Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation / corrosion, other
Remarks:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
18 Dec - 23 Dec 1995
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Basic data given.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1996
Report date:
1996

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
only basic data given, test substance purity not specified
GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-ethylhexyl laurate
EC Number:
243-697-9
EC Name:
2-ethylhexyl laurate
Cas Number:
20292-08-4
Molecular formula:
C20H40O2
IUPAC Name:
2-ethylhexyl laurate
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Laurate d´Ethyle 2 Hexyle
- Analytical purity: no data
- Lot/batch No.: 05022

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: New Zealand

Test system

Type of coverage:
not specified
Preparation of test site:
not specified
Vehicle:
not specified
Controls:
not required
Duration of treatment / exposure:
single application
Observation period:
Reading time points: 1, 24, 48 and 72 h
7 days
Number of animals:
3
Details on study design:
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested

In vivo

Results
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Results of skin irritation study

Observation time

Animal no.

1

2

3

Erythema

Edema

Erythema

Edema

Erythema

Edema

1 h

0

0

0

0

1

0

24 h

2

0

2

0

2

0

48 h

1

0

2

0

2

0

72 h

0

0

0

0

2

0

7 d

0

0

0

0

0

0

Mean value 24 + 48 + 72 h

1.0

0

1.33

0

2.0

0

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified