Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 245-205-8 | CAS number: 22766-83-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 11 Feb - 20 Apr 1998
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- GLP - guideline study, tested with the source substance 2-octyldodecyl isooctadecanoate (CAS 93803-87-3). According to the ECHA guidance document 'Practical guide 6: How to report read-across and categories (ECHA, 2012)', the reliability was changed from RL1 to RL2 to reflect the fact that this study was conducted on a read-across substance.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 998
- Report date:
- 1998
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-octyldodecyl isooctadecanoate
- EC Number:
- 298-361-4
- EC Name:
- 2-octyldodecyl isooctadecanoate
- Cas Number:
- 93803-87-3
- IUPAC Name:
- 93803-87-3
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): only trade name given
- Physical state: pale yellow liquid
- Analytical purity: 100% (UVCB)
- Lot/batch No.: N567701
- Storage condition of test material: at room temperature in the dark
- Other: density approximately 860 kg/m³ (25 ºC)
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Not applicable
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: cultured human peripheral lymphocytes
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: F10 complete culture medium, containing Ham's F10 medium without thymidine and hypoxanthine (Gibco), supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated (56 °C; 30 min) foetal calf serum (Gibco), L-glutamine (2 mM), penicillin/streptomycin (50 U/mL and 50 μg/mL respectively), sodium bicarbonate (1.2 g/L) and 30 U/mL heparin.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with Aroclor 1254
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1:
24 h treatment, 24 h harvest time, without metabolic activation: 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL
48 h treatment, 48 h harvest time, without metabolic activation: 1000 µg/mL
3 h treatment, 24 h harvest time, with metabolic activation: 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL
3 h treatment, 48 h harvest time, with metabolic activation: 1000 µg/mL
Experiment 2:
24 h treatment, 24 h harvest time, without metabolic activation: 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL
3 h treatment, 24 h harvest time, with metabolic activation: 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 0.9% DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: mitomycine C (0.2 µg/mL, 24 h treatment time, -S9; 0.1 µg/mL, 48 h treatment time, -S9) and cyclophosphamide (15 µg/mL in nutrient medium, 3 h treatment time, +S9)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 3 h with metabolic activation, 24 and 48 h without metabolic activation
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 24 and 48 h fixation time with and without metabolic activation
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): 0.5 µg/mL colcemid, added 3 hours before harvest time (21 h with metabolic activation, 21 and 45 h without metabolic activation)
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): 5% (v/v) Gimsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 200 (100 per culture, duplicate cultures)
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index of 1000 cells
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes
- Determination of endoreplication: yes
OTHER:
blood samples were taken from healthy, adult male volunteers by venapuncture, using a sterile vessel containing sodium heparine. The blood samples were stored at 4-25 ºC. Cultures were started within 4 h after blood collection. The average generation time of the cells is 13.6-14.1 h. Cultures were incubated at 37 ºC for 48 h prior to exposure to the test substance. - Evaluation criteria:
- A chromosome aberration test was considered acceptable if it met the following criteria:
a) The numbers of chromosome aberrations found in the solvent control cultures should reasonably be within the laboratory historical control data range (min = 0, max = 5 (mean = 0.9, standard deviation = 1.0) aberrant cells per 100 metaphases in the absence of S9-mix; gaps excluded and min = 0, max = 5 (mean = 0.7, standard deviation = 0.9) aberrant cells per 100 metaphases in the presence of S9-mix; gaps excluded)
b) The positive control substances should produce a statistically significant (Chi-square test, P < 0.05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations
c) A homogeneous response between the replicate cultures is observed.
A test substance was considered positive (clastogenic) in the chromosome aberration test if:
a) It induced a dose-related statistically significant (Chi-square test, P < 0.05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations
b) A statistically significant increase in the frequencies of the number of cells with chromosome aberrations was observed in the absence of a clear dose-response relationship.
A test substance was considered negative (not clastogenic) in the chromosome aberration test if:
a) None of the tested concentrations induced a statistically significant (Chi-square test, P < 0.05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations
The preceding criteria were not absolute and other modifying factors might enter into the final evaluation decision. - Statistics:
- The incidence of aberrant cells (cells with one or more chromosome aberrations, inclusive or exclusive gaps) for each treatment group was compared to that of the solvent control using Chi-square statistics.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: cultured human peripheral lymphocytes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: The test substance precipitated in the culture medium at 1000 µg/mL.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
A range-finding test was performed to select the dose levels for the main experiment, using 10, 33, 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL, with and without metabolic activation. The test substance precipitated in the culture medium at 1000 µg/mL (see Table 1).
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
no cytotoxicity was observed at any concentration, with or without metabolic activation (see Table 2 and 3). - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: results of range-finding assay
Metabolic activation |
Test substance concentration (μg/mL) |
Mitotic index (%) |
|
|
|
24 h harvesting time |
48 h harvesting time |
- |
Vehicle control (DMSO) |
100 |
100 |
- |
10 |
91 |
98 |
- |
33 |
86 |
98 |
- |
100 |
91 |
105 |
- |
333 |
93 |
105 |
- |
1000 |
100 |
91 |
+ |
Vehicle control (DMSO) |
100 |
|
+ |
10 |
92 |
- |
+ |
33 |
90 |
- |
+ |
100 |
94 |
- |
+ |
333 |
98 |
- |
+ |
1000 |
94 |
- |
Table 1: Chromosome aberrations, summarised data, experiment 1
Metabolic activation |
Test substance concentration (μg/mL) |
Total number of metaphases analysed |
Total number of aberrations1 |
Number of cells with aberrations1 |
Mitotic index (%)2
|
||
|
|
|
Incl. gaps |
Excl. gaps |
Incl. gaps |
Excl. gaps |
|
24 h treatment, 24 h harvesting time |
|||||||
- |
Vehicle control (DMSO 1%) |
200 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
100 |
- |
100 |
200 |
7 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
98 |
- |
333 |
200 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
106 |
- |
1000 |
200 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
106 |
- |
mitomycin C |
200 |
41 |
37 |
38*** |
34*** |
61 |
48 h treatment, 48 h harvesting time |
|||||||
- |
Vehicle control (DMSO 1%) |
200 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
100 |
- |
1000 |
200 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
81 |
- |
mitomycin C |
150 |
72 |
65 |
59*** |
55*** |
49 |
3 h treatment, 24 h harvesting time |
|||||||
+ |
Vehicle control (DMSO 1%) |
200 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
100 |
+ |
100 |
200 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
68 |
+ |
333 |
200 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
81 |
+ |
1000 |
200 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
73 |
+ |
cyclophosphamide |
200 |
89 |
75 |
71*** |
63*** |
33 |
3 h treatment, 48 h harvesting time |
|||||||
+ |
Vehicle control (DMSO 1%) |
200 |
9 |
9 |
5 |
5 |
100 |
+ |
1000 |
200 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
81 |
1gaps include chromatid and isochromatid (chromosome) gaps
2percentage of metaphases per 1000 cells, compared to control
* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001 (Chi-square test)
Table 2: Chromosome aberrations, summarised data, experiment 2
Metabolic activation |
Test substance concentration (μg/mL) |
Total number of metaphases analysed |
Total number of aberrations1 |
Number of cells with aberrations1 |
Mitotic index (%)2
|
||
|
|
|
Incl. gaps |
Excl. gaps |
Incl. gaps |
Excl. gaps |
|
24 h treatment, 24 h harvesting time |
|||||||
- |
Vehicle control (DMSO 1%) |
200 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
- |
100 |
200 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
99 |
- |
333 |
200 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
113 |
- |
1000 |
200 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
97 |
- |
mitomycin C |
150 |
63 |
63 |
53*** |
53*** |
39 |
3 h treatment, 24 h harvesting time |
|||||||
+ |
Vehicle control (DMSO 1%) |
200 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
100 |
+ |
100 |
200 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
108 |
+ |
333 |
200 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
101 |
+ |
1000 |
200 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
104 |
+ |
Cyclophosphamide |
200 |
111 |
109 |
80*** |
79*** |
32 |
1gaps include chromatid and isochromatid (chromosome) gaps
2percentage of metaphases per 1000 cells, compared to control
* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001 (Chi-square test)
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
