmond, CA 94804, USA) statistics software. The number of mutant colonies obtained for the
groups treated with the test item were compared to the solvent control groups. A trend is judged as significant whenever the p-value (probability
value) is below 0.05. However, both, biological and statistical significance were considered together.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- in forward gene mutations in mammalian cells
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: strain/cell type: V79
Any other information on results incl. tables
Results and Disscussions
Methacrylamide was assessed for its potential to induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus using V79 cells of the Chinese hamster.
The assay was performed in two independent experiments with identical experimental procedures, using two parallel cultures each. The first main experiment was performed with and without liver microsomal activation and a treatment period of 4 h. The second experiment was performed with a treatment period of 24 hours in the absence of metabolic activation and 4 hours in the presence of metabolic activation.
No precipitation of the test item was observed up to the maximal concentration of 860.0 µg/mL (corresponding to a molar concentration of about 10 mM) in all experiments.
No relevant toxic effects indicated by a reduction of the relative cloning efficiency 1 to values below 50 % of the corresponding control occurred in any part of the project.
No relevant and reproducible increase in mutant colony numbers/106cells was observed in the main experiments up to the maximum concentration. The induction factor did not reach the threshold of 3.0 at any experimental point and no statistically trend occurred.
A linear regression analysis (least squares) was performed to assess a possible dose dependent increase of mutant frequencies using SYSTAT ® statistics software. No significant dose dependent trend of the mutation frequency indicated by a probability value of < 0.05 was determined in any of the experimental groups.
In both experiments of this study (with and without S9 mix) the range of the solvent controls was from 11.5 up to 31.3 mutants per 106 cells; the range of the groups treated with the test item was from 4.9 up to 36.0 mutants per 106cells. The highest solvent control value (31.3 mutant colonies per 106cells) slightly exceeded the range of historical data (1.1-29.1 mutant colonies per 106 cells). The mean value of both parallel cultures however, (31.3 and 15.6 equal to 23.5 colonies per 106 cells) is fully acceptable.
EMS (150 µg/mL in experiment I and 75 µg/mL in experiment II) and DMBA (1.3 µg/mL in experiment I and 1.1 µg/mL in experiment II) were used as positive controls and showed a distinct increase in induced mutant colonies. This showed the sensitivity of the test system and the activity of the S9 mix.
Summary of results
relative |
relative |
mutant |
relative |
relative |
mutant |
|||||
Conc. |
S9 mix |
cloning |
cloning |
Colonies/ |
induction |
cloning |
cloning |
Colonies/ |
induction |
|
µg/mL |
Efficientcy 1 |
Efficientcy 2 |
106 cells |
factor |
106 cells |
factor |
||||
% |
% |
% |
% |
|||||||
Column |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
Exp.I |
Culture I |
Culture II |
||||||||
Solvent contr. water |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
18.9 |
1.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
25.4 |
1.0 |
|
Pos. contr. |
150.0 |
- |
100.0 |
106.6 |
95.1 |
5.0 |
100.0 |
103.5 |
119.4 |
4.7 |
Methacrylamide |
26.9 |
- |
89.1 |
Culture was not continued# |
81.2 |
Culture was not continued# |
||||
Methacrylamide |
53.8 |
- |
118.6 |
110.9 |
20.2 |
1.1 |
92.5 |
115.2 |
17.2 |
0.7 |
Methacrylamide |
107.5 |
- |
103.2 |
108.1 |
14.3 |
0.8 |
99.2 |
108.6 |
27.2 |
1.1 |
Methacrylamide |
215.0 |
- |
109.8 |
108.7 |
19.3 |
1.0 |
89.7 |
111.3 |
26.0 |
1.0 |
Methacrylamide |
430.0 |
- |
108.0 |
110.3 |
31.3 |
1.7 |
91.3 |
109.6 |
24.4 |
1.0 |
Methacrylamide |
860.0 |
- |
120.0 |
117.6 |
22.0 |
1.2 |
84.5 |
108.1 |
33.6 |
1.3 |
Solvent contr. water |
+ |
100.0 |
100.0 |
31.3 |
1.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
15.6 |
1.0 |
|
Pos.contr. DMBA |
1.3 |
+ |
29.3 |
92.6 |
1397.2 |
44.6 |
31.3 |
81.2 |
1420.5 |
90.9 |
Methacrylamide |
26.9 |
+ |
99.9 |
Culture was not continued# |
99.0 |
Culture was not continued# |
||||
Methacrylamide |
53.8 |
+ |
96.7 |
150.4 |
13.7 |
0.4 |
90.5 |
109.5 |
15.2 |
1.0 |
Methacrylamide |
107.5 |
+ |
93.8 |
140.2 |
11.1 |
0.4 |
89.2 |
116.4 |
14.8 |
0.9 |
Methacrylamide |
215.0 |
+ |
83.3 |
184.3 |
14.1 |
0.4 |
82.2 |
106.0 |
17.4 |
1.1 |
Methacrylamide |
430.0 |
+ |
92.9 |
129.7 |
4.9 |
0.2 |
90.6 |
113.6 |
13.5 |
0.9 |
Methacrylamide |
860.0 |
+ |
107.7 |
175.8 |
13.2 |
0.4 |
93.9 |
110.4 |
15.9 |
1.0 |
Exp.II |
Culture I |
Cluture II |
||||||||
Solvent contr. water |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
28.3 |
1.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
28.8 |
1.0 |
|
Pos. contr. |
75.0 |
- |
53.3 |
65.5 |
337.6 |
11.9 |
54.3 |
60.3 |
409.7 |
14.5 |
Methacrylamide |
26.9 |
- |
102.2 |
Culture was not continued# |
94.2 |
Culture was not continued# |
||||
Methacrylamide |
53.8 |
- |
92.4 |
108.4 |
5.4 |
0.2 |
90.7 |
91.3 |
20.6 |
0.7 |
Methacrylamide |
107.5 |
- |
91.7 |
108.7 |
18.9 |
0.7 |
93.3 |
91.0 |
26.2 |
0.9 |
Methacrylamide |
215.0 |
- |
94.1 |
107.9 |
11.9 |
0.4 |
93.7 |
85.7 |
36.0 |
1.3 |
Methacrylamide |
430.0 |
- |
105.7 |
94.5 |
16.9 |
0.6 |
93.7 |
106.2 |
15.9 |
0.6 |
Methacrylamide |
860.0 |
- |
97.2 |
94.7 |
22.8 |
0.8 |
97.8 |
97.3 |
23.5 |
0.8 |
Solvent contr. water |
+ |
100.0 |
100.0 |
11.5 |
0.4 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
22.1 |
0.8 |
|
Pos.contr. DMBA |
1.1 |
+ |
13.1 |
103.7 |
1477.0 |
52.2 |
10.6 |
79.4 |
1438.5 |
50.8 |
Methacrylamide |
26.9 |
+ |
95.3 |
Culture was not continued# |
86.4 |
Culture was not continued# |
||||
Methacrylamide |
53.8 |
+ |
85.2 |
133.0 |
24.8 |
0.9 |
88.0 |
71.2 |
20.1 |
0.7 |
Methacrylamide |
107.5 |
+ |
83.5 |
147.6 |
21.8 |
0.8 |
101.4 |
88.3 |
12.0 |
0.4 |
Methacrylamide |
215.0 |
+ |
91.0 |
148.4 |
16.3 |
0.6 |
87.8 |
72.8 |
18.4 |
0.6 |
Methacrylamide |
430.0 |
+ |
89.9 |
125.4 |
24.6 |
0.9 |
96.9 |
86.3 |
14.4 |
0.5 |
Methacrylamide |
860.0 |
+ |
88.4 |
138.2 |
19.7 |
0.7 |
78.0 |
82.1 |
17.2 |
0.6 |
# culture was not continued since a minimum of only four analysable concentrations is required
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
In conclusion it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported the test item Methacrylamide did not induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus in V79 cells of the Chinese hamster.
Therefore, Methacrylamide is considered to be non-mutagenic in this HPRT assay. - Executive summary:
In a mammalian cell gene mutation assay HPRT locus using V79 cells of the Chinese hamster cultured in vitro were exposed to Methacrylamide (99.9%) dissolved in deionised water at concentrations of 53.8; 107.5; 215.0; 430.0 and 860.0 µg/mL in the presence and absence of mammalian metabolic activation S9 mix.
The assay was performed in two independent experiments. The cells were exposed to Methacrylamide for 4 hours in the first experiment with and without metabolic activation. The second experiment was performed with a treatment period of 24 hours in the absence and 4 hours in the presence of metabolic activation.
The maximum dose was 860 μg/mL corresponding to a molar concentration of about 10 mM.
The positive controls did induce the appropriate response. No substantial and reproducible dose dependent increase of the mutation frequency was observed in the main experiments up to the maximum concentration. There was no evidence of induced mutant colonies over background.
This study is classified as acceptable. This study satisfies the requirement for Test Guideline OECD 476 for in vitro mutagenicity (mammalian forward gene mutation) data.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.