Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
11 Feb - 20 Apr 1998
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
GLP - guideline study, tested with the source substance 2-octyldodecyl isooctadecanoate (CAS 93803-87-3). According to the ECHA guidance document 'Practical guide 6: How to report read-across and categories (ECHA, 2012)', the reliability was changed from RL1 to RL2 to reflect the fact that this study was conducted on a read-across substance.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1998
Report date:
1998

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
2-octyldodecyl isooctadecanoate
EC Number:
298-361-4
EC Name:
2-octyldodecyl isooctadecanoate
Cas Number:
93803-87-3
IUPAC Name:
93803-87-3
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): only trade name given
- Physical state: pale yellow liquid
- Analytical purity: 100% (UVCB)
- Lot/batch No.: N567701
- Storage condition of test material: at room temperature in the dark
- Other: density approximately 860 kg/m³ (25 ºC)

Method

Target gene:
Not applicable
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
lymphocytes: cultured human peripheral lymphocytes
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Type and identity of media: F10 complete culture medium, containing Ham's F10 medium without thymidine and hypoxanthine (Gibco), supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated (56 °C; 30 min) foetal calf serum (Gibco), L-glutamine (2 mM), penicillin/streptomycin (50 U/mL and 50 μg/mL respectively), sodium bicarbonate (1.2 g/L) and 30 U/mL heparin.
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with Aroclor 1254
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Experiment 1:
24 h treatment, 24 h harvest time, without metabolic activation: 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL
48 h treatment, 48 h harvest time, without metabolic activation: 1000 µg/mL
3 h treatment, 24 h harvest time, with metabolic activation: 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL
3 h treatment, 48 h harvest time, with metabolic activation: 1000 µg/mL

Experiment 2:
24 h treatment, 24 h harvest time, without metabolic activation: 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL
3 h treatment, 24 h harvest time, with metabolic activation: 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL

Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
0.9% DMSO
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: mitomycine C (0.2 µg/mL, 24 h treatment time, -S9; 0.1 µg/mL, 48 h treatment time, -S9) and cyclophosphamide (15 µg/mL in nutrient medium, 3 h treatment time, +S9)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium

DURATION
- Exposure duration: 3 h with metabolic activation, 24 and 48 h without metabolic activation
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 24 and 48 h fixation time with and without metabolic activation

SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): 0.5 µg/mL colcemid, added 3 hours before harvest time (21 h with metabolic activation, 21 and 45 h without metabolic activation)
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): 5% (v/v) Gimsa

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 200 (100 per culture, duplicate cultures)

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index of 1000 cells

OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes
- Determination of endoreplication: yes

OTHER:
blood samples were taken from healthy, adult male volunteers by venapuncture, using a sterile vessel containing sodium heparine. The blood samples were stored at 4-25 ºC. Cultures were started within 4 h after blood collection. The average generation time of the cells is 13.6-14.1 h. Cultures were incubated at 37 ºC for 48 h prior to exposure to the test substance.
Evaluation criteria:
A chromosome aberration test was considered acceptable if it met the following criteria:
a) The numbers of chromosome aberrations found in the solvent control cultures should reasonably be within the laboratory historical control data range (min = 0, max = 5 (mean = 0.9, standard deviation = 1.0) aberrant cells per 100 metaphases in the absence of S9-mix; gaps excluded and min = 0, max = 5 (mean = 0.7, standard deviation = 0.9) aberrant cells per 100 metaphases in the presence of S9-mix; gaps excluded)
b) The positive control substances should produce a statistically significant (Chi-square test, P < 0.05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations
c) A homogeneous response between the replicate cultures is observed.

A test substance was considered positive (clastogenic) in the chromosome aberration test if:
a) It induced a dose-related statistically significant (Chi-square test, P < 0.05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations
b) A statistically significant increase in the frequencies of the number of cells with chromosome aberrations was observed in the absence of a clear dose-response relationship.
A test substance was considered negative (not clastogenic) in the chromosome aberration test if:
a) None of the tested concentrations induced a statistically significant (Chi-square test, P < 0.05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations
The preceding criteria were not absolute and other modifying factors might enter into the final evaluation decision.
Statistics:
The incidence of aberrant cells (cells with one or more chromosome aberrations, inclusive or exclusive gaps) for each treatment group was compared to that of the solvent control using Chi-square statistics.

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
lymphocytes: cultured human peripheral lymphocytes
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: The test substance precipitated in the culture medium at 1000 µg/mL.

RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
A range-finding test was performed to select the dose levels for the main experiment, using 10, 33, 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL, with and without metabolic activation. The test substance precipitated in the culture medium at 1000 µg/mL (see Table 1).

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
no cytotoxicity was observed at any concentration, with or without metabolic activation (see Table 2 and 3).
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: results of range-finding assay

 

Metabolic activation

Test substance concentration (μg/mL)

Mitotic index (%)

 

 

24 h harvesting time

48 h harvesting time

-

Vehicle control

(DMSO)

100

100

-

10

91

98

-

33

86

98

-

100

91

105

-

333

93

105

-

1000

100

91

+

Vehicle control

(DMSO)

100

 

+

10

92

-

+

33

90

-

+

100

94

-

+

333

98

-

+

1000

94

-

Table 1: Chromosome aberrations, summarised data, experiment 1

 

Metabolic activation

Test substance concentration (μg/mL)

Total number of metaphases analysed

Total number of aberrations1

Number of cells with aberrations1

Mitotic index (%)2

 

 

 

 

Incl. gaps

Excl. gaps

Incl. gaps

Excl. gaps

 

  24 h treatment, 24 h harvesting time

-

Vehicle control

(DMSO 1%)

200

1

1

1

1

100

-

100

200

7

6

6

5

98

-

333

200

1

1

1

1

106

-

1000

200

3

2

3

2

106

-

mitomycin C

200

41

37

38***

34***

61

  48 h treatment, 48 h harvesting time

-

Vehicle control

(DMSO 1%)

200

1

1

1

1

100

-

1000

200

1

1

1

1

81

-

mitomycin C

150

72

65

59***

55***

49

  3 h treatment, 24 h harvesting time

+

Vehicle control

(DMSO 1%)

200

4

2

4

2

100

+

100

200

4

4

4

4

68

+

333

200

0

0

0

0

81

+

1000

200

1

1

1

1

73

+

cyclophosphamide

200

89

75

71***

63***

33

  3 h treatment, 48 h harvesting time

+

Vehicle control

(DMSO 1%)

200

9

9

5

5

100

+

1000

200

1

1

1

1

81

1gaps include chromatid and isochromatid (chromosome) gaps

2percentage of metaphases per 1000 cells, compared to control

* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001 (Chi-square test)

 

 

 

Table 2: Chromosome aberrations, summarised data, experiment 2

 

Metabolic activation

Test substance concentration (μg/mL)

Total number of metaphases analysed

Total number of aberrations1

Number of cells with aberrations1

Mitotic index (%)2

 

 

 

 

Incl. gaps 

Excl. gaps

Incl. gaps

Excl. gaps

 

  24 h treatment, 24 h harvesting time

-

Vehicle control

(DMSO 1%)

200

0

0

0

0

100

-

100

200

2

2

2

2

99

-

333

200

4

4

4

4

113

-

1000

200

1

1

1

1

97

-

mitomycin C

150

63

63

53***

53***

39

  3 h treatment, 24 h harvesting time

+

Vehicle control

(DMSO 1%)

200

3

3

3

3

100

+

100

200

2

2

2

2

108

+

333

200

2

2

2

2

101

+

1000

200

2

2

2

2

104

+

Cyclophosphamide

200

111

109

80***

79***

32

1gaps include chromatid and isochromatid (chromosome) gaps

2percentage of metaphases per 1000 cells, compared to control

* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001 (Chi-square test)

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative