Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 306-832-3 | CAS number: 97416-84-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
LD50 (oral) > 2000 mg/kg bw
LC50(inhalation) > 87000 mg/m3
LD50(dermal) > 2000 mg/kg bw
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From May 06 to May 27, 2015
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Test conducted according to internationally accepted Guideline and in according to the GLP Principles
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.1 tris (Acute Oral Toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Test type:
- acute toxic class method
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Sex: Nulliparous abd non pregnant female
- Source: Harlan italy Srl
- Age at study initiation: 6 - 7 weeks old rats
- Weight at study initiation: in the range of 165 and 171 g
- Housing: 3 animals per cages during the study 5 animals per cages during acclimatisation (Clear polysulphone H-Temp solid bottomed cages)
- Cage control: Daily inspected and changed as necessary (at least 3 times/week)
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum (laboratory rodent diet: 4RF 18, Mucedola Srl)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
- Veterinary health check: During acclimation period
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 2 °C
- Humidity (%): 55 ± 15 %
- Air changes (per hr): Approximately 15 to 20 air changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours light/12 hours dark - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- CMC (carboxymethyl cellulose)
- Details on oral exposure:
- VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: 0.5 % in aqueous solution of carboxymethylcellulose
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 10 ml/kg bw - Doses:
- 2000 mg/kg bw
A first group of 3 female animals was dosed at a level of 2000 mg/kg body weight (Group 1, Step 1). Mortality did not occur. A second group, similarly composed, was then dosed at the same dose level (Group 2, Step 2). No mortality occurred. No further doses were investigated since the objective of the study had been achieved. - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 3 female per tested dose per group
- Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Sex:
- female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Mortality:
- No deaths occurred.
- Clinical signs:
- other: No abnormalities were observed.
- Gross pathology:
- No abnormalities were observed.
- Interpretation of results:
- not classified
- Remarks:
- Migrated information acccording to the CLP Regulation (EC n. 1272/2008) Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- LD50 > 2000 mg/kg bw
- Executive summary:
Method
The test has been conducted according to the EU method B.1 tris, corresponding to the OECD Guideline 423.
The acute toxicity of the substance was investigated following a single oral administration (10 ml/kg in 0.5 % aqueous solution of carboxymethylcellulose) to the Sprague Dawley rat followed by a 14-day observation period.
Observations
No mortality occurred and no signs of toxicity were observed in the 6 animals following dosing at 2000 mg/kg bw. These results indicate that the test item, AP 1300 S, did not induce toxic effects in the rat following oral administration of a single dose at a level of 2000 mg/kg bw.
Results
The lack of mortality demonstrates the acute toxicity expected (LD50) to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bw.
Reference
Mortality and clinical signs
No mortality occurred and no clinical signs were observed in the first group of animals initially dosed at 2000 mg/kg bw (Group 1, Step 1) and in the further group of 3 females dosed at the same dose level (Group 2, Step 2).
Body weight
Changes in body weight observed during the study were within the expected range for this strain and age of animals.
Necropsy
No abnormalities were observed at necropsy examination performed on all animals dosed at 2000 mg/kg (Groups 1 and 2) at the end of the observation period.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Value:
- 87 000 mg/m³ air
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
Additional information
Acute Toxicity: Oral
The test substance was evaluated for its acute oral toxicity potential in rats. The study was performed according to the OECD guideline 423, following oral administration of a single dose to the rat. No mortality occurred during the study and no abnormalities were observed. There was no effect on body weight gain. The gross necropsy conducted at termination of the study revealed no observable abnormalities.
The acute oral LD50 was determined to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bw
Acute Toxicity: inhalation
The evaluation of acute inhalation toxicity has been based on two studies conducted on a structural analogous and on the precursor/metabolite of AP 1300 S.
The first study (Grate Lakes Chemical Corporation (1982), cited in the WHO publication[1]) was performed on the structural analogous Similar Substance 01 (CAS 21850-44-2); the second one (from Sterner (1967)[2], cited in the WHO publication[1]) was performed on the precursor/metabolite of AP 1300 S, Similar Substance 02 (CAS 79-94-7).
The first study has been considered in order to complete the assessment due to the great similarity between Similar Substance 01 with AP 1300 S. Similar Substance 01 shares with AP 1300 S the same structure, except for the fact that Similar Substance 01 presents two dibromobutane functional groups linked to the dibromophenol core, instead the dibromo-methylbutane as in the case of AP 1300 S.
The Similar Substance 02 is a precursor/metabolite of AP 1300 S, therefore the second study has been also considered for the assessment.
The justification for the Read Across approaches has been attached to the Section 13.
Great Lakes Chemical Corporation (1982) – Similar Substance 01
LC50 > 87000 mg/m3 (LC50 > 87 mg/l)
Sterner (1967) – Similar Substance 02
LC0(8h) > 0.5 mg aerosol/litre air
The LC50 value reported for the Similar Substance 01 in the ECHA website is > 24.4 mg/l air
Acute Toxicity: Dermal
The evaluation of acute dermal toxicity has been based on two studies conducted on a structural analogous and on the precursor/metabolite of AP 1300 S.
The first study (Grate Lakes Chemical Corporation (1987), cited in the WHO publication[1]) was performed on the Similar Substance 01 (CAS 21850-44-2); the second (Hardy (1994)[3] cited in the WHO publication[1]) and the third (Grate Lakes Chemical Corporation (1987), cited in the WHO publication[1]) were performed on the precursor/metabolite Similar Substance 02 (CAS 79-94-7).
The first study has been considered in order to complete the assessment due to the great similarity between Similar Substance 01 with AP 1300 S. Similar Substance 01 shares with AP 1300 S the same structure, except for the fact that Similar Substance 01 presents two dibromobutane functional groups linked to the dibromophenol core, instead the dibromo-methylbutane as in the case of AP 1300 S.
The Similar Substance 02 is a precursor/metabolite of AP 1300 S, therefore the second study has been also considered for the assessment.
The justification for the Read Across approaches has been attached to the Section 13.
Great Lakes Chemical Corporation (1987) – Similar Substance 01
LD50 > 20000 mg/kg bw
Hardy (1994) – Similar Substance 02
LD50 > 2000 mg/kg bw
Great Lakes Chemical Corporation (1987) – Similar Substance 02
LD50 > 3160 mg/kg bw
The LD50 value reported for the Similar Substance 01 in the ECHA website is > 2000 mg/kg bw
[1]World Health Organization (WHO, Geneva, 1995); Dr. G.J. van Esch “Tetrabromobisphenol A and Derivatived” (Environmental health criteria; 172)
[2] Sterner W (1967) Acute oral toxicity of tetrabromo-bis-phenol A to rats; acute inhalation toxicity study of tetrabromo-bis-phenol A and acute eye irritation study on rabbits of tetrabromo-bis-phenol A. St. Louis, Missouri, International Bio-Research, Inc. (Report to Great Lakes Chemical Corporation, West Lafayette, submitted to WHO by the Brominated Flame Retardant Industry Panel).
[3] Hardy ML (1994) Summary; TBBPA toxicological studies sponsored by Ethyl Corporation. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Ethyl Corporation (Report submitted to WHO by the Brominated Flame Retardant Industry Panel).
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – oral endpoint
Test conducted according to internationally accepted Guideline and in according to the GLP Principles
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – inhalation endpoint
No selection has been done due to the Weight of Evidence approach.
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – dermal endpoint
No selection has been done due to the Weight of Evidence approach.
Justification for classification or non-classification
According to the CLP Regulation (EC n. 1272/2008), 3.1 Acute toxicity section, substances can be allocated to one of four toxicity categories based on acute toxicity by the oral, dermal or inhalation route according to numeric criteria. Acute toxicity values are expressed as (approximate) LD50 (oral, dermal) or LC50 (inhalation) values or as acute toxicity estimates (ATE).
The oral LD50 value was established to be greater than 2000 mg/kg body weight, therefore the test substance is out of any classification limit for acute oral toxicity (oral acute toxicity Category 4: 300 < ATE ≤ 2000 mg/kg bw).
The dermal LD50 value was established to be higher than 2000 mg/kg body weight, which exceeded the highest CLP limit for classification (dermal acute toxicity Category 4: 1000 < ATE ≤ 2000 mg/kg bw).
The inhalation LC50 value was established to be higher than 87 mg/l, which exceeded the highest CLP limit for classification (inhalation acute toxicity Category 4: 1.0 < ATE ≤ 5.0 mg/l).
In conclusion, the test substance is non classified for oral dermal and inhalation acute toxicity, according to the CLP Regulation (EC n. 1272/2008).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.